That is all you got after her post?Zachrulez wrote:Perhaps you should have waited till after dance class to post then?KittyMo wrote: Well, Zach, I was planning on providing another method of discussion, but I had to leave for dance class soon, and didn't have time to come up with one.
It was a much needed break. I was starting to not post, gloss over things and just felt nothing for my games no matter my alignment. So far coming back I feel has brought back the old player I used to be, before I hit that wall.farside22: How has taking a break from mafia impacted your play as of coming back?
And this is my exact thought too. In fact this post really bothers meStrangerCoug wrote:No. While I should have said earlier that Zachrulez made a good point in post #11, I honestly don't know what the big fuss is about.KittyMo wrote:StrangerCoug: Is it scummy to suggest skipping the RVS?
How is kittymo obvious scum? Reading your reasoning for voting kittymo can you explain a bit better what it was that is scummy?Nik wrote:I don't care if something promotes discussion. If a guy is obvscum, his scumminess is going to provoke discussion. How is the fact that it promotes discussion supposed to provide reason for me not to vote her?
It could be to stir conversation or to look at something that a person said and hop onto it, use it as their own. Depends when it's being asked.Zachrulez wrote:Hey Farside, why do you think someone generally asks someone what they find scummy?
Unfortunately the game I'm thinking of is currently taking place but I will just say that just because I know I did something that was looking scummy doesn't mean I'm scum. I know many a player that had and still do make comments to stir conversation and see who pounces on a weak scum tell.Zachrulez wrote:See, my thought when I see a question like that is that of a scum player who wants to know what NOT TO DO in a mafia game, a scum player who might be paticularly worried about being caught by a specific player. (You'd have to know my history with Kittymo to fully understand what I'm getting at.)
Do you think the fact that I don't share your stance in this instance makes me more likely to be scum?
The fuss that zach is making over kittymo on her not wanting to RVS and willing to vote on the first person to RVS.StrangerCoug wrote:Whose post really bothers you how? I don't think I'm reading this clearly.farside22 wrote:And this is my exact thought too. In fact this post really bothers meStrangerCoug wrote:No. While I should have said earlier that Zachrulez made a good point in post #11, I honestly don't know what the big fuss is about.KittyMo wrote:StrangerCoug: Is it scummy to suggest skipping the RVS?
MrSuave wrote:Nik, why do you not love me? is your new meta for scum against me ignoring me? D= you should just play normaly, and I might not notice you being a spy.
so far:
Nik town = nik hunting me down, even if it doesn't make sense (korlash + grim pokemon)
Nik scum = siding with me and being nice to me (classic wolf... thing... manbearpig)
This game: ignored! =O *sirens* I new challenger is aproaching!!!
the fact that you told me before that that would be the last time you use that meta on me, makes me wonder about this cold shoulder silent treatment D= this is why you are scum this game. GG Nik, dun QQ too much now =p
Ah.MrSuave wrote:yes, that would be the assumption. but this is a meta that has more than the proof on this mafia site. we (Nik and I) are RL friends, and he has never once spared me in a game, even if I was on his team. he is always out to get me, so that's why this has merit. yes, he continued his shinanigans in mafia, and when he broke away from that he was scum and I killed him for it =D. your argument has merit, but that only applies to people who mearly know one another in this game, or do not game together often. and yes, this does not mean that my whole case is perfect, but so far it has not failed me. and by your logic, Nik should be tunneling me right now, but alas, he is not.farside22 wrote:MrSuave wrote:Nik, why do you not love me? is your new meta for scum against me ignoring me? D= you should just play normaly, and I might not notice you being a spy.
so far:
Nik town = nik hunting me down, even if it doesn't make sense (korlash + grim pokemon)
Nik scum = siding with me and being nice to me (classic wolf... thing... manbearpig)
This game: ignored! =O *sirens* I new challenger is aproaching!!!
the fact that you told me before that that would be the last time you use that meta on me, makes me wonder about this cold shoulder silent treatment D= this is why you are scum this game. GG Nik, dun QQ too much now =p
meta is overrated you know. I have this discussion so many times I feel like I'm on repeat. If a play is scum and knows what another player expects of them as town would they not act that way to ensure their townness.
Please explain better this post strike's me as cryptic.Nikanor wrote:MrSuave, I'm starting to think you're scummy simply because of your overconfidence in the early game. Believe it or not, overconfidence is a scumtell. It's how I always catch KittyMo as scum, hehe.
Anyway,
Unvote. Vote: MrSuave.
You obviously seem to want my vote anyway.
StrangerCoug wrote:A tad opportunistic, aren't we?Nikanor wrote:Except that your reasoning for placing a vote will rely on the RVS's existence.KittyMo wrote: I want to be in a game with no RVS. Therefore, I will vote the next person to random vote.
Vote: KittyMo.
StrangerCoug wrote:KittyMo wrote:Since I apparently fail so much, what better plan would you like to grace us with?Unvote: yabbaguy
Vote: KittyMo
If one plan for generating discussion fails, try another yourself. Don't ask people to generate discussion for you.
@Lowell: What are your thoughts on KittyMo now?Lowell wrote:If kitty can keep up this intensity throughout she'll be an asset. If she can't than this will be a waste of our time. In general I agree with nik's assesment.
unvote, vote zach. 39 and 41, taken together, rub me the wrong way. 39 is meta and 41 is defensive and meta.
I had a question on this page that I want an answer from you.Lowell wrote:I'd like to see some interest in a zach wagon if folks aren't doing anything other than telling jokes.
@Lowell: What are your thoughts on KittyMo now?
I don't like this at all it means now he's voting him because of this meta and it just rubs as scum trying to prove then meta now.Nikanor wrote:MrSuave, I'm starting to think you're scummy simply because of your overconfidence in the early game. Believe it or not, overconfidence is a scumtell. It's how I always catch KittyMo as scum, hehe.
Anyway,
Unvote. Vote: MrSuave.
You obviously seem to want my vote anyway.
So the meta he is talking about has not truth to it? Is somewhat true or what?Nikanor wrote:Read this game and tell me that I'm acting in that game how MrSuave is trying to make me out to act. It is debatable whether I actually tunnel on him later on in the game, but I hardly mention him in the early stages of that game. He is trying to make it look as if I go straight for him and don't look back as town, which simply is not true.farside wrote:Just to clarify mrsauve points out that as town nik goes after him even when the reasoning isn't sound.
Why are you saying that is normal meta is X when that is not the case then?MrSuave wrote:well, I don't want to get 2 days in and be like, "OH CRAP NIK IS SCUM!" I want to get this cleared up asap. hence, guilty untill prooven innocent. you will always be scum to me untill I cannot read you. but so far, my recent game wth you where I read you like a book, I'm going to go with the fact I can read you.
I'm waiting for a response from Suave on my question and see how he responds. Right now he has my full attention.@farside: You admit that Suave's meta 'evidence' is not valid. Why does your vote linger?
farside22 wrote:Why are you saying that is normal meta is X when that is not the case then?MrSuave wrote:well, I don't want to get 2 days in and be like, "OH CRAP NIK IS SCUM!" I want to get this cleared up asap. hence, guilty untill prooven innocent. you will always be scum to me untill I cannot read you. but so far, my recent game wth you where I read you like a book, I'm going to go with the fact I can read you.
Why the vote on Zach when MrSuave was the first to bring meta discussion up.Lowell wrote:Yes, basically. If that's pretty much all they do. It's my opinion that being meta is a good way to appear active while not really ruffling any feathers. This is what I see you doing, even in the way you phrased this question.Zachrulez wrote:Is it your position that people who make meta arguments are scummy then?Lowell wrote:If kitty can keep up this intensity throughout she'll be an asset. If she can't than this will be a waste of our time. In general I agree with nik's assesment.
unvote, vote zach. 39 and 41, taken together, rub me the wrong way. 39 is meta and 41 is defensive and meta.
Why the vote on Zach when MrSuave was the first to bring meta discussion up.Lowell wrote:Yes, basically. If that's pretty much all they do. It's my opinion that being meta is a good way to appear active while not really ruffling any feathers. This is what I see you doing, even in the way you phrased this question.Zachrulez wrote:Is it your position that people who make meta arguments are scummy then?Lowell wrote:If kitty can keep up this intensity throughout she'll be an asset. If she can't than this will be a waste of our time. In general I agree with nik's assesment.
unvote, vote zach. 39 and 41, taken together, rub me the wrong way. 39 is meta and 41 is defensive and meta.
No this is not what you said all on in your original post. You made is sound like he always acts a certain way when town and then acts another with scum.MrSuave wrote:why do I say this is the norm? because I expect "hostility" from my friend Nik. he hasn't failed me before, at wanting to screw me over, so why should I expect different now? I was lightly trying to provoke him, this is true. but if you look at the werewolf game, I believ it was game C?, I was provoking him and he blatently ignored me. Now, if you look at a end game comment, it gets all wifomy because he states he will never be nice to me again. well, I took his ignoring of my pokes at him as a sign. that's all.
I asked this for a good reason. Many people were commenting on Kitty as scum based on her first post. I wanted to see what people thought was a good way to get out of RVS stage to gauge a reaction from people's answers and reference kittymo and her actions. Unfortuantely only 3 people really answered the question which doesn't give enough of an example of difference action players take to attempt to get out of such a thing.@farside- You asked "what's the best way to get out of RVS?"
I agree with the stretching but there was on thing that caught my attention.StrangerCoug wrote:I'm not really buying XScorpion's explanation for his weak attack on everyone attacking him. I also think he's stretching trying to connect Lowell with KittyMo.
Unvote
Vote: XScorpion
It was really the only valid point he had though. The rest just didn't seem to make any sense.xscorpion:
I like how Lowell comments on people showing up, when both zach and Suave have been more active than him. Also I don't like bandwagon votes that have basically no logic behind them.
Lowell wrote:Also, doesn't suave have more votes? If your real purpose were just to make sure we get a lynch, wouldn't you go for the leader rather than suspiciously picking someone with fewer votes?Zachrulez wrote:Deadline's in 3 days guys, we might want to come to a consensus on a lynch here.
Unvote: Vote: Lowell
mod wrote:With 12 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.
XScorpion (1) - StrangerCoug
Lowell (2) - Scott Brosius, XScorpion,
StrangerCoug (1) - KittyMo
MrSuave (3) - Nikanor, farside22, Lowell,
There was about 3 or 4 people questioning kittymo on her opening and her reasoning. I wanted to see how other people would suggest getting out of the RVS if kitty's play was so scummy then for example why did no one target scorpion with is self vote. Basically what I wanted to see is what people do in order to trap scum. I see it more often than not.@farside-225: That just sounds ridiculously too convoluted to be true. Whatever "information" you're planning on getting out of that sounds too deep to possibly be an effective strategy.
I think lowell it suggesting what I have seen as a hypoclaim.Zachrulez wrote:I'm thinking this would be a terrible idea.Lowell wrote:Any chance we should do some sort of mass copclaim situation? Can we use two cops to our advantage here or what?
I know it's not a new idea. I can think about 3 games I recall that did this idea. I don't see how it's role fishing. He's not asking the cops to claim, he's suggesting everyone do a claim so when/if a cop dies the town is left with some information.Zachrulez wrote:By the way, this idea is not new.
This is one of the games such a tactic was attempted.
http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=10191
Pretty easy to see how it ended.
Idk I was in a game where I was scum and it wasn't obvious who was faking but some were easy to tell so yeah I can see it as helpful to scum but just as confusing as well.Zachrulez wrote:Well farside, think about it this way.
If we were to hypoclaim, the scum could look at all the hypoclaims knowing exactly what results make sense and what results don't.
So pretty much what is going to happen is that the cop's results are going to make sense no matter what if they tell the truth about the results they received from the mod, and more than likely at least some of the vanillas are going to claim results that make no sense and the scum are going to instantly know it, and cross their name off the list of potential cops. (Which is exactly what the scum are hoping for.)
Hence rolefishing.
I missed the OMGUS vote.Lowell wrote:You guys are idiots. It's just a suggestion. How bad at this game do you think I am?
vote zach. This guy is unbearable and obvious.
The fact is both zach and scorpion says it was scummy.Lowell wrote:It's not clear to me why SUGGESTING a hypoclaim is scummy. I for one think it would be a good idea, and there might be others out there as well if not for the power of the mob to shoot the idea down before even knowing what I'm talking about. There are a lot of twitchy players out there and I don't like it.
If Suave and I are scum, whatsay we lynch Suave first, okay?
@farside- I am acting out... a little. The way zach clings to the mindless accusations on me suggest to me that he's scum. In ISO I've yet to see him do anything without mass public support, which is not exactly the most townish behavior.
Sweetie I said it helps hide the cops and allows them to give a results so if they die the town has info.Jazzmyn wrote:Keep digging, farside. I didn't put words in your mouth. I never said anything about it being a guarantee for scum and I never said that you said "let's do it". I said that you suggested that hypocop claiming would help the cops (because you did suggest that) and it does no such thing. It helps the scum. Period.farside22 wrote:First I never said I was for the idea. I saw the pro's and con's but never said lets do it. Also as scum it helped but wasn't a garentee. Do not put words in my mouth there were not there.
Again, it only helps the scum by narrowing their targets, even if "there is guessing in it" because if everyone makes a claim, some of them are going to be (to the scum) quite obviously wrong, thus eliminating those players as real cops and narrowing the field for the scum to pick off the cops.farside22 wrote:As scum it's easy to see if someone is just BS'ing if they are terrible with hypo claim and claim something dumb. However there is guessing it it.
If you didn't look at it, you should have because it was posted as evidence of why hypocop claiming in a game like this is a bad idea, and you cited the post in which it was linked. Secondly, I find it hard to believe that you wouldn't remember that game in light of your big, dramatic spat with another player at the end of the game and during the post-game. I'm more inclined to believe that you remember the game very well, but that you hoped nobody else would actually read it to find out that you played in it with an alt, because you're scum in this game and because you know from that game that the hypocop claiming suggestion is a bad idea for town here.farside22 wrote:As for the game zach brought up. No I didn't look at it because I was commenting on those (1) I remembered off the top of my head and (2) was commenting more on the fact it wasn't a novel concept.
Regards,
Jazz
I disagree that it exposes them.Jazzmyn wrote:It does not help hide the cops, though. It helps to expose them.farside22 wrote:Sweetie I said it helps hide the cops and allows them to give a results so if they die the town has info.
Now, now. No need to insinuate that I'm too young to know what I'm talking about. I'm quite certain that I'm older than you, and probably by a decade.farside22 wrote:As for remembering all the games I play. The answer is no. The games I remember the most are the ones I had fun in. I'm sure as you get older you may understand that
But I think that your newly acquired patronizing tone ("Sweetie" and "as you get older you may understand") is another sign that you're scum. I.e. trying to sidestep legitimate accusations by illegitimate means.
Regards,
Jazz
As I said having a tailor alters the idea completely.StrangerCoug wrote:I have to agree with you here. There is a Mafia tailor and no roleblocker, and the tailor probably told the rest of the Mafia his or her target. Therefore, in a hypoclaim situation, somebody claiming a correct result on a player that was tailored that night can be ruled out as a cop, thus narrowing down the pool.Jazzmyn wrote:It does not help hide the cops, though. It helps to expose them.farside22 wrote:Sweetie I said it helps hide the cops and allows them to give a results so if they die the town has info.
I did not say it did. Jesus!StrangerCoug wrote:No it does not. If it does at all, it's only by a trivial amount in favor of scum, who knows who should be showing up as innocent and who should be showing up as guilty. Stop insisting that the town can benefit from hypoclaiming.
Unvote: Lowell
Vote: farside22
Zach when confronted with the obvious answer - i.e. that it only helps scumfarside: in post 40, she tries to gloss over Kitty asking Zach what behaviour he finds scummy. Zach was absolutely right not to answer that question whether he's town or scum, because it only helps scum. So, why was farside so eager to get an answer to the question in the face of a reasonable objection to it? And so eager to vote for Zach when he wouldn't answer it? Then she unvoted
Just a note I looked over everyting after 305 and it's just us arguing about the hypo claim. If I missed something you feel I didnt' answer please state what it was.Jazzmyn wrote:No, it isn't. See my post 305 and subsequent posts.farside22 wrote:In other words Jazz most of your case is based on my clarification of what Lowell is proposing.
Regards,
Jazz
Jazzmyn wrote: After saying that meta is over-rated and that she doesn't use it, she then does nothing but talk about meta in half of her posts and she uses it to justify her votes. She voted for Nikanor on the basis of MrS's purported meta on Nikanor, but she never looked to see if it was accurate. Later, she voted for MrS purportedly because the meta he presented on Nikanor was not accurate. (Want to bet whether she actually read the links provided? My money says a resounding 'no'.) So, she claims that meta is useless and then relies upon nothing but meta to vote both Nikanor and MrS. This is scummy.
I glanced at the games in question that mrsuave brought up. Did I read the games in full. No I never do go that far. I'm a lazy townie look it up in any game.farside22 wrote:Most of the talk is either Kitty and what she did or meta talk. It's hard to get away from meta talk when people are using it as a basis.
My vote on Suave is because he is misrepresenting how Nik act when town vs scum.
Then there is her weird question about "what is the best way to get out of RVS?" which is misplaced and entirely useless, but her explanation for it is utterly ridiculous. To me, it looks like she posed the question to give cover to scumbuddies, and to look like she was participating meaningfully in the game while in fact she was not. See her eventual, belated response to yabba's question on this in her post 225. It doesn't even begin to make sense. This, to me, looks like scum scrambling to cover up for a bad move. (As an aside, I also note that she said it was a question from Zach when it was actually a question from yabba - don't know why that is, but just noting it.)
So no I was actually trying hard to get away from meta talks more then anything. People were either saying kitty was scum for her comment or talking meta.farside22 wrote: There was about 3 or 4 people questioning kittymo on her opening and her reasoning. I wanted to see how other people would suggest getting out of the RVS if kitty's play was so scummy then for example why did no one target scorpion with is self vote. Basically what I wanted to see is what people do in order to trap scum. I see it more often than not.
In 140 Mr.Suave asked what question. I quoted the question in 141. I don't see your point here.In 141, she simply regurgitates points that others had already made, again to me it looks like she's just trying to pretend to scumhunt.
Then after SC telegraphs in his post 150 that he is going to vote for MrS, farside immediately votes for MrS. Classic scum move - see where someone's vote is likely to go and then go there yourself first so that you're on the wagon earlier and not in a position of having to hammer later on.
I really (1) don't see how this is a case against zach and (2) why he would vote for suave so easily without cause.nhammen wrote:WIFOM!XScorpion wrote:P.S. Today is the first day I actually read the whole thread. Does anyone want to explain why my insanely anti-town behaviour hasn't warranted a single vote? At most I got a few slaps on the wrists from Yabba and Locke, but really...I mean, if I was anyone else in this game, I would probably be voting myself already out of policy (oh wait, I already did. Lol.) Just pointing out that it seems strange for there to be so much discussion about certain players, yet if I was scum (and wasn't acting like a jackass with my anti-townness) I would breeze through day 1 almost completely unnoticed.
Why him, rather than Suave or XScorp?Zachrulez wrote:Deadline's in 3 days guys, we might want to come to a consensus on a lynch here.
Unvote: Vote: Lowell
Same amount after your vote. And you saying you are more suspicious of him is meaningless if you don't back this up with reasons. Looks like avoiding the question to me.Zachrulez wrote:You have the same amount of votes.
I picked you because I am more suspicious of you.
Scummiest players:
Zach
XScorp
Suave
unvote
vote Zach
I am willing to change to Suave at deadline.
I don't understand this statementnhammen wrote:BTW a Zach Suave pairing looks likely from ISOing Zach. But that could just be buddying.
KittyMo wrote:Actually, I was planning to just wing it. (Which I guess is an oxymoron.) It would certainly help if more than 4 people had actually answered the questions.yabbaguy wrote:See, I thought you had a purpose of some convoluted sort. I thought you were operating under the belief that somehow the responses were going to get us somewhere, hence "now what?"
Since I apparently fail so much, what better plan would you like to grace us with?
No quote. just taking about his play and not having anything to back it up here.kitty wrote:And Lowell - I've been getting bad vibes from him since his first post, and nothing he's said since has eased that.Vote: Lowell. Why don't you start playing better now? Why do we have to wait for you to do that tomorrow?
I'm having a lot of trouble getting into this game with all the meta talk. Plus the fact no one is really talking about much of anything else makes things more difficult. Some games are just like that.nhammen wrote:XScorp: Quit that WIFOM. There is no scum reason and there is no town reason for what you are doing. STOP
After rereading, I still find real information hard to come by. But I did see one thing. Farside, why do you insist on commenting more on theory questions than try to find scum. Someone else accused you of this earlier (I don't remember who) and the entire hypocop conversation has been you showing the theory of it, while saying it is a bad idea. What about the person proposing it? Do you have any reads on lowell at all?
I'm too tired right now to post more, but I am back, so yeah.
scorpion wrote:I'm much more interested in if there were any successful investigations (indicating scum).
Wow obvscum? [/quote]scorpion wrote:[quote ="Lowell"]
Any chance we should do some sort of mass copclaim situation? Can we use two cops to our advantage here or what?
To this:You took me out of context. I concede to saying little to all the arguments against it, but I was against it too, not in favor of it. By "I don't care if we all massclaimed 'I investigated X and got a Y on them'," I meant that I view it as scummy as proposing that the two cops out themselves, which I interpreted Lowell as saying in what I quoted in 291. I wanted a step ahead of Lowell, and I believe he backtracked into saying the hypoclaims were all he wanted.
To this:I have to agree with you here. There is a Mafia tailor and no roleblocker, and the tailor probably told the rest of the Mafia his or her target. Therefore, in a hypoclaim situation, somebody claiming a correct result on a player that was tailored that night can be ruled out as a cop, thus narrowing down the pool.
No it does not. If it does at all, it's only by a trivial amount in favor of scum, who knows who should be showing up as innocent and who should be showing up as guilty. Stop insisting that the town can benefit from hypoclaiming.
Unvote: Lowell
Vote: farside22
Funny you seem to attack me on this now after I show a case on you and why I'm leaning scum.kitty wrote:Looking back on Day 1, farside pretty much chainsaw-defended and buddied me all day, while also talking about meta, even though she said herself it's a topic she doesn't like to get on. And I find it really odd how she could be attacking everyone that attacked me for so long, and now she suddenly thinks I'm really scummy.
You can think what you want on it. But frankly I never vote when I'm in the middle of an analysis on a player till it's complete. I want to make sure I have everything down and look at everything from all sides before laying down a vote.Zachrulez wrote:Heh, well now you pretty much voted in direct response to my criticism, but there really isn't any way for you to defend yourself from that, so I'll let it go for now.
In short. I found her as my town read. She comes in and blazes this game into life, she has clear thoughts in her analysis of players with I find sound reasoning.Zachrulez wrote:Fair enough.farside22 wrote:You can think what you want on it. But frankly I never vote when I'm in the middle of an analysis on a player till it's complete. I want to make sure I have everything down and look at everything from all sides before laying down a vote.Zachrulez wrote:Heh, well now you pretty much voted in direct response to my criticism, but there really isn't any way for you to defend yourself from that, so I'll let it go for now.
What are your thoughts on Jazz? I'm curious.
Scorpion made that comment which is almost asking for a cop to claim then attacks lowell for the hypoclaim. I just found that incredably hypcrocital.Zachrulez wrote:I don't really like the attacks on Xscorpion.
I'm trying to be careful not to overly excuse his general bad play, but I have a gut town read on him, and I feel pretty strongly about it, as a result I feel uneasy about pretty much any attacks on him.
Lowell I just get the sense you're soft on. Can't really explain it past that, but it's something I generally don't like.
StrangerCoug could use some pressure. I do agree that his play has been questionable.
Your points on Mr Suave are pretty sound, but I can understand why others find the attack suspicious given your stated position on meta.
Also, I have a town read on Jazz which is pretty much based on the reasoning you laid out.
So yeah, kind of a mixed bag here.
StrangerCoug wrote:What!? We don't need them outed yet. They can do just fine hidden. I don't care if we all claimed "I investigated X and got a Y on them".Lowell wrote:Any chance we should do some sort of mass copclaim situation? Can we use two cops to our advantage here or what?
Once again, what!? This is OMGUS out the wazoo.Lowell wrote:You guys are idiots. It's just a suggestion. How bad at this game do you think I am?
vote zach. This guy is unbearable and obvious.
Vote: Lowell
You took me out of context. I concede to saying little to all the arguments against it, but I was against it too, not in favor of it. By "I don't care if we all massclaimed 'I investigated X and got a Y on them'," I meant that I view it as scummy as proposing that the two cops out themselves, which I interpreted Lowell as saying in what I quoted in 291. I wanted a step ahead of Lowell, and I believe he backtracked into saying the hypoclaims were all he wanted.
Zachrulez wrote:How is he endorsing it? I see him attacking Lowell for suggesting it.
That's what's confusing me.
I took this to mean two seperate things from his statement here outting the cops bad, hypoclaiming I don't care.I meant that I view it as scummy as proposing that the two cops out themselves, which I interpreted Lowell as saying in what I quoted in 291
I have to agree with you here. There is a Mafia tailor and no roleblocker, and the tailor probably told the rest of the Mafia his or her target. Therefore, in a hypoclaim situation, somebody claiming a correct result on a player that was tailored that night can be ruled out as a cop, thus narrowing down the pool.
Explaining my positioning and helping people get a read on me is scummy? Since when?farside wrote:
I'm a lazy townie look it up in any game.
Softclaim is scummyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy.
I just had a long post outlining all players and my thoughts on why they are scum and what I found.Excuses for why farside isn't interested in the thread:She's scum and doesn't need to scumhuntShe doesn't like meta talk.
Seriously, if you're going to lie, at least make up a believable excuse.
My hubby is home and I'm not. If you want to talk on skype it's FHCHomeNikanor wrote:Do itttttttt.farside wrote:If you would like me to get my husband on skype to explain in great details my puking I would be happy to get the WIFOM off the table now and not argue about something so pointless
My comment you quoted was in answer to a comment Jazz made to me about my lack of reading links.Lawl.farside wrote:Explaining my positioning and helping people get a read on me is scummy? Since when?
For the sake of completeness, I said nothing about your positioning, etc. I don't care about that. The quote you have there has me calling you scummy for you calling yourself a townie. I don't see how you could get any other sort of conclusion from that, unless by some miracle you don't know what a softclaim is.
Sick is not an excuse. Talking about this game dragging is but if I'm the only one that feels that way tell me why it's only 13 pages long on day 2 then.Yeah, it was in the same post as your excuse. Which makes me wonder why you're making excuses for no reason.farside wrote:Nice try I just had a long post outlining all players and my thoughts on why they are scum and what I found.
You talk about me having excusesWell, if you must know....farside wrote:What did you do the last 2 days?
On Monday I woke up at about twelve or one in the afternoon, iirc. I had stayed up until five in the morning the previous night playing Borderlands with a friend, so I needed to sleep in. Anyway, after I woke up, I ate a bowl of Brown Sugar Mini Wheats before jumping in the shower. After my shower, I made sure to apply medicated lotion to my legs, which have been badly afflicted with eczema as of late, probably due to the cold weather. After that was done, I took the bus down to West Edmonton Mall to meet up with DTMaster and a couple other friends for dinner and bowling. We met up at The Bay (except for DTM, who met us at the restaurant), then headed over to the Boston Pizza in the mall. There were four of us there, so we got a plate of yam fries for an appetizer and two medium pizzas. I appointed DTM to make the decision on what to get, but he waffled around for a bit, so I revoked his privileges. We ended up ordering one Spicy Perogy pizza and one pizza with half BBQ chicken, half Bacon Double Cheeseburger. DTM and I ended up eating the most. One of us had eight slices, one of us ate seven slices, but we never figured out who ate more. The girl sitting beside me ate three slices, and my friend sitting across from me was feeling ill and not hungry, so he ate zero slices. At this point, I realise I should start a new paragraph, but I won't, if only to make this a more monotonous read. After dinner, we went to Ed's rec room (formerly Red's rec room) to go bowling. However, as is always the case when I try to bowl there, we couldn't get in thanks to a league they were hosting. So we just ended up shooting some pool instead. The girl and I were on a team against DTM and the other guy (no, not Korts). DTM and the girl had never played before, while the other guy and I were fairly experienced, so it was kind of even. I sucked, as usual, and sunk only two or three balls the entire time. My teammate killed us all with her talent, and although we lost the first game due to her sinking the eight ball, she carried our team to victory in the second match. After the two games of pool, we went to catch our respective buses home. I took the same bus as DTM and the guy, but they fell asleep for most of the trip. After the bus ride, I went home and played some video games before going to sleep.
On Tuesday, I woke up at roughly nine in the morning, ready for my first day of school. It was rather uneventful, as I only had three hours of class, but after class I went to see a movie with the same girl I mentioned earlier (Sorry for lying to you DTM, please don't modkill me!) After the movie, I went home and played Super Mario Bros. for the Wii with my family. I pissed everyone off, being the only one experienced with platformers, and being the only one jumping on everyone else's heads. I ate some Rice Crispie squares baked by my sister, and they were delicious. Then I went to sleep.
tl;dr: Sarcastic remark.