Inspector Godot wrote:I find Flameaxe suspicious but as far as I'm concerned it's either you or pwnz today.charter wrote: Will anyone else vote flameaxe with me, possibly to a lynch (I ask as I want to lynch Godot as well)? This is twice now he's jumped on a terrible bandwagon when it was popular with no reasoning.
And Zoneace, this is the second time you've been in a war with someone.
I think the "Thats all" was that you were the only one to join on the wagon, and he was hoping more peopel should. I do not think it was because you didnt post a reason in the same post as a vote.Flameaxe wrote:Uhm...I do? I already commented on pwnz before 333. Thanks for showing you're paying attention. Not to mention this is the first wagon I've really been on (being V/LA is fun), which makes me think you might be mistaking me with someone else, like the person I'm voting for.charter wrote:Thats all?
Will anyone else vote flameaxe with me, possibly to a lynch (I ask as I want to lynch Godot as well)? This is twice now he's jumped on a terrible bandwagon when it was popular with no reasoning.
Holy lack of reading, Batman!
Amanda Waller 
But he accused me of jumping on a wagon twice with no reasoning. And when you use logic you get...Grimmy wrote:I think the "Thats all" was that you were the only one to join on the wagon, and he was hoping more peopel should. I do not think it was because you didnt post a reason in the same post as a vote.Flameaxe wrote:Uhm...I do? I already commented on pwnz before 333. Thanks for showing you're paying attention. Not to mention this is the first wagon I've really been on (being V/LA is fun), which makes me think you might be mistaking me with someone else, like the person I'm voting for.charter wrote:Thats all?
Will anyone else vote flameaxe with me, possibly to a lynch (I ask as I want to lynch Godot as well)? This is twice now he's jumped on a terrible bandwagon when it was popular with no reasoning.
Holy lack of reading, Batman!
Grimmy
clarifying
pwnz wrote:Ouch, you hurt my feelings. Godot is still mafia, though.Charter wrote:Question for you and the rest of the pwnz wagon. What has he done that's scummy? I agree he's being unhelpful, but as far as I can tell, he hasn't done anything scummy. Please enlighten me.
When it comes down to the wire, your guess is as good as mine, or anyone else's here, as to who is a part of the mafia. It is the mafias prerogative to not look scummy in order to trick the town into voting each other so that they all die. You are continually asking me to give hard evidence as to why I think Godot is scum. Well, guess what:kloud1516 wrote:In addition to my post 310, add this post of pwnz's and his post 324 to my reasoning, as he continues to avoid answering my questions/responding to any of my comments. Stonewalling might assist you in evading slip ups, but it also continues to speed the deterioration of the doubt that is left in my mind.
Holy Eggnogfas, Batman!I am quite drunk but I do know, yes I do know that Danger has replaced charter and it is effective immediately... also deadline currently remains the same but will consider a 24 hour extension if needed.
Hi, I will post by the end of today after a nice little read..Inspector Godot wrote:Welcome Danger. As it is my policy to take my vote off of players that replace into games, I willUnvote and Vote pwnz. I voted pwnz because he's my number two suspect and I don't want to be not voting at this point in time.
Danger wrote:OW, and the fact that if CKD is scum hes going to look like a right Prick! imagine, it means I caught him with one post! and then I will be-able to say that acting A and D is scummy..but alas I feel he would not give me that plessure so Im guessing hes town
you're an idiot that needs to answer the questions being asked of you.pwnz wrote:I live in Detroit.. It's not rare.Flameaxe wrote: How often do you see a cop arresting people based solely off gut feeling, with no evidence whatsoever? Exactly.
I can see why he would come to this conclusion. I think its Pro –active and fair point for a FOS maybe not a vote. Over egger? Maybe. Scummy?..Nah.charter wrote:vote Inspectot Godot
My feline sense wonders how you're so sure the scum must have posting restrictions and at least one is a hero. Once again, what makes you so sure?
I don’t think this is a great agreement. Logic?~As my predecessor points out. Very WIFOM.Inspector Godot wrote:Logic. Having all three heroes as pro-town would seem too obvious, as would having them all scum. So at least one hero is scum in my eyes. And having everyone that has a posting restriction as either all pro-town or all mafia doesn't seem right either. Should I put an OMGUS vote on you?charter wrote:vote Inspectot Godot
My feline sense wonders how you're so sure the scum must have posting restrictions and at least one is a hero. Once again, what makes you so sure?
Kloud 1516
In my opinion, it is still early in the game, and I do not think that someone expressing their opinion to possible possiblities is all that bad. At the same time, I can see where charter is coming from, for the WIFOM is only helps to create confusion (at least to me). Instead of focusing on possible set-ups, I think we should focus on weeding out who seems the most suspicious and interrogating them, hero or villain, post restriction or no instead of dwelling on speculation and possibility. This will help us answer the questions at hand as well as get rid of scum. Anyone agree?
unvote
FoS: Zoneace; what exactly is your reasoning behind voting charter? I didn't see any justification above.
Is that what the Riddler fears most; a vicious kitten? This certainly is an E.Nygma.
[\quote]
For what its worth I thought this post was very town like. I like the fact you question Zoneace about his vote and how it was put on. Having seen the way Zoneace plays, I already know the answer. Wants someone dead. Might as well be him. Move on, next. Hard to read that one.We find out later that you wont just claim on the word. I find that interestingInspector Godot wrote:Learn to read.charter wrote:No. I'd think it scum logic to decree something like X number of hero's are the scum "because it just makes sense" or whatever other crap reason Godot gave. The only way to know is to lynch a hero.
And I'm not opposed to revealing my character, I'm just saving it just in case we get a mass character role-claim which would be so awesome. If you want me to claim, say the word.Words were said a no claim.Inspector Godot wrote:I will claim, in fact I am dying to claim, but I want to claim fourth. I'd also like the three people that claim before me to be ones that have no obvious patterns (so not Charter, Zoneace, Albert). It's purely out of interest.Hits nail right on head! Love this post.ZONEACE wrote:Grimmy wrote:Quick note: Id probably vote for either Gobot or Charter today. I wont vote until I can find time to post sufficient reasons to though.
More next week.
Grimmy
new companies kick my @$$
Gee you'd vote for either of the two top vote getters? WAY TO TRY AND PLAY BOTH SIDES AND LOOK NOT SCUMMY.
FOS grimmy
also
FOS pwnz
again, way to throw your hat at the top vote getting in an attempt to LOOK not scummy. unfortunately, there's a different between BEING not scummy and TRYING TO LOOK not scummy.
I wanted to give you at least something today. I hope you can understand that it hard to make sence of a lot of it because of the flavour. More to come...
But I would be more then happy to put pressure on Grimmy, Pwnz, and Godot until then.
All will say for charter is he’s an over excited townie who can give it but can’t take it. That Cat should learn to cool.
Now for a Batman Fact :
Batman isn't a creature of the night. The night approaches Batman carefully avoiding any eye contact.
For what its worth I thought this post was very town like. I like the fact you question Zoneace about his vote and how it was put on. Having seen the way Zoneace plays, I already know the answer. Wants someone dead. Might as well be him. Move on, next. Hard to read that one.Kloud 1516
In my opinion, it is still early in the game, and I do not think that someone expressing their opinion to possible possiblities is all that bad. At the same time, I can see where charter is coming from, for the WIFOM is only helps to create confusion (at least to me). Instead of focusing on possible set-ups, I think we should focus on weeding out who seems the most suspicious and interrogating them, hero or villain, post restriction or no instead of dwelling on speculation and possibility. This will help us answer the questions at hand as well as get rid of scum. Anyone agree?
unvote
FoS: Zoneace; what exactly is your reasoning behind voting charter? I didn't see any justification above.
Is that what the Riddler fears most; a vicious kitten? This certainly is an E.Nygma.
You must be new here. Welcome the the USA. Especially New York.Flameaxe wrote:
How often do you see a cop arresting people based solely off gut feeling, with no evidence whatsoever? Exactly.
