Nomic - Game Over. King Max Wins!

[ortolan]

/in

[ortolan]

No on Proposal 1

especially as you've still failed to specify a penalty for it ani- what if the person again fails to vote in their subsequent post?

I would prefer the golden rules to be alterable also, I believe that is a tenet of nomics from my limited reading.

Yes on Proposal 2

[ortolan]

Proposal 3

Players must post at least once every 48 hours or be removed from the game.

Proposal 4

Being removed from the game is equivalent to an automatic loss.

[ortolan]

has he demonstrated proficiency at doing so previously?

Otherwise a resounding no because it's unfair and will grow old quickly anyway.

[ortolan]

Proposal 6

One wins the game when either one "wins" as stipulated by any other rule(s) or when all other players have "lost" as stipulated by any other rule(s)

this game is bringing out the pedant/logicist in me which wonders about the logical validity of rules like these

[ortolan]

I will vote that if my first doesn't go through

[ortolan]

Re: 20, I wasn't voting on the proposal because I was waiting for clarification

OK, it wasn't counted.

[ortolan]

alvinz where do the expiry dates in 30 come from?

No to Proposal 5
No to Proposal 7
No to Proposal X
Yes to Proposal 9
No to Proposal 10
No to Proposal 11
No to 13
No to 15
Yes to 16

@ OP, what does voting neutral mean in practice? Don't see the point in 13 because I believe a proposal just has to get 50%+1 vote in order to pass- it doesn't matter if people don't vote on it.

14 depends on 12 being voted in.

You haven't been specific as to what the roles do ani.

[ortolan]

Proposal 17

any proposition contradicting the golden rules implicitly or explicitly is automatically null and unable to be voted on.

[ortolan]

Retract 17
No to 18
No to 19

Makes it impossible to pass proposals once people leave the game.

No method to retract exists but moved your vote on 17 to Nay

[ortolan]

Yay to 20, 21, 22
Nay to

24

23

I don't understand how meta rules work.

[ortolan]

What's wrong with unanimous exclusion?

[ortolan]

How does it differ from a normal rule?

[ortolan]

LOL

Please read Proposal 20 and vote Yes to it, guys.

[ortolan]

Yo

[ortolan]

yay, my first victim.

[ortolan]

Yes 2 Proposition 33

[ortolan]

hi again

[ortolan]

No to 45

[ortolan]

Proposal

46

45

anyone with "Sud" in their name is removed from the game.

[ortolan]

I sandwiched you back scumbag (I haven't been keeping up and didn't even know that was a rule).

[ortolan]

ho

[ortolan]

do "neutral votes" include players that never voted?

no. you must vote

neutral

for it to count

[ortolan]

da

[ortolan]

aye to sandwich

[ortolan]

with some pastrami

[ortolan]

No to Proposal 49

I didn't vote to have your voting rights revoked.

Proposal 50: Juls pairs off all 6 of us into 3 pairs to play Advanced Rock Paper Scissors/whatever it's called, as per here: http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=11215

Those losing their game are eliminated.

[ortolan]

yum

[ortolan]

salami sandwich

[ortolan]

Vote: Max

[ortolan]

Proposal 51: Max loses

[ortolan]

no sandwich for me, I'd rather a bagel

[ortolan]

'cause I never wonder, how the girl feels...oh how the girl feels

(no rules against losers posting in the thread )

I predict a deadlock at this point though