Open 133 - Lovers Mafia (Over) before 771

[PhilyEc]

vote: Lynx

For helping the cats outnumber us~

[PhilyEc]

vote: hohum

I dont think Mr.Hoho is in this game

[PhilyEc]

Thanks Korts, I'll look at them now, as for Zwets. I personally like the guy so I'm not interested in any policy lynches until

after

scumhunting has been done.
Proposing a likely mislynch (33% chance hes scum at this point) is very reckless and inappropriate seeing as how the RVS hasnt even ended yet.

Could you give your train of thought as to why we should lynch Zwet when if he turns town we'll be in a LYOL situation instantly?

[PhilyEc]

Wait, there arent any night kills. Okay, a lynch wouldn't here so bad afterall, still we shouldnt be jumping on Zwet just yet. My point till stands that scumhunting > policy lynch.

[PhilyEc]

Mmm. On a first hunch: zwet-Phily scumteam. Very aghast chainsaw defense against a harmless joke vote.

Your vote wasnt very funny. In my defence, in all the games I'm playing people want to lynch Zwet, I really dont think its nice or fair. I ain't scum but its a nice first hunch.

[PhilyEc]

[dodges Mod meteorites heading in Zwets direction]

Dx

[PhilyEc]

Lnyx, who's Korts? =/

[PhilyEc]

EBWOP: Lynx*

Sorry, throbbing headache..

[PhilyEc]

FoS Santos

'cause I can~

[PhilyEc]

Original Roll String: 1d6 (STATIC)

1 6-Sided Dice: (1) = 1

Strange, thats Zwet. After talk of policy lynches this seems a tad set-up.

[PhilyEc]

o-O ...I didnt put fixed there...I saw this there the second it posted...a sign from God? O_O

[PhilyEc]

Original Roll String: 1d6

1 6-Sided Dice: (2) = 2

[PhilyEc]

There I just kept clicking preview till it went to 1. I dont think you're correct that I've proven you towards being honest because this is able to happen.

[PhilyEc]

Bats eyelids

[PhilyEc]

I thought you can't cheat the dice roles?

Try it yourself, preview a post, pop in dice with 1d6 and keep hitting preview. The result of the throw keeps changing. I managed to get it to 1 pretty easily.

[PhilyEc]

The point was to get it to one.

Original Roll String: 1d6

1 6-Sided Dice: (1) = 1

[PhilyEc]

Hmm, maybe it was pure luck that my preview went from 1 to a posted version of 1. That 3 was a 1 in the preview. Okay Sekinj, your role was legit. Sorry for the confusion.

[PhilyEc]

Just figuring if the random vote on you was fixed or not.

[PhilyEc]

Mmm. On a first hunch: zwet-Phily scumteam. Very aghast chainsaw defense against a harmless joke vote.

Nothing has happened to change my opinion on this. Willing to lynch zwet. Also note how Phily tries to get a second roll when sekinj's dice indicate that zwet should be lynched.

I've explained my actions, now you're going into tunnel vision. Trust me the game aint that easy. Defending one player doesnt make me scummy, I've sympatised with Zwets place in the policy lynch position for a few games.

[PhilyEc]

Mmm. On a first hunch: zwet-Phily scumteam. Very aghast chainsaw defense against a harmless joke vote.

Nothing has happened to change my opinion on this. Willing to lynch zwet. Also note how Phily tries to get a second roll when sekinj's dice indicate that zwet should be lynched.

I've explained my actions, now you're

going into

tunnel vision. Trust me the game aint that easy. Defending one player doesnt make me scummy, I've sympatised with Zwets place in the policy lynch position for a few games.

A couple points of interest.

Does stating twice that I think a zwet-Phily scumteam is what we have on our hands make it tunnel vision?

I doubt that. Also, since when do you decide what does or doesn't make you scummy?

Your defense of zwet was disproportionate when considering the fact that my vote was pretty much arbitrary, and it was quite obvious that it wasn't serious.

Mulitating my words so much, you have to be scum.

Unvote

Vote Korts

FYI , check my metas with Zwet, I've always voiced how I dont approve of this policy lynch approach. Seems like an easy way to misguide town and Scum will definately support such a thing.

[PhilyEc]

Not seeing the tunneling. There's only six people in the game and we've just started. It's much easier to focus on one individual to get us out of the random phase anyway. It was a rather obvious joke by Korts I feel.

You seem to be staking way too much into the policy lynch suggestion, Phily.

Policy lynches are bs. That is why I suspect anyone that brings them up. Theyre a great way of excusing scum from actually finding a good reason to vote someone.

[PhilyEc]

He fixed the dice.

I thought this was the case too, but you cant fix it, only be extremely lucky that your preview matches the posted number. The dice roll was random.

[PhilyEc]

We went through all this earlier, its been proven you were honest Sekinj, Zwet I advise you read into this game a bit deeper, I know you're busy but it would really help your case.

[PhilyEc]

Yes. Just because I'm in a crapload of games doesn' t mean I can't keep up with them.

Why do you object yourself to this kind of scrutiny when you can simply play less games? 6 should do fine right? And imagine how well theyd go~

[PhilyEc]

I dont know, hence the why. I cant see you enjoying being policy lynched in so many games tbh.

[PhilyEc]

In regards to the other Zwet thing, policy lynches are really unacceptable to me. I don't find them fair whatsoever. You might want to try to limit your games somewhat, but if you feel you can do it, then nobody has a right to stop you as long as you can keep up.

Finally, someone who isnt an asshole! Agreed 100% and the more adamantly a policy L is pushed for the more I've found Zwet has turned up town. (Theory)

[PhilyEc]

Then lets get the lurker(s). Tis how scum would react to 'friendly discussion'. Yes? No? Why? XD

[PhilyEc]

sekinj pushing for this framing gig? Why has everyone else accepted you changed your mind cept her? XD

[PhilyEc]

@phily - are you goign to excuse zwet no matter how he acts?

Hes a bit of a fool so I find it extremely hard to analyse him. Whats your opinion on his acts?

[PhilyEc]

I'm reading the new stuff now but have nothing really to say, Zwet needs to take time and explain himself at this point.

[PhilyEc]

also, zwet has his meta going for him...

Phily - why have you decided to not excuse zwet any more?

I like the guy so I give him the benefit of the doubt. Your posts in particular made me realise he needs to explain himself, etc. If I was to decide the lynch right now, I'd go for Korts.

Far too sure of himself, trying to encourage the mislynch.
As for my claim, I'm plain old vanilla.

---

For those freaking out because I 'dissapeared', I got some new Xbox games, theyre going to keep me pretty busy to be honest~

---

If phily dies I want to hammer him.

You're behaviour so assuredly yet you're wrong. This makes you even more of a fool Zwet, really changing my mind on you now since I thought your small posts had some kind of potential -.-

---

Since this is basically a shot in the dark lynch approaching me, I entice the group to lynch Korts the next day and push out scum after I turn up town. Removing someone so sure in such an insecure game is always the safest option. (Bets are he'll turn on Zwet once hes done using him as the banner boy for my lynch)

Hope that settles any worries over votes towards myself. My vote remains where it is.

[PhilyEc]

Hey look! He stopped buddying up to me! Wishy washy scum...

Obviously can't like someone till they act the idiot. No one does that right? [Rhetorics are hopefully a strong-point for you]