First of all, I'm pretty sure stark is scum. All his posts since this day started seem focussed on lynching me as quickly as he can, possibly before I even post anything. But I can also know for more than 95% that he is scum, because I think both LH and HH are town, and strife didn't hammer me right now so he has to be town as well. In fact, strife being sort-of confirmed simplifies things a lot, and makes me see how wrong I was about Stoofer.
Second: if stark says I visited no one, and you think he's speaking the truth, why would you lynch me? I didn't kill anyone, while I see no reason for scum not to kill. This does apply to stark if he's scum as well of course, therefore I don't think I can convince anyone that stark is scum (but he is near 100% scum from my point of view anyway so I vote for him).
These are a lot of accurate assumptions, stark. It didn't have to be the case that there were locusts or any of these other 2 plagues, because there have been plagues in this game that are not from the bible (trampling by animals for example).stark wrote:So here's my thinking about the foods:
I think that different plagues will have different effects on players based on what they eat.
So far, the only plagues that haven't been done are:
River of Blood
Locusts
Death to Firstborns
The fish would die if the river turned to blood.
The grain (cereal) would be eaten by the locusts.
So it probably wasn't the smartest thing in the world to do to tell everyone our foods.
I say you should keep your food to yourself, LH. It looks like scum has run out of useful plagues, with the exception of death to firstborns.
The name claim is very inconvenient. If I'm lynched and this game is over, I'll ask undo why he gave me a name that does not match my profession. And I'll look for ties between my name and profession right now.