Ok sorry for the wait, after dinner went to a new pub that has tons of UK beers and, dang, the one i tried from Belgium, knocked me on my ass after a few.
But back on topic.
I did a re-read through since like i said i was jealously watching this thread, and took a look at pwnz because people have been questioning him. Pwnz is in two other games I am in and basically acts the same in them all, which usually makes some people question his townieness, and I totally agree with them. First we come to the ABR lynch. Pwnz had not contributed much at all to the conversation about ABR. He never had any suspicions he had posted on ABR, in fact all he had ever really said about ABR is his opinions on everyone post (which was worthless in my opinion) and then saying:
pwnz wrote:ABR's incomprehensible posts will be the reason for my vote after the count.
This at first seems fine, most everyone had a problem one way or another with ABR and the fact he lied about his claim a first (still don't understand that one). But then pwnz goes on to say:
pwnz wrote:ABR was not scum as we have come to find out, but later on down the road even if we had not lynched him yesterday I know I would have been suspect of him for a long time to come.
How can you be suspect of someone for a long time to come if you had never really said anything about them before? This sounds too much like scum trying to seem town to me. Also there was the fact that he was trying to hold onto the vote against ABR here:
pwnz wrote:Any reason for me or anyone else to hold back the lynch vote on ABR, speak soon or forever hold your peace.
So here we see him trying to seem like he is giving ABR a chance, so that when/if he hammered he could say "I gave him a chance!" and seem like he was innocent.
Next Pwnz attacks Godot:
pwnz wrote:VOTE Inspector Gobot
L-2
Ok anyone that was looking at the vote count before could see this put Godot at L-2, so there was no reason to put that there. Instead what pwnz should have put down was a case against Godot and why he was voting him because once again, he never had said anything against Godot, much like ABR. When asked why all he would say is:
pwnz wrote:Inspector Godot wrote:Pwnz, mind posting some reasoning? You're looking awfully suspicious.
Weird! That's why I voted for you, too!
So no reason behind it, just because Godot looked suspicious?
So he responds:
pwnz wrote:To everyone else that wanted me to give some sort of explanation as to why I decided to vote for Godot:
A vote is a vote, usually put on someone when you are suspicious of their posting and overall demeanor.
I placed my vote on him because I believe that he is the most suspicious player in this game so far. I'm not the only one, either, because I see others saying that he looks relatively scummy as well.
So, to all of you that want me to explain why I put a vote on someone, how about we instead ask the person who has the votes on him why we shouldn't lynch him. It is he who should be questioned instead of you who should be defending him, because you then look like you have some specific reason that you don't want him dead.
Bolded part is mine. He says right there that hes placing his vote on him because other people find Godot suspicious, so he is playing it safe.
After questions about his vote come around and a few defensive posts, pwnz then unvotes to try and buy sympathy from people.
I find pwnz scummy from his actions on ABR and Godot and therefore:
vote Pwnz
They tell you never hit a man with a closed fist, but it is on occasion hilarious. - Malcolm Reynolds
Wolf, I fucking hate your face, but still <3 you as a whole. - Starbuck
