2. Galron
3. Ircher
4. NotAJumbleOfNumbers
5. Ausuka
6. Not_Mafia
7. Mallowgeno
8. Jake the Wolfie
9. kdowns
10.
11.
In post 1, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Ambush doesn't normally kill all people who target the ambusher, instead the ambusher chooses one person from among those who voted them to kill.
In post 0, Irrelephant11 wrote:Read these rules carefully because they’re not the same as the board game version.
Yes, this is what my ruleset says. Is there a part of it that makes you think I meant something else?In post 1, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Also a misplayed ambush kills the ambushed on the spot and an ambush does not count as a vote.
Oh shoot. Which part? I'd like to fix it in case people reference post #0 while playing.In post 3, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Yeah your rules read like Ambush counts as a self vote for purposes of target.
I see, yeah that line is unclear. The goal of the rule is (in that scenario of maximum 1 vote each) all Targets should die, regardless of whether they ambushed, AND all ambushers should die, regardless of if they got a vote. Only those who Voted without receiving a Vote are intended to survive (this is an especially handy rule at final 3s, where everyone is incentivized to ambush without this house rule). I'll think about a different way to write it.In post 7, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Exception to the above: In the uncommon scenario in which the highest number of votes anyone has received is 1 vote, all Ambushes fail. In this case, anyone who received a vote dies, those who ambushed die, and everyone else lives.
This line reads as if those who ambush themselves and those who receive a vote would both be tied on 1 vote, as opposed to requiring a vote to put them at 1 and make them a target begins with, not just because it equates vote getters and ambushers as having 1, but also that after saying "all ambushes fail" you include "anyone who received a vote" right before mentioning ambushers, which makes it sound like they're exclusive (in this case, they aren't).
In general the only example you gave created that confusion and I wanted to just add the clarification that any non-target ambusher always dies and ambushes never count as a vote for self as a way of being extra hyper clear.
It definitely will feel different than the original board game, but it’s a perfectly balanced way to play! Just a bit more chaotic-feeling.In post 14, NotAJumbleOfNumbers wrote:read over the house rules. they all seem great except for the ambushes hitting everyone. like, i know its to avoid an extra timing step which is crucial in non-live play but it feels like itd throw off some balance somewhere
Sorry, game's already underway! But I'll note this as a pre-in for next gameIn post 31, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:/in if there’s still room?
I can't help you strategically, but let me know if you have questions about the rules!In post 48, NotAJumbleOfNumbers wrote:does anyone know what's going on
Ugh I should, junk day deserves junk foodIn post 52, Jake The Wolfie wrote:I heard that Irrelephant plans to murder a bag of chips later. The horror.
This is correct! Sorry for the mistake, editing posts to reflect this changeIn post 56, Jake The Wolfie wrote:kdown should still be alive