That's fine. I trust your judgement.Primate wrote:Hmm. Shanba, I know it seems like a snub, but I'm going to bench you and bring on a newer player, if that's ok. I don't want you on this early.
As a side note, I don't know my role yet.
That's fine. I trust your judgement.Primate wrote:Hmm. Shanba, I know it seems like a snub, but I'm going to bench you and bring on a newer player, if that's ok. I don't want you on this early.
Well I can't comment because I'm not on the ice, but it might be beneficial for us not to know - it could be that scum have powers which depend on whether a player is on ice or not. If it becomes important at a certain point, a guaranteed protown player will still have the info, so there's little risk involved.Primate wrote:'s interesting that my table isn't public information. Do those people on the ice know they are on the ice?
I dislike this post, and the post contained within. I think his Lowell vote is beyond weak on the weakness scale.The Venerable Zorg wrote:I could've sworn i responded to this last time i was on. Put simply, i'm not sure whether that comment corresponds to recieving the town role pm.Primate wrote:I actually thought that was an OK post. What didn't you agree with from it and what do you think he slipped up regarding?The Venerable Zorg wrote:Sorry about my absence guys-i only just got back from a week's holiday.
Quickly reading, i don't agree with this post. Could well be a scum slip-up in my opinion.Lowell wrote:I have no idea. I guess it would be nice if one perosn from each position could claim. As in, take positions one by one and find one person to claim, while others stay silent.
Again, I don't really understand the game dynamics, but it seems probable that having the right people in the right positions helps us.
Vote: Lowell
I'm not convinced by Masterminds plan either. Primate's responses made alot of sense, except the bit about 'if i think someone could be scum, you must do as i say'. Whilst of course, as Captain, we know you are on our side, that doesn't necessarily mean you are always right. So, whilst we should take your opinion into account, i don't think just going along with whatever you say is a great way to play the game. But maybe that's just me.
I have this post too, and the post that precedes it. I don't feel he's scumhunting as much as target hunting. I'm not sure that makes much sense, but hey.It seems pretty clear that by breaking that rule, there is one punishment. Certainly there is nothing to indicate otherwise. Hence, i view your post as an attempt to look sympathetic to the town's cause, by feigning concern over Oman's welfare.
I don't think this post is internally consistent, or makes any sense - and his earlier vote of Flameaxe is weak too.The Venerable Zorg wrote:dang...Primate wrote:Goalie: Lowell
Right Back:Panzer
Left Back: TVZ
Centre: CPE
Right Forward: Shanba
Left Forward: Jdodge
You put Lowell in goal? and me in Defence? :shock:
I realise i havent been here for a while. By the look of it, we lynched scum (but this is not absolutely certain) and he is now 'in the penalty box', which im not sure about the meaning of...
Anyway, i agree with Lowell about Flameaxe. This game cant be as easy as to have all the scum so blatantly trying to rack up penalties. Of course, its pretty obvious to me why Lowell is defending Flameaxe-distancing from a probable mislynch.
Vote: Lowell
Also, Primate, please kick this guy off the ice if atall possible. Or at least move him somewhere where we arent totally reliant on him.
Finally, i think we can sure that us letting in a goal was nothing to do with the lynch. I expect it could be something related to our formation, or general amount of penalties during the day. Collateral damage by any chance?
I absolutely detest this post.The Venerable Zorg wrote:lol i like this post, because it raises a valid point. I dont like the way Mastermind is trying to use the Oman lynch as proof of his innocence, when frankly he was a total liability, and was always going to be taking an early shower.Primate wrote:Does 'scum killing mode' look any different to 'oh my scumbuddy is being lynched busbusbusbus' mode in any way?
Post 385 is a definite mark against his name.
I'm still happy with my vote for the moment, butFoS: Mastermind
And I don't like this one much either.The Venerable Zorg wrote:They're just jealous i guess. Lowell is the Mafioso we should off today.Primate wrote:Why the TVZ hate?
IIRC we were worried that claiming positions would make it easier for scum to screw with our lineout by removing players from certain positions etc. However, scum have no nightkill and have so far failed to have an impact on the Hawks.Mastermind of Sin wrote:Zorg, what were the Hawk's response to the problems we had with mass claiming? We discussed this as well on Day 1, but came to the decision that it would be bad to mass claim, because it would help the scum. What reason did they have that was different from our conclusion?
And yes, I'm too lazy to look it up myself. Sorry.
Because your play this game has not exactly inspired me with confidence -_-Flameaxe wrote:Now why would I do that?!Shanba wrote:That said, there's no problem saying who we're comfortable with on the ice.
Lowell I am confident in. MoS I am more or less confident in. Myself I know am town. Flameaxe I'd be worried would screw us even as town. TVZ I am not happy with. CPE I am unhappy with. Jdodge is lurking like a mofo, but I guess I'd beokwith him. killerbob I'd be distinctly uncomfortable with. Panzer has one post -_-
We haven't posted a lineup yet. We haven't massclaimed yet. We've done fuck all, because no one in our game seems inclined to do anything except wagon for luls.Flameaxe wrote:Antsy? The hawks just lynched (according to the last post). This would mean that once Foolster gets it updated, we will have 24 hours. This is one of those good reasons to rush something, as if we don't, we get nowhere.Foolster41 wrote:Well, the hawks have lynched. That means you have 24 hours to lynch of go no lynch.
Vote: MoSfor lulz and him being stupid.