Legacy of the Ancients Mafia (That's All, Folks!)

Budja · Post Post #11 (isolation #0) » Sat Nov 07, 2009 7:02 pm

vote Mufasa

Budja · Post Post #13 (isolation #1) » Sat Nov 07, 2009 7:18 pm

Mufasa lynch > zwet lynch.

Budja · Post Post #73 (isolation #2) » Sun Nov 08, 2009 11:44 am

unvote, vote Deathnote

, for useless posting. Go to GD if you want to talk about out of game stuff.

Budja · Post Post #92 (isolation #3) » Mon Nov 09, 2009 2:24 am

Starbuck wrote: I definitely think we could do some scumhunting without all this policy lynch crap going on.

Go on then. Whats a better way to start? Policy lynch wagons don't seem to be a bad discussion generator to me.

DoS wrote: Yes I mean lurkers. And I am against the argument because we as a town gain very little, if any, information from lynching a lurker imo.

How should lurkers be dealt with then?

Budja · Post Post #99 (isolation #4) » Mon Nov 09, 2009 3:35 am

...or a mod error

. We shall see.

Budja · Post Post #198 (isolation #5) » Mon Nov 09, 2009 1:04 pm

I would like SSK to be doubly sure that a lynch of him will be helpful. I remember Seraphim asked for a day 1 lynch in Suzumiya Haruhi Mafia with apparently wasn't the best move.

So double check, then I'll vote.

Reck's tunneling on a policy lynch is bad. Zwet's looking ok so far.

Suggesting a vig of SSK is more likely scummy than townie. (you still get the kill, possibly without the special ability activation. Win/win for scum)

FoS FL

Bandwagoning SSK is null.
Opposing the lynch is null.

Budja · Post Post #205 (isolation #6) » Mon Nov 09, 2009 1:28 pm

forbiddanlight wrote:

Suggesting a vig of SSK is more likely scummy than townie. (you still get the kill, possibly without the special ability activation. Win/win for scum)
So, you assume the special ability is automatically going to help town? Can you tell me why?

Further, if I'm scum, I'm presumably giving up a free lynch of someone not on my team and risking one of my own getting lynched.

I disagree with your logic, but I don't see it as scum motivated.

If SSK is town, it would help town assuming SSK knows what he is doing.
If he is not-town, we get a good lynch, which IMO trumps the risk of a bad scum ability.

I don't want to stop his special ability. Mafia might think it worth the risk to do so, assuming SSK town.

Budja · Post Post #207 (isolation #7) » Mon Nov 09, 2009 1:30 pm

Preview Edit:

Xyl's 203 is spot-on.
Fl's 204 explains our difference of position. I am more believing SSK town (probably also from previous games).

Budja · Post Post #218 (isolation #8) » Mon Nov 09, 2009 2:23 pm

unvote, vote SSK

Budja · Post Post #224 (isolation #9) » Mon Nov 09, 2009 2:55 pm

@Kise, your attack on Kaiyruu is quite odd. Of all the players I have known to lurk, I have never thought Kaiyruu was one of them.

Budja · Post Post #258 (isolation #10) » Tue Nov 10, 2009 1:20 pm

vote MafiaSSK

Budja · Post Post #298 (isolation #11) » Tue Nov 10, 2009 5:54 pm

Xyl wrote:Grey text and reck's behavior, including his "bah" post, scream survivor to me.

Exactly what I was first thought.
I am willing to give Slicey the benefit of the doubt and label Reck as pro-town.

Kaiyruu wrote:@Slicey: Explain why you need to be on the wagon. If you do, I'll unvote.

^This.

Budja · Post Post #353 (isolation #12) » Thu Nov 12, 2009 12:27 pm

Interesting.
The quicklynch seems kinda pointless now.

Budja · Post Post #355 (isolation #13) » Thu Nov 12, 2009 3:23 pm

But if we had scum-hunted, and chose a lynch then that would have given us a great deal more information.
Still, its happened and it will be good to know SSK's true alignment, I just think his move was foolish (if he truly knew about day0).

Budja · Post Post #495 (isolation #14) » Sat Nov 14, 2009 6:04 pm

Ok, tell me if any of this is wrong . A lot of role info to process.

-----
FL targets SSK for a kill

Dramonic confirms Xyl is Forsaken.
DoS confirms Xyl is not ancient.

FL targets Xyl for a kill.

Deathnode misreps Xyl. Ancient Win con != Ancient as you ought to know.

Stupid move by SSK. He was already confirmed and now he is a stump.

Amished gives SSK his vote back after the day ends.

Snow misreps FL.

Xyl will die the night after he is killed.

-----

I agree that FL should target someone else (deathnote, mufasa, snow_bunny are a few recommendations).

vote Xyl

.

Budja · Post Post #499 (isolation #15) » Sat Nov 14, 2009 6:19 pm

Still, sacrificing yourself for an unknown ability seems pretty silly but I won't dwell on that.

Budja · Post Post #506 (isolation #16) » Sat Nov 14, 2009 9:43 pm

Maybe we should stop claiming unless it really is necessary.
Just saying..

Budja · Post Post #507 (isolation #17) » Sat Nov 14, 2009 9:43 pm

vote Xyl

Budja · Post Post #510 (isolation #18) » Sat Nov 14, 2009 10:32 pm

No town would kill Amished. He was going to help us.

Budja · Post Post #596 (isolation #19) » Mon Nov 16, 2009 3:54 pm

^QFT

I also agree with zwet. Ani is disinterested rather than scummy.

Socio wrote: Although, the second I saw Reck die, I knew with 96% accuracy exactly who it was, from my own meta reasons. And for those reasons, I can guarantee with about the same accuracy that they're town.

If the same person killed Amished as it virtually mod-confirmed, I have a great deal of trouble believe them to be pro-town.

vote: Deathnote

Budja · Post Post #699 (isolation #20) » Thu Nov 19, 2009 12:22 pm

Good luck town.