Open 192: SCIENCE Mafia, Finished

Cat · Post Post #15 (isolation #0) » Fri Jan 01, 2010 4:55 am

Vote: Pomegranate

because your so darn hard to eat.

Cat · Post Post #78 (isolation #1) » Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:35 am

SaintKerrigan wrote:How is it already an endgame situation?

Unvote: Cat. Vote: MrWhereItsAt.

I fail to see how this was worth a vote. However, I also think the followed votes by mykonian and StrangerCoug were unnecessary as well.
I think everyone is just a tad bit jumpy.

And then mykonian and StrangerCoug, who had just agreed on Saint Kerrigan, jump on each other for doing the same thing. DOES NOT MAKE SENSE!

mykonian is votehopping like crazy, and I don't like it.

mykonian wrote:good, pome, how often were those votes on popular wagons? once.

This is Page 3 of a 7p game. Popular wagons shouldn't be occuring.

mykonian wrote:Pome's voting density argument

Pomegranate wasn't arguing the ratio of votes to posts. Your three votes are sandwiched in between Pomegranate's first two. That means they happened in a much smaller timespan than Pomegranate's did. That is votehopping.

Vote: Mykonian

Cat · Post Post #85 (isolation #2) » Mon Jan 04, 2010 12:31 pm

mykonian: posting more doesn't mean you are making cases. Also, votehopping is scummy because it means you are fickle with your vote and you will put it wherever, with little or no reasoning.

Cat · Post Post #94 (isolation #3) » Tue Jan 05, 2010 10:26 am

I fail to see how similar arguments makes us scum, Saint Kerrigan. Anyway, SC and myko both voted MWIA for the same reason (and it was actually a bad reason, unlike our arguments).

Plus, I would've liked to be more active but I celebrated New Years. Sorry.

mykonian: Apparently you want to policylynch malpascp. But I'm against policy lyches because if you continue to policy lynch them again and again you never give them a chance to fix what their doing. If they play scummily, then we can lynch them.