Dethy X, GAME OVER

image · Post Post #7 (isolation #1) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 5:12 pm

Gogogogogogo!

image · Post Post #9 (isolation #2) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 5:15 pm

I claim vanilla townie.

image · Post Post #12 (isolation #3) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 5:22 pm

Guilty on knox.

image · Post Post #19 (isolation #4) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 5:24 pm

Wow, lots of investigations on me.

Vote: No Lynch

image · Post Post #21 (isolation #5) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 5:24 pm

@charter: why?

image · Post Post #27 (isolation #6) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 5:36 pm

Charter, wait till we know if you're NK'd...

image · Post Post #29 (isolation #7) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 5:37 pm

Guilty charter.

image · Post Post #37 (isolation #8) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 5:39 pm

Vote: No Lynch

image · Post Post #40 (isolation #9) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 5:39 pm

Why not?

image · Post Post #42 (isolation #10) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 5:40 pm

Okay; make your claim.

Unvote

image · Post Post #47 (isolation #11) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 5:42 pm

How so?

image · Post Post #49 (isolation #12) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 5:42 pm

Actually, I guess I'm confirmed town since I'm the only one who can be Paranoid. But why you?

image · Post Post #51 (isolation #13) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 5:43 pm

No, I want to hear why charter can prove that he's town first.

image · Post Post #56 (isolation #14) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 5:45 pm

But you might not need to eliminate insane cop. I want to hear what charter has to say; he says he can confirm himself as town, I want to know how.

image · Post Post #60 (isolation #15) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 5:47 pm

So you can't confirm yourself as town? Mighty suspicious.

Vote: No Lynch

image · Post Post #63 (isolation #16) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 5:53 pm

Why do I always die on N2?

image · Post Post #74 (isolation #17) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 5:58 pm

Er, shouldn't that be

"Getting creative, the springlullaby and charter found a cage and put in it: knox.
And then an ox. " ?

image · Post Post #76 (isolation #18) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 6:00 pm

But we didn't know you had innocent on charter, pop

image · Post Post #80 (isolation #19) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 6:01 pm

Not grammar, it just doesn't rhyme if you have "and put knox it it"

image · Post Post #85 (isolation #20) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 6:03 pm

Suppose on D2:

A has guilty on B and innocent on C
B has guilty on A and innocent on C
C has innocent on A and guilty on B.

Then, one of A or B is sane, the other is scum. So C must be insane, therefore his innocent on A is actually a guilty, so A is scum.

I'm not sure if any scum would put themselves in this situation, but there are situations where town has enough info to win on D2.

image · Post Post #87 (isolation #21) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 6:05 pm

Spring also could have been scum, though.

image · Post Post #89 (isolation #22) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 6:07 pm

On D2, I was confirmed Paranoid.
So either spring was scum, charter was insane, knox was sane/naive, pop was sane/naive, or the real situation took place.

image · Post Post #90 (isolation #23) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 6:08 pm

Charter was right that it was spring or knox, but we didn't have enough to prove it on D2.

image · Post Post #92 (isolation #24) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 6:10 pm

Fine, I'll rephrase. Charter would have been able to prove his own innocence on D2.

image · Post Post #93 (isolation #25) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 6:11 pm

Arguments that ignore the possibility of you yourself being scum don't carry any weight.

image · Post Post #98 (isolation #26) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 6:17 pm

I could do one more if it's fast, I guess.