Open 224 -- vengeful/Girls Alive! (Game Over)

[Shattered Viewpoint]

I also was with the not getting on the site last night.

Also, computer issues yesterday. Solved now.

Vote: McGriddle

, because.... hmmm. Because.

[Shattered Viewpoint]

I'm really not comfortable with anyone being at L-1 this early.

unvote

[Shattered Viewpoint]

@TheButtonmen, charter:

Is this your first vengeful? An honest question.

I'm really not comfortable with anyone being at L-1 this early.

unvote

Why?

At the time of my unvote, we were at the bottom of page two. Far too early to be at L-1.

Plus, it was still my random vote.

[Shattered Viewpoint]

Guys, guys, put down the knives.

Sheesh.

@Buttonmen: Is this your first vengeful? Don't make me google you.

@Fenchurch: I'm sure that's completely within the rules, and maybe even the spirit, of the game. But, for some reason, I can't articulate precisely why I feel so violated.

@charter: I think the entire argument is moving beyond useful. McG is looking a tad scummy, though, for cloaking TBM with 'player X' IMO.


(And for those just

looking

for a reason to ....whatever, I feel justified in threatening to google TBM due to Fenchurch's opening up that whole can of worms.)

[Shattered Viewpoint]

Stalking us via msutils.

[Shattered Viewpoint]

I.... wow.

Where did this sudden suspicion of me come from? It's the first I've heard of anyone even saying anything about me (except charter's iso 0, which I assume was just RVS).

[Shattered Viewpoint]

I.... wow.

Where did this sudden suspicion of me come from? It's the first I've heard of anyone even saying anything about me (except charter's iso 0, which I assume was just RVS).

Do you think we should lynch McGriddle?

I would prefer a TBM lynch over McG. I think that while the 'Player X' thing was disingenuous, it's not exactly a foolproof scumtell.

I'm a bit surprised that this game is moving as fast as it is.

Some questions:

charter: Can you expound a bit on the "commonness" of it being a newbscumtell for what McG did? This is only my second vengeful, and I honestly can't make the leap of logic that you're presenting.

Currently I'm most suspicious of SV, for telling people to calm down just now. I think I've seen scum act that way before.

And I've seen scum deflect questions before. Your point?

I'm really not comfortable with anyone being at L-1 this early.

unvote

Why?

[/Facepalm]

You do realize we only have one chance to lynch scum right? And you're obviously who I am going to kill when I die, so if you are not scum I suggest you stop pushing for a terrible lynch based off of nothing on page 1, unless you want to lose. I don't think you are scum though, because scum wouldn't do something that balsey at the beginning of the game.

Hello, WIFOM! (And I thought you'd actually been here long enough to not assume that scum won't do something that, well, scum wouldn't do.)

Also, I think we have more than one chance to lynch scum. Vis a vis (all examples hypothetical):

D1 lynch town!fenchurch; town!fenchurch kills scumgoon!charter
D2 we still have the GF and two townies. (This example also works if the GF is vengekilled.)

That vote on charter wasn't random / reaction.

It was for serious; if he hadn't made that previous post I'd missed I would have been going after him for reals.

These two statements (right next to each other! in the very same post!!) appear contradictory. Can you illuminate?

[Shattered Viewpoint]

It was a

random vote or fishing for reactions

; it was a serious vote. What part of that doesn't make sense?

@SV:

Also if you want me lynched why aren't you voting me?

Well, which was it? I hate waffling.

Vote: TheButtonmen

[Shattered Viewpoint]

....?

It was a random vote or fishing for reactions; it was a serious vote. What part of that doesn't make sense?

@SV:

Also if you want me lynched why aren't you voting me?

EBWOP: It wasn't a random vote or fishing for reactions; it was a serious vote.

Christ, scum, get lynched.

[Shattered Viewpoint]

It's a reliable scumtell.

Picture this. I'm standing in front of you, holding an object. "This is a BRAND NEW FlubbleKlump, Model Z9000. It'll do your laundry, wash your hair, take out the garbage, walk your dog (even if you don't

have

one!) and polish your shoes. Oh, take my word for it. It'll do all that."

You

telling me

it's a reliable scumtell does nothing for me. Zip, nada, zilch. Just like my FlubbleKlump, it may (or may not) do anything for you. Same difference.

Your logic, it fails you.

[Shattered Viewpoint]

@charter: Yes, I can read. Doesn't mean your logic works.

As far as threatening, yes, I can see a person (in a vengeful) about to be lynched mentioning who they will likely kill if they get lynched.

@charter AND @buttonmen:

I'll say it v-e-r-y s-l-o-w-l-y:

TBM is changing his story and waffling back and forth, back and forth about "it was a real vote." "No, it wasn't a real vote." "Yes, it was." "No, it wasn't."

Scum typically can't make up their mind.

[Shattered Viewpoint]

I hate you all.



Good game, town. Lucky guess, at first, then we just couldn't pull out of the hole.

@Fen, I'm not sure whether it's considered bad sportsmanship or not (I guess all's fair, etc. etc.) but I just have this privacy fetish, and it rubs me wrong. No harm, no foul , though.

McG, I don't care if we post the QT. If you see this soon, go ahead and post it (if it's okay with Iecy).

[Shattered Viewpoint]

To me, posting times and online/offline times are beyond simple meta. But that may just be me, and that discussion is probably better suited to MD.

[Shattered Viewpoint]

Oh, no, leave it up. I truly think I'm the one overreacting here (as I said, I just have this privacy thing. Long story.).