Mini 583! BAMPEG!!!....IS THIS THE END???

Erg0 · Post Post #7 (isolation #0) » Thu Apr 03, 2008 11:54 am

/cornfarm

Erg0 · Post Post #14 (isolation #1) » Thu Apr 03, 2008 11:03 pm

Just a heads up: I'm out of town over the weekend, so I won't be online for about 48 hours after this post. Don't lynch anyone without me.

Erg0 · Post Post #19 (isolation #2) » Fri Apr 04, 2008 7:54 am

Random Vote on the way to the airport: JDodge

That's for holdin' me up.

Erg0 · Post Post #44 (isolation #3) » Sat Apr 05, 2008 11:54 pm

Unvote, Vote: Kscope

Better not lynch the daycop.

Erg0 · Post Post #49 (isolation #4) » Sun Apr 06, 2008 5:33 pm

Unvote, Vote: Psychatrog

If the voting just got serious then why aren't you voting anyone?

Erg0 · Post Post #54 (isolation #5) » Sun Apr 06, 2008 8:04 pm

Psychatrog wrote:
Erg0 wrote:
Unvote, Vote: Psychatrog

If the voting just got serious then why aren't you voting anyone?
I took my vote off K-Scope because there was another "non-random" (JDodge) vote on him. I have yet to decide where to put my vote in a serious fashion.
FoS: Erg0
for overreacting.

In that scenario I'd say that your unvote is the overreaction. It's 7 to lynch, why were you worried about Kscope being at 2 votes?

Erg0 · Post Post #57 (isolation #6) » Sun Apr 06, 2008 11:39 pm

Psychatrog wrote:I wasn't "worried" about it, but I thought that I would withdraw my non-serious vote now that things seemed to be getting serious.

I guess I just don't see the point in withdrawing your vote without voting for somebody else - it consigns you to a position where you're sitting and waiting for someone else to do something that you consider voteworthy. What would be wrong with leaving it where it was?

Tamuz wrote:Did you read Jdogde's statement. If you take his assertion that it was a slip then it would assert that HE is scum with me and Scope. So either you have 3 scum nailed just like that... or he is fucking around.

I disagree. I think JD's point was that you made your response to his vote with the assumption that he was a townie. He's saying that he's town and you're scum.

Erg0 · Post Post #68 (isolation #7) » Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:58 am

Unvote, Vote: DizzyIzzyB13

That unvote was even worse than Psychatrog's.

Erg0 · Post Post #102 (isolation #8) » Sun Apr 13, 2008 3:44 pm

Wow, that was like the day 1 VI lynch in double time.

Like many, I don't really dig WhoMe's reaction to the vote on him - it's not like Coron was pushing for his lynch or anything.

On the other hand, I think JDodge is onto something. Or was that on something? Either way.

Vote: roffman

Erg0 · Post Post #108 (isolation #9) » Sun Apr 13, 2008 8:38 pm

What were you expecting at this stage of the game? It's not like we gleaned a wealth of knowledge from day 1.

Erg0 · Post Post #114 (isolation #10) » Mon Apr 14, 2008 10:55 am

There's no such thing as a meaningless vote.

Not for me, anyway.

Erg0 · Post Post #126 (isolation #11) » Tue Apr 15, 2008 12:00 pm

The 3 scum thing isn't much of a tell, I've seen that one plenty of times. It does pique my interest in dahill, but not much more than that.

I've played with WhoMe once before, but I can't remember which game, or what his role was. Think I might go and look for that.

chaotic_diablo wrote:My vote is staying there at the moment for the metagame on an "ongoing" game that dahill1 provided or not provided, whichever works.

I don't understand this sentence. What's your point here?

Erg0 · Post Post #135 (isolation #12) » Wed Apr 16, 2008 2:37 pm

I think we knew that already.

chaotic_diablo: based on your reply above, how are you feeling about dahill right now?

Erg0 · Post Post #146 (isolation #13) » Thu Apr 17, 2008 6:05 pm

I'm feeling very pressured right now.

Erg0 · Post Post #162 (isolation #14) » Sun Apr 20, 2008 11:49 pm

Hooray for the pointless tying vote!

This is like a two-line scummy post extravaganza.

Erg0 · Post Post #175 (isolation #15) » Mon Apr 21, 2008 8:29 pm

Hooray for softclaims!

He's right, though.

Unvote

for now.

Erg0 · Post Post #184 (isolation #16) » Tue Apr 22, 2008 4:24 pm

WhoMe? wrote:Regardless, I'm not saying that a soft claim makes him sacrosanct, but he was already clsoe to lynch, and saying you still want him lynched is scummy. Before lynching a soft claim surely you would press for a full claim first?

Is this why you softclaimed too?

Erg0 · Post Post #186 (isolation #17) » Tue Apr 22, 2008 5:08 pm

I like it when the mod reads my mind.

Vote: dahill1

Erg0 · Post Post #188 (isolation #18) » Tue Apr 22, 2008 6:58 pm

WhoMe? wrote:
chaotic_diablo wrote:
WhoMe? wrote:
unvote, vote dahill

I am really, really against a roffman lynch and very suspicious of all the pushing on him.
Why? Scot provided a good reason for a roffman wagon.
I would rather not say at this time, but will if pushed.

That's the post I'm referring to.

Erg0 · Post Post #190 (isolation #19) » Tue Apr 22, 2008 7:37 pm

Ah, ok - that was when I wasn't sure if he was softclaiming or not, so I presume that you came to that conclusion more quickly than me.

Erg0 · Post Post #192 (isolation #20) » Wed Apr 23, 2008 4:03 pm

We should probably have more, like, talking at this point. Day 3 isn't going to be much better if we keep going at this pace.

Erg0 · Post Post #194 (isolation #21) » Wed Apr 23, 2008 4:26 pm

I'm loathe to burn the deadline extension today when we don't seem to have much to discuss. I have a feeling that a few people are hanging back on purpose at this point, so unless we can force them to post there's no point in having extra time.

To be clear for everyone, the rules state that the player with the most votes at deadline will be lynched.

Everybody loves a case, so let's try one on dahill:

- His agreement with the early "tell" on Tamuz was pretty much baseless (as was the tell itself). Voting based on others' crappy cases is scummy.
- Jumped on the dizzyizzy wagon when it looked like gaining momentum.
- Follows JD onto roffman as well.
- "3 scum" comment potentially shows inside info.
- Half-baked theory on me and roffman being buddies.

Ok, now you do one.

Erg0 · Post Post #217 (isolation #22) » Thu Apr 24, 2008 2:41 pm

WhoMe and dahill are both at lynch-2. dahill reached 4 votes first so he would be the deadline lynch at this point. Why would we be asking WhoMe for a claim?

Erg0 · Post Post #245 (isolation #23) » Sun Apr 27, 2008 12:17 pm

dahill1 wrote:i'm vanilla
the flavor is a band called High Five Hardcore. one of their songs states that i keep to myself, so i have no special powers

This is kind of weird, flavour-wise. The two dead players have mafiascum users as flavour, and you have a band?

Erg0 · Post Post #247 (isolation #24) » Sun Apr 27, 2008 12:54 pm

I wouldn't have admitted to that if I were you.

Erg0 · Post Post #253 (isolation #25) » Wed Apr 30, 2008 2:39 pm

Man, that's harsh...

Go town!

Erg0 · Post Post #374 (isolation #26) » Sun May 18, 2008 6:47 pm

I thought I was possibly naive, since I got 2 innocents. I also thought I was unlikely to be killed since I was being useless. As I was reading along during day 3 I totally believed WhoMe, because I knew that the motivator thing was true. Wrong on all three counts, as it turns out.

This is why I hate getting cop or doc - I always seem to die on night 2, whether I scumhunt or not. Bah.