magnus 163 wrote:@red and ed: Do you really believe steam-powered shovel suspicious for his day protect?
Like I said when I voted, I don't really get what value he's bringing to the game with it. Maybe it was just tongue-in-cheek, but why Llama? It just seemed kind of out of the blue.
---
SK 166 wrote:@ RC: Nothing more to say on what I've said about you?
Alright, well, you say that you put all this thought into voting me, but I don't think that's true. It seemed like you were more in the business of marketing my wagon than you were "thinking" about it. All I saw, essentially, was that you didn't like SP's reasons and you didn't like that I liked them even more.
Why shouldn't this be valid? Because, in my opinion, town would be more pressed to investigate as to why I was warming up to SP rather than assuming I was doing it maliciously (i.e. Llama's reaction versus yours/Spyrex).
Lastly, I surrendered my position on the back of Llama pointing out the tangled web of V/LAs and absences that kind of plauged SP's quick draw position. I still don't really get a scummy vibe off of SP, but I've changed my mind in regards to how he arrived at Nikanorscum.
---
UK 182 wrote:Why aren't you scumhunting? Why are you going for "easy targets". That really aren't. You're not looking for actually scummy, you're looking for textbook scummy to see what shit you can get past us. Add that to knowing too much, and for the time being I'm pretty sure you're scum.
You know, I was trying to find a way to vote you, UK, but I think this is a pretty good observation. I'm changing my mind about you. I've been racking my brain trying to figure out an angle to really back up any wagon on SPS, but there's really nothing there to vote on.
But what seals the deal is your
post 198.
Unvote; vote: Amished
---
Amish 202 wrote:@UK: Fine, fucking lynch me. I'll agree that this game doesn't suit my playstyle and I'm a bit lost but this was the biggest thing to happen in the game and I'm attacking SPS for it.
Amish 204 wrote:Besides, then I can have an example to point to that "lolreactions" is fucking retarded postgame, and that SP doesn't find scum.
Amish 206 wrote:Whatever, I'm town, just lynch me.
Amish 208 wrote:BECAUSE YOU'RE BEING FUCKING IMPOSSIBLE.
I truthfully explain everything that I thought and think through, nothing is inconsistent and everything I fucking say is a lie apparently. Jesus christ.
Here comes the AtE!
---
SK 223 wrote:Leaving my vote on RC because he's gone suspiciously quiet as of late (plus my previous grievances still stand).
Rarely do I post during evenings in any US timezone given my schedule.
SK 234 wrote:@ UK: Voted SPS for the dayprotect stuff. Pretty similar to what Amished got accused of doing.
@ Magnus: That excuses him how? And that makes you call Amished scum and RC not why?
You know what? I brought this up earlier, but I essentially gave you a pass for it. This is the second time you've put words and positions in my mouth. "RC is doing the same stuff as Amish is!"
I'm not, and that's dishonest. I haven't made a post yet because it's only been... 7 hours since Amish clarified his stance and 24 hours since my last post. I noticed you've discounted these things and taken it as an opportunity to both try to get everyone voting Amish to vote me and also argue that I'm being "suspiciously quiet". So, answer this then, how many posts do I need to make a day to not be characterized as "suspiciously quiet"?
---
Spyrex 250 wrote:SK's balancing act statement above doesn't make sense if he's scum and Amish is scum with him - thats just asking for rope.
I'm thinking this is true, but I'm also leaning toward the idea that at least one of them are some form of scum. Amish's complete abandonment of SPS after he went to great lengths to justify his vote is not so great.
---
magnus 252 wrote:Who forgot about this?
Because my question (addressed "@ed and red:") was after that post.
Bingo.
Both Amish and SK are, for some reason, trying to rush through these accusations as though everything that happened tonight happened over the course of multiple days. I hadn't even read SPS' explanations for his fake dayprotect until now, and already SK and Amish are pushing the idea that I was ready to lynch SPS (read Amish 236, SK 234) for invalid reasons. The problem is that it's completely opportunistic in Amish's case, and in SK's case he seemed convinced prior to any vote I cast on SPS that I was scum, so this is just confirmation bias.
In short, no one "forgot" about me, as SK would lead us to believe, there simply has only been a handful of hours since anything has really taken place.
---
Mod/Alpha 260 wrote:Each of you may ask me ONE question to which I will answer with some semblance of useful information.
What do points mean?
Bad Things.
---
Amish 261 wrote:@mo: it's been a day and a half (the day-protect happened yesterday morning). My reaction was different from RC (I was innocent until proven guilty, RC was other way around) for reactions regarding the claim.
Now cut that out, Amish. Are you so prideful that you can't even let the fact that there hasn't been adequate time since my last post penetrate through your rhetoric?
Amish 261 wrote:I also need the flip of RC to nail the next person to the door.
So I went from being a suspect to an information lynch? Sounds completely opportunistic, which is starting to be a common theme with you in this game. Will you just say and do whatever you think will convince the most people?