Except that your reasoning for placing a vote will rely on the RVS's existence.KittyMo wrote: I want to be in a game with no RVS. Therefore, I will vote the next person to random vote.
Open 188 - Tweed Mafia - Over!
- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
I don't care if something promotes discussion. If a guy is obvscum, his scumminess is going to provoke discussion. How is the fact that it promotes discussion supposed to provide reason for me not to vote her?farside wrote: Quick question for both. How is it what she did, did not promote discussion?
A) Probably Locke, yabba, Scott and Kitty, just because they're not bad enough to get lynched, but not good enough to be nk'd.KittyMo wrote: A)Nikanor: Who do you think will survive in this game for a long time, and why?
B) MrSuave: Are you pro-town? (Explain in 100 words or less why.)
B) No.I am in the bottom 10% of scumhunters onsite!- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
More like 'totally opportunistic.' Zach voted KittyMo right before me, remember?SC wrote: A tad opportunistic, aren't we?
It's the RVS, dude, and bandwagons are awesome.
Err, that was a hypothetical situation in which I'd vote for someone even if they were generating discussion.farside wrote:How is kittymo obvious scum? Reading your reasoning for voting kittymo can you explain a bit better what it was that is scummy?
I agree with this.Zach wrote: See, my thought when I see a question like that is that of a scum player who wants to know what NOT TO DO in a mafia game, a scum player who might be paticularly worried about being caught by a specific player. (You'd have to know my history with Kittymo to fully understand what I'm getting at.)I am in the bottom 10% of scumhunters onsite!- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
MrSuave, I'm starting to think you're scummy simply because of your overconfidence in the early game. Believe it or not, overconfidence is a scumtell. It's how I always catch KittyMo as scum, hehe.
Anyway,
Unvote. Vote: MrSuave.
You obviously seem to want my vote anyway.I am in the bottom 10% of scumhunters onsite!- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
So basically, guilty until proven innocent. They have a name for that, you know. It's called Texas Sharpshooting, and it's scummy.MrSuave wrote: well as you can see, right now I'm assuming he is scum. that is the logical conclusion. if A is not true, then B is the answer unless proven otherwise.
Trust me, it's not case by case. It applies to everyone. Here's the reasoning, if you're interested:MrSuave wrote: I'm sorry, but that is a case by case scumtell. just because that's how you catch KittyMo doesn't mean that that is a scumtell for me.
Player A is town in Game A. He flails around a lot, not sure where to look for scum. This is because he is part of an uninformed majority, and he does not know the alignments of the other players.
Player A is scum in Game B. He is decisive and easily calls people scum. This is because he is part of an informed minority, and he does know the alignments of the other players, and can call someone town or scum without the uncertainty of being incorrect. This is where the confidence comes from.
I've applied this scumtell to other people, and I always get positive results. It's one of my more trusted (albeit less trusted by the rest of the players in games in which I happen to use this tell) tells.
However, it should be noted that this is a meta-based tell and requires Player A to have a general lack of confidence in a usual game.
Yeah, your facts are wrong. Just because I tunneled you twice as town doesn't mean I'm going to do it every time.MrSuave wrote:but right now, I have my facts, and unless you give me a reason to believe otherwise, you are scum because the data says you are scum. period.
Game A, where you were scum, my tunneling was justified (you turned out to be scum).
Game B, where you were town, I lynched you in lylo, but I'd hardly call that tunneling. Hell, I mentioned you in three out of my forty-two posts on day one in that game. I would hardly call that tunneling.
Game C, you were town, I was scum. I was only being nice to you because I wanted to keep the StrangerCoug-MrSuave cross-hate alive, otherwise I would have lynched you on day three. Don't try to paint this as the same sort of situation on page four.I am in the bottom 10% of scumhunters onsite!- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
A) Your claim was scummy (you claimed miller with overpowered abilities who couldn't decide if he could use one or two actions per night).MrSuave wrote:the second game, you still assumed I was scum, EVEN THOUGH I had claimed, and was even planning to try and save you because you were BP, and you almost screwed that up too. and as I stated, those were just examples on the site. I could give examples from brawl matches, monopoly, risk, pretty much any game we've played together you ALWAYS try to screw me over.
B) There is no B).
In Risk, Monopoly, etc., screwing you over usually helps my win condition. Tunneling on you each and every time in mafia, however, does not help my win condition.
In rl mafia, the only time I actually lynched you was when you were scum. I'll admit that we only played three or four games together because the rest of the group failed at modding *shakes a fist at DTM*, but my point still stands.
I don't care what you say after the fact, you were appeasing the town, and that is scummy.MrSuave wrote:and that "I'm sorry" was not a serious apology, it was sarcastic. >_>I am in the bottom 10% of scumhunters onsite!- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
Yes, but do you see what I mean when I say it was scummy?MrSuave wrote:I cleared that ability thing up as well as I could. it was hard to tell with the bad descriptions of my skills.
Only when we're pretty much guaranteed a victory anyway.MrSuave wrote:a good example of when you don't care if you win or not, is in 2v2 brawl (we have FF off) and you don't care if you hit me. in fact, sometimes you TRY to hit me. how does that help your win condition?
Anyway, to steer this discussion back on-topic, the whole point of this argument was that you say I try to get you killed in every game where I'm town, while I deny that by saying you deserved to be lynched in those games. I'm refuting your point by providing evidence for why you did indeed deserve to be lynched there.
To provide more support for my argument with Game B where we were both town, I all but ignored you on day one, with only one question and one accusation (of Suave being chainsaw defended by another player, no more) shot your way. You're now accusing me of ignoring you on day one, three pages into the game, and claiming it doesn't fit my town meta. That does not fit the facts at all, and is quite frankly pretty scummy.
It wasn't obvious. And saying it was sarcasm doesn't let you off the hook, either, to be clear.MrSuave wrote:and how was I trying to appease the town? I thought it was pretty obv sarcasm.I am in the bottom 10% of scumhunters onsite!- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
The only game I've played with him in which he flipped scum is his first game; everyone played the newbcard on him from the beginning and he coasted through the entire game without doing anything.Locke wrote:Nik: do you have any examples of MrSuave being overconfident as scum?
When I use sarcasm, I at least have the common sense to put an emote at the beginning/end to let others know I'm being sarcastic.MrSuave wrote:and also, say what you want, that "I'm sorry was very obvious." I know you have enough common sense to know when someone is sarcastic, especially since you yourself use sarcasm
Also, I appreciate that you have nothing to say about my meta now that I've proved you wrong, scum.I am in the bottom 10% of scumhunters onsite!- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
I wouldn't say you were obvtown, or even slightly town. But that's neither here nor there. The point I'm trying to prove with this is that you're trying to make it out to seem like I tunnel on you day one straight off the bat in every game where I'm town, when in fact that is not the case at all. Do you still want to press the case that I tunnel on you every time, even with the evidence I've brought to the table?MrSuave wrote:game B, you were just as scummy as I was, and in lylo, when I was obv not one of the last scum, you STILL vote me, and screw us over. *shakes head* >=(I am in the bottom 10% of scumhunters onsite!- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
Read this game and tell me that I'm acting in that game how MrSuave is trying to make me out to act. It is debatable whether I actually tunnel on him later on in the game, but I hardly mention him in the early stages of that game. He is trying to make it look as if I go straight for him and don't look back as town, which simply is not true.farside wrote:Just to clarify mrsauve points out that as town nik goes after him even when the reasoning isn't sound.I am in the bottom 10% of scumhunters onsite!- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
*facepalm* That's what I've been saying this whole bloody time! Have you not been reading a single one of my posts?faside wrote:So the meta he is talking about has not truth to it? Is somewhat true or what?
Game A, MrSuave is scum, I'm town.
Game B, MrSuave is town, I'm town.
Game C, MrSuave is town, I'm scum.I am in the bottom 10% of scumhunters onsite!- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
This makes no sense. If you always see me as scum, as you say in your fourth sentence, that means you cannot read me. Yet you think you can read me now. Use a defense that actually makes sense or be lynched.MrSuave wrote:well, I don't want to get 2 days in and be like, "OH CRAP NIK IS SCUM!" I want to get this cleared up asap. hence, guilty untill prooven innocent. you will always be scum to me untill I cannot read you. but so far, my recent game wth you where I read you like a book, I'm going to go with the fact I can read you.
This is what I saw. I don't see where yabba finds deflection.Zach wrote:Interesting that you characterized my response that way. My point was directed more toward Lowell's selective method of attack, where he is interested in a bandwagon on me due to meta arguments, but apparently shows no interest in other players at all for doing the same thing. What exactly is wrong about that?
@farside: You admit that Suave's meta 'evidence' is not valid. Why does your vote linger?
@Mod: Why are there fourteen votes in the poll? I'm scared.I am in the bottom 10% of scumhunters onsite!- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
No, but not putting your vote where your mouth is is a scumtell.farside wrote:You are not scare of a vote on you are you? Does it concern you in some way or reason at this point?
I still only see Zach pointing out double standards. *Shrugs*yabba wrote:-Nik: this is really it.Zach wrote:Curious that you've shown no interest in suave in that case...I am in the bottom 10% of scumhunters onsite!- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
That's not the issue here. The issue is that YOU'VE BEEN LEAVING OUT EVIDENCE WHILE BUILDING A META ARGUMENT. Furthermore, when confronted with the contradicting evidence, you have dodged addressing it.
I'm going to ask you nice and slowly now so that you can't possibly dodge the question again:
Do
You
Consider
The
Pokemon
Madness
Mafia
Game
To
Exhibit
Signs
Of
Tunneling
On
You
By
Me
On
Day
One
Four
Pages
Into
The
Game?
If
Not,
Why
Did
You
Ignore
This
Evidence
While
Building
A
Meta
Attack?I am in the bottom 10% of scumhunters onsite!- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
Vote: MrSuave.
MrSuave, please answer my question.
Starting a meta attack itself is not scummy. MrSuave is scummy for pushing a meta case that is inaccurate. He even decides to not answer the question I've asked him multiple times. He refuses to acknowledge the fact that his evidence is faulty, and that is scummy because it says to me that MrSuave is happy pushing a lynch based on inaccurate information.yabba wrote:@Nikanor et al: Do you think Suave is scummy for trying to start this meta attack? Despite thinking the argument was poor to begin with, I personally am uncertain on the whole issue of scumminess. However, I don't really feel this was terribly scum opportunism at work at the moment... but I may be wrong here, so I want to see where you all stand.I am in the bottom 10% of scumhunters onsite!- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
Sorry Zach, when you said you were 'waiting for a response from Nikanor,' I thought you were referring to yabba's question. I missed your inquiry entirely.
1) Yes, as well as his accusations against me. It seems to much like, 'I know exactly who is scum in this game, so I have no problems calling other people scum for completely arbitrary reasons!'Zach wrote:1) So when you say he's overconfident, you mean that he's too confident in his vote on you?
2) I don't know if this question was ever answered, but is this kind of play common to town Suave? (The aforementioned overconfidence)
3) The general idea I'm getting from the back and forth the two of you have is that he's claiming as a qualification to you being town that you must tunnel him, and you have provided evidence to the contrary, (That I haven't actually looked at yet.) that has gone ignored by Suave. Is that an accurate assessment?
2) From what I've seen, no.
3) Yes, that is correct.
@nhammen: Why do you think XScorpion is scummy? Why do you think MrSuave is scummy? Why do you list XScorp above MrSuave in your 'scummy' list, but only say that you're willing to move to MrSuave at deadline?I am in the bottom 10% of scumhunters onsite!- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
Now for the next question: do you think your case (and vote) is justified, then?MrSuave wrote:I see, THAT question. well in the pokemon game, you did not tunnle on me. BUT, you did group me in with a player to be lynched >_>. and your attitude towards me was very hostile IMO. and then at the end you randomly voted me, screwing us over entierly. so, you may not have been tunnling, but you weren't that friendly either >_>I am in the bottom 10% of scumhunters onsite!- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
I'm going to wait to see what MrSuave has to say before I lay a vote down, but this:
Makes a Lowell+Suave team look pretty delectable.Zach wrote:You gave yourself away by calling for my lynch yesterday while maintaining support of the suave wagon. If you were really a townie trying to lynch the person you found most suspicious, you would have been actively trying to push my bandwagon rather than simply waiting for it to be the largest viable one.
Also, Zach is right about the cop claims, obviously. This discussion should stop now, as it only gives opportunity for the cops to slip up.I am in the bottom 10% of scumhunters onsite!- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
I looked and looked and looked and could not find where farside pushed or voted Zach for not answering KittyMo's question. Could you quote/postlink please?Jazz wrote:Zach was absolutely right not to answer that question whether he's town or scum, because it only helps scum. So, why was farside so eager to get an answer to the question in the face of a reasonable objection to it? And so eager to vote for Zach when he wouldn't answer it?
I agree with this.Jazz wrote:So, she claims that meta is useless and then relies upon nothing but meta to vote both Nikanor and MrS. This is scummy.
This, too.Jazz wrote:Then after SC telegraphs in his post 150 that he is going to vote for MrS, farside immediately votes for MrS. Classic scum move - see where someone's vote is likely to go and then go there yourself first so that you're on the wagon earlier and not in a position of having to hammer later on.
This in itself is enough to convince me that farside is scum.Jazz wrote:2) in the post-game, in which farside also participated, the scum mentioned how helpful to them the hypoclaiming had been, which should have been a sufficient basis for farside to renounce it in the strongest of terms in THIS game as soon as the suggestion was made, rather than supporting it and claiming that it helps protect cops, etc.
Sorry? I thought the emote would be enough to tip you off, but I guess I have to say it outright: I wasn't serious about that. If I recall correctly the last game we were in together had you limited to posting from work, so I won't call you out on missing self-imposed deadlines.Jazz wrote:Nikanor was definitely out of line for calling me a "liar" as he did, and it is suspicious to me that he hasn't said a word about those who are actually lurking, and instead choosing to call me a "liar" solely on the basis of being unable to meet my best estimate of when I would be able to post.
Jazzmyn, how do you get 'Overall neutral, leaning town,' out of a post of completely negative points?
At this point I also notice that Jazzmyn only points out scummy posts made by players, and says nothing about town-like posts made by players; this is a minor scumtell, probably worth only about 3 points on a 100-point scumtell scale, but a scumtell nonetheless.
Lack of objection is as good as assertion. Not mentioning your position on something is called 'fencesitting,' and it's scummy.farside wrote:First I never said I was for the idea. I saw the pro's and con's but never said lets do it.
In 349, Suave dodges the cattle prod. Two days later, MrSuave posts again, but his post says absolutely nothing about anything.
i.e. I'm answering the easy question and stalling for the rest.farside wrote:I will get to the complete 305 post when I'm feeling better I have been sick today.
Softclaim is scummyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy.farside wrote:I'm a lazy townie look it up in any game.
So you're saying it was a freudian slip?KittyMo wrote:
When I'm preparing a post, I often backspace and edit things so they sound better, which makes other things come out wrong, and causing me to make freudian slips. I do this often; if you're the kind of person that looks at meta, you can see for yourself, or if you'd like me to quote past games I can.Jazz wrote:Also, I see a possible slip when she says, "I can see that you find what I did to be stupid and/or anti-town. But do you really think what I did made me more likely to betown?" (my bolding) For that sentence to make any sense, that should have said scum, not town.
I can attest to this.KittyMo wrote:Again, this is more of a meta thing for me. I'm the kind of girl that makes the long, pretty, well-thought out cases as scum because I don't actually have to figure out who the scum are
XScorp: Your self-defeatist play didn't exactly work out for you in Newbie 853. Why are you doing it again? What do you think of the difference in reactions between these games? Why do you think the reactions are different?
Stupidity is not a scumtell. Trying to make stupidity into a scumtell is scummy.Lowell wrote:Ugh, scorpion is scummy as hell. "Lynch X, then Y, then me" is not "townie matrydom." It's just regular dumb.
Excuses for why farside isn't interested in the thread:farside wrote:I'm having a lot of trouble getting into this game with all the meta talk. Plus the fact no one is really talking about much of anything else makes things more difficult. Some games are just like that.She's scum and doesn't need to scumhuntShe doesn't like meta talk.
Seriously, if you're going to lie, at least make up a believable excuse.
MrSuave needs to post more. nhammen needs to post more. Locke needs to post more. Lowell needs to post more. KittyMo needs to post a bit more; the big post was good, but your posting needs to be more frequent.
Vote: farside22.
I still think that MrSuave is scum, and that his lurking is designed to avoid suspicion, but I figure I need to stop tunnelling on MrSuave to allow people to get a read on me. Of course, if a bandwagon forms on MrSuave, I'd be happy to jump on it, but for now I'll stick with farside.I am in the bottom 10% of scumhunters onsite!- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
Yeah, I've seen some of those. The posts like mine, the ones filled mostly with quotes and one-liners, aren't bad. The posts to fear are the ones that have paragraph after paragraph of text. Those are the things of which replacements are made. It's horrifying.Zach wrote:Such things that can melt one's eyes.I am in the bottom 10% of scumhunters onsite!- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
Do itttttttt.farside wrote:If you would like me to get my husband on skype to explain in great details my puking I would be happy to get the WIFOM off the table now and not argue about something so pointless
Lawl.farside wrote:Explaining my positioning and helping people get a read on me is scummy? Since when?
For the sake of completeness, I said nothing about your positioning, etc. I don't care about that. The quote you have there has me calling you scummy for you calling yourself a townie. I don't see how you could get any other sort of conclusion from that, unless by some miracle you don't know what a softclaim is.
Yeah, it was in the same post as your excuse. Which makes me wonder why you're making excuses for no reason.farside wrote:Nice try I just had a long post outlining all players and my thoughts on why they are scum and what I found.
Well, if you must know....farside wrote:What did you do the last 2 days?
On Monday I woke up at about twelve or one in the afternoon, iirc. I had stayed up until five in the morning the previous night playing Borderlands with a friend, so I needed to sleep in. Anyway, after I woke up, I ate a bowl of Brown Sugar Mini Wheats before jumping in the shower. After my shower, I made sure to apply medicated lotion to my legs, which have been badly afflicted with eczema as of late, probably due to the cold weather. After that was done, I took the bus down to West Edmonton Mall to meet up with DTMaster and a couple other friends for dinner and bowling. We met up at The Bay (except for DTM, who met us at the restaurant), then headed over to the Boston Pizza in the mall. There were four of us there, so we got a plate of yam fries for an appetizer and two medium pizzas. I appointed DTM to make the decision on what to get, but he waffled around for a bit, so I revoked his privileges. We ended up ordering one Spicy Perogy pizza and one pizza with half BBQ chicken, half Bacon Double Cheeseburger. DTM and I ended up eating the most. One of us had eight slices, one of us ate seven slices, but we never figured out who ate more. The girl sitting beside me ate three slices, and my friend sitting across from me was feeling ill and not hungry, so he ate zero slices. At this point, I realise I should start a new paragraph, but I won't, if only to make this a more monotonous read. After dinner, we went to Ed's rec room (formerly Red's rec room) to go bowling. However, as is always the case when I try to bowl there, we couldn't get in thanks to a league they were hosting. So we just ended up shooting some pool instead. The girl and I were on a team against DTM and the other guy (no, not Korts). DTM and the girl had never played before, while the other guy and I were fairly experienced, so it was kind of even. I sucked, as usual, and sunk only two or three balls the entire time. My teammate killed us all with her talent, and although we lost the first game due to her sinking the eight ball, she carried our team to victory in the second match. After the two games of pool, we went to catch our respective buses home. I took the same bus as DTM and the guy, but they fell asleep for most of the trip. After the bus ride, I went home and played some video games before going to sleep.
On Tuesday, I woke up at roughly nine in the morning, ready for my first day of school. It was rather uneventful, as I only had three hours of class, but after class I went to see a movie with the same girl I mentioned earlier (Sorry for lying to you DTM, please don't modkill me!) After the movie, I went home and played Super Mario Bros. for the Wii with my family. I pissed everyone off, being the only one experienced with platformers, and being the only one jumping on everyone else's heads. I ate some Rice Crispie squares baked by my sister, and they were delicious. Then I went to sleep.
tl;dr: Sarcastic remark.I am in the bottom 10% of scumhunters onsite!- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
Done. He told me he had looked through your pms and told me you were scum in this game. Like, seriously.farside wrote:My hubby is home and I'm not. If you want to talk on skype it's FHCHome
Yes, and you softclaimed in your response.farside wrote:My comment you quoted was in answer to a comment Jazz made to me about my lack of reading links.
Right there. Do you see it now? I know it can be hard for you to notice a softclaim, seeing as how you're a new player and all, but please try your best.farside wrote:I'm a lazyLOOK HERE --->*townie*look it up in any game.<--- LOOK HEREI am in the bottom 10% of scumhunters onsite!- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
Then why bother saying you're leaning town on him? Isn't that kind of counter-productive?Jazz wrote:(on the "don't give the scum too much information on townie reads" theory, and also because I find that keeping some things to myself initially can be helpful in my analysis of players, especially if scum are attacking someone who I have a town read on, which is a better time to pull those things out of my notes).
I don't consider claiming town like KittyMo did to be softclaiming.Jazz wrote:@Nik: Why did you point out farside's soft claim and not KittyMo's?
Also,
Speaking of softclaiming, I find it hilarious that farside practically claimed townie in her softclaim, yet still tries to claim cop. Lynch please.KittyMo wrote:And I still don't understand why softclaiming the fact that you are of a pro-town alignment is scummy when answering the question "Why are you pro-town?"
Jazzmyn, you also mentioned earlier that I didn't move to Lowell to stop a nolynch, yet didn't say anything about whether I thought Lowell was town. Well, I do not think that Lowell is overly town, but I am absolutely dumbfounded as to why Lowell was wagoned on day one, so I can't conclusively say that he's scum either, since stupid wagons always seem to crop up where there is scum involved. Maybe I'm speaking from a biased point of view, knowing that Lowell is an easy lynch when he's town, but I don't see why Lowell should have been lynched over MrSuave on day one. Perhaps someone could explain it to me so that I can finally understand why people such as Zach and SC are voting for Lowell at every opportunity.I am in the bottom 10% of scumhunters onsite!- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
As a connection to Zach's first post of today, Lowell's trying to cover his tracks with this post.Lowell wrote:If she's scum I'm unilaterally declaring that I'm cleared as a possible scum-buddy.0
Vote: Lowell.
However, I want to note that there was waaaay too much lurking coming from certain players during the lynching of farside yesterday. If the lurking trend continues for those players, I will wholeheartedly change my vote to said lurkers.
That is all.I am in the bottom 10% of scumhunters onsite!- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
That's true, sorry.Zach wrote:I'm pretty sure that I unvoted nhammen and not farside.
I haven't had the chance to fakeclaim cop as scum yet, but when I did get the chance, I planned on 'clearing' my buddy (obviously not now that I've said this). The WIFOM is just too much to resist. I don't see why you say it's a bad idea when site meta is showing otherwise.Lowell wrote:farside, as a desperate scum, decided to claim cop, and ALSO IMPLICATE HER SCUMBUDDY by "clearing" him? Someone tell me why that makes sense.
Anyway, the reason for why I'm voting you has nothing to do with farside's result on you and everything to do with your reaction to farside's claimed result on you. Unsurprisingly, I'm disregarding the WIFOM as evidence for or against you. The fact that you're using the WIFOM to defend yourself is scummy as hell, though.I am in the bottom 10% of scumhunters onsite!- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
I tried, but I didn't see him today.KittyMo wrote:Nikanor - prod DTMaster with your fists
Softclaim noted.MrSuave wrote:And it's actually pretty slow if you're just VT. xD
MrSuave, 'throwing your vote around' helps the town get a read on you. I don't know why you'd hesitate to vote someone you think is scum if you were town. I think the real reason for why you're not voting Kitty is because you don't want to seem like you're hopping on the wagon that Lowell just started, which you're doing anyway by saying she's scummy, by the way. Just because you're not voting her doesn't mean you're not jumping on the bandwagon.I am in the bottom 10% of scumhunters onsite!- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
Except that you voted for him to be lynched. That's what a vote is - a vote to have that person killed.KittyMo wrote:I don't think anything about my behavior or anything I said shows that I was looking to get MrSuave lynched.
I know you all knew this already, but we have a lazy, lazy mod. I was sitting next to him today at the university, and I watched him type out the words 'Lowell has been prodded,' then I watched him delete them because he was too lazy to actually go and send Lowell the pm. I almost slapped him.
@Mod: Can you prod Lowell please?
There. Now you HAVE to stop being lazy.I am in the bottom 10% of scumhunters onsite!- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
I think pressure votes are good. However,KittyMo wrote:There's this thing called a pressure vote. I take it you think it's not a good reason for voting for someone?KittyMo wrote:I don't think anything about my behavior or anything I said shows that I was looking to get MrSuave lynched.
That's the entire post where you vote MrSuave. I don't see anything there indicating anything other than that you were 'looking to get MrSuave lynched.'KittyMo wrote:vote MrSuave
Lowell's lynch is just as good if not better, but I mean, just look at what MrSuave posted on Day 2 and Day 3. It's ridiculous. We don't need Lowell at L-1 yet, in my opinion.I am in the bottom 10% of scumhunters onsite!- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
My issue with it is that you didn't indicate that it was a pressure vote. In fact, when you voted, you made it sound very much like you wanted him lynched.KittyMo wrote:I think I was overreacted just a bit isoing him. My main purpose was to put pressure on him to say something.
Really, Zach?Zach wrote:I'm having a hard time seeing Lowell scum after reading this again. (If Lowell is scum, he knows there's 3 scum regardless of how badly he misreads the roles or setup.)
Example of scum making a 'mistake.'
A mistake in that scum only had one veto, while Cojin said they had two.
Plus, what do you think the odds are of Lowell, a guy who has been around the site for longer than you have, Zach, forgetting how many scum are in a twelve person game? It just screams 'intentional mistake' when I look at it that way.I am in the bottom 10% of scumhunters onsite!- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
Okay, but that's forgetting that there is a roleblocker in F11 mountainous. Lowell forgot how many scum were in a twelve-person game. There's a big difference in magnitude between those two mistakes.
I think the fact that I've seen experienced players make that mistake more as scum than as town is factoring into my view on this as well. I've even been lynched for faking that mistake as scum before. Mind you, this was on #mafia where people are a lot more carefree with their lynches, but it still has an impact on the way I see the situation we're now in.
Also, if KittyMo is raising red flags for you, why are you not voting StrangerCoug? How is SC scummier than she?I am in the bottom 10% of scumhunters onsite!- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
So the red flags look more like scumbuddies, you mean? I was thinking the 'Lowell lynch is just as good as Suave lynch' was fencesitting in case she needed/wanted to flip back to Lowell, but I guess it does make even better sense for it to be scumbuddies.I am in the bottom 10% of scumhunters onsite!- Nikanor
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Nikanor
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
- Happy Scumday!
In that case, why would she say that Lowell is just as good a lynch? It's slightly WIFOMic, but it doesn't make sense for her to be scum distancing from a townLowell lynch with her vote on Suave.Zach wrote:I have also considered the possibility that she's distancing from the Lowell lynch because she knows he'll flip town.I am in the bottom 10% of scumhunters onsite! - Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor
- Nikanor