This is a thread where a scummer may ask the community to come up with a title for them. Brainstorming a possible title.
Nothing more, nothing less.
This is an
experimental project
, to see if the community has matured enough to be able to handle this idea without ego, without narcissism, respectfully, maturely, etc. I'm placing faith in the changed times allowing for this to be run without drama or issues;
please
don't prove me wrong.
If this project doesn't pan out for any reason (drama, community backlash, etc.), I will close this thread.
What this thread is
NOT
for:
This is not a thread to discuss Title Fairy events, policies, rules, etc. That's this thread; go there for any commentary you may have on this thread's purpose.
This is not a thread to
who requests it.
This is not a thread to self-advocate for a title for yourself. That's the
other
experimental thread, located here.
This is not a thread to
nth
titles. Nothing here is a nomination, after all, and you can't nth what's not a nomination. Go to the appropriate threads for that.
This is not a thread for
discussing
a title nomination (and is not designed for discussing suggestions, either).
You must follow site rules.
You must not nominate off of an ongoing game.
Titles must follow site rules.
Mean-spirited titles will be rejected.
This thread will
allow
for
discussion
on ideas, but please keep any discussion focused on facilitating new titles. For instance, "hmm, I like that idea, but how about building off of x and y for (new idea) z instead?".
This is not the thread to find the perfect title for a user
. All title suggestions (within the rules) are welcomed, since we're not necessarily trying to come up with THE title for the user. We're just coming up with
ideas
.
Keep the focus on ideas for titles; minimize discussion on already suggested ideas
. (With any discussion meant to facilitate even
more
ideas.)
This is a brainstorm for a title for scummers, on their request. Success is not guaranteed. Your request may go unheeded.
I'll allow (at my discretion) scummers to bump a
completely unheeded
request--
once
. Only once. (Note the "completely unheeded". If someone responds, then you are not completely unheeded.) Your post for your request won't magically go away; it will always be there for someone to read in the future should they choose to. (Just because nobody comes up with an idea within a week doesn't mean someone six months from now won't look at your request and think of something.)
This is not a place for drama. If your request goes unheeded, don't stir up a shitstorm about it. You get what you get. You
don't
get what you don't get. If you don't feel like you can handle nobody engaging your request, it is perhaps best to not make the request. I'm trusting you to know your limitations and not get hurt if the responses are lackluster or absent. (Please for the love of god don't prove me wrong in having faith in your maturity.) If your self-confidence can't handle radio silence towards you, then don't risk it, please. Success isn't guaranteed. Engagement isn't guaranteed. Nothing is guaranteed. So don't go in expecting anything to be guaranteed. Expect silence and be surprised by anything above that.
This is not a place for you to actively participate in your own titling process. Scummers cannot give feedback on any of the ideas for themselves. Leave it to the community on their own if you opt in, please.
The Process:
Any scummer desiring the community to give suggestions/brainstorm on a title for them may post, "
Hey, can I get suggestions for a title for me?
" or something similar. (They may redact their request at any point.)
Scummers can only make one request to this effect, and
must not include any ideas for themselves
.
Scummers cannot give feedback on the given suggestions for themselves. They get what they get, that's it. They don't get a say in furthering the talks.
Other scummers offer whatever title ideas which come to mind.
Since this is a brainstorm process, the suggested titles need not be high-quality.
The goal isn't to find a final title.
The goal isn't to discuss the titles given.
The goal is to simply suggest titles which scummers feel may be apt for the scummer requesting them.
Scummers may suggest as many titles as they want for a scummer requesting a brainstorm of ideas.
And that's it. This is not a thread to nominate/nth a title. It is not a thread to discuss a title nominated. There's no nths here. Just title ideas, at request.
Spoiler: Suggested (mastina-approved) default process
In post 15, Psyche wrote:So what I'd suggest as a default pattern for brainstorming potential titles for a user is:
1. Users start by forming an initial list of notable factors that might form the basis for a title.
2. Discussion from there further develops this list and maybe also prune out elements that aren't so notable or applicable.
3. At the same time, users identify potential words/concepts that might help concisely summarize some core factors from this list
4. Eventually, at least one good potential nomination is workshopped and the conversation moves to the main thread for confirmation
The idea is that we start by collecting all the usual elements of a good case for a title and sort of generate/deduce from there. From there, users can contribute to brainstorming titles even when they don't know the subject of the title that well!
We just need to tread carefully because if you slip up around her as scum she notices and will tear your spine out and slap you to death with it. (I'm slightly scared of Nancy)
~the worst
*******
Nancy is pretty heavenly ngl
~CheekyTeeky
*******
Nancy-scum feels like a hot knife slicing through butter. Nancy-town feels like a magnifying glass in the sun glaring down at an insect.
"You are the Joker of mafia players" - Oversoul
"last time I was scum with Firebringer
his first post in the scum PT was "yes I rolled scum!"
I decided to post "haha just don't post that in the main thread", but to get up to date on the main thread first.
His first post in the main thread was "yes I rolled scum!" -popsofctown
"You are the Joker of mafia players" - Oversoul
"last time I was scum with Firebringer
his first post in the scum PT was "yes I rolled scum!"
I decided to post "haha just don't post that in the main thread", but to get up to date on the main thread first.
His first post in the main thread was "yes I rolled scum!" -popsofctown
In post 5, Firebringer wrote:wait is this only for self titles.
i wanted to use this thread to brainstorm a title for norwee
No the self title thread would be here I believe. Also egoing
I believe this thread is so you can request for people to think of a title for you. If you have a good idea for a title for another scummer already (and aren't just looking to brainstorm), you would post in the main title thread.
So what I'd suggest as a default pattern for brainstorming potential titles for a user is:
1. Users start by forming an initial list of notable factors that might form the basis for a title.
2. Discussion from there further develops this list and maybe also prune out elements that aren't so notable or applicable.
3. At the same time, users identify potential words/concepts that might help concisely summarize some core factors from this list
4. Eventually, at least one good potential nomination is workshopped and the conversation moves to the main thread for confirmation
The idea is that we start by collecting all the usual elements of a good case for a title and sort of generate/deduce from there. From there, users can contribute to brainstorming titles even when they don't know the subject of the title that well!
This would be a good point where I write up an example applicable to someone here but honestly I don't know any of you untitled very distinctly! But below is an example of how even a bot ChatGPT that knows all of us even less can brainstorm titles from an example nom and a small list of user factors. So even if community members draw a blank once we've summed up a user, a good title nom could still be possible.
Spoiler: prompt
An internet forum I visit sometimes grants titles to users based on things they've done and aspects of their personality or reputation. The titles often contain wordplay or jokes.
For a title to be accepted, a user must be nominated by another community member. For example, below is a nomination for a username named "implosion" for the title "polymath":
Nominate implosion for Polymath
1. Notably, he was the arguable MVP in the recent Clash of the Mash and a key component in Red's win (likely every CoTM participant will agree with me to some extent). He got to showcase his outstanding puzzle solving, deduction, strategy, and trivia competency and performed highly in almost every cerebral challenge.
2. The last part of the title plays into his field of study (mathematics) which he has integrated into his site persona. This is by way of making and participating in the second Math and Logic Mishmash thread, discussing math with other sitechatters of present and past (Who and Ellibereth come most immediately to mind) and in numerous very well received MD contributions involving EV calculations or theory.
3. implosion is going back to grad school to once again study math and made the grad school discussion thread in SE. The word polymath evokes an image of someone with a vested interest in academic learning and with knowledge of a wide range of intellectual pursuits and is a good-looking and elegant title.
Can you write up a nomination for a user named "Harold" who is known for making a lot of short posts with little content and singing very well?
Spoiler: ai response
Nominate Harold for "Songbird"
Harold is known for his love of singing, which he often showcases on the forum by sharing videos of his performances or posting lyrics to his favorite songs. His singing ability has earned him a reputation as a talented vocalist, and his fellow community members often express their admiration for his voice.
In addition to his love of singing, Harold is also known for his short, to-the-point posts, which often contain little content but are still well-received by the community. This aspect of his personality is reflected in the second part of the proposed title, "Songbird," which evokes the image of a bird singing a brief but beautiful melody.
Overall, the proposed title of "Songbird" captures both Harold's talent for singing and his penchant for making short, snappy posts. It is a fitting and well-deserved title that would be well-received by the community.
In post 15, Psyche wrote:So what I'd suggest as a default pattern for brainstorming potential titles for a user is:
1. Users start by forming an initial list of notable factors that might form the basis for a title.
2. Discussion from there further develops this list and maybe also prune out elements that aren't so notable or applicable.
3. At the same time, users identify potential words/concepts that might help concisely summarize some core factors from this list
4. Eventually, at least one good potential nomination is workshopped and the conversation moves to the main thread for confirmation
The idea is that we start by collecting all the usual elements of a good case for a title and sort of generate/deduce from there. From there, users can contribute to brainstorming titles even when they don't know the subject of the title that well!
Basically, yes! This is what I had in mind.
However, the idea isn't to have the main thread be only for finalized nominations; users can still make nominations there. This thread is more a place for when the normal process hasn't/doesn't work, to potentially produce something that
will
(at the request of the scummer in question).
Titles that are already close enough to working and/or titles which are not actively initiated by the nominee still go in the main thread.
This is mostly a thread for those who either feel the normal process has failed them, or will fail them (for instance, being too new), and who actively want a title and don't want to wait for someone to randomly nominate them (with the scummer in question not having an idea of their own).
But also, to have a little fun (but specifically opt-in), which might produce new titles even among those who have been titled. (You never know.)