Prophecy Mafia - Over

[Mastermind of Sin]

HAI GUYS IMMA SELF VOTE NOW CUS I'M ULTIMAAVALON

Oh wait, I lied

Vote: xyzzy

cus he's just gonna mad lurk all game anyway.

In terms of game starts, UltimaAvalon did not vote himself to start the game. Let me put it this way. As it were, UA always self-votes to start games. Therefore, we should consider this gross deviation to be a mark of scumminess, so to speak.

WHY DIDN'T ANYOUNE TELL ME AB'T A TEAM ASSHAT BOUBKA ATTACK

Unvote

Vote: Bubka

In addition to abandoning his own schtick, he has copied myself and JDodge vis-a-vis personal schticks. Ergo, he has committed a second transgression without defining any of his parameters beforehand.

It is my esteemed opinion that the Asshat bandwagon should shift over to our normal target. I repeat. All Team Asshat members should

Vote: Sir Tornado

However, here he proceeds with the Asshat schtick, as it were. He has still lacked any serious contribution to the game in terms of actual usefulness, per se.

ZOMG, why?

This post speaks for itself in terms of scumminess, so to speak.

Has it occured to you people that maybe their predictions revolve around not Digimons, and your sillieness is only helping them win?

FoS everyone who says anything about those guys digimon is kinda sorta a rip-off of

He contributes to nonsensical talk about predictions over Digimon. Let me put it this way. If Digimon were a prediction someone made, it's far too late to stop the prediction, so we should stop talking about it regardless. UltimaAvalon is begging the question here, a clear use of material fallacy, as it were.

Guys. Sir T has only posted once. Maybe he doesn't want to play. And it would be a shame if he were replaced. Lets kill him

In terms of useful contribution, this post falls behind even the most meager attempts, so to speak. According to wikipedia, UA has made an obvious attempt at tricking us with the

non sequitur

fallacy, once again presenting us with a demonstrably flawed argument.

I'm intentionally lurking. Discuss.

Also, no no on the massclaim. Just because Pie says it always works, doesn't mean its true. Hell, Pie says Pro-town Vig should kill Night 0 if possible. Shows how full of wisdom he is.

This argument is clear use of

ignoration elenchi

, or the irrelevant conclusion fallacy, as it were. Ergo, we see yet another example of UA hiding behind fallacious comments.

Why is everyone FoS'ing Flameaxe? If we all hate him so much for such an arbitrary issue, we should kill him.

Again with another fallacy, this time

affirming the consequent

. UA is full of flawed and dangerous assumptions, throwing them out to be digested by the innocent and naive townspeople of the Church.

@Stark: Your "stats" are not "stats", but "odds". "Odds" ARE NOT "statistics". "Statistics" are not derived by how likely we are to kill based on numbers, but how likely we are to kill scum based on past games. If you want to base an argument for/against massclaiming based on numbers, use "Statistics", not "Odds". Also, we can't check your work if you don't show your work. We did learn that in 2nd grade. We learned odds too. We might've learned statistics too....can't remember. that mighta been 3rd grade, when they started teaching the TAAS curiculum

@Flameaxe: Why are you so.....asshat-y?

Here UltimaAvalon uses a

proof by verbosity

to confuse the readers into thinking that Stark's theory was clearly and utterly flawed, without actually providing contribution vis-a-vis logic and reason.

I felt like I had to address both sides of the YAY MATH SUCKS argument, but couldn't think of anything else to say.

there would be cop claims, etc. if we did have a mass claim.

What Cop Claims would there be on Day 1? Seriously, after re-reading, I don't like any of his posts, so

Vote: Kanaga

Also, Kanaga, tell your alt to post moar

This post does not really address the issue at all. It uses a

destroying the exception

fallacy to skirt the true issue Kanaga was bringing up, as it were. He then follows this flawed logic into a vote, proving again that he is acting on false premises.

I don't appreciate that snippy shot at me Seraphic, until you can prove Kakeng is my alt please don't do that

Mirth didnt say Kakeng was. I did. and then Peg did. Neither I, nor Peg, are Mirth.

Also, it was a joke.

It seems every statement I make I have to defend, and then I get voted for on the defense.

Welcome to Mafia

Once again he pulls out

irrelevant conclusion

to distract from the issue at hand, so to speak.

People don't (and shouldn't) claim cop unless they have investigations. We have had no investigations, so at this point, if we were to all massclaim today, we would have no cops claim

He finally readdresses his

fallacy of accident

from earlier, but encourages people to lie. Let me put it this way. In terms of mass claims, it cannot be useful, per se, if people have to lie about their roles, as it were.

She also changes her name....how did that happen?

EBWOP: Oops. Got SeraphicMirth confused with another person named Mirth in another game I'm in

A largely irrelevant post that merely backs him out of making a mistake.

Bubka

His scumbuddy Lazy is next

EBWOP:

Vote: bubka

Now a vote on bubka, followed by

begging the question

again, producing yet another misleading circle of logic that will keep the town in confusion.

Better question.

How can you NOT see that as a Scumbuddy connection?

In terms of fallacies, this one is my favorite. Here UltimaAvalon attempts to use

petitio principii

to lure unsuspecting people to believe his arguments.

And after you do, start placing your own vote on bubka

A post that is strangely without fallacy, since most of his contain them. Perhaps it's there and I don't "see" it, so to speak.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Let me put it this way, people. In terms of useful contribution, per se, vis-a-vis Prophecy mafia, UltimaAvalon has neglected to produce anything, as it were, that can be considered even close to the accepted standard we can safely establish with a broad generalization, so to speak. I don't know what your parameters are, but it's obvious to me that UltimaAvalon deserves the ultimate punishment for his crimes, per se, against the people of this town. Ergo, ipso facto, case closed. Q.E.D.

Vote: UltimaAvalon

[Mastermind of Sin]

So apparently MoS noticed I didn't self-vote, decided to do that "View only UA's posts" thing, then commented on why every single one of them was scummy without even reading them in context. So my defense of the whole post will be two lines.

1) I'm not going to give people free Prophecy points

2) Context

Also, Lazy is scum. Also, I can't remember if I'm even voting him or not. So

Unvote Vote: Lazy

You can consider it a confirm vote too, if you swing that way

This defense is a pure case of

non sequitur

, once again showing that UltimaAvalon can only use fallacious "reasoning", so to speak.

[Mastermind of Sin]

No reason? Sorry, but that should be a OMGUS.

Is this in response to me? I didn't even say anything about UltimaAvalon's "reason", so to speak, for voting Lazy. I was speaking purely of his actions vis-a-vis defense of himself, per se.

[Mastermind of Sin]

Go look at Mini 458! Day one lasted around 45 pages.

[Mastermind of Sin]

Was that the mini Vollkan Vigged me D1 in?

Nope. That was my 100th game!

[Mastermind of Sin]

lolz

[Mastermind of Sin]

I is!

[Mastermind of Sin]

We're killing "UltimaAvalon", so to speak.

[Mastermind of Sin]

MoS: Is there a reason you only talk like V when you're talking about me?

Let me put it this way.

Who knows?

[Mastermind of Sin]

Original Roll String: 1d19

1 19-Sided Dice: (2) = 2

[Mastermind of Sin]

Vote: curiouskarmadog

[Mastermind of Sin]

Vote: curiouskarmadog

seriously dice, you want a piece of me?

Original Roll String: 1d2

1 2-Sided Dice: (2) = 2

[Mastermind of Sin]

Yes.

[Mastermind of Sin]

Original Roll String: 1d3-1

1 3-Sided Dice: (3)-1 = 2

Original Roll String: 1d10-1

1 10-Sided Dice: (1)-1 = 0

Original Roll String: 1d10-1

1 10-Sided Dice: (4)-1 = 3

Original Roll String: 1d10-1

1 10-Sided Dice: (5)-1 = 4

[Mastermind of Sin]

Take me back to 19 BC.

[Mastermind of Sin]

THERE WAS A DOG WHO HAD A NAME AND OMAN WAS HIS NAMO!
O-M-A-N!
N-A-M-O!
O-M-A-N!
AND OMAN WAS HIS NAMO!

[Mastermind of Sin]

Vote: Gorrad

[Mastermind of Sin]

Yes, in one of DP's games.

[Mastermind of Sin]

why is Tar scum again?

[Mastermind of Sin]

Unvote, Vote: Tarhalindur

[Mastermind of Sin]

What are we doing in this game?

[Mastermind of Sin]

UltimaAvalon is scum, guys. Look how he denies any involvement with the derailment club. While that may be true, it's way out of his playstyle to do so. It seems that he's trying to stay on our good side and out of the limelight this game.

Unvote, Vote: UltimaAvalon

[Mastermind of Sin]

Mod: Poke me on Monday. I will find replacements.

[Mastermind of Sin]

I'm back.

[Mastermind of Sin]

Notice: I will be leaving Mafiascum in the near future. As a result, I will be cutting back on games where possible. I'm going to try not to be replaced if I can, but this is an advance notice that my activity WILL decrease.

[Mastermind of Sin]

Vote: UltimaAvalon

I thought I already made it clear how scummy he is, why is he still alive?

[Mastermind of Sin]

UA needs to die faster.

[Mastermind of Sin]

Lynch UA faster.

[Mastermind of Sin]

We should be lynching UA

[Mastermind of Sin]

whoa. I thought I got replaced in this game a long time ago.