Karma Mafia (Game Over!)

[Sando]

I think its pretty clear that you think overreaction is a scumtell while I dont think it is.

So I'll ask again, is there any response to a vote(s) that you think is a scumtell?

[Anon]

Ok Saying somt=ething stupid is a bit undescriptive. You said something that is a stupid thing to say when thying to place a vote. It makes your vote seem like it is based off a whim which is unacceptable anywhere other than RVS.

Except I used it to decide my vote between three players I suspected not some RVS crap vote.

Are you like reading?

[farside22]

@Anon

EBWOP:

Well part of my "tantrum" is reaction testing, and part of it is a little frustration. C'mon, you really can't empathise with being panicked and frustrated when 1 person votes you three times?

This is just more bs. I have papa zito trying to push my buttons so many times I lost count. It's meant to get a reaction and if all your going to do is piss and moan and act like a baby because you can't handle pressure, questions or answer things in a reasonable way I don't see changing my vote.

Obviously this answers the question that Anon didn't read my reason's for voting Richard in the first place which leads me to keep my vote on Anon.

[farside22]

Do you disagree with my thought on what town tends to do?

Yes, town tends to push for reactions, thats pure scumhunting, but that doesnt mean that all people pushing for reactions are town.

Wow nice fence sitting you have going on there. I so love it.

[Anon]

The other question Anon missed

Did you even read my reason's for finding his behavoir scummy based on the actions so far?

Yes I talked about them in a previous post:

To reinforce my position lets analyse the reasons farside used to vote him.

Richard being obsessed with CKD's vote on him is ridiculous. It's one vote. I detect panic in Richards post.

Yeah its one vote. But it was not a normal one vote. As I said, CKD voted him three times, in a serious way, with zero ingame argumentation. Of course people is going to be obsessed with someone voting him like that.

[Espeonage]

But why can't you come to a decision on your own over which of the three deserves your vote instead of just going for the one with the biggest wagon.

And no you're right. i'm actually reading instead.

[Papa Zito]

I have strep and need to log off but this game is cooking right now.

@ Anon:

"wagon powers activate"

is a stupid thing to say. We were finished with rvs.

Anonymous lives for lulz.

What did Zito do to you?

I pushed a farside wagon for no real reason. See bottom of page 1 and on.

Prolly picked the wrong target but I haven't played with farside before so eh.

[Anon]

I think its pretty clear that you think overreaction is a scumtell while I dont think it is.

So I'll ask again, is there any response to a vote(s) that you think is a scumtell?

A defined response, no.

As I said, Ive seen townies overreact. Ive seen scumbags not overreact. So overreaction in my book, specially in newbies, is a nulltell.

[Anon]

But why can't you come to a decision on your own over which of the three deserves your vote instead of just going for the one with the biggest wagon.

And no you're right. i'm actually reading instead.

No once again you are not reading:

In the same post:

I cant decide which of the voters is the most scummy. All three have some bad flavor attached.

A more deep reread in iso will give me more light about these three.

So?

[farside22]

The other question Anon missed

Did you even read my reason's for finding his behavoir scummy based on the actions so far?

Yes I talked about them in a previous post:

To reinforce my position lets analyse the reasons farside used to vote him.

Richard being obsessed with CKD's vote on him is ridiculous. It's one vote. I detect panic in Richards post.

Yeah its one vote. But it was not a normal one vote. As I said, CKD voted him three times, in a serious way, with zero ingame argumentation. Of course people is going to be obsessed with someone voting him like that.

That is the tip of my reasoning. I had more reason's on top of that I expanded on as show above. You neglect those or did you just chose not to read?

[Anon]

Do you disagree with my thought on what town tends to do?

Yes, town tends to push for reactions, thats pure scumhunting, but that doesnt mean that all people pushing for reactions are town.

Wow nice fence sitting you have going on there. I so love it.

Its not fence sitting. Its stating the truth. In a wagon, there are always two type of people: townies scumhunting and scumbags pretending to be townies scumhunting.

At this precise moment, Im trying to find out which one you belong to.

[farside22]

Do you disagree with my thought on what town tends to do?

Yes, town tends to push for reactions, thats pure scumhunting, but that doesnt mean that all people pushing for reactions are town.

Wow nice fence sitting you have going on there. I so love it.

Its not fence sitting. Its stating the truth. In a wagon, there are always two type of people: townies scumhunting and scumbags pretending to be townies scumhunting.

At this precise moment, Im trying to find out which one you belong to.

What do you see more often in games as far as players pushing for reaction, scum or town?

[Espeonage]

But why can't you come to a decision on your own over which of the three deserves your vote instead of just going for the one with the biggest wagon.

And no you're right. i'm actually reading instead.

No once again you are not reading:

In the same post:

I cant decide which of the voters is the most scummy. All three have some bad flavor attached.

A more deep reread in iso will give me more light about these three.

So?

So do the read before making a vote.

[Papa Zito]

And Patrick was doing so well with the votecounts too.

farside, I got lost in the machinegun fire. Can you consolidate your Anon case in one post?

[Anon]

Do you disagree with my thought on what town tends to do?

Yes, town tends to push for reactions, thats pure scumhunting, but that doesnt mean that all people pushing for reactions are town.

Wow nice fence sitting you have going on there. I so love it.

Its not fence sitting. Its stating the truth. In a wagon, there are always two type of people: townies scumhunting and scumbags pretending to be townies scumhunting.

At this precise moment, Im trying to find out which one you belong to.

What do you see more often in games as far as players pushing for reaction, scum or town?

Both. Pushing for reactions its easy to fake.

Look, farside, Im asking questions and pushing you to get reactions from you. Does that mean Im town? Should I think you are town for doing the same thing?

[Anon]

But why can't you come to a decision on your own over which of the three deserves your vote instead of just going for the one with the biggest wagon.

And no you're right. i'm actually reading instead.

No once again you are not reading:

In the same post:

I cant decide which of the voters is the most scummy. All three have some bad flavor attached.

A more deep reread in iso will give me more light about these three.

So?

So do the read before making a vote.

Ill do the read whenever I fell motivated to.

My problem is why are you voting me for that?

[Anon]

And Patrick was doing so well with the votecounts too.

farside, I got lost in the machinegun fire.

Its probably me.

Logging off before one of my three new friends posts and I feel the urge to answer.

[Sando]

Look, farside, Im asking questions and pushing you to get reactions from you. Does that mean Im town? Should I think you are town for doing the same thing?

Why are you voting him?

[farside22]

@Papa Zito
Anon not reading the reason's for my case on richard and his vote.
His reason's on voting me here Don't explain anything. Thinks those pushing richard are scummy but his vote happens to be on me who has the biggest bw.
Misrepresting my post here

It's almost obvious he hasn't read the game and make a weak case on those pushing on richards wagon without looking at the facts in the game. Keeps giving Richard a newb excuse when Richard has been here only 2 months less then him. (no I don't see a big difference there)

I also waiting to see how he answers my next question but that's a fence-sitting comments.

Look, farside, Im asking questions and pushing you to get reactions from you. Does that mean Im town? Should I think you are town for doing the same thing?

Look above to your answer Anon
Should I throw a fit now, not answer questions and tell everyone to vote me now? Would that make me more town?

[farside22]

When you get back Anon I want links to games you saw scum do what your claiming there.

[Papa Zito]

Arrite, thanks farside.

[Espeonage]

Anon. It is a simple chioce between a couple of people. There are better ways to choose other than jumping on the biggest wagon.

[farside22]

Come on, let's just lynch whoever the fuck ever, I don't care about Day 1.

This is really a bad comment coming from ABR. Seriously if you don't like day 1 don't play and become a replacement player then.

fos: ABR

[Jahudo]

@Seraphim: How is my DocPotter suspicion invalid? I also don't see how I'm focusing solely on lurkers. I thought I was waiting for Richard's defense.

And I still want Richard to explain his gambit more. It would be scummy if he retroactively decided he was acting up for reactions, just to get pressure off him instead of going the town route and moving forward with town play.

Papa Zito is vig

Holy rolefishing, Batman!

Seriously, what possible benefit is there to announcing it? If he is, then now he's been outed. If he isn't, then odds are he'll be NK'd and we lose a valuable townie.

bv310, have you seen anything in Zito's game to make you wonder if he was a vig? It doesn't feel like rolefishing to me if the original player is initiating the speculation that way. Espe's post is fluff though.

[bv310]

I only saw that one thing, which was how I breadcrumbed vig in a different game (offsite). That's why I was worried when someone flat called him it.

Jahudo, I'm pretty sure he just made up the reaction fishing thing afterwards.