Ok, now onto Charter.
Page 1, pretty weak reason to vote me IMO but lots of people didn't like that post. I think my opinion is swayed because it was against me. Also his contradiction, which is glaring, but I think he was just over anxious to vote me like Netlava was.
----
67 calls out Had for his vote. (This one was positive, not negative. I just thought it noteworthy.)
----
Lining up lynches in 101. "Leave Had alone but if he's alive tomorrow we'll lynch him." (I will note that he didn't do that today, but it's still scummy.)
Also votes BB for hinting at his role.
----
OMGUS's Farside for pointing out his 101. Later he takes it back and says it wasn't that scummy of her after all, after everyone else tells him he was wrong.
----
In 250 admits he is too biased for Netlava and promises a reevaluation. In 264 he lists what he noticed in his reread and Netlava isn't even in it as good or bad. 266 claims neutral on Netlava. 331 Finally does the reread, and eventually comes up town. (I originally put more stock into this because I thought Net was scum, but since he flipped town, this is actually rather weak.)
----
I don't follow his case on LG. Seems weak. Still, he's not giving LG any undue pressure.
----
357 is one of the few posts in the game where his case against Walnut is pretty good.
----
409: "Don't defend yourself, I'm convinced you're scum." Way over-confident. This is not good town play, as even if you are confident in your pick you should want plenty of defense from them. More posting by that person only gives more to read. It is still up to the accuser to decide if it either strengthens their tells or clears accusations, but either way your read is better the more they post.
----
464: Asks Thesp's a question then gets onto Walnut for the same. Over-eager or stretching.
----
467: Telling everyone what to do, and that is not answer questions. This is again bad play because it's limiting information. Any posts, even bad ones, should be helpful. If someone is causing a distraction by meaningless speculation bust them for it, but don't stop all posts before you can judge them as helpful or a distraction.
479 does the same. "Tinsley don't post."
----
548 is scummy because he says, "Fark's case against me is weak, so if anyone else wants to help vote for him I will too." He doesn't give good reasoning for thinking scum, and he's basing his vote on how popular the lynch will be.
----
551: Intentionally putting scummy parts into your posts to see who points it out is not valid scum hunting. Town does not need deceit to lynch scum. This is VERY bad.
====
Conclusion
After rereading everything Charter has done and without the biased thinking that Netlava was scum, I'm starting to think Charter is making a lot of mistakes and jumping the gun a lot, but he's doing so as town. He does some very scummy things, but none of them seem to be working towards any sinister goal of mislynching someone or defending himself unjustly. And I noticed as I went through looking for scum tells, a lot of his cases are presented very poorly, but do make sense if you interpret them a bit.
Walnut doesn't have a defense for his own actions, just attacks against his attackers. He really doesn't have a great case against Charter either. Mainly just that Charter is pursuing him and a lot of Charter's case is flawed in presentation. I don't like his stance on Thesp either. It appears aggressive when brought up, but never on his own doing. He's flying low when he can get away with it, and when forced to make a stance he does so in the most convenient way available at the time.
Some new cases have come up since I started this focused reread, and I'll look into them now that I'm done. I think I've got a live one though.
Vote: Walnut
