Player by player analysis-
animorpherv1:
Has made some good points but only against Netlava who is not really the hardest target.
CJMiller-
Seems to claim in ISO 8 that his vote in ISO 2 was not for quickwagoning... ISO 2 would disagree. Either he is trying to make his ISO 2 vote look better or he was holding back reasoning arbitrarily. Made a silly case on Animorpherv1 for being the buddy of uncomfirmed scum. Then having the audcity do demand that HE explain HIMSELF.
CSL
Has done nothing but coattail other people. ISO 3 follows wolf. ISO 4 follows Ani. ISO 5 follows ani. ISO 8 follows CJ's already heavily questioned accusation on Ani (whom he followed in 4 and 5).
Max-
Overall goodposting. One to keep an eye on though, the town has to watch people with his kind of playstyle because the idea of one guy asking a bunch of questiions can be a nice idea at first, but if he finds himself able to control the flow of the game with those questions then he can basicaly steer it as he pleases. Not that this is happening so far, just something to watch.
Netlava-
Netlava wrote:I was thinking of voting based off the dice roll, but I changed my mind and voted
Not different enough to be totally contradictory but differnt enough to warrent suspison, only to be used as part of a larger case.Netlava wrote:The dice roll had nothing to do with it. The dice roll was only used to annoy people
Wolf-
Do not share Max's strong pro town read of this guy. ISO 9/10 was fairly obvious information with nothing greater than surface analysis. Null tell right now.