He knows why. (Hint: It involves a hummingbird, a dictionary, and three mangoes.)
In other news: I predict RayFrost will not make a single post to this thread.
I was sure you wouldn't show up here.... and youRayFrost wrote:Umm... and that's scummy... how?Nobody Special wrote:Not sure how much I can explain this, but:You posted here.That's non-lurking. I can't get any more basic than that.
And what did you mean by breaking your mind?
I wobble between the two, honestly.Thor665 wrote:Ah, Ythan, either a very clever and sarcastic wit - or a wonderful punching bag of obtuseness. Take your pick.Ythan wrote:I'm torn between agreeing and wanting to say so and not wanting to make another post.
You have NO IDEA.TheCheshireCat wrote:Lol this is gonna be a long game
The irony! It BURNS!!Ythan wrote:I find that it will be much less aggravating if a few players don't waste every other post talking about spam.
TBH, I'm waiting for the Ythan furor to die down and for someone to start looking scummy. And I won't vote for someone who has neither confirmed nor posted.Thor665 wrote:@Nobody Special - you just unvoted RayFrost and didn't re-vote anyone. I can understand if you feel your RVS was answered in such a way as to remove whatever guilt you seriously or jokingly thought had been detected but...what do you see as your reason for removing your vote altogether? Is no one else looking suspicious to you in any way shape or form?
Ythan is a moutermouth.
SFG just voted a lurker
I am too handsome for my own good
and Scrambles just voted Ythan whislt claiming a slight mix of OMGUS and policy lynch
Nothing worth having a vote out there for you?
Oh, that reminds me;
Unvote: SFG
Vote: ScramblesTheDeathDealer
I participate (begrudgingly) in the RVS because it's expected. I despise it, personally; I'd rather go with RQS (but I'm too lazy to start). Therefore, my answer to your question is neither yes nor no.Thor665 wrote:Why did you random vote then? Do you feel putting out a random vote helps find scummy behavior?Nobody Special wrote:TBH, I'm waiting for the Ythan furor to die down and for someone to start looking scummy. And I won't vote for someone who has neither confirmed nor posted.
If yes, why not put out a second vote?
If no, why put out the first vote?
I tend to spar with him a bit, then just try to walk away. He makes it supremely difficult to get a meta read on him, though.Inquisitor JL wrote:@Nobody Special - if you don't think Ythan cares about what people think of what he does, then we aren't gonna change it. Depending on how you see it it's either an imparement to deal with or a boon in disguise. Maybe a more thorough explanation of why you find the way he is posting (I believe the example you used was a case of him quoting me with no addition to it) could cause problems?
This explainsRayFrost wrote:Cuz I'm 15. :/
It's simple: Ray claims to be breaking his meta; I'd bet anything that's just a ruse and he's scum.Sotty7 wrote:As far as the major wagons go I prefer a Ray vote over a Ythan vote, but Thor's case does give me something to chew on. I want Ray to give some content and explain why he is breaking his meta in this game and why he even felt the need to to mention this in the first place.
I refuse to subject myself to your form of play any further.Ythan wrote:Probably too much to hope for him to actually explain his sudden need of replacement.
In eight minutes??chihuahua0 wrote:I read the rest of it.