Mini 694 - Office Supplies Mafia [Game Over]

[salempc]

vote: Stef

I'm at Mini 691 as well!

[salempc]

Not too active are we?

Maybe we need some flags raised so discussion can start.

Still, nothing to say here.

[salempc]

Oh come on... don't be haters!

[salempc]

Alright, sorry about the complaint, sometimes pushing the game this way gets a bad response. There are some better ways to do it.

Now to add to the discussion:

Moratorium: sometimes asking questions about things other than what we are here for can look as a way to divert attention. Maybe you did really wonder why SensFan didn't edit the post above but, really, it's more or less obvious a vote count should be in its own post, and from my (limited I must confess) experience, vote counts do go in a separate post by the mod. It is somewhat rude to invade other posts.

Maybe I'm right, maybe you just really wondered why.

charter: Wagon on me? You're evil. I learned not to vote for someone just because the others are doing the same. Need a night? I don't know.

Anyway, there's my contribution. I'm sorry I was rude with my other posts. It was never, and will never be, my real intention.

BTW:

Unvote

I believe my last vote was random.

[salempc]

OMGUS!

Unvote Vote pacman

You are not making any sense. Are you even useful in this office?

None of us are useful, that's why we are pissed off

[salempc]

Can you be one of them?

Aren't we all supposed to be pissed off?

[salempc]

I find salempc's return to content-less comments after making 1 useful one when challenged, suspicious. Obviously we don't need to push for a lynch anytime soon, but I find him a solid first target for pressure.

My lasy post was just a semi-off topic response to a statement I thought was directed to me. Content-less comment

s

sounds like more than one. And yes, I only responded when challenged because as I don't have much to suspect from anyone at this stage, I don't really have enough material to compose a decent post.

Although, your post has raised some flags for me, why force a suspicion on such a poor base?

[salempc]

I had to research the meaning of OMGUS to understand your post

[salempc]

Sorry for the absence, lots to do lately.

Wait, so you've never placed your random vote on the same person who you want to first vote seriously? I felt like my vote was obviously not random when I posted reasons for being suspicious of GC. Once again, I guess I'll explicitly state everything.

How is it even possible to smell scum on your first random vote? I hope you really meant that your first random vote coincidentally matched your real vote, that I can believe.

[salempc]

Sudo_Nym's only real vote yesterday was against salem_pc. So, continued

FOS: salem_pc

huh?

FoS: qwints

Do I need to explain?

[salempc]

salempc, is it just omgus or do you have a specific reason?

Yes, it's OMGUS.

Most surely I'll rethink my voting, but your last post was, talk about scummy, well, you know.

[salempc]

[quote=raider]
qwints wrote:
raider, he didn't vote me.

He just FOS'd


Your right, thought it was a vote.

Unvote

I miss read it and thought it was something much more then it was
[/quote]

What was that jumping around all about?


[quote=pacman]
hmm...

qwints' post is scummy, as salempc's answer is...
hmm...
[/quote]

hmm?

All I can tell is that qwints FoS'd me for practically nothing, which is disturbing, and now pacman is trying to raise suspicion, i suppose. Neither of you guys look good for me, I must have at least one scum pinned down by now.

Not liking it.

[salempc]

Off topic: The quote tags seem to be ok... why won't it work?

[salempc]

For the record, Sudo's vote wasn't the only reason I suspected salempc. As I pointed out on Day 1, I found the fact that he complained about a lack of activity without adding a contribution of his own to be scummy. After one mildly helpful post, he went back to relatively contentless posts.

Hence the fact that I "continued" my fos.

Stef, why does your gut tell you to vote for me?

I'm pretty sure that issue has been explained some pages ago.

Why does Stefs' gut tell him to vote? Not even he knows. Gut is unconscious. Gut is just a feeling. It doesn't really take consideration in the conscious level, BUT it does in the unconscious.

[salempc]

Nice reply salem.

The issue has been explained "some pages ago", with no reference to what the explanation was, who made it or pointing to the posts.

Saying that gut reasoning is unconscious reasoning.

Yet again, we have you making completely unhelpful comments.

vote: salempc

uh. Ok

Excuse me for not referring to the exact post numbers.

And that makes me mafia, together with the me always doing completely unhelpful comments, which of course is not quoting any, say "no reference" please?

I've been busy lately, so I'll begin to read what I missed until now.