Mini 793: Scrubs mafia- GAME OVER

Gorrad · Post Post #13 (isolation #0) » Fri May 15, 2009 12:06 pm

Vote: Furry

, third vote in a random vote stage.

I don't know most of the people here (except by reputation, in some cases), looking forward to a good game!

Gorrad · Post Post #19 (isolation #1) » Sat May 16, 2009 3:57 am

Fishythefish wrote:
Vote: Gorrad

Brandi's reaction to Furry's vote seems extreme, but 4 votes seem a step too far for this, so I'm going with the person who attacks her attacker.

You do realize that I did not, in fact, put on a fourth vote, si?

Gorrad · Post Post #22 (isolation #2) » Sat May 16, 2009 4:36 am

inHimshallibe wrote:I believe Fishy was saying if he voted Brandi, then it would be 4 votes.

Ah! I see.

Gorrad · Post Post #35 (isolation #3) » Sun May 17, 2009 5:26 pm

Look, here's the thing: If we accept that [hp] did, in fact, slip scum info, we'd also have to accept that there IS a four-person team, something that's already been brought up as highly unlikely.

Gorrad · Post Post #43 (isolation #4) » Mon May 18, 2009 11:09 am

Brandi wrote:Anyway I don't know what to think of HP. That little 'slip up' isn't enough for a lynch, but should be kept in mind as we progress.

I do NOT like this.

Unvote, Vote: Brandi

Gorrad · Post Post #47 (isolation #5) » Mon May 18, 2009 4:37 pm

Brandi wrote:
Gorrad wrote:
Brandi wrote:Anyway I don't know what to think of HP. That little 'slip up' isn't enough for a lynch, but should be kept in mind as we progress.
I do NOT like this.

Unvote, Vote: Brandi
whats wrong with what I said? Maybe I don't like the letter G in your name. I should vote you for that.

You're basically saying, straight up, that while you won't push any case against hp now, you're reserving something to use against him later. A perfect example of which is a scum needing a way to jump onto a wagon later in the game and pulling something from page 2. If you think he's scummy, there's certainly nothing better page 2 on which to base a vote, so vote him! Otherwise, let it go.

Gorrad · Post Post #55 (isolation #6) » Tue May 19, 2009 6:51 pm

Unvote

.

I'll hold you to this. If you bring it up and no evidence of a four-person scumteam exists, I will personally make sure you're the next lynch.

Gorrad · Post Post #63 (isolation #7) » Wed May 20, 2009 12:19 pm

Scummy buddy to town for two reasons. The first being that improves the buddy's opinion of the scum, making the former less likely to vote for the latter. The second is that, should the buddy die, the scum look good by association with town.

Gorrad · Post Post #66 (isolation #8) » Wed May 20, 2009 12:51 pm

veerus wrote:
Gorrad wrote:Scummy buddy to town for two reasons. The first being that improves the buddy's opinion of the scum, making the former less likely to vote for the latter. The second is that, should the buddy die, the scum look good by association with town.
masked as "hey, we're still in random stage, i don't need a reason to play scummy"

Can you clarify? I don't understand to what you're referring.

Gorrad · Post Post #68 (isolation #9) » Wed May 20, 2009 1:21 pm

...I still fail to see continuity. Can you spell it out as opposed to one word and a quote?

Gorrad · Post Post #70 (isolation #10) » Wed May 20, 2009 5:56 pm

Ah, all right. Thanks for bearing with me.

Gorrad · Post Post #74 (isolation #11) » Thu May 21, 2009 1:24 am

inHimshallibe wrote:Don't develop all this theoretical... stuff... within the game; just play each game.

Read as: You've got me in a corner. Please stop scumhunting.

Gorrad · Post Post #126 (isolation #12) » Wed May 27, 2009 4:39 pm

My inactivity stems from my natural tendency towards D1 lurking and finals. Please bear with it for a bit more. I AM reading when I can.

Gorrad · Post Post #140 (isolation #13) » Fri May 29, 2009 12:59 am

V/LA until Sunday

Gorrad · Post Post #155 (isolation #14) » Sun May 31, 2009 5:37 pm

Right now, I don't really get town vibes from inhim OR Brandi. I'd bet that this is not a two-townie argument.

Gorrad · Post Post #178 (isolation #15) » Wed Jun 03, 2009 1:28 am

Good post, Brandi!

Inhim, make a bloody good response or I'm going to vote for you.

Gorrad · Post Post #185 (isolation #16) » Thu Jun 04, 2009 6:29 am

Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:
veerus wrote:DDD, your argument with Furry quickly derailed into theory instead of scumhunting... Who do you think is scummy right now?

Vote: Gorrad

He's running real low under the radar. He's not drawing attention to himself as part of the lurker contingent, but he's not particularly engaged with the main arguments and appears to be content to snipe with one liners into the fray.

I'm not sure if his first post and vote are random or serious because he offers up a tired textbook scumtell as his reason. If it's random I don't like him attaching a reason that could be perceived as real to it and if it's serious it's a bad reason. I don't like his vote on Brandi and I don't like the threat attached to his unvote. And in his latest he whirls from not liking either Brandi or inHim to complimenting Brandi and pressuring inHim.

Yesterday was my last final. I'll have much more time to post now.

Gorrad · Post Post #189 (isolation #17) » Thu Jun 04, 2009 6:26 pm

My vote will be on inHim if deadline gets too near unless, as stated, his defense is of a nature not yet seen of him.

Gorrad · Post Post #212 (isolation #18) » Mon Jun 08, 2009 10:24 am

Vote: inHimshallibe

Gorrad · Post Post #219 (isolation #19) » Tue Jun 09, 2009 3:49 am

Brandi wrote:But I'd more so believe him to be a JESTER than a townie.

NO! I'm stopping mention of Jesters before it starts. Never ONCE does it help town.

Gorrad · Post Post #257 (isolation #20) » Mon Jun 15, 2009 5:30 pm

Furry's really not looking good, but for now I'm going to

Vote: Fishythefish

.

I'm trying a new tell here, not sure it will work.

Gorrad · Post Post #259 (isolation #21) » Mon Jun 15, 2009 5:45 pm

Um....I don't really have any? Why? It doesn't really seem important to me. Does it seem important to you?

Gorrad · Post Post #261 (isolation #22) » Mon Jun 15, 2009 7:02 pm

Brandi wrote:It's just nice to have input on such matters. Speculations as to why someone was NKed, or reactions to the deaths of others. Some may be surprised, some may have expected something to happen. Personally, I honestly don't know why scum would target DDD, he didn't particularly give off the feel of a power role- and he wasn't particularly a strong voice for the town. It almost seems as if it were a completely random choice. Anyway, If all you feel is "meh" then that is an adequate response as well.

Unvote, Vote: Brandi

Gotcha.

Gorrad · Post Post #267 (isolation #23) » Tue Jun 16, 2009 7:10 am

Look, there's precisely one reason for you to find out reactions to night actions. Rolefishing. By asking people how they feel about the night actions, seeing who's surprised, etc., you are trying to out the doc.

And I caught you.

Brandi's scum, y'all. I've seen this case before.

Gorrad · Post Post #269 (isolation #24) » Tue Jun 16, 2009 8:24 am

Vanillas don't have a hand in night actions. Power roles do. If there's a power role that may have effected the night kills somehow (Doc, RB, JK, etc.), they're more likely to react.

Gorrad · Post Post #272 (isolation #25) » Tue Jun 16, 2009 9:04 am

Brandi wrote:I disagree entirely. What you're implying doesn't make any sense at all. Just because you don't have a HAND in the night actions, doesn't mean you can't have opinions on them. Opinions and ideas help progress discussion, and discussion is always good for the town. Just beacuse you're giving your opinion doesn't mean you have to say "Oh BY THE WAY MY ROLE IS ________" It's completely irrelevant.

The more we talk about night actions, the more likely it is that a power role, meaning to or not, lets their role slip.

Gorrad · Post Post #294 (isolation #26) » Thu Jun 18, 2009 10:26 pm

Brandi, no matter how scummy he was, you led a crusade against a townie. It takes a lot of ego to assume yourself to be a night kill after that.

Gorrad · Post Post #305 (isolation #27) » Mon Jun 22, 2009 6:10 pm

Brandi, you're at L-2. Claim please.

Gorrad · Post Post #308 (isolation #28) » Tue Jun 23, 2009 5:59 am

Brandi wrote:
Gorrad wrote:Brandi, you're at L-2. Claim please.
L-2 is no reason to worry, and there isn't any reason for me to claim. So, no.

There's a VERY good reason to claim. Deadline is four days away, and you're the top lynch choice.

Gorrad · Post Post #320 (isolation #29) » Wed Jun 24, 2009 6:36 am

Why the unvote?

Gorrad · Post Post #322 (isolation #30) » Wed Jun 24, 2009 7:35 am

What definition of early are you using?

Gorrad · Post Post #327 (isolation #31) » Wed Jun 24, 2009 8:03 pm

veerus wrote:Hm, I still don't like her excessive fishing about the night results.

Would you mind elaborating on this a touch, veerus?

No one else respond to this until veerus has a chance.

Gorrad · Post Post #358 (isolation #32) » Thu Jul 02, 2009 4:41 am

7 inHimshallibe (

Brandi

, veerus, Fishythefish, hp [leaves]/SSK,

Slicey, Gorrad

, Tzeentch)

5 Brandi (

Gorrad

, veerus, BrianMcQueso, Fishythefish,

Furry

)

BrianMcQueso
veerus
Gorrad
Fishythefish
Fritzler (replacing Lindisfarne (replacing Maturin24))
Tzeentch
MafiaSSK (replacing hp [leaves])

Veerus and Fishy rereads coming soon.

Gorrad · Post Post #366 (isolation #33) » Mon Jul 06, 2009 7:15 am

Fritzler wrote:Hey, what up guys?

Not much, Fritz. 'Sup with you?

Gorrad · Post Post #383 (isolation #34) » Thu Jul 09, 2009 11:34 am

I'm here, no prod needed. Just rather swamped.

Gorrad · Post Post #386 (isolation #35) » Thu Jul 09, 2009 12:07 pm

Vote: Fishythefish

Why do you want to rush me in very likely LYLO?

Gorrad · Post Post #388 (isolation #36) » Thu Jul 09, 2009 12:18 pm

It's the "That's ok... we only need two words. They are "vote" and "veerus"." part. It implies you don't wish any analysis, etc. with them.

Gorrad · Post Post #395 (isolation #37) » Thu Jul 09, 2009 5:15 pm

...I'm loathe to say it, but Snow White is right.

Unvote: Vote: Veerus

.

Let's pray you're right.

Gorrad · Post Post #397 (isolation #38) » Thu Jul 09, 2009 5:20 pm

...: D and you just made me sure my vote is right.

You could hammer. Assuming that the two masons are town, I'm town, and you're town for not hammering, that makes scum Fishy, Fritz, and Veerus.

...But that makes no sense. Then why would fishy be voting Veerus?

Unvote

I need to think on that...

Gorrad · Post Post #398 (isolation #39) » Thu Jul 09, 2009 5:22 pm

...OH! Mafia is Veerus, Fritz, SSK. That makes more sense.

Vote: Veerus

Gorrad · Post Post #413 (isolation #40) » Sat Jul 18, 2009 10:00 am

I concur. Care to go first?

Gorrad · Post Post #416 (isolation #41) » Sun Jul 19, 2009 8:19 am

Considering how few night kills we've had, I think that a doctor claim would be very useful.

I'm Dr. Cox, vanilla.

Gorrad · Post Post #418 (isolation #42) » Sun Jul 19, 2009 12:29 pm

Tzeentch wrote:
Dr. Perry Cox wrote:(It is Day 4.)

Gorrad wrote:Considering how few night kills we've had, I think that a doctor claim would be very useful.

I'm Dr. Cox, vanilla.
Innnnteresting.

Yeah, I knew that reaction would come as soon as I got the role PM.

If you're interested in flavor, it basically says that due to my good looks, talent, and awesomeness, I don't need any powers.

Gorrad · Post Post #420 (isolation #43) » Sun Jul 19, 2009 4:04 pm

MafiaSSK wrote:N2 got a guilty on veerus

Why didn't you lynch him, then?

Gorrad · Post Post #422 (isolation #44) » Sun Jul 19, 2009 4:18 pm

So we either have SW and Tzee pulling a fake masonry gambit or SSK pulling a fake cop gambit. Joy.

Gorrad · Post Post #425 (isolation #45) » Mon Jul 20, 2009 10:27 am

Fritz, I want your claim.

Gorrad · Post Post #431 (isolation #46) » Wed Jul 22, 2009 8:07 am

Vote: SSK

Half of yesterday's wagon was the mason group. I rather believe they're town.