I'm sure he could post some stuff before posting this.inHimshallibe wrote:I apologize to the players and mod in this game for my absence - I'll post on Saturday.
While InHim is absent, let's vote Slicey!
You're absolutely right, and I deserve to be voted for it.hp [leaves] wrote:Saturday has paseed and nothing from inHim.
Unvote, Vote InHim
Oh come on now can we lynch Slicey? Look, he says Brandi is town because scum wouldnt be proactive (its actually best for scum to take over a game if no one else is taking the leader role). So there is logical fallicy number one. Now you go on to say Brandi is still scummy, so there goes that read shot to hell. Basically you got a whole paragraph that boils down toSlicey wrote:My opinion on Brandi is that she looks a lot more town after that gigantic post. I don't think scum would take the time to make such a huge post. However, I still think she's pretty scummy, for: calling people most likely town on P1 (and you downplayed it in your big post), actually considering lynching hp leaves for making a joke about a 4 person scumteam (this was mostly your wording. Town would not be thinking about lynching or not lynching someone on Page 2. They would be thinking about voting that person.) A final reason is that you only seem to worry about things that concern you. For example, you said very little in your big post about the posts between DDD and Furry, other than it happened.
Opinions can change. Brandi was my number one suspect. Now it's InHim. Brandi is now my number 2 suspect (unless InHim flips scum, in which case she's most likely town.)Furry wrote:Oh come on now can we lynch Slicey? Look, he says Brandi is town because scum wouldnt be proactive (its actually best for scum to take over a game if no one else is taking the leader role). So there is logical fallicy number one. Now you go on to say Brandi is still scummy, so there goes that read shot to hell. Basically you got a whole paragraph that boils down toSlicey wrote:My opinion on Brandi is that she looks a lot more town after that gigantic post. I don't think scum would take the time to make such a huge post. However, I still think she's pretty scummy, for: calling people most likely town on P1 (and you downplayed it in your big post), actually considering lynching hp leaves for making a joke about a 4 person scumteam (this was mostly your wording. Town would not be thinking about lynching or not lynching someone on Page 2. They would be thinking about voting that person.) A final reason is that you only seem to worry about things that concern you. For example, you said very little in your big post about the posts between DDD and Furry, other than it happened.
"Brandi is townish for that big post, but not too townish, lets not start calling her town or anything too. She did these things that are scummy remember?"
Before I start the response...Slicey wrote:My stance on Brandi is heavily determined by InHim's alignment. If he is lynched and flips scum, I'd say there's a great chance she's town and vice versa. That's why I think one of them should be lynched today, preferably InHim, and I've already said why I want him lynched. I would have no problem lynching Brandi either, however her flip would not confirm InHim's alignment in my eyes, if you understand what I mean. >_>
If he is lynched and flips scum, I'd say there's a great chance she's town and vice versa.
Oh my...I would have no problem lynching Brandi either, however her flip would not confirm InHim's alignment in my eyes, if you understand what I mean. >_>
I can’t defend this, because you’ve spun it into something indefensible . I never meant that Furry’s vote wasn’t random.Brandi wrote: First serious post by inhim:
This is a terrible line of reasoning. The first thing that you notice is that he put "random" in quotations. This implies that Furry's vote was not random. However, Furry noted that his vote on me was in fact, random.inHimshallibe wrote:unvote
vote: Furry
I don't like the way you backed down from that vote, even if it was "random."
I did not say I didn’t like the fact Furry unvoted; I disliked theSecond of all, inHim just did the VERY THING that he is voting Furry for. He took hisrandomvote off of Brian, and put it on Furry. Just like Furry took hisrandomvote off of me, and put it onto Fishy. Hypocrite much?
me wrote: I don't like the way you backed down from that vote
I think you have read me wrong this entire game if this is how your post starts out. Either this, or you like to imagine worst case scenarios about players instead of evaluating what is really there. Nowhere did I say in this first post that I didn’t want to progress the game, or that I was looking for a quicklynch. You’ve put the cart before the horse, as these developments about how I like to bandwagon came after this post of mine. And, besides, I’ve been over and over on how the reason I like to bandwagon isThird, there is nothing wrong with removing a random vote. Random votes are just to get the game going, very little to no information can be gathered from random votes, therefore it is only reasonable, for the sake ofPROGRESSING THE GAME, that a random vote be either a) reinforced with serious evidence, or b) removed, and a serious vote be placed on another player for some actual reasoning.
Fourth of all, the fact that he wanted 3randomvotes to stay on a player implies that he was hoping for some sort of baseless QUICKLYNCH to happen. Which is INCREDIBLY SCUMMY.
No. Do you always put words into people’s posts like this? And people like this reasoning against me? Wow.Next post, from inHim:
This right here, proving point #4 of my beef with his previous post. He is ADMITTING that his only real reason for voting for Furry was the fact he took ainHimshallibe wrote:At Brandi: I'll admit it wasn't the strongest, but explain to me why my reasoning was "crappy."
unvote
vote: Fishy
I like this wagon better than Brandi's.BANDWAGONoff of ME. A BANDWAGON THAT WAS BASED PURELY ONRANDOM VOTES.
No, at the time, I thought you were more town than Fishy. And your use of caps so often is already starting to annoy me. It proves no point any further, and is simply sensationalist in nature.Fishy seems more likely to be lynched because there is some actual reasoning behind the votes other players have put on him, therefore he is more supportive of it, because it means we mightMOVE INTO NIGHT QUICKER.
OH. I understand what you mean now.inHimshallibe wrote:Before I start the response...Slicey wrote:My stance on Brandi is heavily determined by InHim's alignment. If he is lynched and flips scum, I'd say there's a great chance she's town and vice versa. That's why I think one of them should be lynched today, preferably InHim, and I've already said why I want him lynched. I would have no problem lynching Brandi either, however her flip would not confirm InHim's alignment in my eyes, if you understand what I mean. >_>
If he is lynched and flips scum, I'd say there's a great chance she's town and vice versa.Oh my...I would have no problem lynching Brandi either, however her flip would not confirm InHim's alignment in my eyes, if you understand what I mean. >_>vote:Slicey
This is L-1, so everyone is aware.Gorrad wrote:Vote: inHimshallibe
What was your reasoning behind that vote then? I saw it as a distraction tactic since you apparently voted for the sake of bandwagoning.inHimshallibe wrote:No. Do you always put words into people’s posts like this? And people like this reasoning against me? Wow.Next post, from inHim:
This right here, proving point #4 of my beef with his previous post. He is ADMITTING that his only real reason for voting for Furry was the fact he took ainHimshallibe wrote:At Brandi: I'll admit it wasn't the strongest, but explain to me why my reasoning was "crappy."
unvote
vote: Fishy
I like this wagon better than Brandi's.BANDWAGONoff of ME. A BANDWAGON THAT WAS BASED PURELY ONRANDOM VOTES.
NO! I'm stopping mention of Jesters before it starts. Never ONCE does it help town.Brandi wrote:But I'd more so believe him to be a JESTER than a townie.
Isn't it a coincidence that everyone who has attacked you looks scummy to you?Brandi wrote:I'm at a friends house right now but, I decided to check in briefly on their computer. I have noticed that Brain is still failing to read properly. I don't attack "anyone who looks at me funny." I attack whoever is scummy. I've been clearly very supportive of one wagon, for the sheer fact that no one is even HALF as scummy as inHim.
HMMMMMMMM...Slicey wrote:Isn't it a coincidence that everyone who has attacked you looks scummy to you?Brandi wrote:I'm at a friends house right now but, I decided to check in briefly on their computer. I have noticed that Brain is still failing to read properly. I don't attack "anyone who looks at me funny." I attack whoever is scummy. I've been clearly very supportive of one wagon, for the sheer fact that no one is even HALF as scummy as inHim.
Pay attention, I already said that in my larger post, now I'm just reiterating it. >_>inHimshallibe wrote:HMMMMMMMM...Slicey wrote:Isn't it a coincidence that everyone who has attacked you looks scummy to you?Brandi wrote:I'm at a friends house right now but, I decided to check in briefly on their computer. I have noticed that Brain is still failing to read properly. I don't attack "anyone who looks at me funny." I attack whoever is scummy. I've been clearly very supportive of one wagon, for the sheer fact that no one is even HALF as scummy as inHim.
Slicey looking worse by not moving the vote.
vote: Slicey
Brandi picked quite an inopportune time to write 24 pages and have me respond to it.
The fact you keep bringing it up and not moving over there is what I'm getting at with my vote.Slicey wrote:Pay attention, I already said that in my larger post, now I'm just reiterating it. >_>inHimshallibe wrote:HMMMMMMMM...Slicey wrote:Isn't it a coincidence that everyone who has attacked you looks scummy to you?Brandi wrote:I'm at a friends house right now but, I decided to check in briefly on their computer. I have noticed that Brain is still failing to read properly. I don't attack "anyone who looks at me funny." I attack whoever is scummy. I've been clearly very supportive of one wagon, for the sheer fact that no one is even HALF as scummy as inHim.
Slicey looking worse by not moving the vote.
vote: Slicey
Brandi picked quite an inopportune time to write 24 pages and have me respond to it.