Open 173: Pie E7 Game over

Scien · Post Post #350 (ISO) » Mon Oct 12, 2009 11:19 am

Amished wrote:Scien: Your catch on Dram was better than I made it out to be, so I apologize for that; though you tunneled on charter way too much IMO. He was clearly right about the setup and to have a wrong conclusion be hammered at him so often and early on (and then lead to a case against him) would make anyone angry. I think that's where the charter suspicion started, and I could see that perfectly coming from a townie; so that's why nobody was going to convince me that charter was scum.

Meh, I couldn't prove Dramonic mistake very well though... otherwise I would have been very proud.

You are kind of right on Charter... trying the opposite of how I normally am. I have been criticized for being too not set on my reads. Trying a middle of the road approach between Scien and Hohum at the moment. Be stronger and sound more sure (I don't know if I subscribe to pissing everyone off that you can yet though heh.)

Amished · Post Post #351 (ISO) » Mon Oct 12, 2009 11:29 am

You've seen me recently though, you don't have to be pissed off, just convincing and logical. It's working so far, and in this game both scum have agreed that it would've been hard as hell to get me lynched too.

Scien · Post Post #352 (ISO) » Mon Oct 12, 2009 11:32 am

Was that directed at me? I wasn't mad at anyone.

Scien · Post Post #353 (ISO) » Mon Oct 12, 2009 11:34 am

Oh... I mean Hohum's tendency to piss everyone off to provoke misplays. I don't subscribe to that... my game here was to be more aggressive and to hold an image of myself that looked like I was more confident than I was... in order to scare scum.

Amished · Post Post #354 (ISO) » Mon Oct 12, 2009 11:34 am

Oh, i misread your "pissing everyone off" comment.

Amished · Post Post #355 (ISO) » Mon Oct 12, 2009 11:36 am

Yeah, it's a fine line to prevent tunneling, it's something that I'm working on as I get through more games. Though with this NK/game end, and two other games finished like right now, I need to go keep improving myself. ttyl and fun game (other than hohum's gambit)

charter · Post Post #356 (ISO) » Mon Oct 12, 2009 12:09 pm

hohum wrote:yes I gambled. Blame this loss squarely on me.

QUIT MAFIASCUM AND NEVER EVER COME BACK

Balter wrote:Charter was right about me, but I think he went for the kill way too soon. Had he waited a little bit more time to let me make some bad posts, I think he could have had me cornered.

Yeah, after you posted your answers to my case, I was like "shit, those are really good, no is going to follow me now".

Dramonic, really good play, had me fooled.
Scien, ask less questions. Sorry about not believing you about dramonic, but it didn't seem like a big deal. Have to learn for the future.
Amished, good job, made yourself obvtown.
Balter, curse you and your answers that make sense.
Zito, terrible.
Hohum, going to see if he can be banned for breaking site rule seven. Your actions clearly ruined the game. No case can be made for any of your play being to win as town. There's no point in playing games with you in them since you are a bonus scum member and you wasted everyone's time. Fuck off. Also, undoubtedly the second worst player on the site, even with play this atrocious, there is worse...

Mitey, good job modding. You have restored my faith in open game mods. This was going to be my last one since the last four or so mods for open games I've been in have been terrible.

Really no way for town to win with hohum playing. Waste of all our time.

hohum · Post Post #357 (ISO) » Mon Oct 12, 2009 12:18 pm

you're such a fucking baby. It's a game and I made some judgment mistakes. It happens, grow up.

Amished · Post Post #358 (ISO) » Mon Oct 12, 2009 12:19 pm

Ahh, I knew I was forgetting something.

@Mod: You did *great* for your first modding game. Really well done, and way to be on top of things. Fantastic!

MiteyMouse · Post Post #359 (ISO) » Mon Oct 12, 2009 12:28 pm

I know the game's over and all but, please try to keep it clean.

Thank you for the compliments! I have to say that I got such a great group of players for my first game...thank you all for making my first time so pleasant!

charter · Post Post #360 (ISO) » Mon Oct 12, 2009 12:33 pm

hohum wrote:you're such a fucking baby. It's a game and I made some judgment mistakes. It happens, grow up.

Maybe you should spend your time learning how not to play utterly terrible rather than continuing to insult people because they were right.

VP Baltar · Post Post #361 (ISO) » Mon Oct 12, 2009 12:35 pm

@charter- I got lucky that your questions were related to some of my more honest scumhunting in the thread. Where I think would have really got me was if you had pushed me on not really scumhunting toward my "suspicions" of dramonic. I was hesitant to lean on him hard, and if you had followed through on that attack, I think you would have caught me slipping a bit.

re: hohum- Yeah, he played badly this game, but I don't think its fair to say he's the second worst player on the site. I think hohum a good player, but he just got over confident here and was trying to win singlehandedly. I'm sure he learned his lesson. We all make mistakes.

Also, I hope this game will help redeem me in your eyes as not completely sucking at mafia.

I have played so atrociously in our other games together and I don't feel that is really my norm. I laughed when you were meta attacking me because I was playing well.

And I third the props to MM. The open queue mods do suck a lot because people are just doing it so they can mod the games they actually want to do. Thanks for taking your responsibilities seriously.

dramonic · Post Post #362 (ISO) » Mon Oct 12, 2009 1:04 pm

... Site rule 7?

Personally, I just think you both are very excitable and should simply avoid playing together (Just like me and Kreriov. The only time he replaced into a game I was in was because he got told by the mod he'd die at daybreak XD)

Amished · Post Post #363 (ISO) » Mon Oct 12, 2009 1:16 pm

did you guys just PM each other or was there a quicktopic (that we can see

)

MiteyMouse · Post Post #364 (ISO) » Mon Oct 12, 2009 1:27 pm

Here is the link to the quick topic. http://www.quicktopic.com/43/H/BKBSxsMeqEN

Actions:
Hohum investigates Scien
Baltar blocks Hohum
Dramonic kills Amished

Amished · Post Post #365 (ISO) » Mon Oct 12, 2009 1:48 pm

Oh, VP: Are you modding any games currently? Otherwise with my rash of games ending; I'll pick up another one if you don't have a chance of needing a replacement.

hohum · Post Post #366 (ISO) » Mon Oct 12, 2009 1:54 pm

charter wrote:
hohum wrote:you're such a fucking baby. It's a game and I made some judgment mistakes. It happens, grow up.
Maybe you should spend your time learning how not to play utterly terrible rather than continuing to insult people because they were right.

Maybe you should stop trying to flame-bait me and realize there's more to life than petty forum-kiddie drama. Maybe then your life will actually mean something.

VP Baltar · Post Post #367 (ISO) » Mon Oct 12, 2009 1:55 pm

Unfortunately, no. I'm on the waiting list, but it will probably still be a bit before I get another game. I'm in a game that needs a replacement (probably) if you are interested in that at all to square us up (though it is on Day 3 and a bit of a long read).

VP Baltar · Post Post #368 (ISO) » Mon Oct 12, 2009 1:56 pm

^that's at amished. No obligation by the way. Feel free to wait until I mod again.

Amished · Post Post #369 (ISO) » Mon Oct 12, 2009 2:01 pm

What's the game?

Papa Zito · Post Post #370 (ISO) » Mon Oct 12, 2009 2:06 pm

charter wrote:Zito, terrible.

No. I shouldn't be able to put together a page-long case on the Doc on Day 1.

Dude, hohum, I dunno what to say here.

VP Baltar · Post Post #371 (ISO) » Mon Oct 12, 2009 2:08 pm

Amished wrote:What's the game?

Prozac's LOST mafia, based on season 5. I think ChannelDeliBird needs replacement.

Amished · Post Post #372 (ISO) » Mon Oct 12, 2009 2:10 pm

You gotta admit your case wasn't that good on Charter though... And he was right about VP being scum...

Amished · Post Post #373 (ISO) » Mon Oct 12, 2009 2:10 pm

(Continuing this with VP in PM)

charter · Post Post #374 (ISO) » Mon Oct 12, 2009 2:16 pm

Papa Zito wrote:
charter wrote:Zito, terrible.
No. I shouldn't be able to put together a page-long case on the Doc on Day 1.

Dude, hohum, I dunno what to say here.

Except, you didn't. I might have claimed (probably not) if you had given actual reasons for voting me, but with three votes on me without reason/for pressure it would have been horrible play to claim doc then. Of course, quickhammering in an open setup takes the cake for horrible play.