[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 13440798 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Micro 1057 YABM Mafia (Postgame) - Mafiascum.net
In post 53, ceejayvinoya wrote:I think it would be more interesting to choose the elim from one of the players Looker gives us, see how they flip, and then act accordingly.
Where is gibus? If they're not going to be here, can I have their vote? I'm trying to repair my win-lose ratio.
we are morally obligated to immediately yeet looker and then intentionally cause them to lose the game based on how they flip. anyone who cares about win-lose ratio on this website and brings it up in a game of mafia already deserves this, but someone who would include a blatantly bastard micro in such a win-lose ratio that they care about really deserves this VOTE: Looker
uh...
nothing you said sounds like it has anything to do with the game itself...
Ceejay is only gonna get better but his logic can be on the wrong side of lazy logic sometimes. ~the worst
Spoiler: I thought this interaction hinted that we were joking
In post 22, Bambi Jay wrote:You also a day 0 cop Looker? Excellent PFP to go with that name btw.
In post 23, Looker wrote:It says "You are informed. You are cop. GoldfishFromTheMoon is scum. Gg."
And thank you.
In post 24, Bambi Jay wrote:Lmao I literally was gonna do that when I came in but it sounded too cliche to me. Good to see it lives on in spirit.
VOTE: ceejayvinoya I'm still leery of Post 53 and ProfessorDrapion's decision to sheep it
Then by this logic, shouldn't you be going for the professor first?
was his decision to sheep me townier?
what if he didn't vote? would you have still found my vote suspicious?
Excuse me?
I didn’t vote with the intent to sheep you.
You just happened to have already had a vote when I decided to vote the player with the proclaimed red check.
Sorryyy. Looker said it. Not me.
Ceejay is only gonna get better but his logic can be on the wrong side of lazy logic sometimes. ~the worst
Post
Post #132 (isolation #7) » Sat Jul 16, 2022 1:16 am
Postby ceejayvinoya »
In post 129, Looker wrote:Why hasn't your vote changed since knowing it was a joke
I like my vote to stay there. Bambi is at the very least pro town. ProfDrapion and Enchant seems okay so far.
Did you know it was a joke beforehand and didn't care? Were you using it as a way to avoid posting your own suspicions? Were you using it as a way to line up miselims?
Actually thought you were serious. It's why I posted [p]53[/p] after all.
Also, in your experience, do scum post more than town in most games or is it the other way around?
@ceejay
About the same. There's no mechanic in usual games that prohibits one from posting more as either alignment.
Ceejay is only gonna get better but his logic can be on the wrong side of lazy logic sometimes. ~the worst
Post
Post #135 (isolation #8) » Sat Jul 16, 2022 1:36 am
Postby ceejayvinoya »
It's true that I didn't really believe that you were told who the scum are, but I just couldn't dismiss that entirely in a bastard game, so I was thinking the names you were mentioned were probably significant in some other way.
hellbooks is just sort of there. I can't really get anything out of his posts atm.
Ceejay is only gonna get better but his logic can be on the wrong side of lazy logic sometimes. ~the worst
Post
Post #136 (isolation #9) » Sat Jul 16, 2022 1:40 am
Postby ceejayvinoya »
In post 133, Looker wrote:I asked my questions in bad faith with the assumptions that you were scum that had the answers to the questions you asked. I thought you voted because you knew my targets weren't scum and were preparing to elim me after elimming one of my 'targets' today.
This is actually a bit more reasonable after thinking about it, though it would probably backfire once you confirm that it was a joke.
Ceejay is only gonna get better but his logic can be on the wrong side of lazy logic sometimes. ~the worst
In post 130, Looker wrote:Also, did no one notice I was literally just voting the players who hadn't posted yet? I thought gibus might have had a post restriction before they were replaced.
You literally tried spelling out my name.
VOTE: Looker
nice catch
Ceejay is only gonna get better but his logic can be on the wrong side of lazy logic sometimes. ~the worst
In post 130, Looker wrote:Also, did no one notice I was literally just voting the players who hadn't posted yet? I thought gibus might have had a post restriction before they were replaced.
You literally tried spelling out my name.
VOTE: Looker
nice catch
oooh nvm I get it. Looker was talking about his votes and prof drapion was talking about Looker's fakeclaim targets.
Ceejay is only gonna get better but his logic can be on the wrong side of lazy logic sometimes. ~the worst
Looker is, well, weird. i don't know what to make of that fakeclaim. It could maybe come from town but it sort of dragged on for too long before they claimed it was a joke and by then I'm not really convinced it helps.
VOTE: Looker
Ceejay is only gonna get better but his logic can be on the wrong side of lazy logic sometimes. ~the worst
In post 135, ceejayvinoya wrote:It's true that I didn't really believe that you were told who the scum are, but I just couldn't dismiss that entirely in a bastard game, so I was thinking the names you were mentioned were probably significant in some other way.
What role would have a soft guilty pre-gamestart?
@ceejayvinoya - In what way did you assume the names were significant?
Is this another post made in bad faith? This is a bastard and I wouldn't know every game mechanic and role out there.
At that point on you could be anything from a day 0 alignment cop of some sort or an informed given info on some players for some reason.
Ceejay is only gonna get better but his logic can be on the wrong side of lazy logic sometimes. ~the worst
It would look better for you if you vote me first rather than trying to ask other people this way. That way, you won't look like you're trying to get other people to case me for you or something.
Ceejay is only gonna get better but his logic can be on the wrong side of lazy logic sometimes. ~the worst
Post
Post #371 (isolation #22) » Sun Jul 24, 2022 1:11 pm
Postby ceejayvinoya »
In post 364, Bambi Jay wrote:More likely Enchant is legit if we already have someone who didn't flip on death. Having multiple forms of role concealment is excessive.
My guess at this point is possibly that the Werewolf has the effect of eating and hiding the body, similar to the Donner Open Setup. Makes the most sense to me at least.
And yeah bug is still fake but we knew that already.
*laughs in bastard*
I find it at the very least unlikely that Enchant was unlucky enough to roll vt on a bastard game and then die n1.
Ceejay is only gonna get better but his logic can be on the wrong side of lazy logic sometimes. ~the worst