Mini 794 - Notable (Game Over!)

Empking · Post Post #9 (isolation #0) » Fri May 15, 2009 10:50 pm

/confirm

Empking · Post Post #12 (isolation #1) » Sat May 16, 2009 4:08 am

Vouch: ST

for voting before the mod posted the first day scene.

Empking · Post Post #19 (isolation #2) » Sat May 16, 2009 5:36 am

What's going on?

Empking · Post Post #21 (isolation #3) » Sat May 16, 2009 5:50 am

What's going on?

Empking · Post Post #24 (isolation #4) » Sat May 16, 2009 6:09 am

I think vouching is lynching.

Empking · Post Post #27 (isolation #5) » Sat May 16, 2009 6:16 am

Xylthixlm wrote:Also, I think SirT is going by the same thing I am here.

Which is...?

Empking · Post Post #30 (isolation #6) » Sat May 16, 2009 6:58 am

Oh, I get it now.

Empking · Post Post #34 (isolation #7) » Sat May 16, 2009 8:39 am

Sir Tornado wrote:
Papa Zito wrote:NabNab = Jester?
I really don't care whether he is a jester or not. Town wins when all threats are eliminated. Jester being lynched, or not doesn't affect the win condition of the town.

Ergo, NabNab should be lynched even if he is a Jester. It makes things a bit easier. In fact, IMO we shouldn't even be discussing the possibility of NabNab being a jester because it doesn't affect the town's win condition one bit.

This game is small enough that I'd be wary of him ending the game when lynched.

Empking · Post Post #49 (isolation #8) » Sat May 16, 2009 8:54 pm

Xylthixlm wrote:
Sir Tornado wrote:
EmpKing wrote:This game is small enough that I'd be wary of him ending the game when lynched.
That would be bordering on bastard modding. Generally, players are warned if there is a possibility of jester lynch ending the game.
Bordering schmordering.

OK, then.

I don't see a reason not to lynch him.

Empking · Post Post #51 (isolation #9) » Sun May 17, 2009 2:40 am

Papa Zito wrote:NabNab gets style points if nothing else.

Xylthixlm wrote:Papa Zito: Yes, you're scum.
Case or GTFO.

Mixologist wrote:3)Papa Zito: Why do you jump to the conclusion that NabNab is a jester?
I haven't come to any conclusions, I just threw it out as a possibility. Though I can't figure out a better reason why someone would
want
to be governed.

Did you answer the lynch/govern question?

Empking · Post Post #53 (isolation #10) » Sun May 17, 2009 3:23 am

Sir Tornado wrote:Stop.

No one hammer him just yet. We need to talk this over.

In my mind, there is no doubt. Vouching is same as voting, and governing is same as lynching.

I want everyone's opinion on this before anyone hammers NabNab. Just so there can be no wiggle room for anyone later on.

Empking · Post Post #59 (isolation #11) » Sun May 17, 2009 6:43 am

Iis there still a reason to wait?

Empking · Post Post #61 (isolation #12) » Sun May 17, 2009 7:44 am

Vote: NN

Mod: VC?

Empking · Post Post #63 (isolation #13) » Sun May 17, 2009 7:56 am

Sir Tornado wrote:Has everyone posted an opinion?

Hasn't Mix sorta ruined it?

Empking · Post Post #96 (isolation #14) » Wed May 20, 2009 10:24 pm

Skitzer: Can you fix the number of alive players, please?

I do have the town role PM, though obviously you won't beleive me.

Siro: Any defence to Xyl?

Empking · Post Post #105 (isolation #15) » Mon May 25, 2009 6:20 am

Vouch: Sir

Empking · Post Post #107 (isolation #16) » Mon May 25, 2009 6:42 am

Vouch: Siro

Empking · Post Post #124 (isolation #17) » Tue May 26, 2009 9:22 pm

Unvouch

I'm not sure about MC so I'll go with what the town decides.

Empking · Post Post #132 (isolation #18) » Mon Jun 01, 2009 11:38 pm

But don't prod me.

Empking · Post Post #137 (isolation #19) » Thu Jun 04, 2009 4:45 am

I probably won't post till Saturday, just because.

Empking · Post Post #140 (isolation #20) » Sat Jun 06, 2009 11:36 pm

Mix has left the building.

Empking · Post Post #144 (isolation #21) » Wed Jun 10, 2009 8:39 am

Waiting for Mix.

Empking · Post Post #153 (isolation #22) » Thu Jun 11, 2009 12:25 am

I am Top, I don't have a night action or any other abilities that I know of.

Empking · Post Post #157 (isolation #23) » Thu Jun 11, 2009 8:16 am

Vote; Sajin

Apparently he has a differentt PM from me but doesn't think we can both be town.

Empking · Post Post #175 (isolation #24) » Sat Jun 13, 2009 12:56 am

Sir Tornado wrote:Empking: I can be.

I was asking Sajin.

Empking · Post Post #179 (isolation #25) » Sat Jun 13, 2009 5:16 am

Sajin wrote:
Empking's Alt wrote:Sajin: Why can't Sir T be scum with Siro before 171.
I suppose he could be.

Why did you say otherwise?

Empking · Post Post #189 (isolation #26) » Sun Jun 21, 2009 12:32 am

Obv town, who's name I don't recall. Who's scum?