Mini 867- TTGL Mafia: GAME OVER: Roles posted.

[SocioPath]

Vote: Snow_Bunny

Always scummy, all the time. And has a playstyle I hate.

[SocioPath]

Unvote
Vote: Jebus

Always scummy, all the time. And has a playstyle I hate.

[SocioPath]

Judging from all the reactions, MonkeyMan's is quite clearly the poorest:

I think he might be fakeclaiming the kill in order to get lynched.

With that being among many of his gems.

Unvote
Vote: MonkeyMan576

[SocioPath]

Sounds almost like a jester, hence the reason only an FOS and not a vote.

Actually, the best strategy is to ignore them if you can. If you have no viable scum candidates at the end of day 1, they might be a good alternative, but it's better to go after scum than third party.

You other awesome reactions.

Anywho, time to find your scumbuddy.

Unvote

Actually, the best strategy is to ignore them if you can. If you have no viable scum candidates at the end of day 1, they might be a good alternative, but it's better to go after scum than third party.

Sorry to interject, but ignoring them is a losing battle. I feel it's best just to lynch them and get them out of the way, so long as it won't end the game.

Obvious coaching to scum buddy.

Vote: Chaco

[SocioPath]

Unvote
Vote: Seraphim

For his claim purposes.

[SocioPath]

@Sociopath: I see where you get your "coaching" idea from, however, that is not the case. I was putting out my idea that we should just lynch them and get them over with. Do you see any problems with this? Why?

Nice red herring. Your focus on me answering that question is odd.
Considering I voted for Sera.
Good way to pull attention away from coaching your scum buddy though.

My bad, and by the time I have time to go in depth. . .hammer is dropped.

I have yet to see any depth.

Vote: Chaco

[SocioPath]

Double voter doesn't make sense based on previous wagons. Secret voter could be possible, either town or scum I guess.

I just assumed that the vote counts on previous wagons were wrong.

Mainly because the mod said the votecount on previous wagons were wrong.

I apologize. I have made non critical mod errors in every past votecount. I will make sure future votecounts are correct

:shrug:, why not?

Unvote:
Vote: Forbiddanlight

Why not? Because if nothing happens, than its a no lynch, which gives scum like yourself and your buddy Chaco more time to play around during the night.

We should be lynching those that are scummy, and there are several people that are scummy.

Unvote
Vote: MonkeyMan576

[SocioPath]

Your insistance that we only play one way and only use one path isn't very logical or pro town.

Please describe this "one way" and "one path" to me.

I can't imagine the day ending on a no-lynch if we reach majority on a non-player. Wouldn't the votes just not count?

FL treats lynches of non-players, whether its the mod, or just not a player in the game, as a NO LYNCH.
SO STOP THE NO LYNCH DISCUSSION

UNVOTE
VOTE: COBALT

[SocioPath]

Your insistance that we only play one way and only use one path isn't very logical or pro town.

Please describe this "one way" and "one path" to me.

I can't imagine the day ending on a no-lynch if we reach majority on a non-player. Wouldn't the votes just not count?

FL treats lynches of non-players, whether its the mod, or just not a player in the game, as a NO LYNCH.
SO STOP THE NO LYNCH DISCUSSION

UNVOTE
VOTE: COBALT

I didn't know FL treated votes that way, and I clearly am not advocating a no-lynch, so why are you voting me?

Unvote

Clearly my vote is misplaced, mainly because of THIS COMMENT:

I am not advocating a no lynch. I just want to see what happens if I vote her.

I just TOLD YOU what happens, and yet you still say 'WANT TO SEE', not 'WANTED TO SEE'. Meaning your desire is still in the PRESENT TENSE.

Vote: MonkeyMan576

Do you really find someone new scummy each time, or what?

OBVIOUSLY.
The scummy styles and the scummy players are coming out in droves in this game. IN DROVES.
Also because I WILL VOTE ANYONE WHO TRIES A NO LYNCH. LIKE YOU DID. BUT NOW YOU KNOW BETTER. OR SHOULD.

[SocioPath]

You placed the vote without mentioning it. I usually see people calling for a claim or something when someone hits L-1.

That is complete falsified lies. Monkey never placed a L-1 vote. Chaco at any point has never been at L-1.

Unvote
Vote: Cobalt

Over eager scum it seems like you may be.

[SocioPath]

(as in SP should be able to find a way around that stipulation).

Funny how the votecount came immediately after.

@SocioPath: Do you still think Monkey and Chaco are scumbuddies? Where does that place Cobalt? Third-party or another scumbuddy?

The connections between them shout scum buddies, and I still think all 3 are scum, Monkey + Cobalt also have the buddying vibe going on, but at this point, its Cobalt that is rubbing me the most wrong way.

Socio, if you have a post restriction, I want you to vote me in your next post.

Quit trying to undermine my integrity. >:O

Why aren't we pressuring SP? His post restriction seems to make it close to impossible to communicate effectively. I find it more likely that a really severe PR is faked.

I can communicate quite effectively, thank you.

Also, I don't think MM denied placing the L-1 vote after I mentioned it. Then he says he was aware of the VC. So why did he call for a claim if he knew it was not L-1?

Because he is also scum.

Unvote
Vote: Monkeyman576

[SocioPath]

I don't understand why you'd announce your intention to not claim BEFORE pressure comes on.

At least wait and see if you can see scum jump on your wagon.

This is nice coaching too.

And the bolded part comes off so matter-of-factly that you know there isn't scum already ON his wagon.

Unvote
Vote: Cobalt

Cobalt is my number one suspect.

[SocioPath]

Um, why would I FOS someone that was coaching me?

You are seriously making no sense, Socio.

Scum distancing.
An FOS certainly isn't a vote.
Throwing FOS's around means little.

Unvote
Vote: MonkeyMan576

[SocioPath]

I killed socio by the way. He had fingered all 3 scum and the town conveniently forgot everything he said afterwards:).

I NO RITE

D:<

[SocioPath]

I'm hurt that no one really discussed me or what I was saying after my death. I mean, I certainly couldn't have possibly died for a reason, right? RIGHT?
Indeed it was 'Oh, he died, WIFOM, moving on.'