Mini 1064 - Charlie's Town (Game Over!)

RichardGHP · Post Post #5 (isolation #0) » Sat Oct 02, 2010 8:38 pm

/conform

Playerlist looks awesome.

RichardGHP · Post Post #21 (isolation #1) » Mon Oct 04, 2010 12:09 pm

Continuing the trend...

Limited Access from tomorrow through Sunday

.

What's on October 9th? Some sort of holiday?

RichardGHP · Post Post #29 (isolation #2) » Mon Oct 04, 2010 5:31 pm

Random.org commands:

Vote: Nachomamma8

RichardGHP · Post Post #31 (isolation #3) » Mon Oct 04, 2010 5:57 pm

If it has a reason, it ain't random.

RichardGHP · Post Post #48 (isolation #4) » Tue Oct 05, 2010 5:35 am

Lol.

Unvote, Vote: Shotty

RichardGHP · Post Post #49 (isolation #5) » Tue Oct 05, 2010 5:36 am

Gogo counterwagon!

RichardGHP · Post Post #73 (isolation #6) » Tue Oct 05, 2010 10:20 pm

I have no comment on the RVS wagon on me, but please do not refer to me as GHP. Instead, call me Richard.

I've made two RVS votes, and since RVS is now over, it's time to get serious. Nacho's vote in post 68 causes a reaffirmation of my intitial vote on him.

Unvote, Vote: Nacho

; mas reads as town right off the bat and Nacho has posted 3 times thus far. Meanwhile, none of those posts are even remotely exonerating or content-laden.

HoS Cogito Ergo Sum

for the former reason.

RichardGHP · Post Post #78 (isolation #7) » Wed Oct 06, 2010 8:58 am

@Casus, in order:

-I'm fairly certain I'm protected against self-incrimination by the 5th amendment.

-I think it's fair to say that RVS was still in play, so elements of that, plus self-preservation (necessary during RVS). Trust me, every member in this game will do the latter at some point. Shotty has not done a lot, if anything, to make me think he is or could be scum at this stage.

-If Nacho makes a post that I think I townie would make, I'll consider unvoting him. Not necessarily a scumtell, per se, but I know Nacho to have a pro-town meta and suspect he would have some insight to offer by now. Note that he also has the "third on the wagon is scum" tell that I've heard about working against him, on one of my townreads no less.

RichardGHP · Post Post #89 (isolation #8) » Wed Oct 06, 2010 1:23 pm

I'm liking this surge of activity, inquisition (don't berate me for incorrect spelling if there's any, I'm tired) and explanations from Nacho thus far.

Unvote

Expect more today or tomorrow.

RichardGHP · Post Post #117 (isolation #9) » Thu Oct 07, 2010 5:53 pm

Thanks for that, Reckamonic. Haven't had a good laugh in a while. Which one of you came up with that act?

_Sub

strike

, it's Richard. Not GHP.

RichardGHP · Post Post #119 (isolation #10) » Thu Oct 07, 2010 6:18 pm

TY. <3

RichardGHP · Post Post #127 (isolation #11) » Fri Oct 08, 2010 8:52 am

No it couldn't, and you damn well know it. No-one has ever legitimately caught all three scum within the first day.

RichardGHP · Post Post #129 (isolation #12) » Fri Oct 08, 2010 9:06 am

I'm not scum.

RichardGHP · Post Post #130 (isolation #13) » Fri Oct 08, 2010 9:06 am

There, happy now?

RichardGHP · Post Post #134 (isolation #14) » Fri Oct 08, 2010 3:44 pm

Vote: Spyrex

because his play thus far does not read as town. This is not something I am likely to explain further.

RichardGHP · Post Post #138 (isolation #15) » Sat Oct 09, 2010 9:12 am

On the contrary, my ass is as pro-town as the rest of me. Maybe more!

RichardGHP · Post Post #145 (isolation #16) » Mon Oct 11, 2010 3:51 pm

Casus Belli wrote:
RichardGHP, 127 wrote:No it couldn't, and you damn well know it. No-one has ever legitimately caught all three scum within the first day.
Okay, so who which one of your buddies are we missing?

I can't speak for the buddy of the other two, but nowhere in the threesome does my good self feature. If I had to guess I'd say you're probably missing two, maybe even all three of the scum.

RichardGHP · Post Post #151 (isolation #17) » Mon Oct 11, 2010 5:19 pm

/would like to see that

RichardGHP · Post Post #155 (isolation #18) » Mon Oct 11, 2010 5:22 pm

Put it this way: If you hammer me for the giggles, you won't look good. I'm already on to you and your evil organisation. Tell me who you're cahoots with and I'll go easy.

RichardGHP · Post Post #158 (isolation #19) » Mon Oct 11, 2010 5:27 pm

Confirmed lynch?

RichardGHP · Post Post #160 (isolation #20) » Mon Oct 11, 2010 5:28 pm

Good luck then!

BTW, obvious breadcrumb was obvious.

RichardGHP · Post Post #562 (isolation #21) » Wed Dec 01, 2010 5:08 pm

There is no 'n' in Cogito Ergo Sum.

I had two of the three scum pegged on D1. If you had only kept me alive... well.

RichardGHP · Post Post #577 (isolation #22) » Fri Dec 03, 2010 3:15 pm

Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:What was supposed to be the obvious breadcrumb by the bye, Richard?

In hindsight, it was somewhat obscure, and more of a softclaim as opposed to a breadcrumb. I said something along the lines of "tell me who your buddies are and I'll go easy on you". It was supposed to be a satire of fictional police interrogations; watch Law and Order, NCIS and the like and you'll come across something similar sooner or later.

xvart wrote:Richard - why didn't you claim cop?

I was quickhammered after the L-2 vote. A prior claim was unwarranted and a subsequent claim was not possible. I left for five minutes and came back to find myself lynched. A Nacho-Spy team was VERY tempting to call in the Dead QT for those two votes alone. Worse, Spy's reaction on Day 2 where he had absolutely no qualms about hammering a pro-town power role.

By the same token, would anyone have actually believed the claim?

RichardGHP · Post Post #579 (isolation #23) » Sat Dec 04, 2010 12:12 am

Point has gone over your head.

RichardGHP · Post Post #585 (isolation #24) » Sun Dec 05, 2010 8:03 am

No, it has. As usual.