970 Grimm'S PR Madness- OVER

[ZazieR]

._.
Any player knowing Shakespears language, assist ZazieR
Otherwise, polysyllabic nonsense destroys ZazieR messages >.<

(ZazieR, habitant Netherlands, zero knowledge polysyllabic nonsense)

ZazieR sentences player given stupid post restriction, however computer apparently been virused ._. Sentence waiting.

[ZazieR]

DocPotter also Iecerint
Elaborate following sentences:

'ColC, why try to stop the identification of the PR's? The scum are trying to avoid them, so might not have them.'

'Z/But Z/DP Z/should've Z/waited Z/for Z/the Z/rest Z/of Z/the Z/players Z/to Z/make Z/up Z/PRs Z/first. <_<'

Stupid virus. Having problems tagging >.<

[ZazieR]

Sentence, sentence,

sentence Iecerint

Working, however virus revenge possible >.<

Problem: ZazieR + polysyllabic nonsense = FAILURE
ZazieR English vocabulary includes many syllabic nonsense, barely any polysyllabic nonsense >.<

[ZazieR]

VOTE COUNT THE FIRST

NOT VOTING (12):
Iecerint

Iecy

Locke Lamora

Lamora

Zang

Alien

Col.Cathart

Cathart

Shattered Viewpoint

Shattered

StrangerCoug

StrangerC

DocPotter

DPotter

esuriospiritus

ESpiritus

Pomegranate

Pomy

ZazieR

Deer

Animal

Pittbunny

PBunny

12 Shall stand...7 shall vote for 1 to fall.

Grimmy
should play those lotto numbers now.

Nicknames ^^
Especially Alien also Animal.

ZazieR, cursed Syllabic player

[ZazieR]

Wait,

Zazie

, is your restriction

iambic pentameter?

Or something

completely different?

Either polysyllabic nonsense, otherwise William Shakespear.
ZazieR, zero knowledge William Shakespear.
ZazieR prefers polysyllabic nonsense over William Shakespear without assistance ._.

[ZazieR]

R/I R/mean, R/my R/restriction R/is R/something R/you R/have R/to R/DO. R/So R/is R/yours, R/so R/is R/Pom's, R/so R/is R/Locke's, R/so R/is R/SC's. R/Pitt R/is R/basically R/politely R/asked R/to R/RP R/AFAICT. R/It's R/not R/something R/the R/Mod R/can R/police R/very R/well.

R/That R/said, R/I R/suppose R/the R/PRs R/come R/from R/us, R/so R/that R/could R/be R/all R/there R/is R/to R/it.

T/^ T/I T/don't T/understand. T/Didn't T/Grimmy T/assign T/the T/PRs?

A/Z, A/my A/point A/was A/that, A/given A/that A/scum A/may A/not A/have A/real A/PRs A/based A/on A/flavor, A/we A/should A/have A/let A/everyone A/claim A/one A/before A/bringing A/up A/that A/possibility.

Explain.

[ZazieR]

Also, questions everyone:

Each Player will be asked/required to submit TWO separate Post restrictions to the mod (me).

Submitted restrictions? Also, reasons?
ZazieR:
-Talking only questions (Pomy)
-Unable honest statements

Reasons: Mini 721
Easier restrictions.

[ZazieR]

D/If D/only D/3 D/players D/faked D/PRs D/that D/could D/be D/formalized, D/that D/would D/indicate D/that D/those D/were D/the D/made-up D/PRs. D/There's D/no D/guarantee D/that D/3 D/faked D/PRs D/exist, D/though.

D/If D/your D/point D/is D/that D/I D/kind-of D/did D/as D/much D/in D/the D/earlier D/post, D/fair D/enough; D/I D/tried D/to D/equivocate D/in D/that D/last D/sentence D/to D/minimize D/the D/effect. D/It D/was D/also D/an D/answer D/to D/Z's D/question.

*raises eyebrows* Messages 70, also 91/ 93 Iecy realising Grimmy randomnising restrictions.
Therefore, ZazieR believing message 108 Iecy faking scumhunting.

[ZazieR]

Also, Iecy, answer question message 131

[ZazieR]

E/1. E/Grimmy E/could E/assign E/PRs E/randomly, E/then E/remove E/them E/from E/scum.

E/2. E/Scum E/could E/fake E/PRs E/more E/restrictive E/than E/their E/actual E/PRs.

E/3. E/Not E/until E/SV E/posts.

E/Why E/me E/and E/not E/DP?

1. Broken. Claiming restrictions submitted after every player posted.

2. Grimmy warning.

3. Other reason besides thinking scumbags having different restrictions?

Iecy realised Grimmy.

[ZazieR]

F/1. F/Not F/really. F/Scum F/knows F/their F/own F/restrictions, F/and F/Grimmy F/could F/always F/give F/them F/extra F/restrictions F/as F/things F/analogous F/to F/fakeclaims.

R/That R/said, R/I R/suppose R/the R/PRs R/come R/from R/us, R/so R/that R/could R/be R/all R/there R/is R/to R/it.

Reasons changing Iecy thinking?
Also, Grimmy warning, meaning:

13. All players will have a post restriction. A first breach of a player's restriction will result in my sending them a warning PM. A second restriction will result in a warning in-thread. A third will result in modkill.

F/3. F/Namely, F/if F/someone F/submitted F/a F/really F/awful F/restriction, F/SV F/could F/claim F/it, F/so F/long F/as F/it F/was F/consistent F/with F/his F/actual F/restriction.

Possibility multiple players being able doing? Secondly, multiple evil players.


Question Iecy:
Iecy stated DPotter scummy/ anti-town message 137. Only Iecy voted DPotter message 149. Reason? Also, Iecy, reason determing DPotter scummy, instead of anti-town.
Also, difference between Iecy approach DPotter approach stating evil players without restriction?

my 7w0 PR'5 5ubmi773d w3r3 pi(k3d. Bu|\||\|y |-|45 my fir57 0|\|3

My submitted restrictions were Pitt's

(to talk like a texting 13-year-old girl)

Interesting.


Cathart:
Opinion Iecy stating:

R/That R/said, R/I R/suppose R/the R/PRs R/come R/from R/us, R/so R/that R/could R/be R/all R/there R/is R/to R/it.

A/Z, A/my A/point A/was A/that, A/given A/that A/scum A/may A/not A/have A/real A/PRs A/based A/on A/flavor, A/we A/should A/have A/let A/everyone A/claim A/one A/before A/bringing A/up A/that A/possibility.

[ZazieR]

Mod: A general question

***Did anyone else have this game disapeer a couple of minutes ago? ***

Knowing nothing.

[ZazieR]

intriguing game mechanic

, but it could

totally be a PR

for

scum too!!

. I wouldn't be too afraid to hammer.

1 of da reasons y i didn't want 2 claim. hypnotist doesn't sound very townie,

there's an ez way 4 me to prove it. like, find another pr, and make me hypnotize them ^.^ . It proves A. PR2's ability and B. My ability, lol.

Enjoy

ZazieR reading before commenting.

[ZazieR]

Iecy, message 157 waiting.
ZazieR expects explanations Iecy changing opinions, also difference between Iecy/ DPotter about stating evil players without restrictions. Other words, reason DPotter approach voting worthy, instead Iecy approach.

L/So, L/Z, L/what L/did L/you L/think L/was L/the L/relevance L/of L/a L/rule L/that L/wasn't L/even L/posted L/in L/the L/game? L<_<

Example. Iecy asking meaning Grimmy warning.

13. All players will have a post restriction.

A first breach of a player's restriction will result in my sending them a warning PM. A second restriction will result in a warning in-thread.

A third will result in modkill.

Other words, Grimmy warning = moderator warning.

Grimmy, ZazieR never implied Grimmy using Grimmy killings. ZazieR only posted example moderator warning

Nobody hammering PBunny until PBunny wagon analysed.

Z4z: I gu355 i|\| 7|-|47 3mp7y p4r4gr4p|-| i|\| p057 157 47 m3, u w4|\|73d 70 45k 4 qu357i0|\| 4b0u7 w|-|47 I 54id, 4|\|d w|-|47 D33r 54id.

My r357ri(7i0|\| w45 70 p057 1ik3 u i|\|5734d 0f u, 37(. L00k5 1ik3 D33r 7|-|0ug|-|7 0f 7|-|3 54m3 7|-|i|\|g. I7'5 |\|07 7|-|47 w3ird.

Elaboration.
Also, opinion Iecy.

N/Grimmy N/said N/he N/added N/the N/second N/one N/to N/someone's, N/so N/it N/looks N/like N/that N/explains N/ESS's N/situation.

Interesting.


Other messages entered waiting period.
PBunny wagon analysation following afterwards. Evil players gathered.
Also, restrictions submitted posted soonish.

[ZazieR]

Cathart:
-ESpiritus received restriction submitted.

-PBunny received restriction submitted.

(Submitted restriction exactly?)

Animal:

-PBunny received restriction submitted.

(Submitted restriction exactly?)
-Talking Piratish (Shattered?)

DPotter:
-Foreign language
-Without using letter Do

c

Potter

ESpiritus:
-Apparently StrangerC
-?
(ESpiritus stating second restriction submitted. Also, confirming other restriction submitted.)

Iecy:
-Smileys only

-Asking direct question results specific answer (Apparently ESpiritus)

LLamora:
-Speaking himself subject. (LLamora himself)
-Commentator.

PBunny:
-Hungry item every sentence.
-Never using specific mafiaterms.

Pomy:
-?
-?
(Pomy?)

SViewpoint:
-Submitted ZazieR restriction.
-?

StrangerC:
-Posting Spanish
-Hailing Grimmy

Alien:

1.YOU must 42 words in each mail have.
2.YOU must aquote of the film in evry l' have; other mail.

ZazieR:
-Talking only questions (Pomy)
-Unable honest statements


Underlined, also italics interesting.
Missing restrictions: Cathart, Animal, DPotter, 1/2 ESpiritus, Iecy, Zang.

[ZazieR]

Enjoy

o i kno. trust me or don't, i don't have ne way on my own to confirm.

ZazieR stupid ._.
1/2 ESpiritus also claimed already.

Anyway, wagon saving PBunny opinion ZazieR. Oddly feeling ZazieR having.

[ZazieR]

Cathart:
-ESpiritus received restriction submitted.

-PBunny received restriction submitted.

(Submitted restriction exactly?)

Animal:

-PBunny received restriction submitted.

(Submitted restriction exactly?)
-Talking Piratish (Shattered?)

DPotter:
-Foreign language
-Without using letter Do

c

Potter

ESpiritus:
-Apparently StrangerC
-?
(ESpiritus stating second restriction submitted. Also, confirming other restriction submitted.)

Iecy:
-Smileys only

-Asking direct question results specific answer (Apparently ESpiritus)

LLamora:
-Speaking himself subject. (LLamora himself)
-Commentator.

PBunny:
-Hungry item every sentence.
-Never using specific mafiaterms.

Pomy:
-?
-?
(Pomy?)

SViewpoint:
-Submitted ZazieR restriction.

-Text-posting

StrangerC:
-Posting Spanish
-Hailing Grimmy

Alien:

1.YOU must 42 words in each mail have.
2.YOU must aquote of the film in evry l' have; other mail.

ZazieR:
-Talking only questions (Pomy)
-Unable honest statements


Underlined, also italics interesting.
Missing restrictions: Cathart, Animal, DPotter, Iecy, Zang.

Updated ._.

[ZazieR]

@StrangerC:

Reason going after DPotter, nothing against Iecy.
@Iecy:

Reason asking ZazieR about attacking you, nothing against DPotter without questioning StrangerC attacking DPotter, nothing against Iecy.

@SViewpoint:
Reason attacking Iecy, nothing against DPotter.


@PBunny:

Doc Potter - (3)
Zang
Pittbunny
Iecerint

mah 1st suspicion is esurio, cuz her vote on me wuz just exactly da same as cath's, with no new stuff. at least da locke had a good rezon.

Explanation?
Also, disliking ESpiritus reason voting > Animal reason voting.
Silent voting also following, agreed? Disagreeing preferable including reason.
Denying claiming L-1 scummy.


Anyway, Alien, Pome, DPotter, LLamora opposite evil players.
Iecy, Animal evil players.

[ZazieR]

@Iecy:

Reason asking ZazieR about attacking you, nothing against DPotter without questioning StrangerC, also Cathart earlier attacking DPotter, nothing against Iecy.

Anyway, reason ZazieR saying PBunny wagon incorrect. Wagon started:

hey locke i can scumhunt, no rezon 2 yet. everything is about pr and rvs rite now.

Col.Cathart

Questioned DPotter statement evil players without restrictions. ZazieR question waiting Cathart return. However. Cathart stated something interesting. Quoted Below.
Esuriospiritus

Asking Iecy questions. Reason ESpiritus being mentioned over other players, also reason Iecy hopping DPotter wagon

Locke Lamora

-

Strangercoug

Only bothersome message 99 combined voting PBunny

Deer

Assistance needed. Only 'scumhunting' Animal doing stating DPotter wagon scummy. Never reason given, never stated player

[/quote]

T|-|3 7|-|i|\|g i5, w3 ju57 id3|\|7ifi3d 7|-|3m 411, I 7|-|i|\|k. S0 |\|0w, w|-|3|\| w3 4r3 fi|\|i5|-|3d, w3 (4|\| 574r7 7|-|3 r341 g4m3, |\|0?

the thing is, we just identified them (Restrictions) all, i think. so now, when we are finished, we can start the reai game, no?

Untrue, SViewpoint posted after Cathart voting PBunny. Something interesting, before message, Cathart wanted any Restriction 'discussion'.

[ZazieR]

zazie xoxo, i've played 2 games w/deer. 1 game where we were different players, 1 where i replaced in to for deer. both games he is quiet, but not usually this small w/content o.O.

ZazieR accusation against Animal = hypocricy

[ZazieR]

where

is

the

hypocrisy?

Didn't like the DP wagon, but I like the

Pitt

one.

Reason voting PBunny.

PBunny lacking scumhunting according players.

Animal voted PBunny bolded reason. Animal lacking scumhunting. Hypocricy.

Arrr!! Zazie needs t' MAKE SENSE. Me sea dog head hurts from readin' all that bilge water. Also, Zazie, be ye askin' me somethin', or jus' commentin' on somethin' I spake? Blarg.

Question. ZazieR asking reason SViewpoint attacking Iecy, nothing against DPotter.

Y/Zaz, Y/I'm Y/pretty Y/sure Y/I've Y/already Y/answered Y/all Y/those Y/questions Y/in Y/our Y/prior Y/exchange.

Restate, because ZazieR pretty certain Iecy 'ignored' question.


@Cathart
ZazieR mentioned Cathart stating Cathart opinion starting scumhunting after every restriction identified, because opinion showing Cathart also waiting scumhunting. Also, contradictory something Cathart mentioned earlier.
Iecy scummy:
-Iecy stating Grimmy assigned restrictions, afterwards different opinion, using newly opinion attacking players.
-Voting DPotter, little scumhunting involved (Minus regarding voting PBunny threatening)
-Iecy disapproved stating submitted restriction, never Iecy trying stopping other players claiming submitted restrictions.

As for Zazier, I'm just having trouble following what you say. I've got to say that I'm not even sure what your restriction is as it's not obvious from the posts themselves..

Either polysyllabic nonsense, otherwise William Shakespear.
ZazieR, zero knowledge William Shakespear.
ZazieR prefers polysyllabic nonsense over William Shakespear without assistance ._.

Evil players: Iecy, animal, Cathart.
Game over.

[ZazieR]

Iecy, evil player being funny. Iecy expects ZazieR believing Iecy excuse?
ZazieR disbelieving, reason:

Q/That's Q/kinda Q/a Q/silly Q/PR, Q/though, Q/since Q/it's Q/not Q/very Q/formal Q/and Q/is Q/consequently Q/easily Q/cheated Q/through. Q/I Q/want Q/more Q/specific Q/information.

R/I R/mean, R/my R/restriction R/is R/something R/you R/have R/to R/DO. R/So R/is R/yours, R/so R/is R/Pom's, R/so R/is R/Locke's, R/so R/is R/SC's. R/Pitt R/is R/basically R/politely R/asked R/to R/RP R/AFAICT. R/It's R/not R/something R/the R/Mod R/can R/police R/very R/well.

R/That R/said, R/I R/suppose R/the R/PRs R/come R/from R/us, R/so R/that R/could R/be R/all R/there R/is R/to R/it.

Second message Iecy reason ZazieR disbelieving. Second message following other message.
(ZazieR responding message 265)

B/Do B/not B/overhammer. B/It's B/possible B/that B/someone B/is B/voteless B/or B/whatever B/given B/how B/Grimmy B/phrased B/it.

Reason behind Iecy wanting waiting?

@Cathart
ZazieR mentioned Cathart stating Cathart opinion starting scumhunting after every restriction identified, because opinion showing Cathart also waiting scumhunting. Also, contradictory something Cathart mentioned earlier.

W|-|3r3 did I w4i7 wi7|-| 5(um|-|u|\|7i|\|g? I w45 RVSi|\|g ju57 1ik3 3v3ry0|\|3 3153, 4|\|d 7|-|3|\|, w|-|3|\| i7 pr010|\|g3d f0r 700 10|\|g, I w45 0|\|3 0f 7|-|3 fir57 p30p13 w|-|0 w4|\|73d 70 574r7 p14yi|\|g m4fi4 i|\|5734d 0f g00fi|\|g 4r0u|\|d wi7|-| PR'5 50m3 m0r3.

W|-|47 w45 (0|\|7r4di(70ry 34r1i3r? T|-|47 7|-|i|\|g 4b0u7 S|-|4773r3d Vi3wp0i|\|7? I 3xp14i|\|3d 7|-|47 41r34dy. A|\|d if u 7|-|i|\|k, 7|-|47 f0rg377i|\|g 4b0u7 50m30|\|3 w|-|0 w45|\|'7 p057i|\|g i|\| 7|-|3 g4m3 47 411 i5 4 g00d 5(um7311, 7|-|3|\| I 4dvi53 70 r3(41ibr473 y0ur 5(umd4r, b3(4u53 i7'5 m41fu|\|(7i0|\|i|\|g.

Apparently, Cathart knowing ZazieR meaning. Cathart waited. Meaning Cathart also needed reason starting. Starting scumhunting needing specific information. Specific information absent, scumhunting abstaining. Happens after random voting, reason ZazieR disliking earlier PBunny voting.
Contradictory:

A|\|d wi7|-| 7|-|47 p4r4gr4p|-| 4b0v3, I w0u1d 1ik3 70 570p 7|-|3 PR di5(u55i0|\|. I7'5 fu|\| 4|\|d 57uff, bu7 w3 4r3 |-|3r3 70 (47(|-| m4fi4, 4y3?

and with that paragraph above, i wouid iike to stop the pr discussion. it's fun and stuff, but we are here to catch mafia, aye?

T|-|3 7|-|i|\|g i5, w3 ju57 id3|\|7ifi3d 7|-|3m 411, I 7|-|i|\|k. S0 |\|0w, w|-|3|\| w3 4r3 fi|\|i5|-|3d, w3 (4|\| 574r7 7|-|3 r341 g4m3, |\|0?

the thing is, we just identified them aii, i think. so now, when we are finished, we can start the reai game, no?

Wanting stopping, however wanting starting after every restriction identified.
Cathart, ZazieR apologising. Evil players: Iecy, Animal, Espiritus.

If DP actually hammered, I don't suppose there's anything much to do except to wait for Pitt's flip.

^^Reason ZazieR apologising.
Also, Espiritus, second submitted restriction? Funny, Espiritus seeing message including submitted restrictions, however ignored stating second restriction.


Animal proving Animal evil player:

I think my

quietness

has something to do with my

post restriction

. I know it's not a hard one, but I find it slightly

annoying

to change

font colors/sizes/italics/etc.

ZazieR restriction annoying, however never ZazieR activity influenced. Many players having annoying restriction, never activity influenced (Except DPotter)

I see what Zazie is trying to say about my lack of scumhunting. If you want a legitimate post about the DP wagon early on, I didn't particularly like StrangerCoug's vote on him, or Ice's that followed.

Never questioned, until Animal lacking scumhunting being mentioned. Especially Iecy voting bothering. Reason ZazieR questioning Iecy during certain period. Animal never involved himself.

[ZazieR]

Iecy scummy:
-Iecy stating Grimmy assigned restrictions, afterwards different opinion, using newly opinion attacking players.
-Voting DPotter, little scumhunting involved (Minus regarding voting PBunny threatening)
-Iecy disapproved stating submitted restriction, never Iecy trying stopping other players claiming submitted restrictions.

-Iecy stating Grimmy telling Iecy ESpiritus received Iecy submitted restriction

ZazieR forgetfull ._.

[ZazieR]

Vote: Deer

A/I A/need A/to A/leave A/soon. A/This A/is A/a A/quick A/"follow A/your A/heart" A/vote A/pre-reread A?based A/on A/my A/feelings A/at A/the A/end A/of A/D1.

ZazieR agreeing. ZazieR suggests helping Iecy bussing animal.

Sentence Animal

(ZazieR knowing Grimmy exception rule. ZazieR prefering sentencing ^.^)

@StrangerC
StrangerC talking about responding? ZazieR prefers StrangerC responding. StrangerC talking about different thingy? ZazieR needing elaboration ._.

@ESpiritus, SViewpoint
Second submitted restriction?

[ZazieR]

@Zazie: Ye be havin' received one o' me PRs!!

Elaborate.

[ZazieR]

I had on me list one that demanded polysyllabic expression. 't didna make th' cut, but I still had 't in me mind that 't had. Shoot me fer nay lookin' at me list? I had a list o' like nine or ten things.

*shooting*
Puhlease (Multiple syllables )
ZazieR indeed shooting. Reason? ZazieR expecting SViewpoint looking submitted restrictions after having stated SViewpoint having decided between multiple possibilities.

B/Pom B/may B/be B/scum, B/too.

Disagreed. Pomy always friendly, ZazieR thinking.
Difference between Pome-scum, Pome-town simple. Pome-scum lacking scumhunting. Pome-town always trying, even after players pointing Pomy sucking.
Pomy opposite evil player.


@Iecy
Iecy nothing wanting saying about submitted restrictions?

[ZazieR]

ZazieR thinking Animal avoiding. ZazieR seeing Animal posting elsewhere.

[ZazieR]

I'm here, I'm here.

Here's what I think about Pomegranate: She didn't put down a vote all day. She didn't scumhunt all day either. I really don't like that kind of play. Makes me get some

bad vibes.

vote: Pomegranate

Seriously ._.

Message terrible. Unworthy responding ._.
However, ZazieR friendly.

Difference between StrangerC, ESpiritus, SViewpoint, Pomy?

[ZazieR]

They've scumhunted

.

Pomy

hasn't.

Really? ZazieR stupid. Obviously, stating submitted restrictions, calling somebody sexy scumhunting[/sarcasm]
Examples others scumhunting.

[ZazieR]

I'm here, I'm here.

Here's what I think about Pomegranate: She didn't put down a vote all day.

She didn't scumhunt all day either

. I really don't like that kind of play. Makes me get some

bad vibes.

vote: Pomegranate

Animal trying again? Animal himself stated 'today'. ESpiritus message posted yesterday.

Examples.

[ZazieR]

I didn't state today.

By "all day" I meant D1.

Sorry about the confusion.

Hypocrite

hypocrite

hypocrite

Enough?

[ZazieR]

While that may be true

,

why do you only suspect me for it

and not Pom?

Because Pomy scumhunted.

[ZazieR]

How?

Show me some

examples.

Pbunny. Animal.

[ZazieR]

Why do you not claim? Yes, it'll give scum information, but does that mean that it's not worth is?

Share your reads, at least will you? Don't you realize that the case on you is built on you not feeling the need to share reads? Do you see how far you refuse to scumhunt?


I would like to make it known that I'm considering hammering Pittbunny- K?Pitt, what do you have to say about this?

Why would we want to out another power role just to test your claim? It's shaky, and there's no reason to out another PR to test it, IMO.

But I will day that I do see pro-town benefits; it could be useful for redirecting scum PRs, if there are.

You have meta on Deer?

Deer seems plausible scum- I feel like he's coasting, does anyone else get that impression?

[ZazieR]

2/4

of those I don't consider

scumhunting.

Animal admitting Pomy scumhunted.
Examples Animal scumhunting?

[ZazieR]

intriguing game mechanic

, but it

could

totally be a PR

for

scum too!!

. I wouldn't be too afraid to hammer.

Incorrect. Bolded showing fifty fifty opinion.

Also, I don't like the Doc wagon.

Reeks of scum!!

Scumhunting requires analysis.

I see what Zazie is trying to say about my lack of scumhunting. If you want a legitimate post about the DP wagon early on, I didn't particularly like StrangerCoug's vote on him, or Ice's that followed.

Scumhunting requires analysis. Also, posted after ZazieR accused hypocrit Animal.

Reason Animal decided omitted PBunny voting?

[ZazieR]

Agreeing Animal claiming.

Disagreeing message 332 (Iecy).
Scummy Iecy complaining about quickness Animal wagon during period Iecy voting Animal.

Disagreeing LLamora analysis message 337. Pomy commented against examples Animal scumhunting. Animal ignored Pomy, ZazieR responses.

[ZazieR]

Before ZazieR forgetting again, @Iecy:
Nothing catching Iecy interest regarding submitted restrictions?

ZazieR bothered about other players. Nobody, except Iecy evil player, mentioned something interesting about Animal stated ability:

3. It says that in my Role PM. Basically something along the lines of "because you are a thief, you will turn up guilty in any investigations (although this may work to your advantage somehow)." Maybe a hint that the cop (which I assume there is) is insane? Not really sure.

Reason Animal stated nothing about possible insane investigator yesterday?

Also, ZazieR zero knowledge cooties until ZazieR googled. Internet stated cooties being imaginary children 'disease'. Wanna explain 'prescription treating cooties'?

Finally, yesterday Animal stated scummy StrangerC, scummy Iecy. Reason targeting Pomy over StrangerC, Iecy?


@Players believing allignment changes Pomy targeting evil players
Reason Pomy being evil player?
Evil-Pomy targeting opposite evil player ... Pomy changes into opposite player, giving Pomy knowledge about evil players. Pomy stating knowledge = Game Over.
Opposite Evil-Pomy targeting evil player. Evil player changes opposite evil. Having knowledge about evil players. Stating knowledge = almost game over.

Deer could just be lying about miller status in order to gain safety from cop investigations, but the addition of this part of his claim makes me think it's legit. He claims to not have experience with the miller role, and if he is telling the truth about that then I doubt he would have the foresight as scum to not only fakeclaim miller in the event of a cop investigation, but also toss in something completely unique and unusual like that. Deer just doesn't seem the type to be that conniving.

Animal eliminated + flipping evil player = Espiritus also evil player.
Anyway, disagreed. Animal evil player giving Animal possibility discussing claiming together other evil players.

I'd particularly like to hear more from DP. I agree wholeheartedly with Locke and his sentiment that DP could still be doing way more despite his PR.

Reason 'ignoring' Animal using restriction excuse lacking scumhunting?


@StrangerC
Reason either Pome, Animal being evil player?

R/Given R/just R/that R/information --

R/

Townier

R/Iecerint

R/esuriospiritus
R/Pom
R/Deer

R/

Scummier

R/Locke Lamora
R/Shattered Viewpoint
R/StrangerCoug
R/DocPotter
R/ZazieR

Reasons?
Also, bolded deserves attention.

CC also seems to have been town-aligned but with a separate wincon - can you change wincon but remain town-aligned?

ZazieR being Electrode Grimmy Pokemon Mafia. Electrode also having seperate winning condition. Electrode also winning opposite evil players winning even after failing seperate winning condition.

Unsentence, sentence Iecy

[ZazieR]

Nothing catching Iecy interest regarding submitted restrictions?

T/No. T/Why?

T/Reasons T/are T/in T/the T/post T/before T/that T/one. T/Did T/you T/miss T/that? T/I'm T/still T/thinking T/about T/the T/reasons, T/but T/they T/imply T/that T/list.

Iecy asking reason? ZazieR asking because Iecy stated something interesting early pages. Iecy stated evil players perhaps having different restrictions, instead getting submitted restrictions. Every submitted restriction posted. Comparing stated restriction, submitted restrictions showing errors:
ZazieR, Iecy, DPotter.

Iecy clearly 'ignoring' something Iecy thinking possibility catching evil players. Evil Iecy player.
DPotter also needing explain reason DPotter 'ignored' Stated restrictions VS Submitted restrictions.

Negative. Message above showing Iecy opinion Pomy opposite evil player. Reason Iecy opinion making players townier/ scummier?

To Zazier, The Locke says this: would you expect Deer to mention something about insane cops without claiming miller?

Positive

[ZazieR]

Nothing catching Iecy interest regarding submitted restrictions?

T/No. T/Why?

T/Reasons T/are T/in T/the T/post T/before T/that T/one. T/Did T/you T/miss T/that? T/I'm T/still T/thinking T/about T/the T/reasons, T/but T/they T/imply T/that T/list.

Iecy asking reason? ZazieR asking because Iecy stated something interesting early pages. Iecy stated evil players perhaps having different restrictions, instead getting submitted restrictions. Every submitted restriction posted. Comparing stated restriction, submitted restrictions showing errors:
ZazieR, Iecy, DPotter.

Iecy clearly 'ignoring' something Iecy thinking possibility catching evil players. Evil Iecy player.
DPotter also needing explain reason DPotter 'ignored' Stated restrictions VS Submitted restrictions.

Negative. Message above showing Iecy opinion Pomy opposite evil player. Reason Iecy opinion making players townier/ scummier?

Iecy ignoring ZazieR?

[ZazieR]

X/Z, X/if X/I X/haven't X/already X/answered X/your X/question, X/I X/don't X/understand X/it.

X/If X/someone X/else X/understands X/Z's X/question, X/please X/restate X/it X/for X/me.

Iecy stating evil players possibly having different restrictions. Other restrictions, instead submitted restrictions.
Submitted restrictions posted.
ZazieR poly-something nonsense absent.
DPotter increasing message area absent.
Iecy letter thingy absent.

Reason Iecy ignored submitted restrictions VS visible restrictions?

[ZazieR]

Iecy stating evil players possibly having different restrictions. Other restrictions, instead submitted restrictions.

Z/No, Z/the Z/theory Z/was Z/that Z/they Z/didn't Z/have Z/restrictions Z/at Z/all Z/based Z/on Z/flavor. Z/If Z/I Z/were Z/to Z/scumhunt Z/based Z/on Z/that, Z/I'd Z/be Z/suspicous Z/of Z/SV Z/and Z/LL Z/(and Z/PB). Z/PB Z/was Z/town, Z/and Z/I Z/don't Z/see Z/a Z/particular Z/reason Z/to Z/be Z/suspicious Z/of Z/SV Z/or Z/LL, Z/so Z/it's Z/not Z/a Z/good Z/tree Z/to Z/bark Z/up.

Disagreed.
Iecy believing evil players absent restriction. Meaning, visible restriction different submitted restrictions. Making ZazieR accusation valid. Agreed? Disagreeing includes giving reason.

Also, responding Iecy latest message.
Pomy explained already. Also, ZazieR already explained changing allignments impossible.

ZazieR getting impression Iecy playing devil advocate.


Disliking ESpiritus return message.

ZazieR preferring SViewpoint, Iecy, Espiritus today morning killing.

[ZazieR]

C/I C/don't C/understand C/what C/you're C/saying, C/or C/(as C/a C/side-effect) C/how C/it's C/different C/from C/what C/I've C/said. C/Since C/no C/one C/answered C/my C/request C/that C/someone C/explicate C/what C/you're C/talking C/about, C/my C/guess C/is C/that C/others C/don't C/understand, C/either. C/Give C/an C/example C/or C/something C/of C/what C/you're C/talking C/about.

A/Z, A/my A/point A/was A/that, A/given A/that A/scum A/may A/not A/have A/real A/PRs A/based A/on A/flavor, A/we A/should A/have A/let A/everyone A/claim A/one A/before A/bringing A/up A/that A/possibility.

Submitted Restriction showing ZazieR, Iecy, DPotter restrictions being absent. Iecy believing evil players having other restrictions, instead submitted restrictions. Iecy 'believing' above stament, reason Iecy 'ignoring' above information?

[ZazieR]

I/^ I/Are I/you I/alluding I/to I/Deer, I/Pom, I/or I/DP?

I/@ I/Locke, I/no. I/My I/guess I/back I/then I/was I/that

I/players I/like I/SV I/and I/Pitt

I/who I/had I/subjective I/PRs I/might I/be I/scum I/faking I/them I/on I/the I/back I/of I/the I/flavor I/business.

I/Pitt I/was I/town, I/so I/that I/was I/clearly I/no I/good.

Iecy evil player showing himself^^
Reminder: Zazie stated

Iecy

, ZazieR, DPotter restrictions unavailable submitted restrictions. Iecy stated afterwards:

D/I D/hadn't D/even D/noticed D/that.

D/It's D/a D/good D/point D/if D/you're D/correct.

Bolded important.

[ZazieR]

I/^ I/Are I/you I/alluding I/to I/Deer, I/Pom, I/or I/DP?

I/@ I/Locke, I/no. I/My I/guess I/back I/then I/was I/that

I/players I/like I/SV I/and I/Pitt

I/who I/had I/subjective I/PRs I/might I/be I/scum I/faking I/them I/on I/the I/back I/of I/the I/flavor I/business.

I/Pitt I/was I/town, I/so I/that I/was I/clearly I/no I/good.

Iecy evil player showing himself^^
Reminder: Zazie stated

Iecy

, ZazieR, DPotter restrictions unavailable submitted restrictions. Iecy stated afterwards:

D/I D/hadn't D/even D/noticed D/that.

D/It's D/a D/good D/point D/if D/you're D/correct.

Bolded important.

Hello? Important^^
Iecy evil player. ZazieR interested knowing reason players thinking otherwise.

[ZazieR]

J/1. J/Your J/reminder J/is J/irrelevant. J/My J/worry J/was J/about J/players J/with J/subjective J/PRs. J/Iecy/Z/DP J/do J/not J/have J/subjective J/PRs.

J/2. J/You J/were J/incorrect J/about J/submitted J/PRs J/for J/the J/reason J/Pom J/said, J/so J/it J/was J/not J/a J/good J/point.

*ZazieR coughing regarding 1*

D/I D/hadn't D/even D/noticed D/that. D/It's D/a D/good D/point D/if D/you're D/correct.

D/I D/hadn't D/even D/noticed D/that.

D/It's D/a D/good D/point D/if D/you're D/correct.

D/It's D/a D/good D/point D/if D/you're D/correct.

Regarding 2. ZazieR looking into Iecy. Iecy showing Iecy faking scumhunting.

[ZazieR]

K/Are K/you K/saying K/that K/I'm K/scum K/because K/we K/didn't K/read K/the K/rules K/re: K/PM K/assignment?

Better.
1/2 correct. Statement combined Iecy never scumhunting corresponding Iecy opinion = fully correct.
Also, ZazieR stated other reasons before above accusation.

[ZazieR]

Nothing catching Iecy interest regarding submitted restrictions?

T/No. T/Why?

T/Reasons T/are T/in T/the T/post T/before T/that T/one. T/Did T/you T/miss T/that? T/I'm T/still T/thinking T/about T/the T/reasons, T/but T/they T/imply T/that T/list.

Iecy asking reason? ZazieR asking because Iecy stated something interesting early pages. Iecy stated evil players perhaps having different restrictions, instead getting submitted restrictions. Every submitted restriction posted. Comparing stated restriction, submitted restrictions showing errors:
ZazieR, Iecy, DPotter.

Iecy clearly 'ignoring' something Iecy thinking possibility catching evil players. Evil Iecy player.
DPotter also needing explain reason DPotter 'ignored' Stated restrictions VS Submitted restrictions.

DPotter absent

[ZazieR]

Q/It Q/wouldn't Q/confirm Q/your Q/alignment. Q/The Q/ability Q/is Q/on Q/the Q/scummy Q/side Q/if Q/anything, Q/anyway.

Q/Also, Q/your Q/ability Q/(if Q/not Q/the Q/details) Q/is Q/already Q/pretty Q/much Q/confirmed Q/via Q/Deer's Q/claim.

Q/New Q/thinking!

Q/1. Q/Given Q/that Q/at Q/least Q/one Q/of Q/Pome Q/and Q/Deer Q/is Q/town,Q/ Pome Q/is Q/It.
Q/2. Q/Assume Q/(1).
Q/3. Q/So Q/Pome Q/is Q/It.
Q/4. Q/So Q/Pome Q/didn't Q/target Q/anyone Q/D1, Q/OR Q/Pome Q/targeted Q/another Q/scum Q/D1, Q/which Q/has Q/no Q/point.
Q/5. Q/So Q/she Q/targeted Q/no Q/one Q/N1
Q/6. Q/5 Q/fits Q/town Q/more Q/than Q/scum.

Q/On Q/the Q/other Q/hand, Q/she Q/could Q/just Q/be Q/lying Q/about Q/the Q/effects Q/of Q/her Q/ability, Q/but Q/they're Q/awfully Q/cute, Q/aren't Q/they?

Explain, Iecy.


Anyways, sickish. ZazieR returning soonish.

[ZazieR]

Q/It Q/wouldn't Q/confirm Q/your Q/alignment. Q/The Q/ability Q/is Q/on Q/the Q/scummy Q/side Q/if Q/anything, Q/anyway.

Q/Also, Q/your Q/ability Q/(if Q/not Q/the Q/details) Q/is Q/already Q/pretty Q/much Q/confirmed Q/via Q/Deer's Q/claim.

Q/New Q/thinking!

Q/1. Q/Given Q/that Q/at Q/least Q/one Q/of Q/Pome Q/and Q/Deer Q/is Q/town,Q/ Pome Q/is Q/It.
Q/2. Q/Assume Q/(1).
Q/3. Q/So Q/Pome Q/is Q/It.
Q/4. Q/So Q/Pome Q/didn't Q/target Q/anyone Q/D1, Q/OR Q/Pome Q/targeted Q/another Q/scum Q/D1, Q/which Q/has Q/no Q/point.
Q/5. Q/So Q/she Q/targeted Q/no Q/one Q/N1
Q/6. Q/5 Q/fits Q/town Q/more Q/than Q/scum.

Q/On Q/the Q/other Q/hand, Q/she Q/could Q/just Q/be Q/lying Q/about Q/the Q/effects Q/of Q/her Q/ability, Q/but Q/they're Q/awfully Q/cute, Q/aren't Q/they?

Explain, Iecy.


Anyways, sickish. ZazieR returning soonish.

Iecy, bolded important. Bolded needing explanation.
Homework other players: Research Iecy stances against Pomy/Animal discussion, including amount Iecy changing Iecy stance.

[ZazieR]

Lucky ESpiritus. ZazieR demanding iso button!!!

However, @Espiritus, difference between DPotter, Animal yesterday.

[ZazieR]

S/Deer's S/thief S/result S/on S/Pom S/is S/consistent S/with S/her S/being S/"It." S/Unless S/Deer S/is S/scum S/with S/Pom S/or S/there S/were S/busdriver S/shenanigans S/(to S/an S/"It" S/role S/--> S/very S/low S/probability), S/it S/would S/appear S/that S/Pom S/is S/"It" S/(and S/Deer S/is S/a S/Thief).

S/The S/other S/bolded S/part S/addresses S/that S/point; S/it's S/possible S/that S/Pom S/IS S/It, S/but S/she's S/lying S/about S/her S/ability S/as S/It. S/Was S/relevant S/because S/it S/would S/throw S/off S/the S/interpretation S/of S/4-6 S/in S/that S/list, S/even S/assuming S/they S/were S/all S/internally S/accurate S/(which S/I'm S/no S/longer S/really S/convinced S/of).

Iecy never understands. Firstly, Iecy stating Pomy possibly lying about Pomy ability. Later, Iecy stating Animal ability confirmed Pomy ability. Meaning, Iecy trying making Pomy looking scummy.
Reason Iecy thinking '6' fitting evil player Pomy instead opposite evil player Pomy.

[ZazieR]

Q/It Q/wouldn't Q/confirm Q/your Q/alignment. Q/The Q/ability Q/is Q/on Q/the Q/scummy Q/side Q/if Q/anything, Q/anyway.

Q/Also, Q/your

Q/ability

Q/(if Q/not Q/the

Q/details)

Q/is Q/already Q/pretty Q/much Q/confirmed Q/via Q/Deer's Q/claim.

'Ability', 'details' changes into

T/role

?
Neither working, liar.

[ZazieR]

U/Um, U/no, U/it U/works U/fine. U/We U/know U/she's U/It U/because U/of U/the U/Thief U/result. U/We U/don't U/know U/the U/details -- U/that U/she U/tags U/people U/and U/they U/become U/It, U/and U/she's U/town, U/etc.

Ability = rolename = wrongly assumed. Iecy knowing.
Secondly, Pomy stating proving ability details tonight. Iecy wanting knowing details, reason Iecy ignoring request?
Lastly, reason Iecy changing stances regarding Pomy ability (Reason townie ability --> scummy ability)
EDIT: Reason Iecy stated 'details' = roletype later, leaving absent defence number 1?

U/Also, U/there's U/no U/scum U/motivation U/in U/the U/"slip" U/you're U/purporting U/to U/have U/found.

Getting Pomy away? ZazieR seeing enough scum motivation.

V/Ye V/know, V/Z, V/you V/originally V/said V/I V/was V/"bussing" V/Pom

Quoting appreciated. ZazieR never stated above statement.

V/Did V/her V/claim V/make V/her V/townier V/in V/your V/eyes?

negative.

@Zazier: Not entirely certain I understand you, but the difference between DP and Deer is that Deer made his claim in such a fashion that I do not believe he is lying, both regarding his alignment and role. It's a longer shot than believing he is town because of his actual, y'know, actions, but it's more than I've got with DP's slot.

ZazieR asking about yesterday behaviour.

Yes, I think yer scummy fer th' sole reason that ye didn't clarify yer Role with the Mod.

Examples?

[ZazieR]

Yes, I think yer scummy fer th' sole reason that ye didn't clarify yer Role with the Mod.

Examples?

YARRR Ye've been readin' th' game as well as I have, ye scalawag! Ye know that Pom had that entire thing about no clearin' up her role PM until far too late in th' game.

We've beaten this to death.

ZazieR asking question. ZazieR expecting answer.
ZazieR believing SViewpoint having nothing evidence against Pomy, because Pomy explaining.

I feel that Poms. vote on Deer in the first post of page 14 was scummy, because she was obviously trying to direct the attention from herself to Deer by using the same reasoning against him as he was using against her.

Pomy stated yesterday animal being scummy. Reaction?

Does any one

besides pom have any

reasons we should not lynch her?

^^Scummy

Iecy evil player.

[ZazieR]

E/Hahaha. E/I'm E/not E/even E/in E/that E/post.

Positive. However, previous message showing following:

U/Um, U/no, U/it U/works U/fine. U/We U/know U/she's U/It U/because U/of U/the U/Thief U/result. U/We U/don't U/know U/the U/details -- U/that U/she U/tags U/people U/and U/they U/become U/It, U/and U/she's U/town, U/etc.

Ability = rolename = wrongly assumed. Iecy knowing.
Secondly, Pomy stating proving ability details tonight. Iecy wanting knowing details, reason Iecy ignoring request?
Lastly, reason Iecy changing stances regarding Pomy ability (Reason townie ability --> scummy ability)
EDIT: Reason Iecy stated 'details' = roletype later, leaving absent defence number 1?

Never addressed.

[

Does any one

besides pom have any

reasons we should not lynch her?

^^Scummy

Iecy evil player.

As I was reading

the only person

I saw vouching for Pom.

was herself

.

I wanted to know if any one else had anything else to say about her being town.

Objection. ZazieR ISO showing contradiction.
Besides, reason continuing without hearing every player?

Iecy, Rewqy evil players.
SnowB, LLamora opposite evil players.

SENTENCE: Iecerint

ZazieR supporting Iecy, Rewqy starting claiming.

[ZazieR]

A/Z, A/it A/is A/lylo. A/Unvote A/me A/for A/now.

A/I A/would A/support A/a A/massclaim. A/I A/will A/start A/it, A/too, A/provided A/that A/Z A/has A/unvoted A/me.

Negative. Iecy answering/ responding before demanding.

Rewqy, items gotten?
Reason wanting confirming opposite evil player over catching evil player?

[ZazieR]

Iecerint reading pro town to me. only played one game with him in which he appeared to have the same play style as now and he then town so I like him.

Negative. ZazieR knowing Iecy better over SBunny. Iecy evil player.
ZazieR also wanting showing something. Iecy forgot commenting against something Rewqy stated. Reason Iecy?

@Rewqy, items?
Everybody claiming, meaning keeping items hidden useless.

SBunny analysis message 557 weaky. Many information, useless.

[ZazieR]

B/What B/are B/you B/talking B/about? Be B/specific.

Negative. Obvious request. Iecy looking Rewqy today messages, afterwards stating everything Iecy dislikes.

[ZazieR]

Why is Iecerint scummy?

Iecy scummy:
-Iecy stating Grimmy assigned restrictions, afterwards different opinion, using newly opinion attacking players.
-Voting DPotter, little scumhunting involved (Minus regarding voting PBunny threatening)
-Iecy disapproved stating submitted restriction, never Iecy trying stopping other players claiming submitted restrictions.

Later 'Faking scumhunting' added. Also, meta reasons.

[ZazieR]

When I robbed Iecerint, I stole a badge. I am assuming this means he is a cop.

Only item?

[ZazieR]

Zazie, claim?

ZazieR Inventor. Sending device every evening.
Targeted Alien Evening 1, StrangerC Evening 2.
Device returned Evening 1, flavor showing device result Evening 2.

Reasons targeting players: Appearing opposite evil player, however never strongest opposite evil player reading. Results devices unknown until following morning.

[ZazieR]

B/What B/are B/you B/talking B/about? Be B/specific.

Negative. Obvious request. Iecy looking Rewqy today messages, afterwards stating everything Iecy dislikes.

[ZazieR]

Iecy opinion everything Rewqy stated today.

[ZazieR]

Failing Iecy:

P/A P/mafia P/thief P/would P/get P/information P/that P/gave P/an P/idea P/of P/what P/a P/player's P/role P/does.

P/A P/town P/thief P/would P/get P/information P/that P/gave P/an P/idea P/of P/a P/player's P/alignment. P/I P/mean, P/town P/gets P/both, P/but P/since P/the P/point P/of P/the P/roles P/are P/a P/little P/different, P/the P/balance P/shifts P/whichever P/way.

When I robbed Iecerint, I stole a badge. I am assuming this means he is a cop.

Adding Pomy's flipping also showing Animal/ Rewqy getting information about ability. Reason Iecy never mentioning today?

Zazie, The Locke does not understand what your inventions do. Have neither of them had an effect because both Zang and SC are dead?

Also unknown ZazieR until tomorrow. Invention Evening 2 revealed inside flavour. ZazieR packet ended StrangerC adventure.

[ZazieR]

G/OK, G/for G/someone G/I G/have G/a G/sane G/Innocent G/result G/on, G/GFs G/notwithstanding, G/you G/are G/REALLY G/reaching.

G/I G/never G/doubted G/that G/Deer/rewq G/was G/a G/Thief. G/It G/was G/already G/confirmed G/D2 G/except G/for G/under G/very G/specific G/circumstances.

ZazieR guessing Iecy needing simplified version

Last night, I robbed Pom. Here's the items I received:

a welcome mat that says "GO AWAY".
a prescrition to treat "Cooties".
a bag of onions.
a DVD of the movie "How to lose friends and alienate people"

POMEGRANATE - IT - lynched Day 2

P/A

P/mafia P/thief

P/would P/get P/information P/that P/gave P/an P/idea P/of P/what P/a P/player's P/role P/does.

P/A P/town P/thief P/would P/get P/information P/that P/gave P/an P/idea P/of P/a P/player's P/alignment. P/I P/mean, P/town P/gets P/both, P/but P/since P/the P/point P/of P/the P/roles P/are P/a P/little P/different, P/the P/balance P/shifts P/whichever P/way.

When I robbed Iecerint, I stole a badge. I am assuming this means he is a cop.

P/A

P/mafia P/thief

P/would P/get P/information P/that P/gave P/an P/idea P/of P/what P/a P/player's P/role P/does.

P/A P/town P/thief P/would P/get P/information P/that P/gave P/an P/idea P/of P/a P/player's P/alignment. P/I P/mean, P/town P/gets P/both, P/but P/since P/the P/point P/of P/the P/roles P/are P/a P/little P/different, P/the P/balance P/shifts P/whichever P/way.

Iecy posted above statement during discussion Animal VS Pomy. Today, revealment Animal/ Rewqy getting information about ability. However, Iecy mentioned:

E/1. E/He E/is E/a E/Mafia E/Thief

E/or E/Thief

. E/Old E/news.

Italics interesting after looking above quoted messages.

Rewqy, Iecy evil players.

[ZazieR]

H/If H/he's H/scum, H/Deer's H/stolen H/stuff H/from H/Pome H/might H/have H/been H/embellished H/to H/make H/her H/a H/better H/lynch, H/anyway. H/That H/would H/also H/explain H/the H/disconnect H/between H/1 H/item H/found H/vs. H/4 H/for H/Pom H/vs. H/me.

ZazieR making different statement. According Iecy, Animal/ Rewqy Mafia Robber. Reason: Receiving information about ability.
However, Iecy never stating above reason after being questioned about Rewqy being scummy. ZazieR asking reason.

H/Also, H/yesterday H/I H/was H/giving H/Deer H/lots H/of H/benefit H/of H/the H/doubt H/because H/I H/thought H/I H/was H/insane H/and H/you H/were H/scum. H/So H/that H/colored H/my H/rhetoric.

U/I'd U/be U/pushing U/for U/your U/lynch (ZazieR) U/if U/not U/for U/something U/secret U/I U/noticed U/earlier. U/<_<

Meaning behind second message quoted?

@LLamora
Bussing possibility between Iecy, SViewpoint?
Also, LLamora asking Grimmy result evening 1. Iecy claiming Iecy received result (Targeting SViewpoint Evening 2 giving guilty result) after asking Grimmy.

[ZazieR]

ZazieR making different statement. According Iecy, Animal/ Rewqy Mafia Robber. Reason: Receiving information about ability.
However, Iecy never stating above reason after being questioned about Rewqy being scummy. ZazieR asking reason.

Again^^ Explain reason. Iecy avoiding.

Positive. Quoted message yesterday posted. However, Iecy thinking Iecy being insane, reason breadcrumbing?

Llamora going asking Grimmy. Result: Getting nothing --> Iecy very likely lying. Result: Getting information --> comparing gotten information abilities stated/ revealed.

[ZazieR]

I suppose I should start with the vote thing. Yes I have a doublevote

If I'm first

. That it became one when I ended up first actually surprised me. From the way the role was given to me I thought I would have to place the first vote not end up there.

However, Princess opposite evil player.

ZazieR asking reason Iecy never stated Rewqy being mafia robber today after Iecy stated mafia robber getting information about player ability. Instead, Iecy mentioned possibility Rewqy being either evil player, opposite evil player robber.
Interesting. Iecy using result coming Rewqy evil player (Iecy mentioned mafia robber getting information about player ability. Rewqy getting information about player ability. Therefore, Rewqy being mafia robber according Iecy)

M/No, M/I M/was M/breadcrumbing M/my M/result M/on M/you M/(Innocent). M/Even M/though M/I M/thought M/insanity M/was M/possible, M/I M/didn't M/want M/to M/interpret M/my M/result M/that M/way M/yet M/because M/the M/information M/came M/from M/another M/player M/I M/had M/thought M/was M/scummy.

H/Also, H/yesterday H/I H/was H/giving H/Deer H/lots H/of H/benefit H/of H/the H/doubt H/because H/I H/thought H/I H/was H/insane H/and H/you H/were H/scum. H/So H/that H/colored H/my H/rhetoric.

Anyway,

UNSENTENCE: Iecy SENTENCE: Rewqy

Iecy better, however ZazieR V/LA starting friday.

[ZazieR]

N/I'm N/happy N/that N/apparent N/inconsistency N/has N/been N/cleared N/up. N/BUT -- N/LL, N/who N/did N/you N/target N1? N/Z? N/Does N/that N/mean N/that N/you N/got N/the N/doctor N/result N/on N/SW, N/so N/you N/were N/redirected N/or N/something N/if N/she's N/town?

LLamora targeted Alien Evening 1.
LLamora targeted Princess Evening 2. StrangerC boom-boom Evening 2 --> LLamora cannot having received information about StrangerC

[ZazieR]

1. Dodging question (Again)
2. ZazieR making different statement. ZazieR stating Iecy using information received Rewqy, evil player according Iecy, defence purposes. Interesting.
3. ZazieR stating LLamora cannot having received information about StrangerC ability. Reason Iecy mentioning?

[ZazieR]

Grimmy, prodding Princess?

[ZazieR]

P/@ P/Z

P/Regardless P/of P/rewq's P/motives, P/his P/result P/is P/accurate. P/This P/is P/not P/surprising P/at P/all P/because P/we P/already P/knew P/he P/was P/a P/thief. P/I P/do P/not P/understand P/your P/POV. P/Should P/I P/"doubt" P/his P/finding P/that P/I'm P/a P/Cop P/because P/I P/don't P/trust P/him?

P/I P/meant P/to P/type P/"SW." P/My P/mistake. P/She P/claimed P/X, P/but P/LL P/found P/Y P/(doctor P/result).

Negative. Iecy stating Rewqy results confirming ability ('Defence') catching interest. Reason: Rewqy being mafia robber --> 'unconfirmed' officer Iecy. Result meaning nothing Rewqy Mafia robber, instead Rewqy opposite evil player.
Also, ZazieR needing connection between 'Dexter' --> Serial killer before looking into Hospital --> Mayor/Double voter.

[ZazieR]

Iecy: yes, The Locke targeted Zang N1. The Locke assumes that under normal conditions, The Locke receives results on the player he targets. The Locke believes that if Snow White is town, he must have been redirected, most likely by something Zazie did, as all the other roles are apparently accounted for. That could be one of Zazie's inventions or, if Zazie is lying, then Zazie has some kind of redirector role.

Impossible. ZazieR already explained LLamora cannot having received information about StrangerC ability Evening 2.
Also, LLamora wrongly assumed something. However, ZazieR thinking better explained different morning.

[ZazieR]

Are you asking who Dexter is? The Locke says Dexter is a serial killer, who usually sedates his victims using a syringe and then cuts them up into pieces.

ZazieR agreeing Hospital flavour interesting.

[ZazieR]

@Iecy
ZazieR statement:
-Iecy using Rewqy result 'confirming' Iecy role ability.
-According Iecy, Rewqy Mafia Robber
-Rewqy Mafia Robber confirms nothing regarding Iecy ability.

N/I N/think N/rewq N/is N/probably N/the N/way N/to N/go. N/Will N/vote N/later; N/I'm N/late N/for N/something.

Waiting

[ZazieR]

Bah, would be V/LA starting this friday, but I've got no internet at home anymore

So, V/LA from today till 8th August

[ZazieR]

U/Also, U/it U/looks U/like U/one U/of U/the U/scum U/is U/a U/mafia U/doctor U/-- U/it's U/either U/SW U/(and U/her U/role U/is U/total U/bull), U/or U/it's U/someone U/she U/was U/busdriven U/with. U/In U/the U/latter U/case, U/the U/remaining U/scum U/are U/the U/busdriver U/and U/the U/doctor. U/The U/only U/other U/possibility U/is U/that U/LL U/is U/scum U/and U/totally U/making U/up U/the U/result U/on U/SW.

Really Iecy? Iecy suspecting ZazieR? Iecy thinking ZazieR Mafia Inventor Doctor Godfather?

Y/Z Y/looks Y/like Y/possible Y/SV Y/scumfriend Y/on Y/the Y/basis Y/of Y/the Y/readthrough.

Reason?

[ZazieR]

ZazieR only showing according Iecy logic, ZazieR opposite evil player. Something ZazieR unexpected.
Anyway, ZazieR wanting knowing reason Iecy thinking about mafia doctor.

[ZazieR]

Zazie: The Locke wants to know if you gave your invention to Rewq

Positive.

if you still think Iecy is scum.

ZazieR confused. ZazieR needing checking something.

[ZazieR]

ZazieR thinking about Llamora ability.
ZazieR thinking Llamora getting different results/ insane. However, after looking previously written messages, Llamora stated:

The Mod has told The Locke that he would have discovered that Zang carries a carving knife and a syringe and spends his evenings watching Dexter.

Result being correct. Meaning something incorrect. Llamora, explanation?

[ZazieR]

V/LA till I don't know due to computer issues >.<

Yes, it finally broke down ._.

[ZazieR]

Here. Checking with the mod if I may continue.

[ZazieR]

Sentence Iecy

[ZazieR]

You are the last scum-jabroni, right? It's not Zazie?

>:]

[ZazieR]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sA-qw4Q2 ... re=related