Nomic - Game Over. King Max Wins!

Drench · Post Post #68 (isolation #1) » Sun Apr 12, 2009 4:04 pm

Yay to Rules 6, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17
Nay to Rules 7, 8, 15, 18, 19

Proposal 20 - Unanimous Exclusion

Any Rule that affects any single player or group of players whose sum equates to less than 13 must be unanimously passed to take effect.

Proposal 21 - Voting Glory

Upon the 7th Rule being passed (that is, the 7th overall Rule to take effect, rather than Proposal #7), a vote will occur to eliminate 2 players from the game. This vote will be sent to the Moderator. The trigger for the First Vote may be changed at any time via an Amendment. Steps for further Votes may also be changed, with default Steps being Rules #12, #16, #20, and #25. The Final Vote will consist of 2 Votes, first, a vote to determine 1 player to be eliminated, and then a Second Vote from the Eliminated Players, who will decide the winner.

Proposal 22 - Amendment

A Rule may be Amended my majority vote by stating '

Amendment to Rule ##

', and highlighting amendments within the text in bold colour.

Drench · Post Post #70 (isolation #2) » Sun Apr 12, 2009 4:15 pm

Nay to Proposal 23

Drench · Post Post #72 (isolation #3) » Sun Apr 12, 2009 4:25 pm

Sudo_Nym wrote:Can't you put your own self interest aside for the good of the group, Drench?

I can, but Proposal 20 can't.

SPEEDPASS GOGOGO

Drench · Post Post #78 (isolation #4) » Sun Apr 12, 2009 6:32 pm

Nay to

24

23

Proposal

25

24

- Ineptitude

Any individual who proposes more than 10 proposals that fail will have their proposal privileges removed. A Meta-Rule will be created at this instance for the purpose of tracking when the player should regain privileges.

This will be P24.

Proposal

26

25

- Meta-Rule

A new Rule category, the Meta-Rule is created. A Meta-Rule is more accurately a Proposal that never expires and deals with situations referring to players. Players may say Yay or Nay for the Meta-Rule at any time, however the Meta-Rule will only be removed once a majority of Yays are accumulated. Players may change their stance on a Meta-Rule at any time. Rules may create Meta-Rules at any time. A sample Meta-Rule is this:

MR1: [PLAYERNAME] Posting Privileges (Yay: 4 - Blah, Tweed, Yap, Dizzy) (Nay: 3 - Me, You, Them)

This will be P25

Drench · Post Post #81 (isolation #5) » Sun Apr 12, 2009 6:59 pm

ortolan wrote:
Yay to 20, 21, 22
Nay to 24

I don't understand how meta rules work.

Basically, it's just a permanent proposal that passes when it gets a majority of yays. I envision it for use in conjunction with Proposal 25 (should so-and-so get his proposal privileges back?) as well with whatever anyone else can think of.

Drench · Post Post #83 (isolation #6) » Sun Apr 12, 2009 8:44 pm

ortolan wrote:How does it differ from a normal rule?

A normal rule expires after a week. A Meta-Rule never expires until it acquires a majority of Yays, and is designed to allow for tracking players' opinions and thoughts.

Drench · Post Post #85 (isolation #7) » Sun Apr 12, 2009 10:35 pm

ortolan wrote:What's wrong with unanimous exclusion?

Drench · Post Post #88 (isolation #8) » Mon Apr 13, 2009 12:10 am

Empking wrote:
Proposal N

1. alvinz95
2. Sudo_Nym
3. chenhsi
4. ortolan
5. animorpherv1
6. Blackberry
7. Atticus Finch
8. Xdaamno
10. knox
11. Max
12. organgepenguin
13. Drench

Are removed from the game.

Oh I'm the only one who can vote on it. Sorry guys.

Proposal 20 Amended

Drench · Post Post #90 (isolation #9) » Mon Apr 13, 2009 12:12 am

Xdaamno wrote:Can we have a list of all the active proposals every so often?

OP has it.

Drench · Post Post #92 (isolation #10) » Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:00 am

Juls wrote:
Rule P7 has been defeated.

P7.
All players must post every sixty hours or be removed from the gasme unless their absense is noted before hand and the player does not post on MS during that time. (Expires 04/19 7:06 a.m. CDT) (Yays(4) Empking, alvinz95, chenhsi, Max; Nays(7) Sudo_Nym, Knox, animorpherv1, orangepenguin, ortolan, Drench, Blackberry)

Mod: Please note the changes edited into Proposal 20.

Votes have already been cast so I cannot change it but you are welcome to vote it down and resubmit under the new revision.

Drench · Post Post #112 (isolation #11) » Tue Apr 14, 2009 12:26 am

Nay to all proposals.

Drench · Post Post #114 (isolation #12) » Tue Apr 14, 2009 12:49 am

Proposal 30

Any Rule that affects any single player or group of players whose sum equates to less than 13 must be unanimously passed to take effect.

Drench · Post Post #116 (isolation #13) » Tue Apr 14, 2009 12:53 am

Empking wrote:
No to Proposal 30

Proposal 31

A proposal that does not affect every player in the same way must be unanimously passed to take effect.

How is this different? What is wrong with proposal 30?

Drench · Post Post #117 (isolation #14) » Tue Apr 14, 2009 12:54 am

Aye on 13 and 21

Drench · Post Post #136 (isolation #15) » Tue Apr 14, 2009 2:44 pm

Yay to Proposals 31, 32

Drench · Post Post #138 (isolation #16) » Tue Apr 14, 2009 3:19 pm

Yay to Proposal 33

No need for this to be proposal, fixed now.

Drench · Post Post #140 (isolation #17) » Tue Apr 14, 2009 3:23 pm

Aye on Proposal 22

Drench · Post Post #142 (isolation #18) » Tue Apr 14, 2009 4:32 pm

Blackberry wrote:
And then there were ten...

Proposal 69

Each participant has 10 hp. If you sandwich a person's post (post before and post after) you cause damage and that person loses 1 of those hp. Once a person reaches 0 hp, that person is eliminated and automatically loses the game.

Nay on Proposal 69

Remove the innuendo, and add a retrospective clause and I might consider it.

[loves the chaos]

Drench · Post Post #151 (isolation #19) » Wed Apr 15, 2009 2:26 am

Aye to Proposal 33

Drench · Post Post #227 (isolation #20) » Thu Apr 16, 2009 3:59 pm

Nay to all Unanswered Proposals
Yay to Proposals 42, 44

Drench · Post Post #229 (isolation #21) » Thu Apr 16, 2009 4:12 pm

Nay to P45

Drench · Post Post #276 (isolation #22) » Fri Apr 17, 2009 12:44 pm

Aye on 14 and 45

Drench · Post Post #279 (isolation #23) » Fri Apr 17, 2009 12:57 pm

Proposal 48

A vote will immediately be held at the passing of this Proposal to eliminate a player.

Proposal 49

Anyone without any capitals in their name will be removed at the passing of this proposal.

Drench · Post Post #282 (isolation #24) » Fri Apr 17, 2009 2:37 pm

Of course you would say no...

Drench · Post Post #284 (isolation #25) » Fri Apr 17, 2009 3:00 pm

Juls wrote:
Please don't edit posts. I had already added proposal 48 and drench added 49 to his same post. I can't be expected to keep up with edits.

Hug?

Drench · Post Post #287 (isolation #26) » Fri Apr 17, 2009 3:21 pm

Aye to A6

Drench · Post Post #290 (isolation #27) » Fri Apr 17, 2009 3:23 pm

Drench · Post Post #291 (isolation #28) » Fri Apr 17, 2009 3:24 pm

i dont like you anymore

Drench · Post Post #295 (isolation #29) » Fri Apr 17, 2009 8:53 pm

Nay to P50

Drench · Post Post #298 (isolation #30) » Fri Apr 17, 2009 8:55 pm

Grrrr.

Drench · Post Post #299 (isolation #31) » Fri Apr 17, 2009 8:55 pm

I'll get you.

Drench · Post Post #317 (isolation #32) » Sat Apr 18, 2009 3:23 am

Aye on 51

Drench · Post Post #318 (isolation #33) » Sat Apr 18, 2009 3:24 am

Tada!

Drench · Post Post #320 (isolation #34) » Sat Apr 18, 2009 3:26 am

sandwichp

Drench · Post Post #321 (isolation #35) » Sat Apr 18, 2009 3:26 am

Drench · Post Post #322 (isolation #36) » Sat Apr 18, 2009 3:27 am

Aye on 52

There is no 52.

Drench · Post Post #327 (isolation #37) » Sat Apr 18, 2009 3:31 am

Hammer: Blackberry

Drench · Post Post #331 (isolation #38) » Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:07 am

Aye to 52

There is no 52.

Drench · Post Post #332 (isolation #39) » Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:07 am

Drench · Post Post #360 (isolation #40) » Sat Apr 18, 2009 11:54 am

Welcome...to the FINAL 3!

Aye to 52

Drench · Post Post #361 (isolation #41) » Sat Apr 18, 2009 11:55 am

Wooo!

Drench · Post Post #367 (isolation #42) » Sat Apr 18, 2009 12:38 pm

Proposal 53

The 9 eliminated players will form a jury to decide the winner at the passing of this proposal. No new proposals will be able to be proposed, and any outstanding proposals will be invalidated.

Be more specific. There are 10 eliminated players. Do you want the most recent nine or all ten?

Drench · Post Post #368 (isolation #43) » Sat Apr 18, 2009 12:38 pm

Drench · Post Post #373 (isolation #44) » Sat Apr 18, 2009 12:50 pm

Nay on 48

.

The endgame is what it's all about.

Drench · Post Post #375 (isolation #45) » Sat Apr 18, 2009 12:50 pm

KK?

The mod loses 2 hp, she now has 6 hp.

Drench · Post Post #376 (isolation #46) » Sat Apr 18, 2009 2:00 pm

Mmhm.

Drench · Post Post #380 (isolation #47) » Sun Apr 19, 2009 12:06 am

No to 49

Blackberry: there's no reason to say yes, as you can't make proposals. If you say no, I will first eliminate Max and then revoke the rule barring your proposing privileges.

There is no 49.

Drench · Post Post #381 (isolation #48) » Sun Apr 19, 2009 12:07 am

Drench · Post Post #382 (isolation #49) » Sun Apr 19, 2009 12:08 am

Proposal

53 Redux

54

The 9 eliminated players thus far will form a jury to decide the winner at the passing of this proposal between the 3 remaining players. No new proposals will be able to be proposed, and any outstanding proposals will be invalidated.

Drench, there are 10 eliminated players. I am going to assume this proposal excludes Atticus.Finch

Drench · Post Post #396 (isolation #50) » Mon Apr 20, 2009 12:31 am

54 should be passed if you don't want a draw.