Mini 709 - Musical Mafia - (Game Over!)
-
-
Nekka-Lucifer Townsperson
- Townsperson
- Townsperson
- Posts: 636
- Joined: May 22, 2007
- Location: UK
-
-
Nekka-Lucifer Townsperson
- Townsperson
- Townsperson
- Posts: 636
- Joined: May 22, 2007
- Location: UK
-
-
Nekka-Lucifer Townsperson
- Townsperson
- Townsperson
- Posts: 636
- Joined: May 22, 2007
- Location: UK
I'm sorry for the misunderstanding, but which post in this thread did I vote for Budja? I have not ignored Gamma's 4th vote. I have done the exact opposite and I challenged him for it by confirming my vote for him. He acted abit edgey and gay me a FoS for the first vote on himself. His paranoia seems abit too scummy for my liking at the moment and I stick by my voteTolmides wrote:Corporate and Nekka were quick to vote for Budja (ignoring Gamma's 4th vote). Of the two, Nekka feels like the scummiest.
As for his vig claim at the bottem of page two. His paragraph leading up to his claim seemed abit too scummy to believe the entire post. He may well be the vig but with an attitude like that I think I would prefer him not NKing anyone.
That said, I would like to challenge his claim.Challenge VIG Claim: GammaWhat does you PM say about your role in the band. Is there a specific instrument? What kind of 'orchestrial related' powers do you have? I await your response.GUESS WHO'S BACK?
Not me...-
-
Nekka-Lucifer Townsperson
- Townsperson
- Townsperson
- Posts: 636
- Joined: May 22, 2007
- Location: UK
-
-
Nekka-Lucifer Townsperson
- Townsperson
- Townsperson
- Posts: 636
- Joined: May 22, 2007
- Location: UK
I'm sorry but that screams cover upGamma wrote:I think it's pretty cool how i was drunk as hell and i still had the balls to post my role.
That seems like a quote from your PM. If that is true then I expect you'd be mod-killed. If not, I'm quite happy to lynch you for some info. Obviously not until we've fished. For now though I feel that there's not much more I can get out of you so I think I'llGamma wrote:Can't take stuff back though, so I'll see your vig claim and raise you that I play the piccolo, in the woodwinds, and I play myparticularly crappy and irrelevantinstrument to drive out players. I win when the woodwinds win.UnvoteandVote: Wally
What made you come to your conclusion that you like Gamma? Surely after his -3 and vig claim in the first 2 pages you wouldn't like his play and be quite suspicious. Please elaborate on your reasoning.GUESS WHO'S BACK?
Not me...-
-
Nekka-Lucifer Townsperson
- Townsperson
- Townsperson
- Posts: 636
- Joined: May 22, 2007
- Location: UK
I'm sorry but the structure of his elaboration in his claim seemed very similar to my role PM and I know from past experience that quoting sections from a role PM can get you mod-killed.zachattack wrote:Nekka has leapfrogged the rest of you into #2 on my scummy list. Asking Gamma what his PM says about his role then saying he expects him to be modkilled is very disingenuous, and makes me think that Nekka didn't receive a pro-town pm since like Atlas said, it looks nothing like a quote. I'm almost considering changing my vote, and the reason I haven't is because I feel Gamma's a danger to the town even if he's honest and is the vig.
What kind of post is this in the mafia thread. Mabye you could have written it in the general discussion.zachattack wrote:Baby, I'll put my vote on you anytime you want. Nekka's got nothing on you big boy.
What OMGUS attack? I was wondering why you're on Gamma's side and not find him suspicious? I want some reasoning behind it and I feel you avoided this.Wall-E wrote:Nekka-Lucifer's OMGUS attack is noted.GUESS WHO'S BACK?
Not me...-
-
Nekka-Lucifer Townsperson
- Townsperson
- Townsperson
- Posts: 636
- Joined: May 22, 2007
- Location: UK
What makes you believe his claim at -5?Budja wrote:As long as Gamma picks his targets sensibly, don't kill him.
or they would simpily not NK him to make him lyable for a town lynch if he's telling the truth.Budja wrote:Besides the mafia will probably NK him anyway so I say we forget about him for now.
Believe me, it's been done quite alot of times and do you remember his excuse was because he was under the influence of alcohol?Budja wrote:Wall-E seems a little too over-supportive of Gamma. But he is right is saying the Gamma is very probably the vig. Only the stupidest mafia would attempt to claim vig when their is a decent chance of a counter-claim.
Do I seem to getting rid of Gamma at the moment? I random voted him and he acted very suspicious giving Atlas a -3 so I confirmed my vote on him to see how he acted under pressure (A pressure vote). I was hoping for a slight bandwagon to form to get some information but I didn't need that. He cracked under minimal pressure with a claim that has no use to the town in page two day one. It was page 3 when he revealed abit more information and I didn't believe him but I feel I got enough information from him to move onto voting for Walle to see why he's on Gamma's side for cracking under pressure. He answered by saying I OMGUS attacked him but I feel I was simply asking him WHY he be in support of him claiming on page two.Budja wrote:Nekka seems too eager to remove Gamma and is using fairly illogical statement to support this. But I am not eager to start a bandwagon on him so quickly.
You're a fan of what? Him blurting out unneccesery information when he gets two votes on him? I can't see why you would be in favor of his vig claim unless you were scum yourself.Wall-E wrote:I'm a Gamma fan already.
What was bad grammer. I asked you why you didn't find him suspicious cracking under pressure after !!!2!!! votes on him. This is the third time I've had to ask because I feel you've not given me a sufficient answer. and btw. His vote couldn't have been random unless he was 'drunk' again. He must have surely read the thread first and then voted once he knew what was a random vote. Hence the random voting stage. He admits he didn't read the thread. Now, what kind of person do we want in this game who doesn't read the thread before posting. That's the kind of person I would like to do without.Wall-E wrote:
That's not a question. It's bad grammar. If you're wondering why I don't find Gamma's claim suspicious, it's because his wagon was suspicious. He acted quite appropriately, in my opinion, in the face of a wagon on him for his random vote (wtf people?). His claim is provable, and if he ever crosses my scumdar it will be a snap to get the momentum to lynch him.Nekka wrote:I was wondering why you're on Gamma's side and not find him suspicious?
That was not an OMGUS attack. If you would have please extended the quote you would have seen that I confirmed that the reason for my vote was to ask you why you find Gamma so truthful in his unnecesery claim.Wall-E wrote:Nekka-Lucifer wrote:
What OMGUS attack?Wall-E wrote:Nekka-Lucifer's OMGUS attack is noted.Nekka-Lucifer wrote:UnvoteandVote: Wally
I do believe we've not heard that much about you yet Tony. Could you please elaborate on your vote to possibly give us presonal explanations of to why you feel he deserves a vote.WhereIsTony wrote:Vote Gamma
Self voting is lame
roleclaiming on day one is lamerAtlas wrote:Jersey, I'm wondering why you are blatantly advocating Gamma's lynch without voting for him.FoS: AtlasThis is only not a vote because currently I think Wall-E deserves it more. Why do you feel you have to pick up on every single persons little details. You're not exactly making mountains out of mole hills but you are definately over exagerating against quite a few people.
Not in this situation. I agree with corporate with that. Atlas does seem to point alot of his fingers at the same time. If he's not careful he may have them cut off.JordanA24 wrote:
Can you say wishy washy?corporate wrote:atlas, i know our objective is to find scum, but it feels like you jump on every little thing. maybe im over reacting but it just seems like youre pickyness comes across as over compensating.
maybe im just naive and believe too many people. you could just be a overly helpful townie. but i dunno....
FoS atlas
for making me feel like he is keeping attention off of himself by putting it everywhere else.
Sorry for the long post but I wanted to answer some issues that came up.GUESS WHO'S BACK?
Not me...-
-
Nekka-Lucifer Townsperson
- Townsperson
- Townsperson
- Posts: 636
- Joined: May 22, 2007
- Location: UK
-
-
Nekka-Lucifer Townsperson
- Townsperson
- Townsperson
- Posts: 636
- Joined: May 22, 2007
- Location: UK
You're confident I'm scum based on the fact that I thought that it looked like a PM. In fact the reason I disregarded the 'woodwinds win' section was because I was deemed a Clarinet player (woodwind right?) and I didn't think of checking back on my PM to see if it said if woodwind won or not as it seemed to me at the time that it was the win condition.GUESS WHO'S BACK?
Not me...-
-
Nekka-Lucifer Townsperson
- Townsperson
- Townsperson
- Posts: 636
- Joined: May 22, 2007
- Location: UK
Sorry, I've been rather busy and I'll need to read through 5 or so pages to catch up. Lucky me. Just looking at the ignorant posts on page 6 by Wall-e confirms a vote on him is deemed necesery (qe: Hoping for a wall-e lynch today and seeing the results of who Gamma targets). I don't know the current situation but I still suspect Gamma's actions. I don't know his behaviour since page 6 so I am not ready to call an asumption on the topicGUESS WHO'S BACK?
Not me...-
-
Nekka-Lucifer Townsperson
- Townsperson
- Townsperson
- Posts: 636
- Joined: May 22, 2007
- Location: UK
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.