bv310
No Q from Cobalt
3) Why is TheInquisition scummy and who are your top scum candidates?
4)Why did you vote for The Inquisition?
5) Can you give us a quick summery of what you think of all the players int his game so far?
6) If everyone in the town disagreed with you about the person you found scummiest, would you still pursue them?
7) Do you really think I would give you anything close to a full anwser to your question? And to the latter 3, why repeat a question that has already been asked?
9) What the heck does “niggle” mean, and why would you even use such a word?
10) Why did you vote for The Inquisition? Did you feel that he was scummy enough to merit a bandwagon? Why?
11) During the first Question, Answer and Voting stage,whose actions did you find scummy and why?
12) Do you think that if Ellibereth continues his policy of avoiding actually answering questions (please reread his responses) that we'll ever be able to get a good read on him outside of vote analysis (assuming he actually makes a vote)?
3. TheInquisition asked question that were either role fishing, policy lynching and a question that gives no feed back.
In short I based my vote on the type of questions that were asked. They were anti-town/scummy.
4. see #3 and #5
5. summary of players
bv310: Not much here. Asked only one person a question. The answer to do you have the same alignment as me is very suspect.
he's a very under the radar player from what I know.
Cobalt: Ask a question that was pointless. I don't understand why he would ask a question he wouldn't learn anything from.
He also goes on Doombunny's answer but not on BV for his answer to the question.
bv said:
I believe so, but again the WIFOM
doombunny said:
As far as you know: Yes. Don't know how this will help anyone though
Not really that much of a difference. One says WIFOM he's saying he doesn't know how it helps
doom says as for as he knows bv says I believe so.
difference?
I don't find anything town in regards to cobolt, his question or his attack on boom over bv.
Colbalt is tunneling on doom and I can't see why. leaning scum
CMAR did what theinquister did where he ask a few questions that look to be role fishing. Asking players about their strategy as a PR looks scummy
reading CMAR answers to the questions looks good. I think he is just someone I would keep my eye on for role fishing questions
I really like DDD's questions. They are thoughtful. I feel they are agressive and iquiring. Asked a few questions that were already asked/
So far I have a town read on DDD
doombunny asking trivia questions doesn't serve a purpose. Even with him stating confusion on the game why would trivia questions be a viable thing to do in this game?
At least his follow up questions are good but still feel his initial trivia questions pointless.
overall read uncertain
DOS: is a hard one to read. his comments are crisp. I don't really get anything vibe or read wise on if he's town or scum.
leaning neutral here
Eli: He is short to the point and closed up tighter then a clam. He gives one word answers and no feed back that I find very scummy
kirby: same issue here as with doom. I don't get why asking trivia questions would be helpful in this game.
idk about kirby reading him in isolation I don't get much else. I put him as neutral for now.
neto: I can tell based on his play style we will bump heads. I'm definately more emotional and gut driven player but I find scum doing it. Neto doesn't give me much to go on that I can say hey look here.
I lean neutral
Sanhora: Another player I got nothing on reading in isolation: I lean neutral
Inquister - asked role fishing questions. This looks bad based on his questions
General rolefishing is most often a bad idea as it can usually give scum more information than town. But specific rolefishing can be useful if a player has a very good idea of why he is doing it. For example, if he's a power role and has a confusing result on a player, attempting to draw that out without exposing that player may be worthwhile.
This is just as bad:
Kirbyoshi - You have characterized my questions about roles as fishing, but given that none have actually asked for anything that could actually confirm or deny them, do you think their purpose is to allow actual power roles to very subtlely breadcrumb and then later justify/make scum when claiming justify their response later or do you think it's actually an attempt to out power roles, and assuming you believe that it's actually to out power roles do you think scum would be dumb enough to role fish in Q1 (please answer without using the term WIFOM)?
Looking for things like this is scum motivated to me. Scum would be looking for the these breadcrumbs and such. Pointing out to give players that opporunity just looks to be outing a PR for scum purposes.
6. I had people disagree with me about players before. I typically will look back on it and try my best to see if maybe I'm reaching or too emotional about my views. I never really give up unless I find something in the player I recognize as town. I still always have that feeling in the back the player is scum.
7. You should. you are rather close liped with your answers. This game is simple answer and questions and a person avoiding opening themselves up is bound to look suspicious.
9. niggle is that feeling you get in the back of your head. part of the definition:
worrying, especially in a small but persistent way. I don't know where I got the word from. I heard it somewhere.
10. See #3 and #5 for part of this.
11. who's action were scummiest see #5
12. No. It's why I asked him about his vote. I can say BV310 is under this same category though. Also see my answer for #5 and #7
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
