In post 152, ProHawk wrote: In post 135, Xayzeck wrote:
because Prohawks ISO is one BIG problem that you guys should be talking about, but god I don't know why he's getting townread.
So lets talk.
Active lurk. Why are you waiting for someone else to start the discussion?
Did you just compare me to ZZZX?
I dunno, can we? Oh, my bad, you don't really want to discuss anything, you just want to yell and scream cause you forgot your caps-lock got stuck.
Also an active lurk. I liked that Xay is suspicious of coasting, and with that full post you can see that his point is to bring up a point a second time because he feels NM is ignoring it. Misrep noted.
For the record, I think you are town. Not real good town, but that's another discussion for another day.
I see the same thing towards you right now. Js.
In post 158, ProHawk wrote:Flubbernugget, please tell me you are joking....
But since you aren't, let me spell it out for the reading impaired. In the post in question to "provoke discussion" I called out the dude who keeps yelling and screaming that my posts suck, when they don't. I asked him to talk, when he isn't. I asked him to prove his comparison of me to a lad with two or three posts, where I have more than quadruple that. And I have given a read which will be helpful for analysis later on.
When I am not on my phone, we are going to analyze your posts, to see how much you have spurred discussion flubby boy.
Until then, serious question, are you dumb, or scum?
"Posts suck." Subjective.
Well you're missing the forest for the trees. Maybe I noticed direct challenges were causing stalemates and wanted to take a different approach?
See, I have been at this a long time. I try not to spoon feed people because it gets, well, boring. People should be playing the game, providing reads, making cases, refuting cases and the like. Which I have been doing. Which you have not been doing.
I also like that you're saying people shouldn't have to spoon feed people, but can't get reads off of Xay's minimalist style.
One liner question posts are people wanting to look like they are scum-hunting, when in reality they are scum. You are sitting back, apparently have a scum read (me) but haven't voted yet, despite my only having picked up one vote at this point. Despite having the POWER of multiple votes. May be playstyle, may be scum-caution. I am leaning toward the latter. I would vote you if you weren't at L-2 already.
Rose gotcha here. I dare you to tell me I'm sheeping like your ideas are that complex.
In post 168, ProHawk wrote:
You also skirted my accusation/question about you not having voted anyone at this juncture.
Oops.
In post 161, ProHawk wrote:
Many reasons Oka, however I will start off with gut, which although impossible to defend against generally leads me in the right direction (although not always)
Your RVS initial post was anti-town.
Didn't like your over the top aggression at the beginning. Looked like you were trying too hard.
Used a past experience meta (3d and Bulba) to paint yourself as town.
Didn't like your response to me asking where your scum-reads sat. VERY fency and non-committal.
HOWEVER
With that said, this latest string of attacks on me has scum written all over it. So you definitely don't sit first on my to-lynch pile ATM.
From what I've seen that gambit is used so much in this setup it's no longer a gambit. Also noted that you say nothing about NM doing this.
Aggression gets us out of RVS sooner.
53 was bad. I'll give you that.
Maybe he's more skeptic and less arrogant?
Must I spoon feed you what I mean by "obligatory 'I got you raging' post"?
