Mini 765 - Welcome to Hambargarville GAME OVER!!

Lleu · Post Post #3 (isolation #0) » Tue Mar 24, 2009 1:00 pm

/confirm

Lleu · Post Post #22 (isolation #1) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 4:08 pm

vote:qwints

for being at the top of the list.

Lleu · Post Post #27 (isolation #2) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 1:39 am

I'll just call you Noob, if you don't mind.
It looks like it's a closed setup, so we won't know until the end of the game.

This is also my first non-newbie game. Does anyone have any idea much scum there are?

And come on, what's wrong with Euler?

Lleu · Post Post #30 (isolation #3) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 3:59 am

Idiotking wrote:
Vote Ojanen
for being the first to be the second to vote for someone...?

That would be Yellowbunny on me, actually.

Lleu · Post Post #35 (isolation #4) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 6:53 am

I don't think so. That would be a blatant scum-tell.

Ojanen: Why does it matter, considering we're in the RVS?

Lleu · Post Post #54 (isolation #5) » Mon Mar 30, 2009 10:22 am

I'm more interested in World1Noob, actually. L-2 (qwints) seems a bit far for RVS.

unvote qwints

Fos:Noob

Lleu · Post Post #58 (isolation #6) » Mon Mar 30, 2009 10:44 am

X wrote:Um, qwints had 2 votes. How did you think he was at L-2?

Oops, just really bad at counting. I guess the third one I thought I saw was qwint's vote on Noob.

Idiotking wrote:Guilty conscience, HA! again. I HA! at you.

Considering how eager you were to start discussion, could you at least address the question when you're questioned? Not enough for a FoS, but that still seemed overly dramatic.

Lleu · Post Post #60 (isolation #7) » Mon Mar 30, 2009 12:19 pm

Idiotking wrote:Address it? How do you answer the question "Do you have a guilty conscience?" when the answer, regardless of your alignment (especially this early in a game) is always going to be "no"? No, then. It's an answer that means absolutely nothing.

Fair enough.

Idiotking wrote:OK, so. Try and understand this: I hate random voting. With an undying, ridiculously malevolent passion. I know I have to random vote, however. By not doing it, I cause a problem in that has to be resolved though logic when NO logic has any grounds yet. I.E. the creation of the problem itself is the only "act" to refer to, and as such, means unless the problem is removed, leads to a lot of aimless discussion that causes even more problems.

Could you at least explain why you hate it?

Lleu · Post Post #83 (isolation #8) » Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:08 am

Hm... think I'll focus on one person at a time here.

X 63 wrote:The question was rhetorical, and not meant seriously. Seriously, what are you doing?

"X 63" wrote:Do you really think this is going to get us anywhere?

Who knows? I guess it's just his personality rubbing me the wrong way. As I said, his expressive reactions strike me as odd.

Idiotking wrote:A lot of people dislike random voting, this can't be the first time he heard of such a dislike.

It's the first time I've heard someone put it like "I hate random voting. With an undying, ridiculously malevolent passion." Again, I think this is probably just your personality and not scummy, but I'll do some meta later to make sure.

W1N 66 wrote:even if he was at L-2 it wouldn't matter, if we stopped random voting people because they already have votes on them it wouldn't be random voting any more, it'll be lets spread out the votes evenly so there's no pressure what so ever.

Fair enough.