DETHY VIII ENDGAME MAFIA WIN

X · Post Post #8 (isolation #1) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 5:37 am

Innocent on Caboose.

X · Post Post #13 (isolation #2) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 5:38 am

Is that your result?

X · Post Post #26 (isolation #3) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 5:48 am

Innocent on millar.

X · Post Post #29 (isolation #4) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 5:50 am

millar, everyone except scum is Cop.

Who did you get your results on?

X · Post Post #30 (isolation #5) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 5:51 am

millar's actually cleared, though. Because Sens and I both got two innocents, including one on him.

X · Post Post #31 (isolation #6) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 5:51 am

Sens is scum.

X · Post Post #34 (isolation #7) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 5:52 am

Caboose is dead, Empking and millar are cleared, and I'm a Cop.

Vote: SensFan

.

X · Post Post #38 (isolation #8) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 5:54 am

And millar's claim further proves it. He's Insane, I'm Naive, Caboose was Sane, and Empking is Paranoid.

X · Post Post #45 (isolation #9) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 6:17 am

Empking was proven D1 because if he was scum, Caboose would be Paranoid or Insane, and no one else would be Paranoid or Insane.
millar13 was proven D2 because if he was scum, SensFan and I would both have to be NaÃ¯ve.
millar13 got a guilty on Empking, who was town. Therefore millar13 is either NaÃ¯ve or Insane. He also got an innocent on someone else, meaning that he was Insane. Thus, the person he got an innocent on (SensFan/pacman) was scum. QED.

Back to what we were doing before.

Vote: pacman

.

I have not been proven innocent, except as a corollary to the fact that pacman has been proven guilty.

By the way, I got an Innocent on SensFan. So I'm NaÃ¯ve.

X · Post Post #52 (isolation #10) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 6:21 am

Millar13, you need to read the definition of a Dethy.

X · Post Post #62 (isolation #11) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 6:28 am

pacman281292 wrote:i think it was better to me to kill millar, then mess up Emp making him think X is scum.

No, Emp wouldn't have fallen for it.

Caboose wrote:Under SSK's no lynch policy, Sens could have gotten on here Day 3 first thing and voted no lynch, sending the game into night where he could have won.

That's why I don't like his No Lynch policy. It should take half of the votes, maybe, but certainly not less than half. Lynch can still be achieved with 2 if there are 3 alive (or 3 and 5 alive). The point is, there need to be enough people saying NL so that there could not simultaneously be a lynch at the same time.

X · Post Post #66 (isolation #12) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 6:35 am

I think I've played in or modded all but one of the Dethy setups so far this Marathon Weekend. My conclusion: Dethy games are not won. They are lost.

X · Post Post #70 (isolation #13) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 6:39 am

No, I mean, the outcome of the game is not decided by a good performance on the part of anyone, but a bad performance on the part of anyone.