Mini 948 - Victorian Vampire - Game Over
- TheSkeward
-
TheSkeward Goon
- TheSkeward
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 156
- Joined: March 26, 2010
- TheSkeward
-
TheSkeward Goon
- TheSkeward
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 156
- Joined: March 26, 2010
- TheSkeward
-
TheSkeward Goon
- TheSkeward
- TheSkeward
-
TheSkeward
- TheSkeward
-
TheSkeward Goon
- TheSkeward
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 156
- Joined: March 26, 2010
If you believe that town won't hammer ooba, why are you voting him? Your stated vote is for pressure. If you believe that town won't hammer ooba, how is he under any pressure?JoshTheStampede wrote:Zang wrote:
Shouldn't that have been obvious in the first place?JoshTheStampede wrote:
No one is going to hammer him now that it's been made clear that we'll all assume the hammer is scum.Zang wrote:Can someone unvote ooba. I believe he is at L-1 which gives scum a chance to hammer. You started the bandwagon to start discussion and I believe that was accomplished.
Should have been, yes, but everyone declaring it outright took the chance of a overeager scum slip-up from "slim" to "none".
Not finding a town motivation here.- TheSkeward
-
TheSkeward Goon
- TheSkeward
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 156
- Joined: March 26, 2010
So you're fine leaving him at l-1 even believing that those who would hammer are scum, and you're not scumhunting at all, just waiting for something to ping your scumdar.JoshTheStampede wrote:
When he was at L-1 and before everyone talked about the hammer stuff, he was under pressure. Now, you're right, he isn't. My vote doesn't really need to be on him anymore.TheSkeward wrote:
If you believe that town won't hammer ooba, why are you voting him? Your stated vote is for pressure. If you believe that town won't hammer ooba, how is he under any pressure?JoshTheStampede wrote:Zang wrote:
Shouldn't that have been obvious in the first place?JoshTheStampede wrote:
No one is going to hammer him now that it's been made clear that we'll all assume the hammer is scum.Zang wrote:Can someone unvote ooba. I believe he is at L-1 which gives scum a chance to hammer. You started the bandwagon to start discussion and I believe that was accomplished.
Should have been, yes, but everyone declaring it outright took the chance of a overeager scum slip-up from "slim" to "none".
Not finding a town motivation here.
However, I don't generally unvote unless I am moving my vote somewhere else, though, or unless I think that having it there is detrimental somehow. So until someone else pings my scumdar I'll leave my vote where it is.
Unvote: Vote: JoshTheStampede
HEY EVERYONE: this is a much better wagon than ooba.- TheSkeward
-
TheSkeward Goon
- TheSkeward
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 156
- Joined: March 26, 2010
This is kind of 'damned if you do, damned if you don't', but it's still a valid point: newbie town would be more likely to freak out and say "everyone who's voting me is scum" then to say "yeah, you're all reasonable people with valid points against me except this one."JoshTheStampede wrote:As for my vote, the three people on my wagon had totally valid reasons to be there, though of course I think the reasons are incorrect.
<snip>
I know I'm going to get accused of OMGUS here, butunvote, vote cruelty. Please note that I don't have any problem with the other people on my wagon, and so this is not an OMGUS vote.- TheSkeward
-
TheSkeward Goon
- TheSkeward
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 156
- Joined: March 26, 2010
You don't sound like newbie town. Meaning you are likely to be either someone's alt or (much more likely) scum.JoshTheStampede wrote:
I'm not really sure if you meant this to mean that I don't sound like a newbie, or that I don't sound like town. Can you elaborate?TheSkeward wrote:
This is kind of 'damned if you do, damned if you don't', but it's still a valid point: newbie town would be more likely to freak out and say "everyone who's voting me is scum" then to say "yeah, you're all reasonable people with valid points against me except this one."JoshTheStampede wrote:As for my vote, the three people on my wagon had totally valid reasons to be there, though of course I think the reasons are incorrect.
<snip>
I know I'm going to get accused of OMGUS here, butunvote, vote cruelty. Please note that I don't have any problem with the other people on my wagon, and so this is not an OMGUS vote.- TheSkeward
-
TheSkeward Goon
- TheSkeward
- TheSkeward
-
TheSkeward
- TheSkeward
-
TheSkeward Goon
- TheSkeward
- TheSkeward
-
TheSkeward
- TheSkeward
-
TheSkeward Goon
- TheSkeward
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 156
- Joined: March 26, 2010
- TheSkeward
-
TheSkeward Goon
- TheSkeward
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 156
- Joined: March 26, 2010
Apologies for my absence. If you'll check, it was a sitewide absence, extending to my other games and to GD/MD. My computer died, which makes me very sad. I'm posting from a public computer right now, and am endeavouring to get a more permanent setup as soon as possible.
mmm... cruelty, I think. Or one of the lurkers.ooba wrote:TheSkeward, if the town is unwilling to lynch Josh today, who would be next on your list.
I dislike lurkers, and I think they're a good early lynch. My own play has not been lurking. You could call it active-lurking. I haven't posted in the last couple of days; see above.MagnaofIllusion wrote:What are your thoughts on Ooba’s gambit? On Darox’s love of active lurking. On the fact that you, easjo and CryMe are just plain lurking.
I don't think Darox is active-lurking. His posts are short and frequent, yes, but they almost always come with content. His "active-lurking is fun" post struck me as sarcasm then and still now.
Ooba's gambit was fine. WIFOM, but I think it's more likely to come from town than scum. That and the way he asks questions make me think he's town.- TheSkeward
-
TheSkeward Goon
- TheSkeward
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 156
- Joined: March 26, 2010
Miller Vig made me smile. I wonder what a weak vigilante is. The only other reference I can find to it are some variants in the Best Role Ideas thread - http://mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.ph ... 5fb93e9dc4 - but none of these seem particularly relevant.
We're off to a good start; let's lynch some more scum.
Vote: Nobody Special- TheSkeward
-
TheSkeward
- TheSkeward
-
TheSkeward Goon
- TheSkeward
- TheSkeward
-
TheSkeward Goon
- TheSkeward
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 156
- Joined: March 26, 2010
- TheSkeward
-
TheSkeward Goon
- TheSkeward
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 156
- Joined: March 26, 2010
- TheSkeward
-
TheSkeward Goon
- TheSkeward
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 156
- Joined: March 26, 2010
- TheSkeward
-
TheSkeward Goon
- TheSkeward
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 156
- Joined: March 26, 2010
- TheSkeward
-
TheSkeward Goon
- TheSkeward
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 156
- Joined: March 26, 2010
Nobody SpecialDarox wrote:Got any reasons/post #'s/vague gut feelings to back that up?
I'm kind of neutral to NS right now.
Doesn't like Darox's nameclaim.
"Very skeptical of Josh". No given reason. At this point Josh is obv the D1 lynch.
Says SpryeX is "less jovial, less outspoken" than usual.
Is way, way too ready to lynch Josh, for "purposely misinterpreting things" - his example is the slippery slope debate. Concludes with "Please, get lynched. Vote: Josh. Still on Page 7. Still reading. Still happy with a Josh lynch."
When SpryeX (not harshly at all, complete with a wink smiley face) responds to his comments, he says "Just observing, sheesh. Don't get your panties in a bunch. Have NONE of you on this whole fucking board EVER heard of '"hyperbole?'"
D2, he votes a lurker. Laughably, he also says "I also have some suspicions about Darox (admitted active lurking, distancing from Josh)"
When Darox pressures CMAR, he says to CMAR, "So, what you'rereallysaying is that your target ceased to be a target, and, for whatever reason, you declined to even look for another target. Gotcha."
In essence: he seems to think everyone is scum. As soon as anyone is under any kind of pressure at all, he jumps onto them as though he's always been there. Furthermore, whenever he perceives any kind of pressure on himself (above, in the response to Darox, and also in the back-and-forths with CMAR), he responds with venomous ad-hom.
I'm definitely happy with a CMAR lynch. I'm fairly sure one is scum, and it's possible both are scum, and I don't see the other contributing positively to the game anyway. But I think NS is more likely to be scum, and CMAR's more likely to be just stupid.- TheSkeward
-
TheSkeward Goon
- TheSkeward
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 156
- Joined: March 26, 2010
- TheSkeward
-
TheSkeward
- TheSkeward
-
TheSkeward Goon
- TheSkeward
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 156
- Joined: March 26, 2010
- TheSkeward
-
TheSkeward Goon
- TheSkeward
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 156
- Joined: March 26, 2010
You just don't have my animal magnetism.CryMeARiver wrote:
Seriously though, you pretty much posted what I did.TheSkeward wrote:CryMeARiver wrote:
I am stunned. He virtually posted the same thing I posted.Darox wrote:That's pretty convincing. Yeah, I could go for a NS lynch over CMAR.
Let's get the ball rolling.
Vote: Nobody Special
*crawls off to his room*- TheSkeward
-
TheSkeward
- TheSkeward
-
TheSkeward Goon
- TheSkeward
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 156
- Joined: March 26, 2010
- TheSkeward
-
TheSkeward
- TheSkeward
-
TheSkeward Goon
- TheSkeward
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 156
- Joined: March 26, 2010
- TheSkeward
-
TheSkeward Goon
- TheSkeward
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 156
- Joined: March 26, 2010
- TheSkeward
-
TheSkeward Goon
- TheSkeward
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 156
- Joined: March 26, 2010
- TheSkeward
-
TheSkeward Goon
- TheSkeward
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 156
- Joined: March 26, 2010
I appreciate his support and I'm glad we appear to be thinking along the same wavelengths (I've gotten that feeling since the game began). At the same time, I'm unsure of his alignment and don't trust him more than anyone else (besides those I think are scum, namely CMAR and NS).SpyreX wrote:Maybe the new blood will interject some life. That'd be nice.
I'm now fairly confident that Darox and TheSkeward aren't scum together though - that whole "SpyreX, this is obviously what he meant." and then TS coming in and saying he was wrong sure doesn't click for a scum team.
TS: Thoughts on Darox answering for you?
Unvote; Vote: CryMeARiver
Yeah, yeah, flipflopping, votehopping, wagonstopping. The reasons for this are twofold.
1) Nobody Special actually wasn't voting CMAR. Part of the reason I find NS scum is his opportunism, but discovering that it goes as far as comments and not as far as votes makes him less scummy.
2) CMAR and I had an exchange after I convinced Darox to switch over, where he went from hostile to buddyish, as I made a couple of jokes (posted his avatar, and commented that he was missing my animal magnetism). Since then, he's stopped attacking me. Although I won't claim that judging his reaction was all part of my master plan, the way he changed behavior so quickly definitely rang my bells. It could be town gratitude, but I'm not convinced.
Neither of these on their own would get me to switch back, but both together will. Note that I'm still fine with a NS lynch.- TheSkeward
-
TheSkeward Goon
- TheSkeward
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 156
- Joined: March 26, 2010
- TheSkeward
-
TheSkeward Goon
- TheSkeward
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 156
- Joined: March 26, 2010
- TheSkeward
-
TheSkeward Goon
- TheSkeward
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 156
- Joined: March 26, 2010
VV: I'm talking about "your" parroting accusation. CMAR's case against Slaine/NS and my case against NS are two completely different animals. The only person who thinks they're the same thing is CMAR, and now, since he told you, you. CMAR attacks a bunch of different things that aren't scumtells, some that are, and some that would be except he had to twist words to get there. His case isn't particularly convincing. My case is focused on two specific points (NS seems to think everyone is scum, and NS reacts with vicious adhom when he feels threatened), one of which CMAR didn't even mention. We both have multiple quotes in our cases - we only quote the same post once.
That's why I was so dismissive when CMAR accused me of parroting the first time; because it's clearly untrue, and any townie with half a brain can see that. So why, other than CMAR told you to, did you call my case parroting when clearly it's not?- TheSkeward
-
TheSkeward Goon
- TheSkeward
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 156
- Joined: March 26, 2010
- TheSkeward
-
TheSkeward Goon
- TheSkeward
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 156
- Joined: March 26, 2010
- TheSkeward
-
TheSkeward Goon
- TheSkeward
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 156
- Joined: March 26, 2010
Alright, that's six of us. That's plenty. We'll go popcorn style (each person who claims chooses the next person). Remember that scum lose an advantage if they have to claim before town, so try to pick the remaining person you think is most likely to be scum.
Rolling for who claims first.
1 = Zang
2 = cruelty
3 = TheSkeward
4 = SpyreX
5 = MagnaofIllusion
6 = Darox
7 = Ooba
Original Roll String: 1d71 7-Sided Dice: (1) = 1- TheSkeward
-
TheSkeward
- TheSkeward
-
TheSkeward Goon
- TheSkeward
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 156
- Joined: March 26, 2010
ElectricBadger wrote:Welcome to Victorian Vampire! I suggest you add the topic to your Watch list and read over the rules.
You are Russ the Executioner. Your reputation is too daunting for even the most wicked to trespass against you; at night you may block the path of someone else, preventing them from any action. You win withtown.
Please reply to this message with the name of your role to confirm that you have read the rules. Good luck!TheSkeward wrote:Russ the Executioneroleblocker. Going to go read the rules now.TheSkeward wrote:To confirm, you say wecanquote private communication from the mod?ElectricBadger wrote:yesTheSkeward wrote:And what's the spirits of the void / diary of the damned?ElectricBadger wrote:The dead/Links to lynchesElectricBadger wrote:Just a day left to send in your night actionTheSkeward wrote:Block: DaroxElectricBadger wrote:
Confirmed, thank yaTheSkeward wrote:Block: DaroxElectricBadger wrote:
You succeeded with your actionTheSkeward wrote:Block: DaroxTheSkeward wrote:Where's the game?
Edit: Never mind. Issue resolved. See the thread where people go to bitch about the site (not GD, I said the thread) to see what I meant.TheSkeward wrote:I target Nobody Special.ElectricBadger wrote:Alrighty, thanks for letting me know!
Just leaves SpryeX.ElectricBadger wrote:
Your attempt fails.TheSkeward wrote:I target Nobody Special.- TheSkeward
-
TheSkeward Goon
- TheSkeward
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 156
- Joined: March 26, 2010
I think that each weak vig should kill whoever he thinks is scum out of the pool of weak vigs, since I agree that four is unlikely. I'm against lynching any of them today.
To MoI, I'm voting Darox because my opinion of him depended largely on NS/CMAR flips. The post you pointed out where I said we were thinking on the same wavelength? Read it again. I said we appeared to be thinking on the same wavelength, and I appreciated that, but I didn't have a townread on him. That was all in the same sentence, explained quite concisely. I don't know how you possibly could have interpreted that in any other way.
Preview Edit: HOLD IT RIGHT FUCKING THERE. Cruelty got a guilty on Yosarian2. Yosarian2 was a weak vig/miller, and unless I'm mistaken, he didn't know he was a miller. That point is critical to this throught process, so point it out somewhere if there's information to the contrary.
AND YET, he got an INNOCENT on SpryeX, another claimed weak vig. I find it extremely likely that all the Angry Mob are millers.
Option 1) Cruelty's scum. He claimed cop with innocent on a player who'd not yet claimed. This would have been a pretty dumb move, and anyway I have a townread on cruelty. Also, (modWIFOMspeculationyaddayaddayadda) why bother including millers with no cop? Unlikely.
Option 2) SpryeX is scum. He claimed Angry Mob at the last minute because it felt like a good fakeclaim. The innocent on him means he's a Godfather. Likely.
Option 3) Neither are scum, but cruelty lied about his results or EB made at least one of the Angry Mob a miller and at least one not a miller. Unlikely.
Option 4) Both are scum. This again means that there are millers with the only (possible) investigative role a mafia. That would be interesting with the traitor - they could be looking for their traitor and have four weak vig/millers to fuck them up. Makes the mafia pretty powerful, though. It means that there wasn't sufficient cooperation between scum when making claims, since cruelty declared an innocent on his scumbuddy who went on to claim a role that's almost certainly a miller. Possible.
Unvote; Vote SpryeX- TheSkeward
-
TheSkeward Goon
- TheSkeward
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 156
- Joined: March 26, 2010
Zang, I don't think you understand the concept of a preview edit. You see, there's a preview button. When you're previewing, you can still edit. So if you say Preview Edit: whatever, it means you hit preview, then added 'whatever' to your post.[/teach]
I left the earlier point in rather than rewriting my post because I had to go get my student ID card and my friend was bitching at me to hurry up. It also allows you to see my train of thoughts.
To me, this is completely obvious. I'm pretty sure "Preview Edit: HOLD UP A FUCKING MINUTE" pretty clearly explains that this part of the post is in disagreement with the previous because I've changed my mind after just realizing something. Zang's just stupid. SpryeX is attacking it because he's scum and hoping someone will jump on it.
So SpryeX, out of the four options, which do you think is true and why?- TheSkeward
-
TheSkeward Goon
- TheSkeward
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 156
- Joined: March 26, 2010
- TheSkeward
-
TheSkeward Goon
- TheSkeward
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 156
- Joined: March 26, 2010
It appears that SpryeX hasn't even read the post he's attacking. He just takes a few points and attempts to scream loud enough to drown it out. We'll deal with this bit by bit.
1) All the options I present require one of cruelty/SpryeX to be scum or cruelty to be lying as town.
False. I clearly present one of the options as "neither is scum. either cruelty is lying as town or not all of the weak vigs are millers."
2) I changed my mind within the course of a post.
True. SpryeX has yet to show how changing my mind based on a new realization is scummy.
3) It is unlikely that there is both a godfather and three millers.
Opinion. SpryeX has yet to show why my belief is scummy.
In conclusion, SpryeX' accusation of me seems to be complete OMGUS. I noticed this behavior with Josh, but Josh was scum. I was fairly sure of it D1, which meant (I thought at the time) SpryeX must be town. Day 2 I gave him a pass because the lynch was going to be one of the VIs. Day 3 Darox was scummier (until SpryeX started OMGUSsing me), but I'd be a fool to lynch based on my reads instead of role information as relevant as the results of a cop investigation, and SpryeX' reaction was hostile and accusatory despite having no real points against me (unless you count "I disagree").- TheSkeward
-
TheSkeward Goon
- TheSkeward
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 156
- Joined: March 26, 2010
- TheSkeward
-
TheSkeward Goon
- TheSkeward
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 156
- Joined: March 26, 2010
Goddamn, cruelty, did *you* read it?
More importantly, can you explain to me why it's scummy to change your mind over the course of a post because you had a sudden realization?The point where I pretty fucking obviously changed my mind wrote:Preview Edit: HOLD IT RIGHT FUCKING THERE. Cruelty got a guilty on Yosarian2. Yosarian2 was a weak vig/miller, and unless I'm mistaken, he didn't know he was a miller.- TheSkeward
-
TheSkeward Goon
- TheSkeward
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 156
- Joined: March 26, 2010
- TheSkeward
-
TheSkeward Goon
- TheSkeward
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 156
- Joined: March 26, 2010
- TheSkeward
-
TheSkeward Goon
- TheSkeward
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 156
- Joined: March 26, 2010
- TheSkeward
-
TheSkeward Goon
- TheSkeward
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 156
- Joined: March 26, 2010
- TheSkeward
-
TheSkeward Goon
- TheSkeward
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 156
- Joined: March 26, 2010
I fucking wrote:It looks like town is determined to mislynch today. You guys had better fucking lynch SpryeX tomorrow. Don't let him slip out of it.I fucking wrote:It looks like town is determined to mislynch today. You guys had better fucking lynch SpryeX tomorrow. Don't let him slip out of it.I fucking wrote:It looks like town is determined to mislynch today. You guys had better fucking lynch SpryeX tomorrow. Don't let him slip out of it.I fucking wrote:It looks like town is determined to mislynch today. You guys had better fucking lynch SpryeX tomorrow. Don't let him slip out of it.I fucking wrote:It looks like town is determined to mislynch today. You guys had better fucking lynch SpryeX tomorrow. Don't let him slip out of it.I fucking wrote:It looks like town is determined to mislynch today. You guys had better fucking lynch SpryeX tomorrow. Don't let him slip out of it.I fucking wrote:It looks like town is determined to mislynch today. You guys had better fucking lynch SpryeX tomorrow. Don't let him slip out of it.I fucking wrote:It looks like town is determined to mislynch today. You guys had better fucking lynch SpryeX tomorrow. Don't let him slip out of it.I fucking wrote:It looks like town is determined to mislynch today. You guys had better fucking lynch SpryeX tomorrow. Don't let him slip out of it.I fucking wrote:It looks like town is determined to mislynch today. You guys had better fucking lynch SpryeX tomorrow. Don't let him slip out of it.I fucking wrote:It looks like town is determined to mislynch today. You guys had better fucking lynch SpryeX tomorrow. Don't let him slip out of it.
ARARADGAGHHGHA;LEJFI;OAJFOSD;VIJAEJNFI;NEZ;ISFNIO;AENF INCOHERENT RAGE HE WAS SO OBVIOUS ZANG MAGNA DAROX WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOUI fucking wrote:It looks like town is determined to mislynch today. You guys had better fucking lynch SpryeX tomorrow. Don't let him slip out of it.- TheSkeward
-
TheSkeward Goon
- TheSkeward
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 156
- Joined: March 26, 2010
- TheSkeward
-
TheSkeward Goon
- TheSkeward
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 156
- Joined: March 26, 2010
- TheSkeward
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
- TheSkeward
- TheSkeward
- TheSkeward
- TheSkeward
- TheSkeward
- TheSkeward
- TheSkeward
- TheSkeward
- TheSkeward
- TheSkeward
- TheSkeward
- TheSkeward
- TheSkeward
- TheSkeward
- TheSkeward
- TheSkeward
- TheSkeward
- TheSkeward
- TheSkeward
- TheSkeward
- TheSkeward
- TheSkeward
- TheSkeward
- TheSkeward
- TheSkeward
- TheSkeward
- TheSkeward
- TheSkeward
- TheSkeward
- TheSkeward
- TheSkeward
- TheSkeward
- TheSkeward
- TheSkeward
- TheSkeward
- TheSkeward
- TheSkeward
- TheSkeward
- TheSkeward
- TheSkeward
- TheSkeward