Open 233: Ninja Mafia Boogaloo - Over!

[Chronopie]

Vote: Enigma

for posting before me.

[Chronopie]

1. Pepsi or Coke?

- Coke

2. Favorite Setup?

Pledge of Allegiance - Pick your side

3. How would you describe your meta?

- Lurky, scummy, devil's advocate, blatant rolefisher. basically what a good townie shouldn't.

4. Win/loss record?

- idk exactly. Poor though.

5. Maximum number of games you'll play in at one time?

I had 11 at once, at one point. I try to stick to 2-4 though.

[Chronopie]

mmm... cake

It's my birthday. be back tomorrow.

[Chronopie]

Hai guys, I'm back. Caramel Gold Mudcake ftw.

SV's over-reaction, and false (?) Meta, doesn't sit right on my scumdar.

VOTE: Shattered

[Chronopie]

in other news, Chronopie is posting all over the site (10+ times today)...can we please start a wagon here and not reward him for lurking.

ofc I am. One game at a time, in order that I get the emails to my inbox.

[Chronopie]

>_< closed the tab yesterday on a Wall-o-text. lost it all.

Lets try this again...

--

^It'd be a policy LAL lynch. I've never been this lurky, either alignment (Except that one game that was suspended due to 2/3 of the playerlist being lurky...)

[Chronopie]

^FTR: It was a pbpa of all 8 pages. trying to reconstruct now. expect it in an hour or so.

[Chronopie]

Page 1

-Silver votes Agar, triple posts.
-CKD votes Zorblag, out of respect?
-Enigma votes Agar, for having a short name.
-I vote Enigma, for posting directly before me.
-Zorblag inserts his Newb game WoT, votes Agar, for being first alphabetically not to have posted.
-Beefster votes kagelord, because kage = shadow. (likes flavour text)
-Cathart votes Silver, for overactivity.
-CKD makes a fluff post.
-Sotty7 votes Zorblag, for treating it as a newb game.
-Agar fail votes Sotty7, fluff, fixes vote.
-Confid votes CKD, because curiosity kills the cat, etc. fluff reason (like everything else)
-Smashbro_SSS votes Cathart, for being slot #1.
-Zajnet votes Agar, for being a lurker (Wait, what?)
-Paltry votes Zajnet, for voting Agar for false lurker reason.
-Silver - fluff
-SC votes SV, for his name.

Result: typical RVS, Silver is a bit over active, but I view that as a null-tell.

Page 2

-Beef opens some RQS
-Coug answers
-SV answers
-SV unvotes, with out having ever voted. later claims it was to see who was paying attention.
-Zajnet answers
-Cathart answers
-I answer
-CKD answers
-Sotty answers
-Paltry answers, Votes SV, points out that SV hadn't voted in the first place.
-Beef answers his own (harmless) questions. Then states that he didn't want to put out any 'fishy' RQS.
-Smashbro_SSS answers.
-Gamma answers.
-Enigma claims to hate RQS, answers anyway.
-Sotty questions why Svunvoted, but didn't notice that Sv hadn't actually voted in the first place.
-Sv states that it was to see who was paying attention.
-Sotty votes SV
-SC votes paltry, for voting SV. (Defending?)
-Silver doesn't answer
-SV votes silver for not answering.

Result: An RQS that doesn't lead anywhere. The innocuous questions were more a time waster than anything else. not inherently scummy though. Of more interest was SV's voteless unvote, and the discussion generated from that. Possible SC-SV link. unlikely that Paltry-SV are on a team.

Page 3

-Silver complains that he'd answered in another game, so should be exempt (Yeah right)
-Agar answers the RQS, Claims infinite meta? (Slope of an exactly vertical line)
-Paltry defends SV vote, claiming irrationality is vote-worthy
-Agar claims that the RQS is a stp away from RVS (Suggesting RVS is over)
-Agar wagonhops. (RVS appears over, but no reason given for change)
-SC accepts paltry's defense, Shifts to voting Silver, claims dodginess.
-SC clarifies that Silver vote is because he didn't answer questions here.
-Silver answers questions.
-Agar explains where Silver answered previously
-Agar asks SC about the balance, votes shattered for little reason
-Sotty justifies SV vote
-Cathart insists it's still RVS (Wait, What?), votes SV
-Gamma votes SC, with a question as to SC's view on SV
-Beef answers for SC (W, W?)
-Cathart HFoSes Beef for answering, asks why
-SV re-enforces reason for voting silver, and goes on the defensive,
-Beef evades question
-Silver | Sv accuse each other, ask who each others scumpal is (singular?)
-Beef points out that it's a four scum game

Result: Paltry seems town, SV seems SV, Beef seems scummy.

FoS: Beefster

. It's unlikely that SV and silver are buddies. Cathart wants to drag us back into RVS.

Page 4

From here on in, I'll be combining several posts into single points, as the game has gotten more cohesive

-SC answers Agar's setup Question, answers Gamma's question on SV's reaction fishing, Claims Beefster is reaction fishing (Weak)
-Sotty questions SV on his reasoning and playstyle (:Goodposting:), Points out Beef's evasion, SC's weak reaction fishing reasoning. (SC answers)
-Cathart answers Beef's non-answer, doesn't act on it.
-SV ansers Sotty's questions, Claims that Silver's failure to answer the RQS points to a larger meta of withholding info (Which is scummy)
-Silver protests that he has a larger meta, being relatively newb. but doesn't deny withholding info, for a time. (note also: he was town in said games, so it can be said that withholding info is Silver's town meta)
-Enigma complains about SV's answers, withdraws complaint
-Paltry takes a pro-active stance, questioning Beefster, enigma, and SV
-Silver continues on a defensive streak
-Agar re-enforces reasons to

policy

lynch SV. (Disagreement with Playstyle is policy lynching)
-Ongoing discussion between Sc and Sotty over 'Modkill fishing' (I feel that SC is pushing it too far)
-Zajnet Wagons SV, and makes poor Star Wars reference.
-Sv backs down, stating no past evidence of Traps (barring ongoing), and can't reveal Silver's meta w/o outing main acc (Hai - I knows it btw)
-CKD votes Zajnet, for being wagony/jokey/lack of content

Result: Paltry continues to look town as does Sotty, Cathart's weak stance on Beefster is noted, Zajnet is unhelpful, SV backed down. SC-Beef team unlikely.

Page 5

-100-108 = fluff
-Confid arrives, answers RQS, votes shattered. I vote shattered for what I perceived as over-reaction and presenting false meta.
-Silver continues to defend
-Gamma announces SV is at L-2, SC then asks for a claim.
-Sv admits that he was applying someone else's meta to Silver mistakenly
-Beef shows up, mentions that the statement was jokey (the one that SC over-reacted about)
-Cathart pushes at beef again to answer why he answered for SC
-Zorblag shows back up (Since Page 1), Posts lots of questions and comments towards others. :Goodposting: Then votes Kagelord for not having posted (W, W?).

Why no suspects?

-Zajnet fails to justify his semi-RVS lurker comment.
-SV claims that Skimming is Scummy, Beefster claims to skim regardless of alignment (FTR; I tend to aswell)
-Agar answers Zorb on setup design knowledge

Page 6

-Enigma shows up, Given setup, by far most likely claim is VT, questions SV's assertion on Scum-Skimming
-Smashbro shows up, Questions SV. admits reluctance to jump on a L-2 / L-3 wagon, and votes Zajnet, for his wagony behaviour
-Beef shows up, wagons Zaj. Confid shows up, does the same thing.
-Agar comments on Confid-Wagonning, Zaj comments that the Sv wagons is falling apart due to quick build-up, and that his own is building as quickly.
-CKD votes me, for voting SV for his over-reaction / False meta, while also quoting Confid, yet doing nothing about him, and finishing up by keeping his Zajnet-wagon option open.
-Sv shows up, flails around disjointedly. Votes Smashbro, supposedly for skimming.
-CKD questions SV on skimming assertion
-CC states disbelief in SV's scum-skim assertion, claims uneasy feeling on Zajnet. Does nothing about it.
-Paltry shows up, unvotes from a dying wagon, and picks a new target in Enigma, claiming poor reasoning and prepping an SV wagon vote + gut
-SV replies to CKD's questions, with his typical sarcasm. also provides several scum games, for meta purposes. (a vengeful (goon), a large as a goon (So was I), and another large where he was GF)
-Beef and Cathart Attack Sv's Scum-Skim assertion
-Gamma calls SC scum, but doesn't place a vote.
-Agar votes Confid for being wagony
-Zorb shows up, Makes some decent points. :goodposting:
-Agar explains that he wanted SC to slip and explain too much (W, W?)

Result: Zorblag looks town, SV doesn't appear to be playing to his scum meta, Paltry slips back down the towniness ladder, CKD looks scummy.

Page 7

-SC replys to questions, claims Beef has some fallacious reasoning. After Zaj makes some poor posting, votes Zaj.
-Gamma defends Silver's not answering RQS
-CKD rages at SV's pretentious form of reply on previous page.

And my Laptops nearly dead. I'll have to finish Page 7 and do page 8 later.

[Chronopie]

/prodded

Not much has changed. Still voting Enigma. Still waiting for everyone else to do the same.

ConfidAnon wagon is so much better, SV. You know it, too.

Confid can be tomorrow.

Enigma today.

I can endorse this (for all that my word's worth)

unvote

VOTE: Enigma

[Chronopie]

"For all that [your] word's worth," Chronopie? What makes you say that?

Consider my play. my meta. my past history of being

completely, utterly

, wrong.

[Chronopie]

UNVOTE: Enigma

Zajnet needs to claim.

===[] is raised and waiting.

[Chronopie]

V/LA until home internet is restored (Cable got cut during some digging work), piggybacking neighbour's wifi.

[Chronopie]

V/LA until home internet is restored (Cable got cut during some digging work), piggybacking neighbour's wifi.

-.-;;

[Chronopie]

also a chrono prod, he is posting everywhere else.

Why Hello Thar. (No prod needed).

--

Holy wall of... nothing -.-

quote strips, comment, and... a complete lack of analysis. OTOH, SV policy voting is always good.

--

Well I never got around to finishing

my

pbpa. tbqh I don't think I will either. Really, really not in the mood.

We've had no scum flips, no track/watch/cop results, a successful Night kill... Basically I have nothing to work on. :/

(FTR: I like NAs / Scum flips and associations to find me a suspect)

[Chronopie]

Chrono, why aren't you voting?

Because I hadn't read all the pages in the middle.

I opened MS, clicked, view your posts, spotted Open 233 near the top, opened the most recent page, saw that CKD had requested a prod, (as well as the Quote wall), and responded.

--

Now that I've read (the majority) of the pages in the middle.

VOTE: Confid L-3

[Chronopie]

I call BS on the cop.

Good job guys, you just lynched your friendly neighbourhood watcher.

ftr: no-one visited Cathart.

/bah post

[Chronopie]

I think it's over. (Awaiting lynch scene.)

But teh Mafias Win.

We knew, as we didn't roll roleblocker, that there was going to be a Cop OR a Doc, not both, and Ninja meant Either Tracker+Watcher v Ninja, or Vanillas v Ninja. So really, the latter being the case, Troll-Ninja's inactivity Modkill (FFFUUUUU) set us back by less than I expected it might have.

Glad that the cop claimed and fell early, only taking down me, rather than multiple scum. As we knew there was no Doc, thus freekill.

[Chronopie]

lol. Huey, Dewey and Louie were all in this game. Interesting Flavour.

But as I said before being Scum w/out Roleblocker meant that we had a clear shot at the cop, once he claimed.

Scum MVP: Gamma, for sure.