Open 164 - Bird 7P (Over) before 836

OneGunman · Post Post #6 (isolation #0) » Tue Aug 18, 2009 1:34 pm

/confirm

OneGunman · Post Post #12 (isolation #1) » Tue Aug 18, 2009 4:44 pm

Vote zwetschenwasser

for conforming.

OneGunman · Post Post #24 (isolation #2) » Thu Aug 20, 2009 1:15 pm

brothernature wrote:
Unvote; Vote: zwetschenwasser
for having a really long name....

I smell a hopeful bandwagon...

OneGunman · Post Post #43 (isolation #3) » Sat Aug 22, 2009 11:32 am

brothernature wrote:So when I vote for a person who already has a vote on him, it's suspicious, yet when zwetschenwasser does it, it's not? Please explain your logic.

Completely different. Zwets's vote was for a late confirm. You switched your random vote to...another random vote but with one guy already on him?

OneGunman · Post Post #48 (isolation #4) » Sat Aug 22, 2009 5:45 pm

brothernature wrote:hiphop: First, zwet made the second vote on Xehdat. Far_Cry made the first, then unvoted, and put his vote BACK on Xehdat. Second, your jumping to conclusions.

OneGunman: So are you telling me I'm not allowed to change my vote? At all? Okay then. Next time you change your vote, I'm gunna take it as a scumtell.

Both: Neither of those are scumtells. Just drop 'em.

From here.

At the beginning of a game of Mafia, there is very little information to be had. As a result, initial votes are made with no substantial reasoning offered.
I don't understand how you can think someone is scum within the first two pages. Honestly.

You two are either thick-headed or newbies. I prefer to believe in humanity's intelligence and go with the latter.

The issue is not with changing your vote, the issue is primarily with changing your vote to someone who already has one in the RVS stage.

OneGunman · Post Post #58 (isolation #5) » Mon Aug 24, 2009 9:14 am

PorkchopExpress wrote:And why is that a problem exactly, OGM?

It seems to me like someone's trying to get a quick wagon going. Short days hurt the town, big time.

OneGunman · Post Post #59 (isolation #6) » Mon Aug 24, 2009 9:23 am

brothernature wrote:I agree with you Far_Cry. hiphop and Gun, you two are really overdoing it. Tone it down a bit, because at the moment, it really does look like your scum trying to act town.

OneGunman, I
also
don't get what your making a big deal about it. It's two votes. Okay, so with 7 people, it puts that person at L-2, but then again, 1 vote puts a person at L-3. It's not suspicious, so drop it and focus on finding some real evidence.

Fine. I'm watching you.