role fishing
Fate, are you a Porkens alt? Fess up and stop ignoring me!
1) No you don't. We're not doing it.MMM wrote:Question time:
(Because waiting for RVS to end is really boring.)
1. Policy Lynching... need I say more?
2. Is set-up speculation scummy, even in a bastard game?
3. Lynch-all-Liars?
4. How well acquainted are you with the ME games/books?
I don't care so much about identifying yourselves. What I do care about is you guys keeping any differences of opinion in your QT. If you guys disagree on something, then arrive at a compromise before posting here. I take the word of hydras like any other player and inconsistency is going to result in your lynch.Kerristar wrote:The other half of this hydra is Kunkstar7. Do you guys wish for us to identify which one of the heads is posting, or does is not matter to you?
How do you know he's serious? You were definitely rolefishing. In fact, I don't see why people aren't wagoning you right now.CC wrote:What fishing? Fate already claimed quintuple voter. We know his role, so what is going to hurt town if we'll know if he's either Jacob, Legion, Thane or whoever else? Also, see below.
OMFG. What kind of setup is this that you think massclaim is helpful? LYNCHING NOA.CC wrote:Actually with this kind of setup, massclaim would be good here.
Or maybe the mod didn't give you fake claims...better figure out what NOT to claim before your turn comes!CC wrote:I'm interested in Fate's flavor role for the sake of my own curiosity as a ME fan.
You both agree with this?Kerristar wrote:@Cathart: Your logic behind the massclaim makes sense, I'm leaning towards supporting it. Is it both role and name claim or just one or the other?
This is a good point. I will support a Kerristar wagon as well. Also, their excuse making of being one head doesn't mean they shouldn't be posting.Limerick wrote:Truthfully, I think the fact that Kerristar agreed with Cathart in such a passive manner is more suspicious, to me anyway. End result is Kerristar supporting the massclaim without drawing a lot of the attention associated with actually initiating the idea.
So proposing something that greatly benefits the scum isn't scummy? That makes no sense.bv310 wrote:It just gives the scum a priority list of who to kill. Asking for it is not really scummy, since I don't see scum being dumb enough to try on D1.
You see a connection between all three of them?MMM wrote:He's expressing moderate suspicion of Kerristar and C.C, but isn't really confronting them. I sense a scum pairing.
Ok, so what massclaim did you support and what benefit would the town gain from that?Kerristar wrote:Our support of the massclaim depended on what it consisted of.
I don't think someone is town if they support my theories for what it's worth. At least not automatically. And I'm saying not Reck because right now he's playing to his town meta for the most part as far as I can see....which isn't exactly pro-town. Mind you, it's a fine line for him between town and scum, but I need more time to see if my initial read is correct and there are much better lynch choices today.Col wrote:Why not Reck? What did he did so pro-town? He's not very vocal, he's not scumhunting much, and he's not even supporting your 'ROAR, Col is scum!' theory.
This doesn't answer my question of why you thought this would be a benefit to the town...which is sort of the important part of all that. Also, Col. Cat's reasons for mass claim seemed to be more role based than name based, so I'm not sure why you were supportive.Kerristar wrote:We supported nameclaim in particular. Role stuffs. Kind of pointless now that everything was shot down and we'll probably have to claim. Thats why Limerickx is misguided. We wanted to see if the massclaim would contain a nameclaim, if not, it wasn't worth pursuing. So Limerickx was reading too much into that sentence.
Lyncher and Jester are scum roles if you want to get technical. Anyhow, why do you think Parama is a newbie? Do you consider yourself a newbie?MMM wrote:Parama: Frankly, the attack on Doombunny9 doesn't look like scum to me. Newbie town, yes. Lyncher, yes. Jester, maybe. But probably not scum.
Do you have any meta from completed games where you know his alignment? I don't see how "doing better" = town. He doesn't appear to be doing so well anyhow if you ask me.ani wrote:Parama is town - Doing much better than in [ongoing game]
Sigh. I actually just wanted a yes or no from you because I figured it might have been something related to this. I actually do not mind name claiming if this is the case.Kerristar wrote:For our role, it wouldn't be a bad idea. It is not something we demand, however.
At what point do you plan on deciding? We're four days from deadline, so optimally we'd need to have someone at L-1 in the next day or so to allow time for a claim and an assessment of it.Doombunny wrote:As I have said they are all about equal to me and I'll be waiting until I hear more from everyone until I make up my decision. If I had to choose right now however it would be the cols for reasons already stated.
Please don't answer this.doombunny wrote:The Col/Kerri-Can you go in depth about why you wanted nameclaims? This is a bastard mafia after all so names won't help us that much.
It doesn't have to delay anything actually. You only need to put it as a single line in your post. And even if you think the town has nothing to gain from it (which isn't true, I can think of a very good way the town could gain), what does it hurt the town to do it?MMM wrote:I am against a nameclaim, because it will serve only to delay scumhunting. As I've said, town has nothing to gain.
How many fucking times do I have to say it? My reason has nothing to do with names being related to alignments. Additionally, most mods aren't going to put characters with that direct of links to their roles. Doing so would be stupid and make your game very difficult for the scum.xREckx wrote:VPB, I don't know how familiar you are with the games, but nameclaiming would mean nothing about ALIGNMENT since all the good guys are potential bad guys, but it COULD mean something about roles. For example, if someone claimed to be one of the tech users like Legion, it might lend itself to a tracker-type role due to the flavor from the games moreso than someone like, say, Joker, who wouldn't really make sense as a tracker.
Doombunny wrote:The reason for the hammer is valid at least although still early.
Let me know when logic comes back to the game. Hey mod, can I chill with you in the laugh boat for awhile?doombunny in the same frakking post wrote:I am beginning to doubt that Ani is a vig due to her quick hammer
Could you elaborate on why you're trying to end the day as quick as possible?Kerristar wrote:Mod: I don't see why Doomsbunny's vote in Post #273 was invalid. There is little difference between it and xReck's vote in the following post, which was counted. Could you elaborate on why Doomsbunny's vote didn't count?
The difference being that the mod had already clarified votecount 2.1 was official and Kerristar tried to argue out of it and get the lynch.doombunny wrote:I have to side with Kerristar on this one. VP, by your reasoning, I could be labeled scum as well for telling the mod I was voting ani yet the reason I did tell the mod is because I am a rule abiding player. Kerri was just pointing out to the mod that something was wrong. I see nothing scummy about that.
Masons by definition are mod confirmed town. Even though Reck did not start off as a mason, the mod could have created a role where two players can learn each other's alignment via mod confirmation.Kerristar wrote:@ VP: Why are masons confirmed town? Reck didn't start out a mason, so it's plausible that Bvtown could've masonized Reckscum.
I have plenty of reasons to vote people. Furthermore, I suggest you actually read some of my town games if you are going to claim that vote hopping is scummy from me.doombunny wrote:Another thing I noticed about VP is that within the whole game, he has voted half the people (either alive or dead) and jumps around constantly, usually with little reason to do so.
Why post then? You could have just waited until today. Seems like the only reason you posted was because you wanted to make excuses after attention turned toward you.bv wrote:VP, I just got back from a 6-hour car ride and it was 11 pm on Monday night. Real content will be up by the same time tonight. That last post was mostly just me checking in.
How is it flimsy? My guess is that you didn't even bother to look. If I vote hop as town, then how the frak can you call it a scumtell on me? You're clearly grasping at straws and picked the wrong one.doombunny wrote:On the flip side, your defense to me ("But I vote hop when I'm town! Look at my meta!") is also very flimsy unless you had something else to defend yourself too (which you didn't).
Self-awareness or not, the point is that it IS something I do as town and therefore it is a null tell at best. Doombunny accusing me of being scum for it is ludicrous. Anyhow, I've wasted far too much time trying to explain this point. If it's not evident by now, I don't think people are going to understand.Col. Cat wrote:Self-awareness of your own mate makes any meta-defense a null, at least in my opinion. I mean, if you do something as town and something else as scum, and you REALIZE it, there's no problem with meta-manipulation the next time it comes handy.
This was never my reasoning. Not at all. Please explain how you are coming to that conclusion.Col. Cat wrote:'I'm doing this as a town all the time, so I'm obvtown, aye?' line of reasoning
Why did you say this?Reck wrote:my role is NOT bastard-friendly, if I'm understanding that terminology correctly.
What is your experience with luke and what prompted you to say this?Reck 149 wrote:PS, something's off about LPD.
Did this happen? I don't recall.Col. Cat wrote:Also, ani/DB pair is interesting, I'll have to take a look at it tomorrow.
Reck wrote:PS please don't vig bv310, he's town.
Why did bv go from "please don't kill he's town!" to "idk what my read on him is"?Reck wrote:I don't know. It's a hard read....<words>VP wrote: @Reck - what is your read on bv310 from your interactions? What kinds of things did you talk about in your QT?
Nah, that's why I quoted it for posterity. He just voted.Fate wrote:Did Luke say anything else in his"immadeadimmavote" post? Would be kind of unfair if other people got to see it >_>