Mini 968 - Bastard Mass Effect (Game Over)

[Parama]

vote: lukepukeduke

Policy lynching ftw.

[Parama]

1. Policy Lynching... need I say more?
I approve of a worthwhile policy lynch. Luke is one of those from my experience with him (Mafia 112 as well as plenty of games on Epicmafia)

2. Is set-up speculation scummy, even in a bastard game?
I dunno. Don't particularly care. It's more of a waste of time.

3. Lynch-all-Liars?
Considering that fits under "contradictions" in my book it's lynchable but the degree of relevancy should factor into that as well.

4. How well acquainted are you with the ME games/books?
About as little as possible (I know nothing ). Not that it should prevent me from playing a good game, since AFAIK I don't need to know anything about the theme ever to play mafia.

I'm too lazy to do much more right now, just got back from AP Phys. test and I have to write a paper due Wednesday. :/

[Parama]

By the way I do not support a massclaim.

[Parama]

Hmm. ITT Doombunny sounds like he has something to hide, and I don't particularly like that.

unvote, vote: Doombunny

[Parama]

@ Fate, Parama: What do you think of the players who support a massclaim?

They are being retarded and need to start scumhunting.

@ Parama: What has doombunny said that makes you think he has something to hide?

This in particular:

Also, I think we've established the fact that we're not going to massclaim so I see little reason to go on about it.

Seems like he a motive other than the town motive for not wanting a massclaim. This may be me reading into things too much but it makes sense to me at the very least.

Also, kunk isn't posting in another game as well so I don't think it's exclusively this game he's actively ignoring.

[Parama]

1. A scum motive ofc.

2. Okay, I missed Limerick's point on Kerri. xReck seems to have missed it too. And bv just looks like he's bandwagoning.

I like Limerick's point but I do not like the company the wagon has attracted :/

[Parama]

OK, first off, I'm not seeing how scum would be against a massclaim. Secondly, you imply that you know scum would be against a massclaim, which implies you know something we don't. Thirdly, why Doombunny9? Stating the obvious, that we're not going to massclaim, isn't scummy.

Strike three, buddy.

Unvote, vote: Parama

A little pressure never hurt anyone.

1. I don't know why scum would be against a massclaim either, but Doombunny seems to get really hung up on it.

2. ^^^

3. Doombunny because he seems to be overreacting to the massclaim suggestion a little much.

More votes on me would make me happy. It's a tradition, you see.

[Parama]

I know I am against a massclaim. The way he got hung up on the massclaim is just bothering me.

Yes I am against a massclaim. I stated this and moved on. Doombunny didn't move on.

[Parama]

Well Cathart's request for massclaim looks more like an "extreme moment of derpliness" more than an incredibly scummy thing FMPOV (I have a lot of these moments of derpliness).

I will admit that Limerick's point on Kerri is good. However I like my own theory better tbqh.

[Parama]

Lol Urban Dictionary. No.

[Parama]

Mmmk, you can continue to suspect that, since I know it's wrong. I'm more interested in lynch the scumz anyways. Not going to write an essay to defend myself from one vote.

[Parama]

So I'm scum by association then? 'tis what you're implying.

[Parama]

Nah, tbh he looks fairly town to me, but I'm good at being wrong too so :/

[Parama]

whoops, I got dyslexic for a moment, ignore that post

[Parama]

Looks like a missing

tag to me.

[Parama]

Here's more from me.

And nothing has changed about Doombunny being scum. I still like my vote, he has done nothing to convince me otherwise. He's letting MMM do the defending for him and then comes in with snide remarks after MMM's case. Also note the intent to follow what everyone else is proposing. Are you going to do any scumhunting yourself?

[Parama]

I can't explain my reasoning any more than I already have, guys. Stop asking for something I've already explained well.

[Parama]

Also,
"I also don't like Parama's ISO 10. I don't see a reason why townie would abstain from defending himself... "

So instead of scumhunting you'd prefer me to defend myself? Oh no, I don't particularly give a damn about defending myself. I have that feeling that I'm right, everyone else is wrong, and Doombunny's buddy is helping build the failure of a case against me.

[Parama]

I can't explain my reasoning any more than I already have, guys. Stop asking for something I've already explained well.

Then I must be blind, because I still don't see it.

Because I can totally explain a gut feeling in a way that everyone agrees with.
Oh wait.
I gave my reason - it was a feeling that he had something to hide. I gave the line that made me feel that way. Nobody else seems to get the same feeling, but I can't deny that I have it. So, I've explained it as best as I can. Whether you choose to agree with me or not is up to you.

Now can we please lynch Doombunny?

[Parama]

They get modkilled after a full game day, not a full IRL day.

I'm not saying that I don't have other scum reads, but more that I trust my gut feeling on Doom and I'm going to follow through with it.

Lovin' 106 though, that's very tempting. Contradictions are a good way to find scum.

MMM, I'm not Newbie. People just don't tend to follow my logic half the time even when it's dead-on (which it tends to be).

[Parama]

@ Parama: What are your other scum reads? Do you have any more points in your case against Doombunny9 besides the 'other motive against massclaim' theory?

There's scum in the lurker group for sure (bv, ani, luke) but I won't be able to tell which until they actually start posting. This is just a theory coming from experience.
Kerristar looks pretty scummy to me, for reasons pointed out that I don't feel like restating, namely the reaction to the massclaim suggestion as well as the contradiction you pointed out in 106.

But I still like my Doom vote the best. It's not that I don't understand the logic for a Kerri lynch - I just like my vote better.

[Parama]

Oh and for additional points on Doombunny see my post 81.

[Parama]

@ Parama: So, you think Doombunny9 is scum because of the 'ulterior motive' and... because I questioned your reasoning?

No, because of his ulterior motive that I get from his post as well as contradicting himself on a Limerick read.

Parama- Answer my question? How did you come up with this "Doom has something to hide" theory?

Gut feeling, like I said.

[Parama]

'tis what you said here

The only person I see with a reasonable point against us is Limerickx, although misguided.

Implies Limerickx is town.

I see scum hoping for a quick policy lynch on inactivity.

Implies Limerickx is scum.

[Parama]

whoops that is the wrong person
ffs I need to read better

[Parama]

post 81 I'm saying he's letting other people do the work for him and not doing any scumhunting of his own

plz ignore the fail of my previous 2 posts for I am a derp

[Parama]

Looks like a case of "vote doesn't logically follow the post" syndrome.

[Parama]

I've already explained my Doombunny case. I can't do anymore to convince you guys about it.

[Parama]

Still don't like Parama pretending he has a 'case' against DB. I have no idea why you're stubbornly sticking to an admitted 'gut feeling' to the extent you are.

I like my gut feelings.

[Parama]

I'm not newbie town, MMM. I just play differently than what most people on this site agree with.
Doombunny, I answered already, probably 5 times. It's a gut feeling. And I like my gut feelings.
I do not support any form of claiming, if you're wondering.

[Parama]

He actually weakened his case from 'ulterior motive' to 'gut instinct'.

I have a gut feel that he has an ulterior motive. I thought I made this clear.

[Parama]

@ Parama: Even if he does have an ulterior motive, how do you know it's a scummy one?

Ulterior motive implies not town <.<

[Parama]

They haven't come up with a good fakeclaim yet? (though mod provided them with one I'd think)

Now that I think about it it makes Doombunny more likely 3rd-party.

[Parama]

xReck, I have no clue what the votecount is and I'm not claiming until L-1.

[Parama]

Yeah I'm definitely not going to bother claiming at L-3.

[Parama]

Actually I shouldn't bother claiming at all. Something someone said earlier makes me feel my claim will get me lynched anyways.

[Parama]

by my claim I mean my role ofc

[Parama]

I'll claim jester if you want me to but that would be a lie

[Parama]

1 more vote until I don't claim!

[Parama]

Don't read Mafia 106 while you're at it, that game is embarrassing
Also my playstyle is not a sad thing.
ALSO META SUCKS.

[Parama]

By the way a comment I want to make:
People on this site think too rationally. You overthink everything and make stupid mistakes and miss stuff that the somewhat irrational people would never miss. That's why I don't bother to become more rational though I can be as rational as I want to be when I feel like it. Don't feel like being rational in a game where nobody else is being rational tbqh.

Now if you'll excuse me, I'm going back to not claiming.

[Parama]

Yay, now I don't get to claim!
Don't feel like claiming but I can say that if you don't lynch me Doombunny will die tonight.

[Parama]

there goes my unlynchable streak :/

[Parama]

I'm dead, and the answer is no

[Parama]

Also, bah, go town.
I'm leaving now.

[Parama]

since I'm dead, spoiling the surprise, Cathart is right about my role

[Parama]

Best setup.
I was wrongly lynched D1. There were 4 SKs on my wagon Also this is the only time I have been or ever will be lynched.

[Parama]

Question! Who was on what floor?