Post
Post #5471 (isolation #602) » Tue Oct 27, 2015 10:26 am
Postby zoraster »
I don't view getting Koreans as all that helpful anyway. The talent pool may be somewhat deeper in Korea, but importing even very good Koreans doesn't solve all that many problems. That's not to say you shouldn't recruit in Korea; you'd be stupid not to do so if you have resources to really evaluate those players. But just buying a Korean introduces many issues that need to be solved, so you can't just plug in one and expect results. Liquid's year was pretty much defined by trying to integrate Piglet, for example.
Post
Post #5480 (isolation #603) » Tue Oct 27, 2015 3:11 pm
Postby zoraster »
it doesn't help that NA and EU play half the games in a given season that Korean teams do. That said, playing that many games didn't really help China.
Source on that? can't find any indication.
I mean yea, officially he has never left gambit, but does that mean anything?
Source? I'm saying that he joined them, not that he just joined them. My point being that he was a top tier ADC who joined a mediocre team. He's not coming back is my understanding.
This seems like a shortsighted plan. He's clearly amazing (though the graves/lucian meta was far better for him), but he sounds like a pretty miserable person to have on your team.
This seems like a shortsighted plan. He's clearly amazing (though the graves/lucian meta was far better for him), but he sounds like a pretty miserable person to have on your team.
I think it's a lot easier to work on attitude than it is to work on mechanical talent.
I think you are wrong. I think sometimes it's worth it to take on a bad attitude, but I don't think it's very easy to improve the attitude of a player, particularly one who has shown himself unable to deal with multiple different teams.
Sometimes people can change -- if you had a bad attitude as a 17-year-old, it's perfectly plausible you'll have mellowed by 21, but it's harder to see why Forgiven would suddenly be a great person to have as a teammate a few months later.
Post
Post #5599 (isolation #625) » Wed Nov 11, 2015 3:32 am
Postby zoraster »
I don't really like Regi, but he didn't come across as skeevy to me. Coming to an agreement to trial Sven makes sense. Loans are pretty common in some sports (Soccer is the best example). I don't really get the objection.
Post
Post #5642 (isolation #627) » Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:33 am
Postby zoraster »
I'm not sure I see your problem.
Like it can suck for those players who qualified, and perhaps there should be a rule (which I assume is what you mean by "legal") that requires 3/5 players to qualify, but it's the team that's qualified, not the individual players. So NRG is buying the team. They may be buying the contracts too (or Coast may be eating the cost of the guaranteed money, whatever it is, from the sale of the team, as well as compensating any sponsors), but they're bringing in new people.
We say they're buying the slot because they're not really keeping the individual players or structure intact, but it's probably more accurate that they're buying the team, changing the name, firing everyone, and bringing in new people.
Think TSM. TSM's players all qualified to stay in the LCS this season, but only Bjerg is returning. The owner is the same, but those players still did the same amount of "earning" it as the Challenger Series team.
Post
Post #5644 (isolation #628) » Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:41 am
Postby zoraster »
I do think it's weird that you can get around the 3 out of 5 player rule by selling your team (if in fact that's what's going on), but I also think it's weird that Challenger teams have to keep 3/5ths of their players while LCS teams don't.
Post
Post #5650 (isolation #631) » Mon Nov 16, 2015 9:38 am
Postby zoraster »
He "earned" the relegated spot just as much as a promoted team member "earned" the LCS spot. But of course we don't expect that of Freeze because he's LCS caliber and it'd be a waste of his talents when he could join a competitive team in the LCS. Plus, presumably the money is better for LCS teams (either in income or in general value of the slot), so a challenger team probably isn't going to pay him what the market would bear (which is apparently 10k a month?).
The flip side of "LCS caliber player but got relegated because not LCS calibre team" is "not LCS player but got promoted because LCS caliber team." In both situations, the team and the esport benefit from being able to move the player to the appropriate league.
---
The question is this: do we want esports to be a professionalized major thing or do we want it to just be the broadcasting of amateur events?
Post
Post #5659 (isolation #633) » Mon Nov 16, 2015 10:18 am
Postby zoraster »
In post 5656, quadz08 wrote:I suppose these are necessary growing pains, to an extent - but right now, with so many of the teams that aren't the biggest ones continually shifting in and out of existence, it's difficult for someone to root for an organization - rather, they root for a group of players. I'm rooting for Renegades next split because of Remilia and Crumbzz, for example - not because I give a shit about the RNG organization. It's going to take some time for more teams to exist in the long-term, and I think I'll know we've made it when it's a rarity when organizations stop existing after they're relegated, rather than the norm.
I think the basic issue is that whatever people think, it's pretty hard to really root (in a way that makes money) for a team that's in danger of being relegated regularly.
Esports has a pretty big problem of not having much in the way of geographic based fanbases that would engender more unthinking support, particularly before you get to international tournaments. It'd be like if the NBA were solely played by Los Angeles.
If Coast really cared about what happened to their players, they'd put some sort of contractual obligation on the new organization if they don't decide to retain them. But of course they didn't because they wanted to sell the team and get maximum price for it. Coast sold for a REASON though. And one of those reasons is likely that they didn't have full faith in the team in place.
Post
Post #5666 (isolation #634) » Mon Nov 16, 2015 11:32 am
Postby zoraster »
It'd be nice if they did a tournament like the FA Cup. I just don't know where it'd go in the season, and the argument would probably be made that the time should be used to play more international tournaments.
Post
Post #5668 (isolation #635) » Mon Nov 16, 2015 11:41 am
Postby zoraster »
I don't think teams usually want to use their resources right now to have a full second string, plus stamina and health aren't really that relevant so it's a lot easier to field your normal team.*
*Health is relevant only in a long-term sense. Not playing a best of 5 series isn't going to decide whether or not your wrist is damaged.
Post
Post #5706 (isolation #641) » Thu Nov 26, 2015 6:11 pm
Postby zoraster »
I don't think it was that weak, really. I just think the meta shifted to late game carries that didn't really maximize his talents. He was fine on corki and Caitlyn but neither gave him the opportunity to be the beast he was when graves and Lucian were strong.
Post
Post #5756 (isolation #643) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 4:26 am
Postby zoraster »
Trust in Deilor.
Also, this format stuff is fascinating. Simultaneous streams aren't much fun. I think BO2 is probably better for a spectator because you always know how many games a team is going to play on a day, and if you look at their schedules they're able to put in a "game of the day" each day that doesn't have simultaneous broadcasting.
Basically in summer split, EU will have Best of 2s (3 points for winning both), 1 point for splitting. NA will have Best of 3s. Everyone will play everyone twice.
The schedule changes and will have simultaneous broadcasts, and NA will play 2 of the series on Friday.
Post
Post #5760 (isolation #645) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 4:56 am
Postby zoraster »
to be fair, i imagine you'll catch more than you think because (1) games wil llast different times and there's significant downtime between matches that you can flip over to an active game. If they're smart they'll stagger start times a bit to really get this, and (2) for BO3 only a fraction of games will go the full 3, so there will be a lot of times where one match is still going on but the other is over.
Post
Post #5784 (isolation #652) » Fri Dec 11, 2015 5:02 am
Postby zoraster »
I understand people taking issue with the separation of OGN, but the venom over going BO2/BO3 is ridiculous ,even if offering "used to soccer splits" is a lame reason.
Post
Post #5796 (isolation #653) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 3:58 am
Postby zoraster »
In post 5794, AGar wrote:But as far as eSports journalists go, the guy has been doing it profitably for well over 8 years now, and very well at that. Most of the time, his information is on point. Now, one owner can completely mislead on a situation, which is what appears to have happened with the shirts deal, but when an esports journalist can get a quote from a team owner on an actual development, that's newsworthy considering that all of these team owners have a general belief that their sites should be the only sites putting out content and are extremely hard to pull any form of relevant information from.
Perhaps esports has gotten too big and professional for him. If you are a journalist who literally attacks someone you're covering, you aren't doing it right. There are now plenty of outlets that aren't like this for anyone to need this guy.
I suspect that he will find himself more and more isolated with fewer and fewer sources. Most remaining will likely be the types that already want to stir shit because that's what he's become: a tabloid asshole. This might make for some sensational headlines, but they've become so warped as to be meaningless.
Post
Post #5797 (isolation #654) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 4:01 am
Postby zoraster »
In post 5794, AGar wrote:Regardless, the tone-deaf response to the Bo2/Bo3 format as well as the whole OGN/KeSPA thing are some pretty ugly things. But it appears that Valve and Blizzard are trying to out fuckup Riot this week, so I have a feeling Riot is actually pretty ok with how the week went.
Riot didn't fuck up with the BO2/BO3 format. That's reddit's need to be perpetually outraged about everything. Sure, the soccer thing was a little lame, but if this is your biggest complaint, you need to find other things to be mad about. Because Riot moving to a Bo2 or a Bo3 is literally a response to people's complaints before about the bo1 thing. Who the flip cares if a throwaway line was lame?
The OGN split is a much bigger deal, and I don't know if it's really a fuck up or not, but I certainly understand the bad feelings behind it.
Post
Post #5809 (isolation #656) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 4:37 pm
Postby zoraster »
In post 5808, AGar wrote:I mean, they did. Giving one region a distinct advantage over another is a pretty big deal. Bo2 is probably the better regular season format, as quadz mentioned. But in terms of who's getting a better deal, NA came out way ahead. Having more games and a more intimate knowledge of how to approach Bo3 series strategy wise and having a regular idea of how to prepare for them is huge.
Mountains out of molehills. The relevant regional difference isn't between EU and NA other than as it relates to viewership, and EU has had the shorter end of that stick for a while.