Charter wrote:@MK, is that vote serious?
A vote based upon the fact that you can't hear a smiley. Of course, it's serious. It's the biggest scumtell ever
.
Serious answer: Of course
Charter wrote:Actually, would the vigs claiming be all that bad? If two of them claim, then we know that they are confirmed town. If three claim, one is either the SK or scum, and two are real, if four claim, we'll be doing pretty good. Five, not going to happen.
So that the scum knows who the vigs are and can concentrate on all the docs? If every killing player hits a doc while all the docs are protecting the vigs, we would lose half of town.
Wall-E wrote:I think players should be forced to claim targets each day starting tomorrow morning. Thoughts?
If you were a vig, what would you give as answer? Say which of the dead players you targeted so that everybody knows you're a killing player or lie about it and perhaps get caught in it. Is this good for town?
Charter wrote:If two people claim vig, and everyone else says they are not a vig, then we have two confirmed innocents, which will be nice.
Not entirely true. I hope you will see for yourself why.
Charter wrote:Another point of note. I think it might be very likely we go a few nights with no kills without the massclaim, which seems like pushing the game towards nightless, which is much better for the town.
I have to think this over.
Plum wrote:For now, I would advocate basic strong scumhunting.
Agreed
. The setup discussion is only distracting.
GnK wrote:Sorry Plum. The Lynch thing for you was a poor joke.
For either bad excuse or weak joke.
Stef wrote:I'm not liking GnK's posts.
Follows much, doesn't he?
Charter wrote:I would be suprised if we have a kill tonight
Why?
GnK, should the percentages impress me? How many times isn't a lynch a gamble at the beginning? And even when a player is lynched, it's still hoping that you were right.
GnK wrote:He was the first to jump on a double-vote, making it a three-vote very early in the game.
That's even scummier than your Smiley theory
GnK wrote:Secondly was his odd stance on the night thing.
It really does bother when you follow someone and then you're the only one who stays behind.
GnK wrote:Contradictions tend to seem scummy.
See? Contradiction is scummy.
*hint* Think back at his theory about hearing a smiley
GnK wrote:I suggested that we make some kind of protection plan
Want to propose your own idea or are you going to follow someone again?
Wall-E wrote:Those are odds with tits and beer on tap!
Sure couldn't be better
Wall-E wrote:I read Gonk town and Plum town
It's called SCUMhunting.
Wall-E wrote:The world needs stubborn people
Look who says it
Nameless wrote:If GK tries to take back anything else as a joke, it may warrant further attention.
Well done mentioning
Nameless wrote:Stef, you seem to be jumping awfully hard on a newbie player. Easy target, hmm?
Or scummy. What do you think of GnK?