ZeekLTK (2) -
Skruffs (1) -
Adel (1) -
Shy Guy (1) -
Not voting (5) -
So, now we have to come up with a new way to accuse someone else? Wonderful *rolls eyes*More replacements! Huzzah!
Blah
Besides the lylo part, that was my thought as well. It's like we are TRYING to make this the longest game ever :S.My deal is nothing like 4 replacements at lylo in a game where there's links between players.
Also interesting was that Zeek was at two votes for awhile there. But, given the overall inactivity it's not as telling as it could be.
I suspect that Zeek is scum with Skruffs, so I'll be watching Harvey pretty closely.
Do not like this one bit (page 5, re: gimbo), as well as his vote hop to chelseafan and his original vote on gimbo.knight wrote: even if you end up being a townie, you deserve to die for a stunt like that...
Lynch set up from Knight.actually, I say we take out spyrex. i personally think there's a good chance he's mafia, and even if he isn't, gimbo surely will be.
Here he is blatantly trying to shift Knight's focus away from himself and partner and on to Gimbo, who we now know to be a townie. Not only this, he does not address any of the issues Knight brings up, and only tries to shift attention to Gimbo, eventually leading to a Gimbo lynch.chenhsi in [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=1148506#1148506]post 136[/url] wrote:Why do you think flea is voting for his fellow mafia member? The only reason you think they are mafia is because they claimed.KNIGHT42 wrote:I guess flea has voted for his fellow mafia member...
I say to prove our point we vote for Chelseafan and see what happens with his vote.
Unvote, Vote: Chelseafan
Why should Chelseafan's vote change because you voted for him?
If you really think we are scum, why don't you vote for Gimbo, who has more votes and is closer to being lynched?
I din't remember him saying anything about problems. I did remember him constantly complaining that chenhsi was a poor partner.Nameless wrote:Vote: Shy Guy
Epic reaching.Shy Guy wrote:Chelseafan getting replaced reeks of frustrated scum replacing out because buddy sucked.
I've pointed out multiple posts by chenhsi I regard as strong evidence that he is scum.Nameless wrote:I'm not normally fond of using the meta game to accuse or defend people, but the fact that chenhsi is not really playing this game (or, apparently, others particularly much) is not indicative of scum as much as it is an issue with the player. Also, this strikes me as an attempt to make a policy lynch (Lynch All Lurkers?) rather than one based on strong evidence.Shy Guy wrote:I am not very willing to dismiss chenhsi's play as "always does that".
This response irks me, but it is hard to point out exactly why.... WAIT no, it isn't hard. It is too vague and gut oriented, and doesn't have anything of substance to respond to.Nameless wrote:On a lesser note, these two questions irk me, although it's hard to point out exactly why. Neither actually indicate Chelsea's alignment, and the second is somewhat misleading of Adel's plan D1.Shy Guy wrote:What about how Chelseafan wanted to lynch someone everyone else was willing to lynch? Why are they #1 town, after being the optimal lynch yesterday?
Scum can bus each other just as long as they don't LYNCH each other.Skruffs wrote:Intersting - Adel clears them, you say that's a distraction (which indicates Adel is scummy) and then say you want to vote the people Adel is clearing?
Scum can't bus each other, because lynching one kills all of them.
This seems entirely misguided. If scum were nice enough to completely ignore each other this would be an easy win. It seems that scum would HAVE to attack each other to make it not obvious who their partners are.Skruffs wrote:Considering that 40% of the game is made of scum at this juncture, it should not be hard to figure out which clump of four is the most likely to be trying to avoid each other.
I don't care that you replaced in or who replaced, specifically. I think I've been led through hoops too much and distracted and that no one has really refuted my initial thoughts or made me believe they are untrue.Skruffs wrote:Shy Guy, why would you try to push a lynch so quickly after my replacement? Do I make you nervous?
I didn't remember seeing the internet problems things. I do remember him complaining multiple times about chenhsi and requesting that chenhsi be replaced and being very frustrated chenhsi lurked and kept looking scummy, just as you describe in point C.Skruffs wrote:Please explain how Chelseafan's replacement reeks of "Frustrated scum":
A) She didn't ask for a replacement
B) "Chelseafan (although he did mention having computer issues so I'll cut him some slack) " - from the mod's last vote count
C) "We're getting nothing from chenhsi, this kinda seems the norm for him.
A replacement would be much better, but I suppose as long as he fulfills minimum posting this can't happen." - from CF's last post in the game, where she expressed frustration over her PARTNER'S LURKING...
Without B, C sure equates to "CF is frustrated replacing out because buddy sucked". Why would you say otherwise?Skruffs wrote:None of those three things equivalate to "CF is frustrated scum replacing out because buddy sucked."
Link this game for me, please. I'd love to have more back up on my thoughts of Adel/SpyreX/Zeek/Harvey. Though, given armix's blantent defense of her, I'm rather willing to change my mind.
Adel then agrees with Shy Guy and votes one of the players. Does not strike ANYONE as a blatant scum gambit, the exact kind of thing that Adel does on a regular basis?? I just came from a "MetaMafia" game where I analyzed ADel's posts very closely (She was scum) and found a bussing tie between her and the last real mafia player. I got lynched anyways, because I am apparently not a very good salesman, but I totally got into ADel's head and I know how she works.
Soooo...why am I scum again?
So, my scum listing stands (fl/shy guy/Zeek/Harvey). Most confident ShyGuy/fl is scum, small chance of FS/nameless beign scum IMO, but not large enough I wouldn't be comfortable voting Zeek/Harvey over Fl/ShyGuy to ensure a lynch on one of the 2 "groups".
As for most town, I would have to say Adel/SpyreX by far.
fl's play has been neutral at best.It also seems that you have no reason at all to be suspicious of my partner, that you've stated. Is this correct?
I like how you twist my arguments to make them look like me attacking you for being pro-town here.-Knight was frustrated with Gimbo's play.
-Knight thought Spryex and Gimbo were both suspicious and thought that lynching both of them was not a bad idea.
-I tried to make cases day 2 about day 1 actions while many other players either sat back and did nothing or tried to attack cases being made day 2.
I suggest you read the part where he auto-claimed in response to Gimbo pushing the movement.I read over chenhsi and tried to find where he pioneered mass claiming and pushed for it strongly, and couldn't
That's a false dichotomy and you know it. Give him some real options.
I suggest you read the part where he auto-claimed in response to Gimbo pushing the movement.
Skruffs, would you be willing to vote Shy Guy over Adel?
it is metabreaking mafia, look on my wikipage for a link. I was scum, and did a light bus of my partner day 1, later day 1 ABR tried his damnest to get me lynched (as he does in literallyforbiddanlight wrote:Link this game for me, please. I'd love to have more back up on my thoughts of Adel/SpyreX/Zeek/Harvey. Though, given armix's blantent defense of her, I'm rather willing to change my mind.
Adel then agrees with Shy Guy and votes one of the players. Does not strike ANYONE as a blatant scum gambit, the exact kind of thing that Adel does on a regular basis?? I just came from a "MetaMafia" game where I analyzed ADel's posts very closely (She was scum) and found a bussing tie between her and the last real mafia player. I got lynched anyways, because I am apparently not a very good salesman, but I totally got into ADel's head and I know how she works.