War in Heaven II - Spirit of Vengeance (Over!)

Drench · Post Post #17 (isolation #0) » Wed Mar 18, 2009 5:35 pm

/confirm before Ybele-Cay.

Drench · Post Post #24 (isolation #1) » Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:08 pm

Cybele wrote:
Drench wrote:/confirm before Ybele-Cay.
Too late!

FASTER THAN YOU

Drench · Post Post #25 (isolation #2) » Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:23 pm

Drench wrote:
Cybele wrote:
Drench wrote:/confirm before Ybele-Cay.
Too late!
FASTER THAN YOU

Cybele wrote:/confirm

Cybele in AIM wrote:ochre face paint (9:22:45 PM): Tha's right, bitch!@

I stand corrected. Unwillingly.

Drench · Post Post #46 (isolation #3) » Thu Mar 19, 2009 9:53 pm

Nuwen wrote:
But he really
could
be a daycop bulletproof mason with a single 50%/50% shot this time!

BWA HA HA HA

Drench · Post Post #162 (isolation #4) » Fri Mar 20, 2009 6:07 pm

God you people post fast. Damnit.

On Kinetic: I can see the arguments, but for me they aren't really substantial. I wouldn't hurt Kinetic on those arguments alone.

I like the fake voting system. It allows us to express our suspicions while not actually putting said suspect in trouble.

Don't like that idea of roflcopter's. As tenchi wrote:

This is so creepy. The last time I saw people do this, it allowed scum in the council (even when they were in the minority) to manipulate the vote. Also, why should we trust your choices? I feel just placing one scum in that council of four can really sway things.

Let's remind ourselves that no one is perfect. If roflcopter makes one mistake during the formation of this council, then we immediately get disadvantaged. Not a risk I would be willing to take.

Heal: Xylthixlm

. Random.org FTW.

Drench · Post Post #167 (isolation #5) » Fri Mar 20, 2009 6:34 pm

Tenchi wrote:Drench, several other cases have been posted.

Do you have a new case (notice anything weird)?
Which of the existing cases do you agree with?

Answering your first question: Not a thing.

On your second, I believe these are the cases presented:

Kinetic: As explained above, I don't agree with it fully.

Xyl: Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the case here is that post:

I don't see any need to subvert the hurt/heal mechanism.
Just try to concentrate your fire on people who are already hurt, rather than wearing everyone down at once.
That will make it harder for scum to suddenly kill townies using secret damage.

As several people have said, a fast-paced game helps the town even more than normal.
Expect scum to try to slow it down by lurking.

Something about those sentences is off. Let me think.

Oh yeah. Xyl is suggesting we finish off everyone that loses a bit of health instead of spreading around the

joy

pain. The he suggests we cut down on the information gathering. You know, to hurt the scum.

Perfectly normal.

Vote: Xyl

. I now hate random.org.

vIQ: I believe this was about the definite percentage. I agree it's fishy.

FoS: vIQ

. At the very least, I'd like to know how he managed to get such an exact number.

rofl: To cover in more detail from above, I believe rofl is playing very aggressivly. Not a fan of that. If we all played like rofl, as someone said I believe, by D3 we'd all be dead. That wouldn't help our chances of defeating the Fallen.

I don't know if I missed anyone. Take a number if so.

Drench · Post Post #180 (isolation #6) » Fri Mar 20, 2009 8:02 pm

Xylthixlm wrote:
Drench wrote:Oh yeah. Xyl is suggesting we finish off everyone that loses a
bit
lot of health instead of
spreading around the joy pain
letting the scum choose which ones to finish. The he suggests we
cut down on the information gathering
gather information as fast as possible. You know, to hurt the scum.

Perfectly normal.
Fixed.

Thanks for that. Now could you be a dear and fix up the glaring holes in your strategy? For example, how is advocating killing off anyone who loses a lot of health regardless of circumstance good for the town? How is it that quick days will resolve in

more

information? Could you answer?