California Trilogy - Dantès in Fresno (Game Over!)


User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1399 (isolation #0) » Sat Oct 20, 2007 12:54 pm

Post by Setael »

Hello all. I'm reading the thread and since I have to leave work I thought I'd just post what I have so far.

Zindaras is likely Town because of LoudMouthLee's post 62 accusing him. Oman also likely Town after this post and LML's post 68.

MoS (now Sarcastro) could be scum due to LML's post 75.

PlaysWithSquirrels (now Gaspar) votes Dragon Phoenix for being the 7th vote on Skruffs but has no problem with jeep placing the 8th vote and Oman placing the 9th vote not long after. Makes it look like the fact that he had a problem with the 7th vote was a lie. Also Post 100 looks very much like distancing from LML.

Oman "now IH" likely Town due to Post 88 which would be much too blatant of buddying up to LML. Also likely Town due to Thesp saying Oman's Skruffs vote was "off".

logicticus defends LML in post 105; I find it odd that he says he's getting good town vibes from Vitr because i kept thinking vitr was scum and was surprised when I saw he came up town when I checked the player list. Seems more likely logicticus knows vitr is town at this point due to prior info. Defends LML again in post 107. Not sure he would buddy up this obviously.

Adele (now Mr BuddyLee) likely Town from post 109. No reason to bus here if she was scum. Also looks Town due to LML's reaction to Adele in Post 136.

DragonPhoenix's post 115 looks scummy. Throws suspicion on both CubsFan, foolinc, jeep, logicticus, MoS, Skruffs and Zindy all for weak reasons, while at the same time clearing LML as Town. Also looks scummy in post 140 for telling us how "Town" his player analysis was. Jeep vote also looked scummy (I agree with Vitr's post 151 about it, even though he got talked out of it by MGM and xyzzy).

foolinc post 121 scummy. Staying under the radar and when he does post, just asks for clarification. He eventually gives a player analysis in which he is wishy washy on almost everyone, except jeep, MoS and skruffs and he merely parrots everyone else's arguments against them. clears LML as Town. This post looks very much like scum trying to look like they're scum hunting without actually doing so.

Talitha looks Town in post 134, especially if I'm right and playswithsquirrels (now Gaspar) is scum.

When Thesp comes in he distances from LML and likely PWS (now gaspar). He says "I like DP and xyzzy. I don't like LmL or Oman. I like the jeep hate. I find the Skruffs wagon uninteresting. Vote: LoudmouthLee, Oman, jeep, logicticus, Cogito Ergo Sum, PlaysWithSquirrels." I think he was distancing from LML and PWS and possibly DP which makes the others he named likely Town. This doesn't help much since I already knew CES was since I replaced him and xyzzy, skruffs and jeep are all dead. This leaves Oman and logicticus as likely Town (besides me of course).

LML's post 162 makes Adele (MrBuddyLee) and Zindy look Town. He picked apart their votes on him but not Thesp's.

DP's 170 has that condescending tone scum tend to get when they aren't being agreed with.

I won't make any conclusions or vote until I've read the whole thread, but that's what I've got so far.
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1403 (isolation #1) » Sun Oct 21, 2007 4:18 am

Post by Setael »

gaspar wrote:FoS: Saetel

You seem to be of the assumption/conclusion that LmL and Thesp were on the same side, and that LmL was actively distancing from others. This is.... well, completely different from what everybody else in the game has concluded. Do you have any particular reason to believe that LmL was Mafia and not a Serial Killer?
And exactly where in the first 7 or so pages do you think I should've realized LmL and Thesp weren't on the same side? I'm glad you pointed this out so I don't read under that assumption anymore, but I think your FoS is incredibly off. If you were Town, rather than FoSing me, you'd have drawn the conclusion that I haven't read enough of the thread yet to know that, and that I'm more likely Town because I didn't have prior knowledge re: scum alignments.

I'm pretty sure you're scum. I'll try not to let it cloud my judgment as I read the thread.
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1406 (isolation #2) » Sun Oct 21, 2007 9:22 am

Post by Setael »

I did read the list of living and dead, but the fact that one said "Mass Murderer" and the other said "Parisian Mafia" did not make me think they were working separately. I just read it as "scum" and assumed they were on the same team. That may be partly due to inexperience, but I've already played in games where the mafia had unrelated titles or didn't seem to be related, but were working together (i.e. Mafia vs. Wolves). So, frankly, until I hit the part in the thread where that was discussed, it's not surprising that I wouldn't independently conclude that they're not working together.
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1424 (isolation #3) » Tue Oct 23, 2007 11:31 am

Post by Setael »

I agree with Zindy. That analysis was only of the first few pages, and it was made under some incorrect assumptions so I'm starting from scratch. I saw that 2 scum had been killed and was reading almost solely looking for their interaction with others. I'm glad I only got to page 7 before I found out they weren't on the same team. So yeah... I'm still reading the thread, and I'm glad I didn't read the whole thing under a false assumption. I'll post once I've finished reading.
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1447 (isolation #4) » Thu Oct 25, 2007 5:40 am

Post by Setael »

Ok I'm up to p. 18 and I'm going to post what I have so far. Rereading the first several pages, I did indeed change my mind about almost everything since I had been looking for interaction between LML and possible scum buddies. There isn’t nearly as much meat in the first few pages if LML was an SK rather than part of a mafia team. Disregard my first post.

Though my predecessor FOS’d him for it, I agree with Vitr’s post 151 that “It kinda feels like DP pushed the disagreement between jeep and him to the point where he could accuse jeep of something. It is essentially a strategy disagreement. The accusation of "backpeddling" seems an attempt to turn that into more than it really is.”

Foolinc and DP could be scum after Thesp’s 160. Thesp points out something he disagrees with foolinc about but doesn’t include him in his top 6 scums. Says he likes DP without giving any reasons.

Oman 176 looks scummy - opportunistic skruffs vote; seems to be working hard to give enough supplemental reasons to existing case to not look scummy

Zindy 182 looks town; also likely town because jeep (BM) was NK'd night 1 - too much negative between zindy and that role for him to NK it

DP's thesp comment in 231 looks scummy; skruffs makes some good points against DP in 264 –
skruffs wrote:You are voting me, and if I come up innocent, Cubs is very likely scum. But you didn't address, what if I come up scum, as you seem to be so sure I am (based on your votes)? Does that make cubs likely innocent? It's not hard for me to theorize that you only did one half of the equation because you already know I'm not scum. Error of omission.
298- I can see IH being scum after his intro to the game. Replacing in when he did, scum would not want to support the Skruffs wagon. Rather, they’d treat it just like IH did. He also seemed to be careful about Thesp. Everything he said about Thesp could be expected from a scumbuddy. Also in this post, based on the fact that he doesn’t say a word about foolinc but then lists him as scum, I would guess that foolinc was thrown in for distancing and is also likely scum with IH.

304 – tamaz makes a good case against foolinc. Right after, Talitha draws him out in conversation about her condorcet. Possible distraction from foolinc case but could be she just wants to defend against this before it blows up. Then in Post 330, IH attempts to blow it up. Throws suspicion on both Talitha and cubsfan. Can definitely see IH's post here as distraction from foolinc. It worked since the foolinc case was pushed to the background.
Post 345 – If IH is scum, Pooky probably isn’t. “Is anyone else having a deep unsettling suspicion of IH right now?” doesn’t look like bussing.

349 foolinc player analysis is very off from my read of the game. I can see a possibility of foolinc – IH along with Thesp scum group.

BM’s entry into the game. Makes a point about DP I hadn’t noticed: “Interesting to see the numbers jumping to the aid of DP, despite the early stage of the game. Xyzzy is among these in post 156.” I need to go back and look more closely at that.

384 IH oh so helpfully clarifying the game, and not posting any actual game content.

I agree with Adele’s post 388 and subsequent vote on DP. After the discussion regarding the possibility of a 2nd mafia family, DP comes off looking scummy. BM, logicticus and Zindaras’ posts commenting on it look Town, especially in comparison to Thesp's reaction to the same argument.

IH’s 400 is scummy. Attempts to discredit Adele and throw suspicion on BM.

Gaspar’s entry post (401) was remarkably pro-Town. He made two statements I don’t see scum making.
gaspar wrote: I would strongly suggest that, later in the game, players come back and revisit this entire debate. Obviously, I don't yet know what it'll lead to, but I can pretty much guarantee that it will have some Good Information when all is said and done. I'm not sure whether that information will come out until we've seen some bodies, but this is the sort of stuff that people should absolutely pay attention to when looking back on Day One.”
I am interested to see if Gaspar pointed back here later in the game once there were a few bodies lying around.

Also
gaspar wrote:An extension of the above point, forcing scum to constantly list all of their top suspects in order limits their ability to suddenly or strategically launch a new attack on a different player. While it does not completely eliminate this possibility ("I just did a re-read on Adele's posts, and I find her to be scummy for these reasons...."), it forces scums to keep up some similar threads of thought/suspicion from the very start of the day. It's *MUCH* easier to catch flip-flops and inconsistencies if we have repeated detailed lists of suspects.
Based on where I'm at so far, players most likely to be scum are DP, foolinc, and IH with Oman as a possibility but that's not as solid. Not going to vote until I've finished the thread.

Unvote
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1453 (isolation #5) » Thu Oct 25, 2007 10:38 am

Post by Setael »

foolinc wrote:I don't know how Oman could be just a possibility if you believe IH is scum. Could you explain this a bit more for me?
Damn. I knew something like that would happen - I kept getting confused by who was replacing whom.
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1487 (isolation #6) » Sun Oct 28, 2007 11:17 am

Post by Setael »

Sorry I haven't posted this weekend. My internet time plummets to almost nonexistent most weekends. Still working on my reread - I'll vote before the deadline and if there's a wagon on someone I find remotely scummy, my vote will go there.
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1495 (isolation #7) » Mon Oct 29, 2007 9:59 am

Post by Setael »

I just had an analysis through page 30 I was cleaning up before submitting and my laptop crashed and lost it all. I could spit nails right now.

I will have time tomorrow to finish my reread but without having time right now to redo all the reasons behind it, none of the people I find suspicious are currently being wagoned. Unless something drastic happens in the next 30 pages, I won't be voting for any of the wagons anyway.

My suspicion list: Dragon Phoenix, IH, foolinc and Tamuz
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1517 (isolation #8) » Tue Oct 30, 2007 7:58 am

Post by Setael »

I'm on p. 41 and still not liking any of the leading wagons, though my opinions have changed somewhat. The 10 pages I have read today:
IH wrote:I haven't actually seen Thesp coming to Skruffs rescue
IH defending Thesp. Subtly, but still defending.

718 thesp makes Gaspar look town with “Your defense of CES is noted.”

739 dani asks mgm for secret word

746 IH still pushing at logic for figuring out MGM’s breadcrumb so quickly. This argument makes IH look scummy and logic look town since IH’s logic makes no sense to me. It seems a lot more likely that scum would avoid being the one to figure out MGM’s hidden code, since it draws attention to them and can bring up the very argument IH is making against logic.

747 either Tamuz and IH aren’t mafia together or Tamuz just pulled off some really impressive distancing

749 skruffs seems not to know about secret words

748 thesp’s defense of logic makes it unlikely logic is scum – could be distancing from IH

752 foolinc says he used the secret word in a post day 1

Zindy said he has a secret word

LML says he also has a secret word
DP, post 764 wrote:Dani Banani, replacing Mastermind of Sin D1: post 666 (!) is as scummy as they come. Building trust with two players and suggesting a play for the day without any motivation. Post 739 does not sit well with me either. Why on earth bring up the secret word thing as townie - when for all you know [if you are a townie] that scum do not have secret words? Likely scum.
This logic makes no sense. I can see no reason why scum would be motivated to talk about secret words. Townies, on the other hand, would have no fear of doing so. DP came off looking very scummy for accusing Dani of being scum for bringing up secret words.

Logic’s 772 is very Town

776 It's looking like I was wrong in my read of the first 30 pages. Foolinc looks very Town in this post. Pooky and Talitha vote him soon after, so my impression seems to not be widely shared.

781 Thesp votes IH without giving a reason – possible distancing. Says he enjoys the Adele hate – unlikely distancing statement, more likely adele is Town.

790 Gaspar points out that foolinc’s conclusion should’ve been that skruffs was town not scum. Though this may be the case, I don’t think it’s a scumtell for foolinc. Mafia know skruff’s alignment and would be careful not to make this “error” gaspar is pointing out.

808 – 811 : IH and foolinc unlikely to be scum together

824 DP opportunistically jumps on the foolinc wagon – gives a scummy sounding explanation for the vote

831 tamuz opportunistically pushes foolinc wagon while hiding behind a skruffs vote

857 dani (sarcasto) unlikely to be scum after thesp says to dani:
thesp wrote:That's the thing - I think you're lying about your reasoning for bringing up the secret word. I agree I think you have a secret word. Was I unclear on that point? Asking in the way you did makes a heck of a lot of sense if you're scum with a secret word, and afraid that other people might not have one - testing the waters to see what comes up.
Thesp also says in this post “IH needs to die” without giving reasons, presenting a case on IH or really trying to convince anyone. Still looks like distancing.

874 DP basically lurking – pops in and says ‘no incentive to change my vote’ – scummy
gaspar, post 876 wrote:IH, I say this only because I think you're town and that you're playing really carelessly right now. STOP GIVING INFORMATION TO THE SCUMS. Your post 868 gave out information on two different accounts (that none of the non-counterclaimers are probably the real Count/Dantes), and that your role is a person from Fresno and not a character from the book.
For somebody who was so disgruntled with Skruffs spewing information at the start of the day, you seem to have just soft-claimed yourself. Tack on your theorizing about BM's death last night, and you've given more information about who you are/aren't. For the love of Pete, think before you post.
This pots makes gaspar look town but I think his conclusion about IH is wrong. I find it hard to believe that IH would be “stupid town” and give info to scum. More likely he is scum who felt the need to subtly tell his scum buddies that they should NOT claim to be the count.

880 DP does not look like he's bussing; foolinc once again coming off town

DP 889 and IH in 892 and 894 re: “password” vs. “secret word”. Both DP and IH’s posts come off looking scummy. IH has never actually said he has a secret word, but has tried to subtly imply it. Same with DP.
skruffs, post 901 wrote:Now that IH has claimed to not be from the book AND fossed any claims to the main character, that the game is titled after, i am pretty sure he's'a good lynch.

I have a theory about the game's setup, but. Not sure if talking about it is kosher. IH is not only fishing, he's'propagandizing.
QFT. I think Skruffs was right about IH.
skruffs wrote:IH just baited town by saying "I'm pretty sure anyone from the book is scum" - Absolutely FIshing!!! Why would he say that?? Because he seems to know he's from OUTSide the book. Has anyone ELSE claimed to be from outside the book? CUbs? LML? BM did, but he also claimed to be from Paris in 1807.

Question about IH's theory that "People from the book are scum"...
Everyone who has claimed, has claimed roles from inside the book or about the book. Presumable, IH has no connection to the book. He is therefore NOT Dantesian in nature. THIS DESERVES TO BE CONSIDERED.
Also QFT

907 there’s a chance Pooky is trying to distract from skruff’s IH case – says thinks IH is scummy in 910 but other than that just seems to be distracting from it by posting about anything but that right after skruffs post.

919 gaspar excuses IH by saying he doesn’t “have his head on straight”.

924 IH capitalizes on gaspar’s trust on him by saying “Even though I did indeed push the soft claim as being scummy, I think that Gaspar and the above is the most logical.... It would have to be a horrible gambit for Skruffs scum to push through.”

IH is basically backpedaling on skruffs, but hiding it behind gaspar’s summation of the whole argument wherein he said IH is just confused Town. IH's post here sounds like scum whose argument is not gaining popularity, and after what gaspar said about it I think scum would do just this.

IH’s comments on foolinc in this post way too over the top for buddying up. Looks like IH is mafia, and foolinc isn’t.

Tamuz 933 once again feels like distracting from skruff’s post on IH

Not sure what to make of Pooky’s angry blow up at skruffs but then IH defends pooky and says “I don't think Pooky is too high a priority on my list atm, as I mostly think he's town.” If I'm right about IH, this is likely distancing from Pooky.
mrbuddylee, 943 wrote:if ih is scum he's artful and attentive--seems town to me.
the first part qft. The second part is wrong imo. Don't think mrbuddylee would be scum with IH.
talitha post 946 wrote:Something about the way IH (see post 924) is reacting to every single post and bumping people up and down his list as he reads singular posts seems very mechanical to me... I can understand players who play by their gut, and I can understand players who insist on trying to apply logic, but I tend to believe that IH is trying to give the appearance of hunting scum, while not actually hunting scum.

Ah but he's already second on my list, so that's good.
QFT – talitha is probably not scum if IH is
IH's response to Talitha, 952 wrote:You're joking, correct? Me trying to make sure everything is covered is scummy?
Yes, actually.

976 foolinc claims doc. I definitely believe the claim. foolinc has been looking very town in his last few posts.

Thesp’s 978 is odd re: IH. Says that several people saying they’re getting pro-town reads from IH when he’s getting the opposite, when actually several people had recently voiced suspicion of IH.

Mr Buddy Lee’s posts since replacing in have all seemed very Town. (this is up to p. 41)

So I had hoped to finish the thread before deadline but it looks like that's not going to happen. Based on my read through p. 41 I'm going to:

vote: IH
, DP, Tamuz, Pooky
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1524 (isolation #9) » Tue Oct 30, 2007 8:59 am

Post by Setael »

I didn't realize I was supposed to list everyone. I don't yet understand the condorcet deal fully.

vote: IH
, DP, Tamuz, Pooky, [everyone else], no lynch, setael
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1531 (isolation #10) » Tue Oct 30, 2007 9:55 am

Post by Setael »

No lynch would be no good.
Unvote
.

vote: logicticus
, IH, DP, Tamuz, Pooky, [everyone else], no lynch, setael

I really don't think Adele was/Buddy is scum, so my other option is logic.
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1534 (isolation #11) » Tue Oct 30, 2007 9:56 am

Post by Setael »

Forgot it has to be the last thing in the post.

vote: logicticus
, IH, DP, Tamuz, Pooky, [everyone else], no lynch, setael
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1548 (isolation #12) » Fri Nov 02, 2007 12:31 pm

Post by Setael »

I was able to finish reading the thread during the night and here are my thoughts on the last chunk.
talitha, 1016 wrote:Not necessarily foolinc, as it seems we have 2 scum groups. The scum would probably know from the size of their group that there's likely another family out there. I think Lee's point about IH is the best evidence that we have so far.

And yeah - it looks like Thesp's group must have killed Skruffs. Interesting.
I find it odd that talitha is assuming there are 2 groups because there were 2 deaths. What about a town vig? Feels like maybe she knows there are 2 groups.
foolinc, 1017 wrote:I think that it's odder that I'm not dead. I don't care how bad I played day 2, you'd think that someone would have nightkilled me. Hopefully, the the Night write up will help clear things up. Oh and so I don't forgot: faked.
When I first read this I though he was saying his doc claim was faked. It isn't so odd that he wasn't NKd since scum could use that as a WIFOM way to get us to waste a lynch. However, I do think that this post of his feels off, as though it's exactly what mafia would have pre-planned to say the next day after not getting NK'd. Starting to look like a fake claim even if that's
not
what he meant by faked.

1020 IH claims (WHY?) and says he has no role name, just innocent fresnoite
IH wrote:Also, I know this is Wifom, but wouldn't you think scum would take a more confirmable claim from the book? Thesp could have even taken a more confirmable claim by playing off of the fears that the count was not protown (If he's even in this game)

Thesp's role doesn't have a Wikipedia entry...
Though he doesn’t point it out, what IH is saying could be applied to himself as well – seems like he wants the town to think “if IH was scum, he would take a more confirmable claim from the book and he certainly wouldn’t say he has NO role name” without him actually having to say it.

Zindy explains he sees no reason for 2 groups, talitha explains she was thinking there’d be 2 groups because one is named “Parisian mafia” then Ih says to talitha “So.... you know you're abilities and members and maintain there should be another?” Sounds like something scum would say to a townie who is being attacked for a mistake.
MBL, 1046 wrote:IH's claim is inappropriate and bizarrely timed. Overly proactively defensive, reads like a play from a scum overnight playbook.
QFT

The more people accuse Talitha of having insider knowledge when she speculated about 2 mafia groups, the more I think that if she was mafia she wouldn’t have said anything about it at all.

1047 Talitha anti IH… what changed?

1064 MBL’s analysis of Thesp’s play. Says “Glued to IH all day, gives very few ongoing specifics. Sticking doggedly to a scumpartner or riding the easy lynch? I'd lean towards the latter.”
How was IH the easy lynch? I see no reason to make the conclusion MBL did here unless he has a reason to defend IH

1137 MBL points out possible connection between DP and IH

1138 IH looks like he’s trying to distance from DP

when foolinc protected LML there was only one NK… is LML telling the truth when he self hammers in 1278? (i.e. Is poky scum?) I need to go back and look at the night results and which LML claimed to be responsible for.

1311 foolinc doesn’t die yet again – Vitr is NK’d. makes no sense. I’m doubting foolinc’s claim. He claimed to protect gaspar, so if foolinc is scum gaspar likely isn’t.

1335 MBL says Marcus Wesson didn’t work alone – family members did many of the kills. If there are 2 families, MBL is likely not in LML’s but could be in Thesp’s.

*The secret passageway to servant’s quarters… I marked this to keep an eye out to see if anything else would be said about it. Nothing yet. Any ideas on what that was supposed to mean? I got the impression LML had kidnapped someone and was hiding them but now that nothing's come of it I don't know.

1337 foolinc discounts MBL’s 2 family idea and says LML was an SK working alone

foolinc then gives his take on the reasons LML self hammered
foolinc wrote:There are three possibilites:
1. To limit the damage
2. Just to screw with the rest of the players (aka because he was pissed off)
3. He really believed that it was a scum led wagon and sac himself for the town.
These don't all make sense with an SK imo. Why would an SK care about limiting damage? #2 is a possibility just because he was frustrated and fed up. 3 I doubt - I don't see LML as a pro-Town SK. If anything I think the info he gave at the end was designed to throw us off. (Anyone know general stats about how often SK's try to help the town? I've never seen it happen.)

On the other hand, I can see a lot of motivation for him to say he was SK if he was part of a family
1) To prevent us from looking back for links between him and his mafia team
2) To cast suspicion on players not on his team
3) To not give any further info or tells to anyone not on his team
4) To give him a chance to lie about which deaths his team is responsible for in order to throw off anyone looking back for connections

IMO foolinc is off for assuming what he did and giving 3 reasons for it that make no sense.

1339 gaspar points out possible link between DP and MBL
logic wrote:I am with Pooky on not liking CES' "You guys got lucky" comment. It seperates us from him, us being the majority of the players. Even if I was 100% certain that LML was town and was completely against lynching him and defended him the whole way to no avail and he came up town, I would say "We got lucky." not "You guys got lucky." So I dont buy that defense.

vote CES
CES’ explanation that he was referring to those who advocated a LML lynch (a group he did not consider himself a part of) makes perfect sense. I don’t agree with logic’s reasoning here. The thing I find most interesting is that the next 3 posts are made by 3 of the players who seem most scummy at this point and they all say the same thing, discounting logic’s reason for voting CES. I can’t see 3 scums repeating each other like that.
gaspar wrote:2) The only person who really clearly expressed "I'm voting LmL because his response to this whole issue is what's scummy" is DP. Plus points for him, in retrospect.
I disagree. Scum would see LML as a mislynch and would be expecting him to come up Town. DP’s statement would likely be made by scum who is trying to cover their bases for when LML comes up Town.

1367 gaspar, foolinc and sarcasto arguing with talitha about LML lying about killing xyzzy. It seems to be forgotten that he faked having used “lace” as a verb on that dating site which means he was motivated to prove he uses it regularly which REALLY makes it look like it was the way he killed xyzzy and he was trying to prove it wasn’t.

1376 again we see what looks like IHscum trying to buddy up to gaspartown where IH compliments gaspar and carefully never opposes him at all.

1379 scummy. Trying too hard to appear active and pro-Town without actually doing anything

1380 talitha points out that foolinc said in post 51 that “Baron Danglars, Count de Morcerf aka Fernand Mondego, Monsieur De Villefort, and Gaspard Caderousse since they are the four that send Edmond Dantès to Château d'If.”
I don’t think foolinc would make this comment if he was part of that mafia team, or at least not if his team was made up of those exact characters.

If LML really was SK it seems like he’d have just said “cubs’ duels could only kill actual mafia, not the SK.” If he’s mafia, it makes more sense that instead of saying this, he said he had a one shot immunity to a kill

1462 MBL says he wants to solve the IH problem – what is he referring to?
gaspar wrote:Saetel's bringing up the D1 Condorcet debate is interesting -- no, I don't believe I have gone back and looked over it. I was thinking at the time that scum would try to flock onto this debate, because it gives the appearance of contribution without actually hunting for scums.
Mgm is dead town
VitR is dead town
Jeep/BM is dead town
ZZ is dead town
CES and DP are the only ones (other than me) left on the list. DP is fairly high on my list still, whereas CES (now Saetel) is middle-of-the-road.
Obviously I'm still alive... but I know I'm protown.

That's something I'll have to think about in the coming days.
*I'm town and gaspar seems pro-town, which leaves DP as likely scum

I’d like to re-bring up something asked of IH that he never provided – a link to his best game as mafia.

Tamuz’ 1515 looks like distancing – after I state that I think he is scum with IH, he safely votes for IH (meaning it’s close to deadline and VERY unlikely IH will get enough support to be lynched) without trying to convince anyone else or present a solid case

So with logic as the NK, it looks like the mafia bought his mason claim which seems to have been a lie. It also looks like our claimed doc didn't protect our most obvious power role (logic, whose claim none of us had any reason to not believe). Unless I've forgotten about a bigger claim that foolinc would be motivated to proect, and based on the fact that he keeps not getting NK'd, I no longer believe foolinc's claim. I'll wait to vote to see what he has to say.

@foolinc: Who did you protect and why?
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1555 (isolation #13) » Fri Nov 02, 2007 6:40 pm

Post by Setael »

He has been asked why he has to say his word before and never responded to the question. Maybe any of the scum who are fake claiming have to say "fake" every day that the town doesn't wise up and lynch them. That would be so awesomely too obvious. If I ever mod, I'm totally doing that.

Either way, I don't buy it. This is the 3rd night the mafia has opted not to NK the doc which makes no sense since he is a big hindrance to them and can potentially mess up their NKs. I think he didn't protect the mason (or at least the player he should've thought was a mason if he was town) because he's not really a doc. Oh and here's another thing I thought of. If he really was a doc, the mafia would've expected him to protect logic because of the mason claim and they would therefore not have targeted logic for fear of wasting their NK on the person the doc would OBVIOUSLY be protecting. The fact that they targeted logic with no worries that he would be protected by a doc cements it for me.

vote: foolinc
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1558 (isolation #14) » Sat Nov 03, 2007 3:01 am

Post by Setael »

Interesting that you totally ignored my post and vote on you.
foolinc wrote:If I was scum, what would be the reasoning for me doing what I am doing?
Here are a few possibilities:
1) The one I've already mentioned, that scum who have fake claimed have to say "fake" once each day.
2) You know something about secret words we don't... like maybe if mafia say their secret word every day they are immune to investigation. That's a pretty big benefit, so it makes sense that you would not be allowed to hide the word in your text but have to make it obvious the way you do.
3) Or maybe it's just that if we say our secret word each day we are immune to NK or something like that so you're hoping it will make you immune to investigation.
4) You don't really have a secret word and are trying to be sure we all think you have one. (I have an ongoing theory that scum don't have one since some of the players I find scummiest have never said they do and have danced around it trying to
imply
that they do without actually saying they do).

I don't believe the superstition answer for a second. If that's true, why didn't you say the first time you made it so obvious you were saying your word "Hey guys I'm kind of superstitious so I'm going to say my word every day so a black cat doesn't eat me." Superstition is not a good enough reason to do something that makes you stand out so much. If you are town, it is very anti-town for you to do something like that without giving a reason up front. I also find it odd that you draw attention to it the way you do. If you just wanted to say it because you're superstitious why wouldn't you hide it in your text as subtly as possible?
foolinc wrote:I'm looking at it this way. I've used it every day and nothing bad has happened because of it. So why would I stop?
This also made no sense. A lot of us have never used our secret word or even hinted that we have one and nothing bad has happened to us either... so where are you getting this logic?

So that reason didn't fly...

Wanna try again?
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1560 (isolation #15) » Sat Nov 03, 2007 4:50 am

Post by Setael »

I suppose there could be a mafia roleblocker. It is weird that foolinc hasn't been counterclaimed if he's lying. If there's a real doc out there who hasn't counterclaimed in order to stay hidden, that real doc would've protected logicticus. *sigh* I still don't believe superstition as a reason, but I'll let it go for now.

unvote
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1564 (isolation #16) » Sat Nov 03, 2007 8:04 am

Post by Setael »

Any ideas what the word count thing means?
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1574 (isolation #17) » Sat Nov 03, 2007 5:29 pm

Post by Setael »

IH - if foolinc is scum do you think there's a doc in this game that hasn't claimed? If so... why do you think they didn't protect logicticus?

Kind of makes no sense.
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1578 (isolation #18) » Sun Nov 04, 2007 7:12 am

Post by Setael »

You must have missed this post:
setael wrote:I suppose there could be a mafia roleblocker. It is weird that foolinc hasn't been counterclaimed if he's lying. If there's a real doc out there who hasn't counterclaimed in order to stay hidden, that real doc would've protected logicticus. *sigh* I still don't believe superstition as a reason, but I'll let it go for now.

unvote
If someone is targeted by more than one person, does the doc protect fail?

Does anyone else believe the "superstition" answer?
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1581 (isolation #19) » Mon Nov 05, 2007 6:18 am

Post by Setael »

I've seen no reason to change my suspicions of DP and IH, though I was obviously wrong about Tamuz and I don't know what to think about foolinc. Both DP and IH have pretty much ignored my suspicions of them.

vote: IH
, DP, everyone else, no lynch, me
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1583 (isolation #20) » Mon Nov 05, 2007 7:45 am

Post by Setael »

Posts 1447, 1517, 1548

You're welcome :P
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1613 (isolation #21) » Wed Nov 07, 2007 3:05 am

Post by Setael »

I will have time to respond to DP tomorrow. I have a six hour layover in Atlanta which will pretty much be devoted to catching up on mafiascum.
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1619 (isolation #22) » Wed Nov 07, 2007 5:09 pm

Post by Setael »

I would tell you I'm jealous of your short layover, but I'm looking forward to having a little time to catch up in my games actually.
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1635 (isolation #23) » Fri Nov 09, 2007 3:42 am

Post by Setael »

IH's post did read very townie, especially the vote since it seems unlikely scum would so blatantly OMGUS. I can't help but agree with Silent Lee that "you just made your monthly "post that reads protown"." In fact, IH looked like he
knows
DP is scum when he said:
IH wrote:If DP comes up scum, I will be suspicious of Setael.
What a coincidence, because if DP comes up scum, I will be suspicious of IH. This statement very much felt like he knows DP will come up scum and would then like to somehow get me lynched for it.

In fact, DP's defense post was quite lacking. He pretty much just called my arguments crap and left it at that. I think they're both scum, but I'd like to see what IH does if DP comes up scum.

Unvote, vote: DP
, IH
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1661 (isolation #24) » Sat Nov 10, 2007 6:53 pm

Post by Setael »

IH wrote:First of all, why would the scum kill a claimed power role that the town would expect doc protection? That would implicate foolinc even more. While it is entirely possible the scum didn't think that through, I'm willing to give them the benefit of the doubt and base it's possible there is another mafia group, another Sk, or some form of a vig out there.
I think it's more likely that there's a mafia roleblocker that has been blocking foolinc. Another mafia group or an SK would be equally concerned about the doc protecting a claimed power role, so they wouldn't be any more likely to target him. A mafia roleblocker would better explain the mafia's confidence in picking off claimed power roles without being worried about wasting their kill.
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1669 (isolation #25) » Mon Nov 12, 2007 5:36 am

Post by Setael »

I think if we all come together on a DP lynch, we'll hit scum. His last post telling us "we're handing the game to scum on a silver platter" just sounds like something scum would say to sound town.

Maybe anyone who thinks I'm wrong about DP and thinks he's town tell me why you think he's town. Otherwise vote him.
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1686 (isolation #26) » Tue Nov 13, 2007 3:28 am

Post by Setael »

@IH, can you tell us what you think of DP please?

@DP: Can you give any reasons for thinking I'm scum that aren't OMGUS?
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1693 (isolation #27) » Tue Nov 13, 2007 12:42 pm

Post by Setael »

DP wrote:Ever since my post 764, I have listed your predecessor (based on post 642) and later you as possible scum, typically in third or second place in my condorcets. I have given severak examples since that first post of things I found scummy of the two of you. A bit cheap to suggest with the question that it is an OMGUS.
What I meant was that you had not expressed suspicion of me/my predecessor until I accused you of being scum. Can you please point out where you stated your suspicion of CES?
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1703 (isolation #28) » Wed Nov 14, 2007 7:19 am

Post by Setael »

How is Zindie the best bet? I'm not feeling the Zindie wagon at all. There are AT LEAST two, maybe three scum still out there and they could easily have steered the focus away from one of themselves (Zindie if he was scum) without looking obvious. I have no doubt that if Zindie was scum, there would be no wagon on him right now. DP or IH are the only ones I'd be willing to vote for. Some of you townies need to change your votes.
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1712 (isolation #29) » Wed Nov 14, 2007 3:27 pm

Post by Setael »

Can someone tell me what LO and LO2 stand for there? /awkward newbishness
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1717 (isolation #30) » Thu Nov 15, 2007 3:26 am

Post by Setael »

DP wrote:I don't sense any real scum vibe from Zindaras - except that I am beginning to become a bit sceptical with respect to his passiveness as well. Silent Lee and Zindaras are STILL not on the voting board, and that is just simply bad, whether you are town or scum. Since no-one is wanting to follow my Sarcastro lead, and a switch to my #2 suspect is hardly better, I will probably switch to Pooky or Zindaras if he does not contribute more. I will have a re-read of today's happenings first.
Feels very much like DP knows Zindaras will come up town and is planting insurance for when that happens. I won't be voting Zindy.
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1734 (isolation #31) » Fri Nov 16, 2007 3:14 am

Post by Setael »

Can someone summarize the case on Pooky? I've felt he was town all game. It feels like every wagon is on a townie... I don't want a mislynch but I hate that I'm only given crap options for deadline lynches.
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1737 (isolation #32) » Fri Nov 16, 2007 7:47 am

Post by Setael »

Ok. I did a quick reread of Zindaras and Pooky. I'm really not seeing Zindaras as scum, and though I think there are 2 players (you know who I'm talking about) that are WAY better options than Pooky, there's a chance Pooky is scum. More so than Zindaras anyway. I especially don't like his arguments against Zindaras late today. If he's being apathetic across the board, it's hardly a scum tell.

Anyway. More comfortable throwing my weight behind a Pooky lynch than a Zindy lynch.

vote:
Pooky
, DP, IH
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1762 (isolation #33) » Mon Nov 19, 2007 3:08 pm

Post by Setael »

Gotcha. My apologies for fighting the Zindaras wagon.
vote: Zindaras
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1767 (isolation #34) » Tue Nov 20, 2007 3:45 am

Post by Setael »

unvote. Didn't realize we were at lylo.

I thought Sarcastro was soft claiming cop. I'd like full claims from both of you.

Votes/Unvotes not appearing at the bottom of the post are not counted. Tags removed. - Mod
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1790 (isolation #35) » Wed Nov 21, 2007 3:50 am

Post by Setael »

I didn't have a case. i thought Sarc was soft claiming cop.

Though, actually, that Gaspar vote is pretty fishy. Do you have anything else on him besides not believing his claim?
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1815 (isolation #36) » Sat Nov 24, 2007 9:33 am

Post by Setael »

After 1809 and 1810 I'm feeling DP and Talitha scum together. DP saying Talitha's reaction to Gaspar is scummy felt off, and then Talitha totally disregarding DP's accusations looked like scum ignoring a partner's distancing attempts so it doesn't go anywhere. The third could be Zindaras or IH. I'd be willing to vote for any of those 4.
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1819 (isolation #37) » Sat Nov 24, 2007 5:56 pm

Post by Setael »

@Talitha: Why do they have to convince me they're not scum? If the scum are in my top 4, then Silent Lee and Sarcastro are town aren't they? It's not so much what they have done to make me trust them, it's what you, DP, IH and Zindaras have done that's looked scummy. I'm much weaker on Zindie - a lot of why I think he's scum is that pooky was town. Seems like one of yesterday's wagons necessarily would've been scum. Plus I'm getting the feeling that I was making some incorrect assumptions about him. I'm weaker on IH than I've been all game, as well. That's probably just because he's good at being scum.
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1845 (isolation #38) » Mon Nov 26, 2007 10:19 am

Post by Setael »

I don't believe DGB's claim unless he's hidden in his closet every night. If he has any info, he'd have posted results when he role claimed. I also agree that if Zindie had that role, he'd have claimed long ago as soon as he got close to being lynched. It's a pretty safe claim, really, since he isn't able to clear or condemn anyone. Power roles with night abilities would probably read as "not asleep in their beds" or whatever as well.

I wouldn't be too pissed if we all go along with Sarcastro's mass role claim idea, but I don't really think it's helpful at this point. I'd rather just lynch DGB.
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1853 (isolation #39) » Mon Nov 26, 2007 12:10 pm

Post by Setael »

If Gaspar is telling the truth about his claim, he was not out of bed last night, since he's already killed Dantes, right?

So... if DGB turns out to be telling the truth, we know Gaspar is scum.

At this point I believe Gaspar over DGB. My only hang-up is that I really can't see a replacement coming in, not reading the thread and claiming THAT if he's scum. However, that hang up is outweighed by the fact that if he was town, he'd have given those results as soon as he claimed. The time between his claim at 1:16 and his results at 4:40 is plenty of time to look over the thread and make sure your results work with who was in the game when, etc.

Anyway, I'm happy with my vote on DGB.
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1857 (isolation #40) » Mon Nov 26, 2007 4:14 pm

Post by Setael »

Actually, that logic makes no sense. If Gaspar is scum and you are telling the truth, he wouldn't want you lynched because if you come up town and were telling the truth, he's caught.

The "I'm busy and I have a life" excuse doesn't fly here imo. If you had time to post at all, to be online long enough to claim, then you had long enough to give your results. The only reason you wouldn't is if you were fabricating them.
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1861 (isolation #41) » Mon Nov 26, 2007 5:23 pm

Post by Setael »

Unvote. I need to think on that one.

Votes/Unvotes not appearing at the bottom of the post are not counted. Tags removed. - Mod
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1862 (isolation #42) » Mon Nov 26, 2007 5:29 pm

Post by Setael »

Unvote. I need to think on that one.

Votes/Unvotes not appearing at the bottom of the post are not counted. Tags removed. - Mod
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1864 (isolation #43) » Mon Nov 26, 2007 5:50 pm

Post by Setael »

Probably wise since Silent Lee doesn't seem to be in a real hurry. Leon S. Peters, Innocent and Boring.

Are you at all worried you'll out a doc? That would be bad.
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1866 (isolation #44) » Mon Nov 26, 2007 6:06 pm

Post by Setael »

Oh yeah, forgot about foolinc. Can you tell I was never sure about his claim?
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1875 (isolation #45) » Wed Nov 28, 2007 1:35 pm

Post by Setael »

I'd like to hear DP's claim.

*Imitates Sarcastro's voice* "Claim now please, Dragon Person."

Unvote
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1882 (isolation #46) » Wed Nov 28, 2007 4:19 pm

Post by Setael »

Well evidently the claim idea was a good one, as we seem to be flushing out scum. IH claimed a long time ago - Innocent Fresnoite with no name. DP, your turn.
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1899 (isolation #47) » Thu Nov 29, 2007 5:34 am

Post by Setael »

If we mislynch today, it's game over, right? Scum gets a NK tonight and then it'll be 3 scum vs. 3 townies. If Sarc vigs a scum we'd be at lylo tomorrow, but if he vigs a townie it's also game over unless we lynch scum today.

I'm thinking more and more that DGB would be a mislynch, and those pushing for her lynch are scum. She's not careful enough to be scum. She's done a lot of dumb things that scum would (and has) capitalized on such as not voting Gaspar and yet voting Silent Lee, not claiming her results right away, defending DP in this last post, and thinking Talitha was talking about her in regards to notable Fresno residents when she obviously was referring to me. I don't think scum would be this sloppy. I don't think scum would say they found Gaspar out of bed if they were making up that claim and results. This is the clincher for me. If Gaspar can get DGB lynched, it won't matter that it will then be obvious he's scum when we find out DGB was telling the truth, because by then it will be too late and scum will have won (unless Sarc vigs scum today).

So if I'm right about DGB, Gaspar is scum because he was found out of bed last night. The neutral claim is not true, though he may have had a task as mafia to kill the real Dantes. I think Talitha is scum after this last exchange between she and Gaspar. Her recent arguments against me looked very scummy as well. She is accusing me of being instrumental in not getting zindie lynched. I didn't vote for him, but other than that how was I "instrumental"? And what about everyone else whose play was more "instrumental" than mine? Just gonna ignore them? Talitha's claim is one we could expect from scum and her weak argument against me actually blows up in her face. If I was scum making up a role name, by her own logic I’d have been careful to pick a name off that list. Oh, and there’s hers on the list: “Ickey Woods - Former Cincinnati Bengals fullback”. Pretty far down the list, unlikely to be in the game. A perfect choice for a scum's fake claim.

The third scum I'm not so sure about. I could see Silent Lee, DP or even IH as the third. I'm not sure about DP's claim. First, it's weird that he spelled it wrong (he said "I am Sindbad the Sailor"). Also, he waited until everyone else had claimed so he had no worry of being counterclaimed which makes sense since that role would be seen as obvtown, but could possibly have been countered. Could also just be that he wasn't asked to claim until the end so it's a null tell.

I'd like some clarification on the gift giving. Who all has received a gift and how was it given? I have not been given any gifts and I also haven't ever used my secret word, though I do have one. I would recommend Gaspar as the vig choice. It seems pretty clear that he's scum but if by chance I'm wrong, then we know DGB was lying and can lynch her and tomorrow we'll be at lylo. If Gaspar is vigged and comes up scum, I'd have to reread but I do remember him defending IH, and I can definitely see he and Talitha as scum together.
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1904 (isolation #48) » Thu Nov 29, 2007 8:30 am

Post by Setael »

If Sarcastro is town, then I was obviously wrong about DGB since that would mean DGB is scum for saying she had a result N4 when Sarc blocked her. It would also mean I'm wrong about Gaspar since if DGB is scum, Gaspar is definitely town. I think a vig kill of DGB would be stellar right now since if she comes up scum, it would clear both Sarcastro and Gaspar as townies. If she comes up town, both Sarc and Gaspar are scum (this will obviously not be the outcome because if this were true, Sarc would not vig her).

I say use your vig kill now since it's almost certainly going to give us enough info to ensure we lynch one of the scums today. In fact, using it now is the only town thing to do because if we go and mislynch a townie before you make your vig kill, the game's over. So anyway, vig on.
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1921 (isolation #49) » Fri Nov 30, 2007 5:18 am

Post by Setael »

I agree with Gaspar saying that he and Sarc are not cleared by DGB's death, but if either of them are scum, DGB did some impressive distancing. Sarc especially I'd say is virtually cleared since his roleblocking claim sealed DGB's fate. If not for his claim, I think scum could've pulled off a mislynch (I for one was not at all convinced DGB was the one lying until Sarc's claim). As for Gaspar, I've never seen a gambit like that one either - scum saying they had results that proved a scumbuddy was lying and setting up either Gaspar or her for sure getting lynched. I guess maybe if they saw their lynch as inevitable and everything they were doing was aimed at distancing from scum buddies it's possible. DGB never had a chance to communicate with her scum partner(s) so it wasn't pre-planned with them. I guess there's also a chance she was just sloppy and accidentally implicated a scumbuddy.
sarcastro wrote:Just to let everyone know, Gaspar and Zindaras are scumbuddies. I guarantee it.
This was because of yesterday's zindaras wagon. You've probably addressed this, but do you still suspect Gaspar and Zindaras were scumbuddies?

I'm very much thinking Talitha is scum for several reasons. She has totally ignored my points against her in 1899.
Setael, 1899 wrote:I think Talitha is scum after this last exchange between she and Gaspar. Her recent arguments against me looked very scummy as well. She is accusing me of being instrumental in not getting zindie lynched. I didn't vote for him, but other than that how was I "instrumental"? And what about everyone else whose play was more "instrumental" than mine? Just gonna ignore them? Talitha's claim is one we could expect from scum and her weak argument against me actually blows up in her face. If I was scum making up a role name, by her own logic I’d have been careful to pick a name off that list. Oh, and there’s hers on the list: “Ickey Woods - Former Cincinnati Bengals fullback”. Pretty far down the list, unlikely to be in the game. A perfect choice for a scum's fake claim.
I think she made up a safe claim, and I think it's suspicious that she didn't address this accusation.

Her attempt to link me and zindaras is even more suspect now that zindaras has come up scum. If she knew zindaras was going to come up scum, it makes sense for her to plant seeds that would link townies to him.

I'm going to reread the past few days before voting. I do think the zindaras wagons that didn't succeed could be quite telling now that our suspect list is narrowed down. It might be a few days before I get to it.
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1925 (isolation #50) » Fri Nov 30, 2007 7:17 am

Post by Setael »

Gaspar wrote:EBWOP: Looking at the list of people from Fresno... it's alphabetical by last name, Setael. Of course Ickey Woods is near the bottom.
Why are you defending Talitha on what I believe is a scum's fake claim? Don't you think it'd be more pro-town to let her answer for herself? (Especially in light of the fact that she has thus far avoided doing so.)
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1928 (isolation #51) » Fri Nov 30, 2007 9:12 am

Post by Setael »

DP, you misunderstand me. I am saying that YOUR claim is likely to be in the game. Therefore, if it was made up you would be motivated to wait and claim last. At this point, the main problem I have with Talitha's claim is that she's posted 4 times since I questioned it and has ignored my arguments. I don't care if the list is alphabetical - I'm saying scum who was claiming before others (unlike DP) would be more cautious when making up a name. Being sure it's on that list and picking one unlikely to be in the game are two things Talitha's claim fits with - especially in light of what she said about mine. She obviously had thought through the fact that she thinks all the townies names should be on that list. I think she thought this through when she chose a fake name to claim.
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1934 (isolation #52) » Sat Dec 01, 2007 11:02 am

Post by Setael »

vote: Talitha
, DP, Silent Lee, IH, Gaspar, Sarcastro
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1938 (isolation #53) » Sat Dec 01, 2007 3:37 pm

Post by Setael »

Gaspar's vote made me think DGB was distancing after all. If he is town, it makes no sense for him to be blindly following DP. I think I need to make a change to my condorcet. Looks like they're working together for a Silent Lee mislynch.

Unvote; vote: DP
, Gaspar, Talitha, IH, Silent Lee, Sarcastro
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1940 (isolation #54) » Sat Dec 01, 2007 4:06 pm

Post by Setael »

DP wrote:The recent exchanges makes me prefer Tailtha over Setael as town. I don;t see anything happening that could make me want to change my prime lynch candidate. I'm ready to vote. Anything stopping us?

Let's roll.

Vote Silent Lee, Setael, Tallitha, IH, [Gaspar, Sarcastro]
gaspar wrote:Vote: SilentLee, Setael, [Talitha, DragonPhoenix], [IH, Sarcastro], No Lynch, Gaspar
Does that clear up why I think you're blindly following DP?
gaspar wrote:What do you think of my claim? Of Mr. Grey's existence and disappearance?
I've already addressed this. I think it's likely that one of the scum roles included the task of killing the real Dantes.
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1943 (isolation #55) » Sat Dec 01, 2007 4:11 pm

Post by Setael »

Because she's wrong about a SilentLee/Setael pairing and you're following her without having your own reasoning for it.
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1944 (isolation #56) » Sat Dec 01, 2007 4:12 pm

Post by Setael »

*he's wrong

For some reason I've thought DP was a girl all game and have to correct the gender in my posts every time.
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1946 (isolation #57) » Sat Dec 01, 2007 4:21 pm

Post by Setael »

Please clarify what that has to do with a SilentLee/Setael link.
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1948 (isolation #58) » Sat Dec 01, 2007 4:31 pm

Post by Setael »

Ok, that works for an explanation, though please notice that you did not state any of this before mirroring DP's vote. Your first statement is actually incorrect since you could say "anything that moves and isn't Sarcastro" just as well. You could even throw IH in there as something that moves that I'm not currently jumping at, even though I thought he was scum earlier in the game.

I don't think SilentLee is scum and I don't think Sarcastro is scum. Your post which looked very much like following DP made my scumdar flare up so I moved Talitha down and focused on you two as a scum pair. I was obviously wrong about Zindaras/DGB all game so I don't trust my radar all that well and I really need to reread the Zindy wagons that failed. At this point, I would vote for any of you 3 to ensure a lynch today. I would actually vote Silent Lee or IH as well to avoid a no lynch, but I'd feel better about a lynch of either DP, Talitha or you.
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1950 (isolation #59) » Sat Dec 01, 2007 6:44 pm

Post by Setael »

If Sarc agreed with DP and posted a condorcet matching his like you did, I think I would've had a different reaction. Rather than jumping to the conclusion that he and DP are scum buddies like I did with you, I think I'd have looked back on my play to see what made someone I think is very likely town suspect a link that doesn't exist. And then I'd try to show them where they're wrong. I really don't think Sarc would do that though, for the same reasons I thought you looked scummy for doing it. DP very likely could be scum, so I don't see townies blindly following her logic (which is what your vote looked like).
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1959 (isolation #60) » Sun Dec 02, 2007 9:35 am

Post by Setael »

@Sarcastro: I see the error in my assumption. Because I know DP is wrong about a SilentLee/Me connection I was assuming everyone I think is Town would disagree with it.
DP wrote:Not much to discuss further as far as I am concerned
If you were town, you'd see a lot to discuss and you'd be willing to defend yourself. This statement was a major scumtell imo - refusing to give any content at all in order to avoid looking scummy right before deadline. Much safer to stay quiet and hope you get your Silent Lee mislynch.
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1964 (isolation #61) » Sun Dec 02, 2007 6:46 pm

Post by Setael »

DP wrote:Setael, if you are town, you are one of the worst I have ever seen.
Wow. That's a pretty bold statement. Is this just because I was wrong about Zindie? You have 3 people who think you're scum (not ALL of which can be scum btw) and you STILL refuse to do anything helpful like... give us a reason to think you're not scum.

I finally had a chance to look back at the wagons Zindie survived, though I didn't have time to be as thorough as I'd like. I'm posting all the condorcets that matter so others can glean from it who have more time than I do.

[quote-"Post 1482 DP (72 hrs from deadline)"]Vote MrBuddyLee, Sarcastro, [Cogito Ergo Sum, Pooky], [Logisticus, Gaspar, Tamuz, Zindaras], [IH, Talitha], Foolinc, DP, no lynch[/quote]
1492 Gaspar wrote:Vote: Talitha, MBL, DP, Saetel, [Pooky, Tamuz] [IH, logicticus, Zindaras], [Foolinc, Sarcastro], No Lynch, Gaspar
1496 Zindie wrote:Vote: No Lynch, [Talitha, MrBuddyLee, logicticus, IH], [Sarcastro, Gaspar, Tamuz, Dragon Phoenix], PookyTheMagicalBear, Setael, foolinc, Zindaras
1503 talitha wrote:vote: Gaspar, logisticus, Sarcastro, MrBuddyLee, Tamuz
1505 & 1506 Gaspar makes good arguments against Zindie for no lynch vote but then condorcet is: Vote: MrBuddyLee Talitha, Zindaras, [DP, Saetel], [Pooky, Tamuz] [IH, logicticus], [Foolinc, Sarcastro], No Lynch, Gaspar
1520 DP wrote:Vote MrBuddyLee, [Sarcastro, Seteal/Cogito Ergo Sum], Pooky, [Logisticus, Gaspar, Tamuz, Zindaras], [IH, Talitha], Foolinc, DP, no lynch
1524 Me wrote:vote: IH, DP, Tamuz, Pooky, [everyone else], no lynch, setael
1537 Zindie, after logic claims mason wrote:Vote: MrBuddyLee, [Talitha, IH], [Sarcastro, Gaspar, Tamuz, Dragon Phoenix], PookyTheMagicalBear, Setael, No Lynch, foolinc, Zindaras, logicticus
1538 DP wrote:Vote MrBuddyLee, [Sarcastro, Seteal/Cogito Ergo Sum], Pooky, [Gaspar, Tamuz, Zindaras], [IH, Talitha], Foolinc, Logisticus, DP, no lynch
="1539 Zindie"Vote: Sarcastro, MrBuddyLee, [Talitha, IH], [Gaspar, Tamuz, Dragon Phoenix], PookyTheMagicalBear, Setael, No Lynch, foolinc, Zindaras, logicticus
Tries to get Sarc lynched at the last minute.
Sarc, 1550 wrote:Well, that was interesting. Question to Zindaras - what the *** was that? Yeah, how about we don't try to lynch people at the last second before they're even given the opportunity to claim? I know it sounds a little crazy, but I really think it could work.
Sarc is confirmed townie by virtue of zindie trying to kill him here (besides the daykill which already confirmed him)

1559 Gaspar’s post after that no lynch really makes he and Zindie look linked. Distances with “I still want Zindie to explain why he felt his earlier fence-sitting was justifiable. Consciously choosing not to try to contribute to a lynch is something I cannot comprehend, and wishy-washiness/indecision is definitely a scumtell in my book, whether you hide it or flaunt it.” But then votes TSS. Doesn’t bring it up again right away.

Vote: the silent speaker, Zindaras, Talitha, Foolinc, DP, Saetel, [Pooky, Tamuz], [IH, Sarcastro], No Lynch, Gaspar
Gaspar, 1585 wrote:Vote: the silent speaker, Zindaras, DP, Talitha, Sarcastro, Foolinc, Saetel, Pooky, IH, No Lynch, Gaspar
1608 Talitha theorizes that Gaspar is bussing TSS
Talitha, 1608 wrote:
vote: Gaspar, Silent Lee
1632 IH wrote:Vote:Setael, SBL, DP, Talitha, Sarc
1647 DP wrote:Vote Sarcastro, Setael, Pooky, [IH, Silent Lee], [Gaspar, Zindaras, Talitha], Foolinc
1662 DP still trying to get foolinc lynched
1662 DP wrote:Come to think of it, I am not buying the mafia role blocker theory, unless someone can convince me otherwise; In every game I have been in with role blockers (pro or anti town), a role blocked player was informed that his/her nightly action did not go through.
1664 DP wrote:So, is the discussion dying down again and are we heading for another pathetic no-lynch? We are really handing the scum this game on a silver platter. Anyone not voting yet, comit to someone!
I said this at the time, and I'll say it again. I think this statement was SO scummy. Bad acting, basically.
1671 Gaspar wrote:I'd give 85% that the remaining scums are among [Tally, DP, Zindaras, SiLee]. Accordingly:
Unvote
Vote: Zindaras, [Tally, DP, SilentLee], [Pooky, IH], [Sarc, Saetel, foolinc], No Lynch, Gaspar
Talitha 1683 wrote:vote: Pooky, Gaspar, Silent Lee, Foolinc, Sarcastro, Zindaras, IH, Setael, Dragon Phoenix
DP 1685 wrote:I would obviously prefer a Sarcastro or Setael lynch, but I can live with a Pooky bandwagon. If that is the way the wind will blow today, I will hop on.
All 3 would've been mislynches...

1689 Gaspar makes case against Talitha (re: interactions with Thesp)
1689 Gaspar wrote:Vote: Zindaras, Talitha, DragonPhoenix, SilentLee, [foolinc, IH, Pooky, Sarcastro, Setael], No Lynch, Gaspar
Gaspar starts seriously pushing for a Zindie lynch anymore. Likely bussing.
1713 DP wrote:I don't sense any real scum vibe from Zindaras - except that I am beginning to become a bit sceptical with respect to his passiveness as well. Silent Lee and Zindaras are STILL not on the voting board, and that is just simply bad, whether you are town or scum. Since no-one is wanting to follow my Sarcastro lead, and a switch to my #2 suspect is hardly better, I will probably switch to Pooky or Zindaras if he does not contribute more. I will have a re-read of today's happenings first.
This post seals it for me. When DP just called me a bad townie, I figured it was because I was wrong about Zindaras. And yet he said this. He said I was "instrumental" in keeping zindie from getting lynched, and yet he made this post?
1727 Silent Lee wrote:Vote: Talitha, DP, [Pooky, Gaspar], Setael, [Zindaras, Sarc], IH, foolinc, no lynch, me
1728 DP wrote:I prefer a Pooky lynch clearly over a Zindaras lynch, but will switch to Zindaras before the deadline if that's what it takes to get as lynch. So:

Unvote Sarcastro
Vote Pooky, Sarcastro, Setael, Silent Lee, IH, [Gaspar, Zindaras, Talitha], Foolinc, DP, No lynch
This is scum creating insurance for later. Very possible he had no intention of switching vote to Zindaras and was actually "instrumental" in Pooky lynch.
1733 Talitha wrote:vote: Pooky, Gaspar, [Silent Lee, Foolinc, Sarcastro], Zindaras, IH, Setael, Dragon Phoenix, No lynch, Talitha
Me wrote:vote: Pooky, DP, IH
IH wrote:unvote, vote:Zindaras, DP, Setael, Talitha, Sarcastro
Zindie wrote:Vote: Gaspar, Silent Lee, [IH, Sarcastro, Talitha], Pooky, Dragon Phoenix, No Lynch, foolinc
[quote-"1756 Zindie (POOKY HAMMER)"]Vote: Pooky, Gaspar, Silent Lee, [IH, Sarcastro, Talitha], Dragon Phoenix, No Lynch, foolinc[/quote]
1765 gaspar wrote:I also want Setael to unvote simply on the basis that we're at LyLo, and she shouldn't be rushing into a decision if she's town.
This statement really makes gaspar look like he knows I’m town. Otherwise he’d have called this as a scumtell instead of saying it this way.

DP then lurked through the beginning of the day and has given basically one liners since then. I think gaspar and DP are both scum, actually. I'd happily lynch either of them. After the reread, I actually think Talitha is town so I'm hoping she has time to look over these condorcets and see that her vote should be on DP.
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1973 (isolation #62) » Wed Dec 05, 2007 9:05 am

Post by Setael »

First of all, I'm the gift giver. No one accepted from CES, and Sarcastro was the first to accept since I replaced in. As Talitha hinted at, last night I chose her since she seems the most obvtown to me at this point. (If I accidentally choose mafia to give a gift to, they can also receive an action that would help them). I didn't claim it yesterday because after Sarc was given a daykill I knew I would be the NK target for it and I wanted to be able to give at least one more gift before that happens.

Second, @Talitha & DP: you're both wrong, and I think one of you already knows it. I admit I've been a horrible scum hunter in this game, but if I was scum there's no way I would have defended BOTH Zindaras and Silent Lee the way I did - that doesn't even make sense as scum play. I was wrong about alignments, but I'm not scum. In fact, I'd expect the real scum to attack me for not voting Silent Lee, since I am now officially the easy wagon.

I think Talitha is practically confirmed town due to her making sure SiLee got lynched. That leaves DP as my top suspect. I definitely need to reread for a full overhaul, since every conclusion I've come to this game has been wrong. Don't expect a vote from me anytime soon.
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1980 (isolation #63) » Wed Dec 05, 2007 9:53 am

Post by Setael »

Gaspar wrote:The role ability is proven, obviously, but there is never any reason to lie about your role if you're town, especially during a massclaim.
I didn't lie about anything. There was no wagon or votes on me, so why hand the scum a power role? If a wagon would've formed on me, I'd have claimed my ability.

My name is Leon S. Peters, a Fresno resident whose main goal is to serve and give back to the community.

Each night I am able to offer an action to one player and they then choose to accept it or not. If they accept, they'd be given an action which would be randomly chosen by Mr. Grey. I was not allowed to tell them which player the offer was coming from.

The first night after I replaced in I gave the offer to Gaspar, the second night I chose Sarcastro and last night Talitha. CES chose xyxxy N1 and then didn’t send in a choice N2 or N3. I don’t know if that’s because he was inactive/not paying attention or didn’t have a good enough idea who was town and who was mafia and didn’t want to accidentally help out mafia. I considered the fact that he may have thought that he inadvertently poisoned xyzzy, and I guess that could be an explanation for why he sent in no further choices. I decided to go ahead and send in choices, since I had no reason to believe xyzzy's poisoning was caused by CES' offer, since xyzzy didn't even accept it.
Gaspar wrote:On, one more question, Set: What possible abilities can be granted by your product?
All I was told is that it would be an action that would be randomly chosen by Mr. Grey.
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1982 (isolation #64) » Wed Dec 05, 2007 12:36 pm

Post by Setael »

You're making no sense. Why would a power role hint that they had a power role if the reason they were NOT claiming their ability was to avoid drawing a NK? Of course I hinted at being vanilla. I didn't want to get NK'd for having a power role. I had suggested not doing a mass claim so as not to out power roles, and then it was pointed out that that made me look like I had a power role. So I hinted at being vanilla to undo the damage.

Your guess is as good as mine about CES' motivation and choices. xyzzy was right before "everyone else" so he wasn't a prime suspect. Other than that, I don't know. All I know is what was in my replacement pm.
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1984 (isolation #65) » Wed Dec 05, 2007 5:41 pm

Post by Setael »

Yeah, I don't know. Your guess is as good as mine. I can say that if I wasn't telling the truth, I wouldn't have told you CES picked xyzzy, since he was poisoned and I knew that would raise some eyebrows. Regardless, I gave Sarc a daykill yesterday and that was enough motivation for me to try to give someone another ability today.

I'd like IH to weigh in on the whole issue, but more importantly I'd like the remaining townies to recognize that the scum that's left is using my ability as a red herring. What scum has ever defended TWO scum buddies in a row when they're already attracting suspicion for defending the first one? It's mind boggling - DP has already accused me of being the worst townie he's ever seen. If I was scum in this game, I'd be the worst scum I've ever seen. Ironic.
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1988 (isolation #66) » Thu Dec 06, 2007 3:45 am

Post by Setael »

No, there is no chance that they will die.
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #1991 (isolation #67) » Thu Dec 06, 2007 9:38 am

Post by Setael »

There's nothing in my role pm that even hints that the player I choose to offer the gift to could be killed or that there could be any negative outcome at all. Because xyzzy DID NOT accept the offer, the only possibility (if that's what caused his death) is that those who DON'T accept die. That has been disproven as well, since Gaspar did not accept and nothing happened to him. I don't know who poisoned xyzzy, but it had nothing to do with CES offering him a gift.

Because I have claimed, there's a safety net in place. If something bad happens to Talitha, you lynch me. The only reason she would be hurt is if I'm lying scum so if something happens to her, you can lynch me. I know this won't happen since I'm not scum and the only time my offer has been accepted, Sarcastro received a daykill that took out one of the scums.
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #2075 (isolation #68) » Tue Dec 18, 2007 5:53 am

Post by Setael »

Question for Mr. Grey... did CES poison xyzzy?
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #2078 (isolation #69) » Tue Dec 18, 2007 6:09 am

Post by Setael »

I was neutral. I was shocked when Sarc and then Talitha got a daykill. I thought Sarc was bluffing getting a vigkill to draw me out, which is why I didn't claim gift giver during the mass claim. So if both Sarc and Talitha got what I told them they'd get it makes me wonder if CES poisoned xyzzy (since yeah, xyzzy actually DID accept and then died the next day and CES' offer to xyzzy was nothing like my offers).
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #2083 (isolation #70) » Tue Dec 18, 2007 6:40 am

Post by Setael »

I almost offered it to you again. Glad I didn't.
Glork wrote:For future reference, Set, I would not use the WIFOM of "but why would I admit to CES targeting Xyzzy on N1?" as an excuse for your actions.
I should not have admitted that xyzzy had been targetted, but once it was too late, I didn't see any way to go but WIFOM. What would you have done instead in that situation?

I suspected you after the neutral claim, since it seemed unlikely there'd be two of us left. DGB's claim implicating you threw me off, though, especially once she came up scum. Without knowing who they were, I was trying to keep scum in the game to give me time to make my sells, so I found it ironic when DP called me "the worst townie ever."

It was a fun role - probably the trickiest one I've had.
User avatar
Setael
Setael
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Setael
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2708
Joined: August 16, 2007
Location: AZ

Post Post #2101 (isolation #71) » Thu Dec 20, 2007 4:50 am

Post by Setael »

Talitha wrote:I am very tired these last few days... feel like a zombie.
Sorry, that's my fault. Clearly a side effect of the steroid use.

Return to “Completed Large Theme Games”