Open 189~Trouble@Warren State Mental Hosp (Over)
-
-
Qooq
-
-
Qooq Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 35
- Joined: December 6, 2009
-
-
Qooq
-
-
Qooq Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 35
- Joined: December 6, 2009
I’ll be completely honest, this game has been pretty hard to follow because I am not sure how much is serious and how much isn’t. I’m not used this sort of pace. Correct me if I’m wrong but the Xdaamno wagon started with this:VP Baltar wrote:Cat, tajo, Qoog, Otto, and anyone else who hasn't really commented, what do you think of the daamno wagon?
I guess it’s hard for me to understand that you can you can get a really accurate read off someone by starting a discussion like this. It seems to me like an abstract question is going to get an abstract answer (that is the way I read Vi’s remark, an abstract way to try and scumhunt). I guess I just don’t see the logic in attaching a lot of meaning to the response. Of course you can try to catch someone in their words and make them squirm later on, but where did the line of questioning begin?Vi wrote:
We're lynching you. Discuss.Xdaamno 19 wrote:/checks in
Right now I’d like to reserve judgment on Xdaamno. Post 60 obviously concerns me because I agree with Vi's logic about it (post 68), but I’m not convinced he’s scummy yet. I’m reading Vi town right now though, if it means anything.
JDodge, why did you feel the need to respond to a statement directed at VP Baltar?JDodge wrote:
Occam's Razor - the simplest explanation is usually the correct one. Try again.Hyl wrote:Your question-filled posts, coupled with little follow up to said questions, are scummy. Gives off a strong "trying to look helpful & active" vibe. I also noticed that you didn't give much opinion on the wagon, yet you're asking everyone to comment on it.-
-
Qooq Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 35
- Joined: December 6, 2009
Although it has already been addressed for the most part, do you mind clarifying exactly where I said I was confident that Vi was town, VPB? Also, out of curiosity, why did you feel the need to answer for me HowardRoark?VP Baltar wrote:
Really? Why's that? I don't think many people could get confident reads by page 4.Qoog wrote:I’m reading Vi town right now though, if it means anything.
The only thing I really have to say to this is that if you think I was trying to derail the Xdaamno wagon, I would probably quote the rest of my post where I said I thought the wagon was pretty bogus to begin with. Not this, where I openly admitted I didn't know who was being serious and who wasn't. I can't speak for tajo on the issue, though.HowardRoark wrote:populartajo (85) wrote:The thing is that I cant tell wether some people are being serious or not. Dodge and Vi seem serious while cayke and dizzy are prob just joking around. Correct me if im wrong.
(See comment to populartajo above)Qooq (91) wrote:I am not sure how much is serious and how much isn’t.
Trying to derail the wagon?
Could you clarify what you mean by lying, Vi? Do you think he isn't being transparent so it is a lie, or purposefully acting transparent is in and of itself a lie? Or something else?Xdaamno wrote:
Stop trolling.Vi wrote:
Promising suboptimal play and lying in the same sentence doesn't become you.Xdaamno 122 wrote:This isn't optimal play - I'm just being transparent.-
- Qooq
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
-
-