Open 233: Ninja Mafia Boogaloo - Over!

[Col.Cathart]

vote: silverbullet999

You talk way too much "w00t! random craziness n'stuff", for the first three posts of the game.

[Col.Cathart]

Your no fun... > : (

On this particular subject - indeed.

1. Pepsi or Coke?
2. Favorite Setup?
3. How would you describe your meta?
4. Win/loss record?
5. Maximum number of games you'll play in at one time?

1. Pepsi

2. The one that still exists only in my head and awaits fleshing out. It's gonna be awesome, so stay prepared

3. Posting rarely is my normal trait. When I'm about 80% sure about someone being scum - I attack hard. I bus a lot as a scum, and try to pair myself and every other scumbuddy into scumpairs with a townie to fool town. Works beautifully most of the time. Can't think of anything more.

4. Give me a sec...

*checks wiki*

18 played games, 9 wins, 7 loses, 2 games abandoned.

5-5-2 record as town
3-1-0 record as scum
1-1-0 record as third part (as soon as Grimmafia will end, I can add another win here )

5. There was a time when I had no problems with 4-5 games at the time. Now I avoid being in more than one game at once.

[Col.Cathart]

@Anyone who is solely answering the questions set by Beefster:
Do you see any benefit to Beefster's questions?

Nah, it's as RVS as it can get IMO

unvote

vote: Shattered Viewpoint

[Col.Cathart]

*Starts gathering materials to make shelter. Grabs a few leaves of Marijuana to use for the shelter.*

QUESTION HIJACK! I think SV was just reaction fishing. I can't imagine what else he would have to gain by unvoting without actually having a vote.

Huge FoS: Beefster

Why did you answer for him?

[Col.Cathart]

Why did you answer for him?

Why not?

Because someone else is asking the question to get an answer from that SPECIFIC person. Answering for them prevents possible scum slips if questioned scum would give a shaky answer. Now he can just say 'yeah what he said' and we're back at square one. May be used by scum to prevent insecure buddy under fire from digging his hole even deeper.

tl;dr: because it's scummy.

[Col.Cathart]

When I made that comment on scumbuddies, I was merely joking along with someone who posted before me.

Has Kagelord even posted yet? My vote stands until I do a reread later tonight or tomorrow.

Would you kindly answer me, why did you answered question not directed at you? Why not is not a good answer, especially after my last post.

(Yeah, I just finished Bioshock, how did you guessed that?)

[Col.Cathart]

-I don't know why CC is attacking me so hard about hijacking the question aimed at SC.

Because it's damn scummy to me.

Scum skim.

Really? I always thought it's the other way around. Every scum mistake is a crucial one, while the random vanilla who is not that interested in game may not care about mistakes. So usually the scum is the one who will read every post three times to avoid mistake, while townies can be careless. It's anti-town, yes, but definitely not that scummy, unless some obvious contradiction will happen.

On the other hand...

The irony is also killing me... SV's wagon falling apart because it is "too fast," and three votes pile on me in a couple hours. This is a bullshit wagon, by the way. I voted once outside of random, for someone that I, and others, feel is likely scum, and all the sudden "TOMGZ BANDWAGONING SCUMMZ!!!!1!!!!one!!1!1!12!1eleven!111

Overreaction level just went over the scale. I have an uneasy feeling about him after that post.

[Col.Cathart]

you have never seen a bored vanilla townie skim or any town for that matter?

I have. I lynch them, too. If you aren't going to actively participate in a game, don't sign up for that game. Simple, really.

So your crusade against skimming players is more of a policy lynch then?

[Col.Cathart]

@Col. Cathart, Zorblag & silverbullet999: What do you think of Enigma's play?

You know, for the purpose of this question I even ISO'd him.

strike one: Lot's of talking about theory, absolutely no talking about anyone at least potentially scummy, I didn't notice that before, awfully scummy.

strike two: hesitance to vote. One of my favorite personal tells, usually works like gold for some reason.

That's easily 2x as much as I had on both Beefster and SV.

unvote

vote: Enigma

[Col.Cathart]

-Cathart insists it's still RVS (Wait, What?), votes SV

(...)

Cathart wants to drag us back into RVS.

'Wait, What?' is my line here. I guess you are referring to my post 65, in which case this is completely not true. That was obvious comment about Beefster's questions which WERE as RVS as it can get. Me stating that fact about something that happened several posts ago =/= insisting it's still RVS or dragging us back into RVS. SV vote was dead serious. It would be awesome if you could explain in any way your line of thinking here.

[Col.Cathart]

Sotty

: Sorry, I missed that question.

I was thinking about putting my vote on Enigma but I don't like the Col. C's hop on the wagon in post 181. Just feels really opportunistic. Col, why didn't you vote Beef? I feel like you voted Enigma here to appease Paltry.

You mean why didn't I vote Beef instead of SV or instead of Enigma?

If the former, it was because SV also looked scummy and it looked like there will be a nice wagon him and that's always a good thing.

If the latter, the answer is in the very same post I voted Enigma: he had twice as many guilty charges in my book than Beefster and SV combined. I just happened to realize it when Paltry asked me for opinion as I ISO'd him, and I was awestruck how the hell I missed it before. Actually, I don't have that much time right now, but this evening or tomorrow morning I plan to ISO everyone in this game, because I have weird feeling there is more players like Enigma who weren't exposed yet.

[Col.Cathart]

IMPORTANT: I will be unavailable this weekend and I dunno exactly when I'll be back during next week. Emergency situation, my Mom is in hospital, so I need to stay with her until she gets better.