Hmm, I missed the post where Charter said the mod had confirmed the role name of the person he reecruits changes to mason. 'Kay.Green Crayons wrote:Dizzy: charter putting "mason" into someone's role name which we will see when they die is a pretty confirmable action. Kort's dying/not dying when he should be protecting an investigative role is a pretty confirmable action.
I would say that they are confirmable power role claims. How are you suggesting that they are not confirmable at all? If you wanted to throw out legitimate criticism, I would have thought you would have argued that charter's ability doesn't make him town or that Kort's ability might take too long to test - and thus if he's lying, he might already be a part of the mafia majority by the time it comes down to realizing we should string him up.
Those are the criticisms that come to mind.Notthat their roles are flat-out unconfirmable. I would like to know why you think we can't confirm either of these roles at all, because that just looks like a big fat lie?
No, I think she's town.Post 672, Ether wrote:Hmm. Incognito, is Camn scum?
I did give an explicit reason for my vote, and it wasn't your "interacting rather than lag behind". Actually, even having recently come off you, I want you to explain why you're not reading the posts of someone you apparently suspect.Korts wrote:As of my scumlist: I still think charter is scum based on that claim, and he has been fairly scummy for a while; Xdaamno is scummy, but I'm not convinced of his guilt now; and the people who are pushing my wagon based on the fact that I decided to interact rather than lag behind--Izzy, Patrick I assume (although I don't see any explicit reason for his vote), and Ether I assume (her apparent case on me never got produced).
Rules wrote:4: Lynching requirements are set out in the previous post. Once a lynch is decided, the decision is final. Feel free to continue posting until the thread is locked, but unvoting, etc. before I check the thread will not prevent the player from being lynched.
vollkan wrote:13: Each day will have an automatic deadline of three (3) weeks. Undernocircumstances will I extend the deadline.At deadline, the player with the most votes will be lynched. In the case of a tie, whichever of the tied players received the LAST vote shall be the lynchee.
QFT (though I'm pretty certain which wagon I'll be on at the deadlineOhGodMyLife wrote:I don't particularly like the prospects of either an Izzy lynch or an X lynch, but a no lynch would be disastrous so I'll put my vote on whichever one is closer to being lynched in a few hours.
) 
Even if, we have charter. If charter recruits you, and we lynch you and you come up mason, then we have a semi-confirmed town that Korts the bodyguard can protect.DizzyIzzyB13 wrote:Korts cannot be confirmed unless he dies, and even if he doesn't he's not confirmed scum because of WIFOMy bullshit involving guessing mafia motives. We don't even know if we have an investigative role, and I can completely see why OGML appears to be thinking that Miller Yos could just be a red herring. And if he's not, there's a cop and those two claims are true, then there's almost definitely a Mafia Power Role involved, possibly an RB, which would make Korts' ability next to useless, so even if the cop dies while being protected by Korts, he's not confirmed scum.
Ah, so we aren't in danger of doing a no lynch. Then I'm keeping my vote where it is.Incog wrote:rules citation
How is charter unconfirmable?DizzyIzzyB13 wrote: I'd rather lynch Korts, but charter's a viable second choice. I am uncomfortable with the notion that they should suddenly be let off because of unconfirmable power role claims, especially since I seem to suddenly be the default lynch and I'm just a vanilla townie.
