Dethy V - GAME OVER

animorpherv1 · Post Post #15 (isolation #1) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 1:40 pm

caf19 wrote:Guilty on X.

same.

vote:X

animorpherv1 · Post Post #17 (isolation #2) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 1:43 pm

X wrote:
Vote: No Lynch
.

ani, 2 guilties doesn't make me scum.

but there is 1 Paranoid and 1 Sane. I think we have a good shot at having the sane target this person.

animorpherv1 · Post Post #24 (isolation #3) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 1:49 pm

I persoonally don't like an0-lynch. If we no lynch, and Mafia kills, and we no lynch again, mafia just won.

animorpherv1 · Post Post #26 (isolation #4) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 1:51 pm

oh well. We just hammered No-Lynch

animorpherv1 · Post Post #30 (isolation #5) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 1:53 pm

X wrote:I'm guessing ani's scum.

So, not liking NL makes me scum?

animorpherv1 · Post Post #35 (isolation #6) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 2:00 pm

caf19 wrote:Meh. I got a guilty on ani.

Innocent on Alduskel.

I think your paranoid.

animorpherv1 · Post Post #39 (isolation #7) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 2:03 pm

Where is Alduskel?

animorpherv1 · Post Post #40 (isolation #8) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 2:03 pm

animorpherv1 · Post Post #43 (isolation #9) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 2:09 pm

I'm reitirating the fact that I don't like NLs, especially 2 in a row

animorpherv1 · Post Post #52 (isolation #10) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 2:29 pm

I still have Inno on X and guitlty X.

animorpherv1 · Post Post #53 (isolation #11) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 2:29 pm

inno on Alduskell, sorry

animorpherv1 · Post Post #57 (isolation #12) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 2:32 pm

X wrote:Wait, you didn't get a third?

Unvote
.

Because I figured that caf was inno.

animorpherv1 · Post Post #67 (isolation #13) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 2:44 pm

Alduskkel wrote:
X wrote:But if animorph1 had a third investigation result, he would be able to figure out his own sanity...
Well, he didn't, unfortunately.

All I can say is that X was kind of spreading suspicion on you, ani. It's a weak scum tell, I know, but otherwise X hasn't done anything scummy.

I persoonally don't like the "investeated dead players, is [whatever showed up in the death thing]" either.

animorpherv1 · Post Post #76 (isolation #14) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 2:58 pm

oh yay, I get to choose?

I'm going with my gut and

vote:X

Sorry if you end out to be town, but the constant No-Lynch, the always inno results when Alduskkel claimed Naive, and such seem scummy to me.

animorpherv1 · Post Post #80 (isolation #15) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 3:02 pm

X wrote:No Lynch was necessary, and you still should have investigated someone.

I didn't think of that then.